He definitely can't moderate the thread as it's in Off-Topic, I had assumed he moved it there from somewhere in the mining section.
He did, it was definitely Pools (maybe mining)this morning. It was Pools. I posted in it this morning, then went back and it had disappeared. |
|
|
|
He definitely can't moderate the thread as it's in Off-Topic, I had assumed he moved it there from somewhere in the mining section.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56802.0This thread was locked by reason of being inappropriate, then moved from POOLS after Diablo did his handy work to it.. If that thread doesn't belong in the Pools forum, then there are many others that shouldn't be either. |
|
|
|
Diablo, get in here and do your 'job'. This thread is CLEARLY INAPPROPRIATE, as you have set the precedent that polling a pool's miners for their opinions of what happens in their pool, DOES NOT BELONG IN THE POOL'S FORUM. Please see the following for reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56802.msg689672#msg689672 |
|
|
|
|
This is just fantastic. NOT APPROPRIATE ? ARE YOU HIGH ?
The forum ownership really needs to re-evaluate some of the moderation positions that have been handed out.
Moving this thread to OFF TOPIC is retarded. WHERE ELSE SHOULD IT BE, IF A POOL-MEMBER 'ATTN' THREAD DOES NOT BELONG IN THE POOL'S FORUM, SHERLOCK ?
This thread was moved from POOLS to OFF TOPIC.... sooo....which is the INAPPROPRIATE FORUM ?
|
|
|
|
YOUR MINING POWER is being used not only to line the pockets of Luke Dash Jr himself, but also to attack other chains in the process. Wait isn't that an Oxymoron? If the hashing power is used to attack CLC then aren't the CLCs worthless? On the other hand if the CLC have value wouldn't that indicate the attack isn't working? Come on....really ? For a so-called married & religious male, Luke sure seems to have alot of male suitors. The term ATTACK, as I am using it...... Recipe:1) Throw large amounts of hashing power at weak chains, using OTHER'S HASHING POWER (not your own). 2) Collect all alternative chain proceeds yourself, EXCLUSIVELY, WITHOUT COMPENSATING YOUR POOL'S MINERS WHO UNKNOWINGLY PROVIDED SAID POWER FOR THE ATTACKS. 3) Take said proceeds and fire-sale them on the market(s) to further DRIVE DOWN THE VALUE, WHILE DRIVING UP THE DIFFICULTY ON THE CHAIN(S) TO DESTROY THE OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHERS TO PARTAKE, IN A FAIR FASHION. I0C, IXC, CLC = all targeted and ATTACKED by Luke Dash Jr. PROVEN. DVC = threat of being ATTACKED by Luke Dash Jr. DOCUMENTED. LTC = out his his reach thankfully, as he doesn't have the financial or 3rd party 'pool' resources to stage any type of relevant 'attack' on the chain, as it requires CPU Power to dominate.....EXPENSIVE CPU POWER (Intel I7 or better). OBVIOUS. ....Anything else ? |
|
|
|
He has indicated that reverse engineering is lawful and an acceptable method of moving forward, so please take this into consideration when reviewing his patches and do everything you possibly can to MAKE THEM YOUR OWN so that his reputation doesn't leave any marks on this great project.
Reverse engineering is lawful. Granted that right has been severly (and IMHO wrongly) degraded by provisions in DMCA but there is nothing wrong with reverse engineering. Often when products or protocols are abandoned the ONLY way forward to new sustainable code is via reverse engineering. Linux simply wouldn't exist without reverse engineering. Before companies began to support it most drivers were created from reverse engineering. I left the person of your attack out of the quote and response because it is off-topic but I felt I couldn't leave this perception unchallenged. Also in a GPL project there is no such thing as MAKE THEM YOUR OWN. If you want your own fork that makes fart sounds everytime a block is found you can pull it right now. The license gives you the right and that right can never be taken away. I should have clarified a bit.....so thank you for reminding me to post again. YES, let him fork his own project and call it DOOSH-JR-MINER, but PLEASE do not allow any of his contributions to make into the master repository. |
|
|
|
Thanks for doing this work. It will take me some time to review these patches as they're fairly large and I'm relatively low on cycles for anything more than a cursory glance at the moment. Please do not allow Luke-Jr to become associated with CGMiner in any way. Frankly, he is nothing more than a stain on the community as a whole and if his past actions are any indication, you would be opening the door for him to create more havoc in the project than it is worth. He has indicated that reverse engineering is lawful and an acceptable method of moving forward, so please take this into consideration when reviewing his patches and do everything you possibly can to MAKE THEM YOUR OWN so that his reputation doesn't leave any marks on this great project. |
|
|
|
|
It's nice to see that Eligius has taken a 50-odd GH/s hit in loss of mining power, but that is simply NOT ENOUGH.
People need to WAKE UP and leave that pool. As has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, YOUR MINING POWER is being used not only to line the pockets of Luke Dash Jr himself, but also to attack other chains in the process.
