[PRE-ANN] OPAIR | Decentralized Debit Cards | OCaml | New Blockchain Platform

[CoinManiac1]

Here comes the defender...  

Have you even read the OP thoroughly.

Do you even know the meaning of OPEN AND FAIR.... Btw, understand the meaning of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt).

We are not creating Fear (wasserman is over investors money which was not escrowed)

Uncertainity is obviously created by wasserman over Frank and Hao (regarding an interview),

and Doubt obliviously, we all of us have over the legitimacy of this project...

My advice.. Wasserman transfer the money to Sebastinju which was not escrowed. Thats it. No interview needed, we will even not care for Frank and Hao...

And who are you "CoinManiac - Now CoinManiac1 (trust rating of -4?)" to fill us with confidence, relieve us of our uncertainties and free us of doubt. We all understand what the Opair Team could do better / improve to wash away all doubt but for someone who has had to change their account because of a negative trust rating you are very harsh (FUD allot) and to be honest and fair quite untrustworthy and/or a reliable source of information but I guess its always better then the newbie accounts filling this thread with boneless accusations - so I must give you credit for being transparent.  

Haha, do you even know why my old account is -4. Clear your facts...  

[Tradingriver]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

[wasserman99]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

We have a basic roadmap at the beginning of our thread but we can not give exact details until know how many btc will be raised.
The first great feature that we launch will be the creation and use of decentralized debit card, as was the idea that users most want to see made a reality. Later, we will continue with the development of our functional language, which is a modification of OCaml for his application in the corresponding to our smart contracts solution.


We were already forwarded the BTC raised today to the escrow. To avoid any confusion, I want to clarify that our wallet created two outputs in the transaction. But, as you may know, all funds remain in our wallet. I leave here the information: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9007/why-are-there-two-transaction-outputs-when-sending-to-one-address

Regards

[cyberspacemonkey]

Hey guys, is the signature campaign still ongoing? do I just add it to my profile or do I need to sign up somewhere?

Thanks.

[shapeshiftscam]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

We have a basic roadmap at the beginning of our thread but we can not give exact details until know how many btc will be raised.
The first great feature that we launch will be the creation and use of decentralized debit card, as was the idea that users most want to see made a reality. Later, we will continue with the development of our functional language, which is a modification of OCaml for his application in the corresponding to our smart contracts solution.


We were already forwarded the BTC raised today to the escrow. To avoid any confusion, I want to clarify that our wallet created two outputs in the transaction. But, as you may know, all funds remain in our wallet. I leave here the information: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9007/why-are-there-two-transaction-outputs-when-sending-to-one-address

Regards

good, now the situation is that you try to satisfy investors, which is good, full fund is escrowed now. But the another issue, why you still don't have the interview? if you are legit, just won't worry dude, you have already showed their names, why you mind to show their faces and words??     If you have an interview, after everything is cleared, people will invest you again.

[MoneyJ]

yes nice suggestion . Hope OP will heed to your request . Getting more interesting as time goes by.

[electronicash]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

We have a basic roadmap at the beginning of our thread but we can not give exact details until know how many btc will be raised.
The first great feature that we launch will be the creation and use of decentralized debit card, as was the idea that users most want to see made a reality. Later, we will continue with the development of our functional language, which is a modification of OCaml for his application in the corresponding to our smart contracts solution.


We were already forwarded the BTC raised today to the escrow. To avoid any confusion, I want to clarify that our wallet created two outputs in the transaction. But, as you may know, all funds remain in our wallet. I leave here the information: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9007/why-are-there-two-transaction-outputs-when-sending-to-one-address

Regards

Will have to be confirmed by Sebastian.
Take note that we will expose your sorry ass wasserman. You have scammed people in the past thru the ponzi you created like cloudmining sites.

[wavespump]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

We have a basic roadmap at the beginning of our thread but we can not give exact details until know how many btc will be raised.
The first great feature that we launch will be the creation and use of decentralized debit card, as was the idea that users most want to see made a reality. Later, we will continue with the development of our functional language, which is a modification of OCaml for his application in the corresponding to our smart contracts solution.


We were already forwarded the BTC raised today to the escrow. To avoid any confusion, I want to clarify that our wallet created two outputs in the transaction. But, as you may know, all funds remain in our wallet. I leave here the information: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9007/why-are-there-two-transaction-outputs-when-sending-to-one-address

Regards

Will have to be confirmed by Sebastian.
Take note that we will expose your sorry ass wasserman. You have scammed people in the past thru the ponzi you created like cloudmining sites.

any good findings about his scamming history? you can post here and that unmoderated thread to avoid he deletes here.

