margin terminal is now FREE - bots for over 30 exchanges

[money4good]

New patch released (margin 1.0.1)

• fixed a possible buffer overflow issue, when erroneously entering an empty value in the login mask
• fixed a bug that under some circumstances caused spot orders to enter an infinite place/cancel loop
• fixed some issues for people who used an older CPU that doesn't support a set of advanced SIMD-instruction sets. This lead to an "illegal instruction" error. Please notify us if you you still encounter other "illegal instruction" errors!
• re-enabled the ARM version

Hey guys,
The new version is coming up now on Raspberry Pi with one problem. Kraken is no longer an option on the login menu...

Hi,

you are correct. The Kraken market made it mistakenly not into the patch release in the ARM version. Will be fixed asap.
Thanks for you support!

  Rene

Thanks Rene. All else seems fine with the new version. Btw, anyone using Kraken, set your API nonce window to 5000. I was getting a lot of communication errors back and forth with the Kraken servers when I had the default (set to 0). All errors have virtually disappeared since I changed that setting.

[yhbae]

Hi, can  Leonardo and Margin simultaneously be connected to the same exchange (say Bittrex)  and run on the same PC?

The problem is that both are using the same API key. So running it in parallel will probably cause problems with API-limits or nonces.
Having it installed on the same machine and running one or the other is no problem though.

You can of course just create a new API key for margin.de and then run it with two different keys simultaneously!
Submit the new key/secret on margin.de and you are able to run both in parallel.

All the best,

 Rene

So if I have more than one sets of keys per exchange, do they let me hit the exchange more frequently? That sounds strange, unless I misunderstood this limitation in the first place...
Thanks.

Some limits are based on the IP-addr and some on the API key pair. This depends from exchange to exchange and even changes sometimes
The safest way is to just run only one client from a single IP. Having at least two different API keys is important, but is not preventing that you might run into IP call limits. Might I ask why you would like to run both in parallel?

All the best,

  Rene
 

Not really looking to run is parallel. I was just curious how that worked.

[curr3ncytr4d3r]

Anyone interested in setting up a better alternative that actually keeps it's promise of a lifetime license? We should be able to find enough capable users in this community. Just leave a reply and send me a DM.

[CTShaman]

Be careful if you waited the six weeks for Bitstamp verification and then use their trading view. I have found that the page misbehaves and will happily suck down 70% of the CPU cycles on a four processor system eventually stalling the system. Thankfully margin was not running on the system at the time. I was able to track it down using taskmanager and firefox about:performance.

[jefikas@yahoo.com]

Anyone interested in setting up a better alternative that actually keeps it's promise of a lifetime license? We should be able to find enough capable users in this community. Just leave a reply and send me a DM.

sure im interested in your alternative. As a newbie i cannot PM you.

[CTShaman]

ATTENTION Binancians!

Binance is de-listing CTR on all pairs.

https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002428872-Binance-Delists-Centra-CTR-Token

Previous (very ominous) risk announcement:
https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002360851

I had just added it due price and volume factors, then somehow saw the first announcement but not the second. I know how easy it is to have many bots running and fail to keep track of all the viable pair, Bittrex does it to you all the time.

[bitChipper]

Anyone interested in setting up a better alternative that actually keeps it's promise of a lifetime license? We should be able to find enough capable users in this community. Just leave a reply and send me a DM.

sure im interested in your alternative. As a newbie i cannot PM you.

If you were an early supporter of leonardo than I dont know how you can be upset with what they are doing.

If you bought before than you get month free and big discount on future subscriptions. They had to switch to a subscription model it makes sense, every other bot besides gunbot is subscription based. Gunbot is reaallly expensive though and wouldn't surprise me if they move to subscriptions in the future.

Margin is so much nicer than leonardo, very impressed and pleased as an early supporter

[leonArdo@margin]

Anyone interested in setting up a better alternative that actually keeps it's promise of a lifetime license? We should be able to find enough capable users in this community. Just leave a reply and send me a DM.

sure im interested in your alternative. As a newbie i cannot PM you.

If you were an early supporter of leonardo than I dont know how you can be upset with what they are doing.

If you bought before than you get month free and big discount on future subscriptions. They had to switch to a subscription model it makes sense, every other bot besides gunbot is subscription based. Gunbot is reaallly expensive though and wouldn't surprise me if they move to subscriptions in the future.

Margin is so much nicer than leonardo, very impressed and pleased as an early supporter

Thanks for your support. It is very well appreciated. If anyone wants to meet at the crypto conference in Berlin today, let us know!