DEMAND COMPENSATION, or run for the hills.
|
|
|
|
0.25
Improved x64 SCRYPT implementation, run bitcoin-miner-64.exe
For me, officially the FASTEST Solidcoin Miner I am running (only tested x64 implementations thus far)...... My Dual I7 Xeon/Win7 x64 Based rigs have seen WELL OVER 5% increase in hashing performance running the latest Ufasoft x64 Miner, over Pooler's last release (pooler-cpuminer-win64-20120103). Very nice work. Well, after some testing, it seems the new 64bit miner is EXTREMELY temperamental when it comes to a solid internet connection, which is about the ONLY thing I can blame for the problems I am having. 2 of the machines that I am using it on, are on a Wireless Bridged leg of my network and the miner crashes on both after a while and the machines are 99% different with only Win7 x64 and the WiFi Bridge in common. Running Pooler's minerd, the machines stay up for weeks without incident. The new Ufasoft x64 miner lasts only till the network connection gets flaky (of course, my fault).....usually a crash every hour or so, requiring a restart. The miners that run on wired connections have NO such problems and uptime is 100%. |
|
|
|
sorry for OT but did this ---v really happen? I only heard about the 'random' text in block headers. Speaking about law, how "lawful" is using the hashing power of your pool to perform an attack? Without informing the users mining there?
It's slander, nothing more. No, this is still Libel. Pickup a fucking dictionary, Slander is what many of us will be doing, when calling up your Church and Bible thumping buddies to inform them of your (QUOTED) views on the Pope and Catholicism. |
|
|
|
Yes, I filed the DMCA takedown. If you have a problem with that, that's your problem for supporting plagerism and copyright infringement. The MIT license is not very hard to comply with. It has a single requirement: maintain the copyright line(s) and license text as-is. It is impossible to "accidentally" violate as RealSolid is supposedly claiming.
No MINE FÜHRER......no problem. |
|
|
|
This is part of Luke Dash Jr's latest conquest.
He had made threats in BTC-e chat, in regards to having Solidcoin taken down due to license violations and the fact that Realsolid used some of his (Dash's) code to create Solidcoin without maintaining the license.
you sure? apperently it was a person called tekkub who sent the takedown notice. It doesn't matter who's name is attached to the official notice. This could have happened ages ago, but only as of late has Doosh-Jr been spouting off about it. |
|
|
|
|
This is part of Luke Dash Jr's latest conquest.
He had made threats in BTC-e chat, in regards to having Solidcoin taken down due to license violations and the fact that Realsolid used some of his (Dash's) code to create Solidcoin without maintaining the license.
|
|
|
|
0.25
Improved x64 SCRYPT implementation, run bitcoin-miner-64.exe
For me, officially the FASTEST Solidcoin Miner I am running (only tested x64 implementations thus far)...... My Dual I7 Xeon/Win7 x64 Based rigs have seen WELL OVER 5% increase in hashing performance running the latest Ufasoft x64 Miner, over Pooler's last release (pooler-cpuminer-win64-20120103). Very nice work. |
|
|
|
you were banned from #solidcoin for being a liar and thief. This is nothing but slander. It's actually Libel....but thanks for playing, Sherlock. I am still actually waiting to hear how the 'personal equipment' vs 'pool resources' thing plays out....and I still haven't got a response to this: If you had the personal $$$ to get 80 ghash then how do you know he also doesn't have the $$$ needed as well ? Fail yet again. Please post concrete evidence next time before making random statements.
Actually, I've read his Family Blog and everything points to him being as broke as a joke......quite pathetic actually, so I can see his concerns with maintaining BTC's value, as he must use it to feed his family. It was some of most entertaining 'Coupon Clipping' and Religion garbage that I had ever come across. I downloaded full mirrors of all of his online personal websites, for future reference.Unfortunately, everything now seems to be removed from the net, as too many people were given the opportunity to get a glimpse inside the life of such a self-righteous Bible thumper. He seems to be living on love, prayers and donations from the rest of his family (although with a boycott list, as to which products he will not accept as gifts). That's right - a real man who let's the rest of his friends & family pay to raise his kids.....CLASSIC. 80 ghash, did you say ?bulanula ? |
|
|
|
|
pooler-minerd is marginally faster on all of my I7 and Core2 platforms ........for me anyways. Unfortunately, I don't have any AMD CPUs to test with.
|
|
|
|
You have a payment with 13 confirms from the pool ? what does it say in your BTC client for label or source ? from about 2.5 hours ago.
Yep. Says mined. OK, cool. thanks for clearing that up for me. |
|
|
|
But I found a block for the pool also, didn't I ? it's labeled as MINED, the others are labeled as received from P2pool. Mined would be any block found by anyone using the p2pool, if I'm not mistaken. You have a payment with 13 confirms from the pool ? what does it say in your BTC client for label or source ? from about 2.5 hours ago. |
|
|
|
But I found a block for the pool also, didn't I ? it's labeled as MINED, the others are labeled as received from P2pool. |
|
|
|
|
WTF ?
I just got 1 MINED + 5 additional PAYMENTS in my wallet from P2pool.......
I started mining last night. What does this mean exactly ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