[wasserman99]

Hey guys, is the signature campaign still ongoing? do I just add it to my profile or do I need to sign up somewhere?

Thanks.

Here you can found the Opair Signature Campaign!

Welcome to the Opair Signature Campaign!



About Opair:

Opair stands for Open and Fair which are the two key elements the project seeks to fulfill.
- Open Project: The code and new language will be documented, open source and it will be found at Github.
- Fair Distribution: After analyzing the last ICO´s, the team realized that the distribution is not as fair as it should be. On the one hand, most of the distribution of the coins usually is in the hands of so few, that’s why we decided that 30% of the coin will be distributed old school through PoW. On the other hand, most developers don´t distribute 100% of the coins and they keep a portion (%) in their hands as background/developer and bounty funds, so opair wants to highlight that 0% will be retained by the team.

More about the opair project can be found in their official announcement thread.


This campaign will run for a total of 1.5 months, divided into 6 weekly rounds (running from wednesday to wednesday).
The payment for each participant will be depending on their individual share of the total reward pool.
Overall, an XPO equivalent to 7BTC will be paid to all participants.
The payments will be made in XPO and once the final stage of this campaign completes.

For each round they've been part of this campaign, users will receive the following shares:

Legendary: 2.5 Shares
Hero: 2 Shares
Senior/Full: 1.5 Shares
Member: 1 Shares

Users will only be eligible for a payment at the end of the campaign, if they:
- Made at least 50 constructive posts during the time they've been wearing the signature
- Are wearing the signature once the payments are made, and haven't removed it anytime since they've signed up
- Have neutral or positive trust on default settings all during their participation

In order to join this campaign, please set up the signature and post in this thread with the following information:

Code:

Username:
Rank:
Current number of posts:

Our signatures are as following:

Members:
Preview:

Code:

Code:

[center]| [url=http://www.opair.co/]o[/url]pair |                      | [url=http://www.opair.co/]o[/url]pair |
[u]    ◦● [url=http://www.opair.co/]OPEN BETAS[/url] | [url=http://www.opair.co/]ASSET AND CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM[/url] ●◦    [/u]
◦● [url=http://www.opair.co/]SMART CONTRACT USING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING[/url] ●◦[/center]

Full Members:
Preview:

Code:

Code:

[center][url=http://www.opair.co/][color=#ef3e36]|[/color][color=#fff]|[/color] [font=Arial Black][color=#ef3e36]o[/color][/font][font=Century Gothic][b][color=black]pair[/color][/font] [color=#fff]|[/color][color=#ef3e36]|[/color]                      [color=#ef3e36]|[/color][color=#fff]|[/color] [font=Arial Black][color=#ef3e36]o[/color][/font][font=Century Gothic][b][color=black]pair[/color][/font] [color=#fff]|[/color][color=#ef3e36]|[/color]
[font=Century Gothic][b][color=#ef3e36][u]    [color=#000][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] OPEN BETAS [color=#ef3e36]|[/color] ASSET AND CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]    [/u]
[color=#1e73be][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] SMART CONTRACT USING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color][/url][/center]

Senior Members:
Preview:

Code:

Code:

[center][table]
[tr]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#ef3e36]

████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
[/td]
[td]
[center][size=2pt]


[url=http://www.opair.co/][color=#1e73be][size=6pt][b][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] NEW PLATFORM FROM SCRATCH [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[color=#000][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] SMART CONTRACT USING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[color=#1e73be][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] DECENTRALIZED DEBIT CARDS [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#fff]

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
[/td]
[td][url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt]

[color=transparent]
████████[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
█████[color=#ef3e36]█████████████[/color]
████[color=#ef3e36]███████████████[/color]
███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]█████▌[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]▐█████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]█████▌[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]▐█████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]
███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
████[color=#ef3e36]███████████████[/color]
█████[color=#ef3e36]█████████████[/color]
████████[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
[/td]
[td][url=http://www.opair.co/][size=26pt][font=Century Gothic][b][color=black]pair[/color][/font][/size]
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#fff]

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
[/td]
[td]
[center][size=2pt]

[size=6pt][b]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][color=#000][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] ICO | PRIVATE CHAINS [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[color=#1e73be][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] OPEN BETAS | ASSET AND CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#ef3e36]

████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table][/center]

Hero/Legendary Members:
Preview:

Code:

Code:

[center][table]
[tr]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#ef3e36]

████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
[/td]
[td]
[center][size=2pt]


