1062
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:53:18 PM
|
hmm well I am out of ideas and bowing out from mining.
I've built more miners then I care to list but I cannot get this bugger to build consistently across my platforms.
Dev, you gave it your all, but this is kinda fucked.
Get some rest and try again tomorrow.
Actually quite the contrary, chain has settled, difficulty is getting stable. Chain is stable. Miner has issues yes, actually, I'm going to fix that right now. Viz.Ok, I will meet you half way, the launch should of been better. Your project has potential sir, its a shame it started so rocky. Yes this is true, but all it means is that I just have a lot of work to do. It didn't go perfect butter smooth no, actually very chaotic; but the fact that it has stabilized from such chaos shows its progression forward. This is just the beginning. Viz.I'm not trying to kick you while you are down, but when you bring something 'different' like this to the crypto scene, you should shoot for butter smooth. I will be the first to tell you that a rock launch leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I've seen worse though that turned out solid (cryptonite comes to mind) and assuming you are a one man dev team you have done a very good job handling things. I wish you luck and hope that I can rape effectively mine your coin soon. You are correct, but as the circumstances are that is in the past. All I can do is move forward and keep innovating. Viz.Thats a fact sir and I wish you luck with that! Thank you for the Support, it makes the last 4 months of tireless work worth it.Viz.lol well lets not get carried away. You need to worry about getting some sleep bud. Things can only get better, right? Precisely my friend. I'll get some sleep, build a new miner tomorrow, update RPC console, and update the Checkpoints. Thanks Again,Viz.Then I will meet you in the morning on the field of battle sir Also, check your pm's if you have a second (between crisis)
|
|
|
1063
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:41:52 PM
|
hmm well I am out of ideas and bowing out from mining.
I've built more miners then I care to list but I cannot get this bugger to build consistently across my platforms.
Dev, you gave it your all, but this is kinda fucked.
Get some rest and try again tomorrow.
Actually quite the contrary, chain has settled, difficulty is getting stable. Chain is stable. Miner has issues yes, actually, I'm going to fix that right now. Viz.Ok, I will meet you half way, the launch should of been better. Your project has potential sir, its a shame it started so rocky. Yes this is true, but all it means is that I just have a lot of work to do. It didn't go perfect butter smooth no, actually very chaotic; but the fact that it has stabilized from such chaos shows its progression forward. This is just the beginning. Viz.I'm not trying to kick you while you are down, but when you bring something 'different' like this to the crypto scene, you should shoot for butter smooth. I will be the first to tell you that a rock launch leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I've seen worse though that turned out solid (cryptonite comes to mind) and assuming you are a one man dev team you have done a very good job handling things. I wish you luck and hope that I can rape effectively mine your coin soon. You are correct, but as the circumstances are that is in the past. All I can do is move forward and keep innovating. Viz.Thats a fact sir and I wish you luck with that! Thank you for the Support, it makes the last 4 months of tireless work worth it.Viz.lol well lets not get carried away. You need to worry about getting some sleep bud. Things can only get better, right?
|
|
|
1064
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:37:44 PM
|
hmm well I am out of ideas and bowing out from mining.
I've built more miners then I care to list but I cannot get this bugger to build consistently across my platforms.
Dev, you gave it your all, but this is kinda fucked.
Get some rest and try again tomorrow.
Actually quite the contrary, chain has settled, difficulty is getting stable. Chain is stable. Miner has issues yes, actually, I'm going to fix that right now. Viz.Ok, I will meet you half way, the launch should of been better. Your project has potential sir, its a shame it started so rocky. Yes this is true, but all it means is that I just have a lot of work to do. It didn't go perfect butter smooth no, actually very chaotic; but the fact that it has stabilized from such chaos shows its progression forward. This is just the beginning. Viz.I'm not trying to kick you while you are down, but when you bring something 'different' like this to the crypto scene, you should shoot for butter smooth. I will be the first to tell you that a rock launch leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I've seen worse though that turned out solid (cryptonite comes to mind) and assuming you are a one man dev team you have done a very good job handling things. I wish you luck and hope that I can rape effectively mine your coin soon. You are correct, but as the circumstances are that is in the past. All I can do is move forward and keep innovating. Viz.Thats a fact sir and I wish you luck with that!
|
|
|
1065
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:26:54 PM
|
hmm well I am out of ideas and bowing out from mining.
I've built more miners then I care to list but I cannot get this bugger to build consistently across my platforms.
Dev, you gave it your all, but this is kinda fucked.
Get some rest and try again tomorrow.
Actually quite the contrary, chain has settled, difficulty is getting stable. Chain is stable. Miner has issues yes, actually, I'm going to fix that right now. Viz.Ok, I will meet you half way, the launch should of been better. Your project has potential sir, its a shame it started so rocky. Yes this is true, but all it means is that I just have a lot of work to do. It didn't go perfect butter smooth no, actually very chaotic; but the fact that it has stabilized from such chaos shows its progression forward. This is just the beginning. Viz.I'm not trying to kick you while you are down, but when you bring something 'different' like this to the crypto scene, you should shoot for butter smooth. I will be the first to tell you that a rock launch leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I've seen worse though that turned out solid (cryptonite comes to mind) and assuming you are a one man dev team you have done a very good job handling things. I wish you luck and hope that I can rape effectively mine your coin soon.
|
|
|
1066
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:21:37 PM
|
hmm well I am out of ideas and bowing out from mining.