All the best,

  Rene

[CTShaman]

Thanks for your support. It is very well appreciated. If anyone wants to meet at the crypto conference in Berlin today, let us know!

All the best,

  Rene

Would love to but can't make the 4214 mile jaunt on short notice. Just post a picture of the team party afterwards with some of that famous German beer. 

[CTShaman]

Direct correlation in market movement to wakeup times (EST). 

You can read many things into this but the only direct inference I can get from this is that our Asian counterparts are doing more than their share to keep or make cryptocurrency profitable.

[seldem]

  Hi all,
I started to use new margin for the last couple of days and noticed something with the "margin maker strategy" . If I start the bot with buy order and amount of 1400, after buy order fullfilled next sell order amount decrements by 1. So in this example it orders sell of 1399 as amount. Other example was buy order of 5.6 and following sell order was 5.59. 
I use Bittrex and Binance and it seems happens on Binance only. Anyone encountered this behaviour?

[naska21]

Margin is so much nicer than leonardo, very impressed and pleased as an early supporter

Could you make some comparative table,cons and pros? I just can't bring myself to leave leonardo and move to margin.

[CTShaman]

  Hi all,
I started to use new margin for the last couple of days and noticed something with the "margin maker strategy" . If I start the bot with buy order and amount of 1400, after buy order fullfilled next sell order amount decrements by 1. So in this example it orders sell of 1399 as amount. Other example was buy order of 5.6 and following sell order was 5.59. 
I use Bittrex and Binance and it seems happens on Binance only. Anyone encountered this behaviour?

Super great question!

All exchanges have implemented their own rounding rules. -Also, Binance is not unique but maybe one of the first to implement their own "exchange fee coin" BNB. So what I think you are seeing is maker and taker fees being applied.

Oops! Either you do not have the option turned on to use BNB for fees or you do not have any BNB. You can cut your fees by half if you use BNB. See that little BNB window near your funds? It is there to remind "us" to keep some coin there and keep fees to a minimum.


Here is a good article which sounds like what you just described.
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@pandorasbox/the-downsides-of-binance-exchange-it-s-not-just-sunshine-and-roses

[hoop]

Hi, i try to run margin on Debian Jessie 8.2  server but there are many errors. i fixed most of them excpt this error (version glibcxx_3.4.21' not found debian) btw libstdc++.so.6 is lastes version on the server. plz how i can run the margin?

[dbolivar]

Hi, i try to run margin on Debian Jessie 8.2  server but there are many errors. i fixed most of them excpt this error (version glibcxx_3.4.21' not found debian) btw libstdc++.so.6 is lastes version on the server. plz how i can run the margin?

You should use Ubuntu 16.04, which is the certified release by Margin. The Ubuntu Server 16.04 release is very nice to use on servers, I prefer it instead of "plain" Debian: it's stable (being a LTS release), but with newer software than Debian -- meaning you almost 100% of the time can install software certified for Debian, plus the ones certified for Ubuntu, like Margin.

A glibc version mismatch, especially when the software you're installing require a newer version than the base OS, is a pain in the ass to solve (if not impossible without changing the base OS to have matching glibc versions). *Possibly* if you upgrade your Debian installation to Debian testing or unstable, you'll have an up-to-date enough glibc, but if you're going this route, I'd suggest a clean Ubuntu 16.04 install, which will get you up and running in no time.

[seldem]

  Hi all,
I started to use new margin for the last couple of days and noticed something with the "margin maker strategy" . If I start the bot with buy order and amount of 1400, after buy order fullfilled next sell order amount decrements by 1. So in this example it orders sell of 1399 as amount. Other example was buy order of 5.6 and following sell order was 5.59. 
I use Bittrex and Binance and it seems happens on Binance only. Anyone encountered this behaviour?

Super great question!

All exchanges have implemented their own rounding rules. -Also, Binance is not unique but maybe one of the first to implement their own "exchange fee coin" BNB. So what I think you are seeing is maker and taker fees being applied.

Oops! Either you do not have the option turned on to use BNB for fees or you do not have any BNB. You can cut your fees by half if you use BNB. See that little BNB window near your funds? It is there to remind "us" to keep some coin there and keep fees to a minimum.
https://image.ibb.co/i3uLXH/image.png

Here is a good article which sounds like what you just described.
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@pandorasbox/the-downsides-of-binance-exchange-it-s-not-just-sunshine-and-roses

Thanks for replying but I use BNB and have enough amount  of it. Here is the screen shot of trade from Binance. (if I manage to upload it) . By the way I see the sell order in margin as 1399 not 1400.
http://image.ibb.co/ifnURc/margin_trade_bnb.png

[CTShaman]

  Hi all,
I started to use new margin for the last couple of days and noticed something with the "margin maker strategy" . If I start the bot with buy order and amount of 1400, after buy order fullfilled next sell order amount decrements by 1. So in this example it orders sell of 1399 as amount. Other example was buy order of 5.6 and following sell order was 5.59. 
I use Bittrex and Binance and it seems happens on Binance only. Anyone encountered this behaviour?