[url=http://www.opair.co/][color=#1e73be][size=6pt][b][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] NEW PLATFORM FROM SCRATCH [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[color=#000][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] SMART CONTRACT USING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[glow=#ef3e36,1]                    [color=#fff][color=#fff]◦●[/color] DECENTRALIZED DEBIT CARDS [color=#fff]●◦[/color]                   
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#fff]

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
[/td]
[td][url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt]

[color=transparent]
████████[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
█████[color=#ef3e36]█████████████[/color]
████[color=#ef3e36]███████████████[/color]
███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]█████▌[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]▐█████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]█████▌[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]▐█████[/color]
██[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]███████[color=#ef3e36]██████[/color]
███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]███[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
████[color=#ef3e36]███████████████[/color]
█████[color=#ef3e36]█████████████[/color]
████████[color=#ef3e36]███████[/color]
[/td]
[td][url=http://www.opair.co/][size=26pt][font=Century Gothic][b][color=black]pair[/color][/font][/size]
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#fff]

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
[/td]
[td]
[center][size=2pt]

[size=6pt][b]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][color=#000][color=#ef3e36]◦●[/color] ICO | PRIVATE CHAINS [color=#ef3e36]●◦[/color]
[glow=#ef3e36,1]    [color=#fff][color=#fff]◦●[/color] OPEN BETAS [color=black]|[/color] ASSET AND CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM [color=#fff]●◦[/color]    
[/td]
[td]
[url=http://www.opair.co/][size=2pt][color=#ef3e36]

████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
████
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table][/center]

Additionally, users can wear our avatar: link.



Aswell as our personal text: Open and fair!


Your status, aswell as all campaign participants and their currently claimed shares can be found in the following spreadsheet:
-will be set up tomorrow-

[wasserman99]

how much of the features are already finished?

do you have a roadmap?

We have a basic roadmap at the beginning of our thread but we can not give exact details until know how many btc will be raised.
The first great feature that we launch will be the creation and use of decentralized debit card, as was the idea that users most want to see made a reality. Later, we will continue with the development of our functional language, which is a modification of OCaml for his application in the corresponding to our smart contracts solution.


We were already forwarded the BTC raised today to the escrow. To avoid any confusion, I want to clarify that our wallet created two outputs in the transaction. But, as you may know, all funds remain in our wallet. I leave here the information: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/9007/why-are-there-two-transaction-outputs-when-sending-to-one-address

Regards

Will have to be confirmed by Sebastian.
Take note that we will expose your sorry ass wasserman. You have scammed people in the past thru the ponzi you created like cloudmining sites.

Stop threatening and presents the evidence of what you say. You're wrong again.
It seems that you want me to go to believe that you were right. It's sick. But we will show to everyone the opposite. I'll stay here and I'm not going nowhere as you say.

Regards

[AltcoinScamfinder]

Well, i see this went well
Protip: When 2 people with LinkedIn profiles won't get on bitcointalk, and the person with a bitcointalk account won't post his name or LinkedIn profile. 'maybe' not hand money out. Thankfully I am guessing the bulk of the Bitcoin comes from the 'team' themselves, but you know. That's probably just FUD.

#liveandlearn

[wasserman99]

Well, i see this went well
Protip. When 2 people with linkedin profiles won't get on bitcointalk, and the person with a bitcointalk account won't post his name or linkedin profile. 'maybe' not hand money out. #liveandlearn

The other two do not write in the forum, because it's my task. I am the Opair Marketing Director. But Frank has published a statement in the forum also. He has published in his personal account too: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/opair-statement-frank-h-rettig

Greetings everyone,

Due to the fact that many asked for me to create an account, here I am. In response to the first question asked I have never had an account on the forum before, but I have been a passive reader since late 2012. That is why I have never had the need of creating an account. I have created it exclusively to leave you this message. I want to confirm my involvement on this project in response to many requests. You must understand that I did not create an account when we launch Opair because my role is to lead the developing process; Wasserman is the Marketing Director.  And he is doing it very well so far. Last but not least, I wanted to clarify that I’m responsible for the ICO, and along with my team, we will be in charge of taking this ship safely to shore. Regarding my work, I’m currently working full time on a company and, along with Hao, we are splitting the tasks. Our goals are to work full time with Opair, once we have the ICO funds, and also to broaden our team. The success of that goal relies entirely on the results of the ICO, from there it is on our hands.

Please, feel free to contact me at via email if you have any questions.