I've built more miners then I care to list but I cannot get this bugger to build consistently across my platforms.
Dev, you gave it your all, but this is kinda fucked.
Get some rest and try again tomorrow.
Actually quite the contrary, chain has settled, difficulty is getting stable. Chain is stable. Miner has issues yes, actually, I'm going to fix that right now. Viz.Ok, I will meet you half way, the launch should of been better. Your project has potential sir, its a shame it started so rocky.
|
|
|
1067
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 11:17:50 PM
|
So the ubuntu wallet segmentation faults on launch. I'm using a windows box as the server but the miners on different machines are giving failed to update height. Any ideas?
Use Port 9325Same issue. WTF? Is your wallet synced correctly? Yes I have tried two diff wallets on two machines acting as servers. Neither will allow a remote miner to work. it connects but gives failed to update height are you sure you deleted any old data? are said wallets connected to the network? Not to say otherwise, but I'm pretty sure your wallets are not synced
|
|
|
1070
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 10:43:44 PM
|
what are the dependencies for the miner? One box built fine on Linux Mint 17, another on Ubuntu 12.04 is giving me this :: ~/primeminer$ make -f makefile.unix g++ -c -pthread -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat -Wformat-security -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -I/home/slicify/primeminer -I/home/slicify/primeminer/build -I/home/slicify/primeminer/hash -O2 -MMD -o build/miner.o miner.cpp miner.cpp:53:27: warning: integer constant is so large that it is unsigned [enabled by default] miner.cpp:53:7: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90 [enabled by default] In file included from util.h:5:0, from types.h:4, from core.h:5, from miner.cpp:1: hash/templates.h: In function ‘uint256 SK256(const std::vector<unsigned char>&)’: hash/templates.h:40:23: warning: unused variable ‘pblank’ [-Wunused-variable] In file included from core.h:5:0, from miner.cpp:1: types.h: In member function ‘LLP::DDOS_Score& LLP::DDOS_Score::operator++(int)’: types.h:125:3: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::DDOS_Filter::DDOS_Filter(unsigned int)’: types.h:136:22: warning: ‘LLP::DDOS_Filter::cSCORE’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:133:16: warning: ‘unsigned int LLP::DDOS_Filter::BANTIME’ [-Wreorder] types.h:138:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from core.h:5:0, from miner.cpp:1: types.h: In member function ‘virtual bool LLP::Connection::ProcessPacket()’: types.h:249:40: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Connection::Connection()’: types.h:254:18: warning: ‘LLP::Connection::DDOS’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:219:17: warning: ‘LLP::Packet LLP::Connection::INCOMING’ [-Wreorder] types.h:258:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Connection::Connection(LLP::Socket_t, LLP::DDOS_Filter*)’: types.h:254:18: warning: ‘LLP::Connection::DDOS’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:219:17: warning: ‘LLP::Packet LLP::Connection::INCOMING’ [-Wreorder] types.h:259:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from miner.cpp:1:0: core.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Outbound::Outbound(std::string, std::string)’: core.h:61:19: warning: ‘LLP::Outbound::PORT’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] core.h:80:79: warning: base ‘LLP::Connection’ [-Wreorder] core.h:80:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from miner.cpp:1:0: core.h: In member function ‘uint64 LLP::Miner::bytes2uint64(std::vector<unsigned char>)’: core.h:256:79: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:98: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:117: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:136: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] miner.cpp: At global scope: miner.cpp:15:28: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member ‘nSearches’ [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:28: error: making ‘nSearches’ static [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:28: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member ‘nSearches’ miner.cpp:15:41: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member ‘nPrimes’ [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:41: error: making ‘nPrimes’ static [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:41: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member ‘nPrimes’ miner.cpp: In constructor ‘Core::ServerConnection::ServerConnection(std::string, std::string, int, int)’: miner.cpp:76:21: warning: ‘Core::ServerConnection::PORT’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] miner.cpp:72:7: warning: ‘int Core::ServerConnection::nThreads’ [-Wreorder] miner.cpp:78:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] make: *** [build/miner.o] Error 1
|
|
|
1073
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 09:18:41 PM
|
I can`t start wallet, give me this error coinshield server starting terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >' what(): bind: Address already in use Someone help me please daemon already running? No. I trying to run daemon. Do you have any other crypto wallets running? I think someone said earlier that LTC used the same port. If nothing else, reboot and try running it again No othen wallets but i reboot The system is going down for reboot NOW! after reboot irvo@:~$ ./coinshield irvo@:~$ coinshield server starting terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >' what(): bind: Address already in use Ubuntu 14.04 boost version 1.54 What can it be? did you install the dev package? ie libboost-dev?
|
|
|
1075
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CoinShield -SK-1024 | 11 New Features |Launch Date Set | Coinshield Verify
|
on: September 23, 2014, 09:06:59 PM
|
I can`t start wallet, give me this error coinshield server starting terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >' what(): bind: Address already in use Someone help me please daemon already running? No. I trying to run daemon. Do you have any other crypto wallets running? I think someone said earlier that LTC used the same port. If nothing else, reboot and try running it again
|
|
|
|