Super great question!

All exchanges have implemented their own rounding rules. -Also, Binance is not unique but maybe one of the first to implement their own "exchange fee coin" BNB. So what I think you are seeing is maker and taker fees being applied.

Oops! Either you do not have the option turned on to use BNB for fees or you do not have any BNB. You can cut your fees by half if you use BNB. See that little BNB window near your funds? It is there to remind "us" to keep some coin there and keep fees to a minimum.


Here is a good article which sounds like what you just described.
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@pandorasbox/the-downsides-of-binance-exchange-it-s-not-just-sunshine-and-roses.

Thanks for replying but I use BNB and have enough amount  of it. Here is the screen shot of trade from Binance. (if I manage to upload it) . By the way I see the sell order in margin as 1399 not 1400.

Provided you have this setting turned on, I think this may be one for support as I have never had my eyes on the code.

[CTShaman]

Hi, i try to run margin on Debian Jessie 8.2  server but there are many errors. i fixed most of them excpt this error (version glibcxx_3.4.21' not found debian) btw libstdc++.so.6 is lastes version on the server. plz how i can run the margin?

You should use Ubuntu 16.04, which is the certified release by Margin. The Ubuntu Server 16.04 release is very nice to use on servers, I prefer it instead of "plain" Debian: it's stable (being a LTS release), but with newer software than Debian -- meaning you almost 100% of the time can install software certified for Debian, plus the ones certified for Ubuntu, like Margin.

A glibc version mismatch, especially when the software you're installing require a newer version than the base OS, is a pain in the ass to solve (if not impossible without changing the base OS to have matching glibc versions). *Possibly* if you upgrade your Debian installation to Debian testing or unstable, you'll have an up-to-date enough glibc, but if you're going this route, I'd suggest a clean Ubuntu 16.04 install, which will get you up and running in no time.

It has not been thoroughly tested at least by me yet, but Ubuntu LTS 18.04 (2017-02-18 daily build) does run 3.8.0, 4.0.0, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1.

If someone has a need to run leonArdo/margin on a non-Ubuntu Linux system that supports snaps, using snaps may be a solution and make it universal to Linux. I don't know if it would widen the install base enough to compensate for support issues? hmm..

[hoop]

Hi, i try to run margin on Debian Jessie 8.2  server but there are many errors. i fixed most of them excpt this error (version glibcxx_3.4.21' not found debian) btw libstdc++.so.6 is lastes version on the server. plz how i can run the margin?

You should use Ubuntu 16.04, which is the certified release by Margin. The Ubuntu Server 16.04 release is very nice to use on servers, I prefer it instead of "plain" Debian: it's stable (being a LTS release), but with newer software than Debian -- meaning you almost 100% of the time can install software certified for Debian, plus the ones certified for Ubuntu, like Margin.

A glibc version mismatch, especially when the software you're installing require a newer version than the base OS, is a pain in the ass to solve (if not impossible without changing the base OS to have matching glibc versions). *Possibly* if you upgrade your Debian installation to Debian testing or unstable, you'll have an up-to-date enough glibc, but if you're going this route, I'd suggest a clean Ubuntu 16.04 install, which will get you up and running in no time.

It has not been thoroughly tested at least by me yet, but Ubuntu LTS 18.04 (2017-02-18 daily build) does run 3.8.0, 4.0.0, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1.

If someone has a need to run leonArdo/margin on a non-Ubuntu Linux system that supports snaps, using snaps may be a solution and make it universal to Linux. I don't know if it would widen the install base enough to compensate for support issues? hmm..

Margin just running fine on my laptop debian  stretch 64-bit but sometimes i got this error (The initialization of a market failed:
(Could not initialize market hitbtc: Could not query the supported currency pairs. http error: )
Make sure your computer is connected to the internet.)

[cruxio]

I've noticed that the app won't close after running it for more than 24 hours (It just keep on saying Shutting Down for hours). I've left it for half a day but it's still running, so I decided to terminate it through the task manager. After relaunching the app, all of my settings and bots disappeared. I hope there's a way for us to save individual bots in a separate file which you can import or export.
I've encountered this on Windows 10 using the latest version of the bot, I didn't have this problem in Ubuntu.
Please advise.