Frank H. Rettig


Hallo zusammen,

da mich bereits Viele darum gebeten haben ein Konto zu eröffnen, tue ich dies nun, um hier kontaktiert werden zu können. Als Antwort auf die als erstes gestellte Frage: ich habe vorher noch nie ein Konto in diesem Forum gehabt, bin jedoch seit Ende 2012 passiver Leser. Daher gab es für mich bislang keinen Grund, ein Konto zu eröffnen. Dieses Konto habe ich nur erstellt, um diese Nachricht zu hinterlassen. Ich möchte, nachdem ich sehr viele Anfragen erhalten habe, meine Teilnahme an diesem Projekt bestätigen. Ich habe zum Zeitpunkt als Opair gelauncht wurde, kein Konto erstellt, weil es meine Aufgabe ist, den Entwicklungsprozess zu betreuen; Wasseman ist der Marketingdirektor, eine Aufgabe, die er so weit sehr gut erfüllt. Darüber hinaus möchte ich noch klarstellen, dass ich für das ICO verantwortlich bin. Gemeinsam mit meinem Team werde ich dieses Schiff sicher in den Hafen bringen. Was meinen Job angeht, arbeite ich derzeit in Vollzeit für ein anderes Unternehmen und teile mir die Aufgaben, die Opair betreffen, mit Hao. Sobald die ICO-Gelder zur Verfügung stehen, möchten wir jedoch gerne unsere gesamte Zeit in Opair investieren und ebenfalls unser Team erweitern. Der Erfolg dieses Ziels hängt voll und ganz von den Ergebnissen des ICO ab, erst danach liegt es in unseren Händen.

Bei weiteren Fragen können Sie mich gerne per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Frank H. Rettig

[AltcoinScamfinder]

Well, i see this went well
Protip. When 2 people with linkedin profiles won't get on bitcointalk, and the person with a bitcointalk account won't post his name or linkedin profile. 'maybe' not hand money out. #liveandlearn

The other two do not write in the forum, because it's my task. I am the Opair Marketing Director. But Frank has published a statement in the forum also. He has published in his personal account too: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/opair-statement-frank-h-rettig

Greetings everyone,

Due to the fact that many asked for me to create an account, here I am. In response to the first question asked I have never had an account on the forum before, but I have been a passive reader since late 2012. That is why I have never had the need of creating an account. I have created it exclusively to leave you this message. I want to confirm my involvement on this project in response to many requests. You must understand that I did not create an account when we launch Opair because my role is to lead the developing process; Wasserman is the Marketing Director.  And he is doing it very well so far. Last but not least, I wanted to clarify that I’m responsible for the ICO, and along with my team, we will be in charge of taking this ship safely to shore. Regarding my work, I’m currently working full time on a company and, along with Hao, we are splitting the tasks. Our goals are to work full time with Opair, once we have the ICO funds, and also to broaden our team. The success of that goal relies entirely on the results of the ICO, from there it is on our hands.

Please, feel free to contact me at via email if you have any questions.

Frank H. Rettig


Hallo zusammen,

da mich bereits Viele darum gebeten haben ein Konto zu eröffnen, tue ich dies nun, um hier kontaktiert werden zu können. Als Antwort auf die als erstes gestellte Frage: ich habe vorher noch nie ein Konto in diesem Forum gehabt, bin jedoch seit Ende 2012 passiver Leser. Daher gab es für mich bislang keinen Grund, ein Konto zu eröffnen. Dieses Konto habe ich nur erstellt, um diese Nachricht zu hinterlassen. Ich möchte, nachdem ich sehr viele Anfragen erhalten habe, meine Teilnahme an diesem Projekt bestätigen. Ich habe zum Zeitpunkt als Opair gelauncht wurde, kein Konto erstellt, weil es meine Aufgabe ist, den Entwicklungsprozess zu betreuen; Wasseman ist der Marketingdirektor, eine Aufgabe, die er so weit sehr gut erfüllt. Darüber hinaus möchte ich noch klarstellen, dass ich für das ICO verantwortlich bin. Gemeinsam mit meinem Team werde ich dieses Schiff sicher in den Hafen bringen. Was meinen Job angeht, arbeite ich derzeit in Vollzeit für ein anderes Unternehmen und teile mir die Aufgaben, die Opair betreffen, mit Hao. Sobald die ICO-Gelder zur Verfügung stehen, möchten wir jedoch gerne unsere gesamte Zeit in Opair investieren und ebenfalls unser Team erweitern. Der Erfolg dieses Ziels hängt voll und ganz von den Ergebnissen des ICO ab, erst danach liegt es in unseren Händen.

Bei weiteren Fragen können Sie mich gerne per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Frank H. Rettig

And your linkedin? And Escrow confirmation?

[wasserman99]

Well, i see this went well
Protip. When 2 people with linkedin profiles won't get on bitcointalk, and the person with a bitcointalk account won't post his name or linkedin profile. 'maybe' not hand money out. #liveandlearn

The other two do not write in the forum, because it's my task. I am the Opair Marketing Director. But Frank has published a statement in the forum also. He has published in his personal account too: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/opair-statement-frank-h-rettig

Greetings everyone,

Due to the fact that many asked for me to create an account, here I am. In response to the first question asked I have never had an account on the forum before, but I have been a passive reader since late 2012. That is why I have never had the need of creating an account. I have created it exclusively to leave you this message. I want to confirm my involvement on this project in response to many requests. You must understand that I did not create an account when we launch Opair because my role is to lead the developing process; Wasserman is the Marketing Director.  And he is doing it very well so far. Last but not least, I wanted to clarify that I’m responsible for the ICO, and along with my team, we will be in charge of taking this ship safely to shore. Regarding my work, I’m currently working full time on a company and, along with Hao, we are splitting the tasks. Our goals are to work full time with Opair, once we have the ICO funds, and also to broaden our team. The success of that goal relies entirely on the results of the ICO, from there it is on our hands.

Please, feel free to contact me at via email if you have any questions.

Frank H. Rettig


Hallo zusammen,

da mich bereits Viele darum gebeten haben ein Konto zu eröffnen, tue ich dies nun, um hier kontaktiert werden zu können. Als Antwort auf die als erstes gestellte Frage: ich habe vorher noch nie ein Konto in diesem Forum gehabt, bin jedoch seit Ende 2012 passiver Leser. Daher gab es für mich bislang keinen Grund, ein Konto zu eröffnen. Dieses Konto habe ich nur erstellt, um diese Nachricht zu hinterlassen. Ich möchte, nachdem ich sehr viele Anfragen erhalten habe, meine Teilnahme an diesem Projekt bestätigen. Ich habe zum Zeitpunkt als Opair gelauncht wurde, kein Konto erstellt, weil es meine Aufgabe ist, den Entwicklungsprozess zu betreuen; Wasseman ist der Marketingdirektor, eine Aufgabe, die er so weit sehr gut erfüllt. Darüber hinaus möchte ich noch klarstellen, dass ich für das ICO verantwortlich bin. Gemeinsam mit meinem Team werde ich dieses Schiff sicher in den Hafen bringen. Was meinen Job angeht, arbeite ich derzeit in Vollzeit für ein anderes Unternehmen und teile mir die Aufgaben, die Opair betreffen, mit Hao. Sobald die ICO-Gelder zur Verfügung stehen, möchten wir jedoch gerne unsere gesamte Zeit in Opair investieren und ebenfalls unser Team erweitern. Der Erfolg dieses Ziels hängt voll und ganz von den Ergebnissen des ICO ab, erst danach liegt es in unseren Händen.

Bei weiteren Fragen können Sie mich gerne per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Frank H. Rettig

And your linkedin? And Escrow confirmation?

My personal information:

Frank and Hao decided to be public, for my part, I prefer to work with a pseudonym, even more after the threat of that user. Our debt to investors is to deliver as promised once the ICO finish, not give personal information about us.

Escrow confirmation:

I was asked by wasserman99, the issuer, to provide an Escrow address that is used to collect the funds for the ICO of OPAIR Coins.

Please note that I will only hold the investments that will be invested from this point on. That point could not be changed by me because it was fixed.

The funds will be not released in total at the end of the ICO but in parts, depending on the needs of the next steps of development. This will ensure that results can be seen before releasing more coins.

***********
The escrow address should not be used as a direct deposit address. Instead you will use the service provided by the issuer and he will regularly, twice daily, forward the coins to the escrow address. So when you want to check then observe the escrow address and your funds should find their way there.
***********

Who am I?

Iam SebastianJu, Iam escrow on Bitcointalk since years. Iam not connected to the issuer or the coin. Iam an independent third party who acts as an escrow in an attempt to make the ICO more secure. See my Servicethread for reviews: [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

Safety from Escrow

Once the Wallet and the OPAIR Coins are released to the investors we will wait 7 days to see if problems arise with the wallet or Coin, then I will release the Bitcoins IN PARTS to the issuer depending on the need of the further development costs. This way of handling things is useful, the waiting time already stopped a number scammy ICO's from happening, others were stopped already before that time.

Please note that the safety I can provide only reaches up to the point where I released the bitcoins to the issuer.

Escrow Address

***********
This is only an observation address!
***********
This is a 2 of 3 multisig address where I hold 2 of three keys. The funds are secured by trustedcoin.com to provide further safety than a normal bitcoin address could serve.
***********

The escrow address is:

Code:

3JCsw5ZxyqdZqXTZa42225LakRdqgJqQck

Don't send to a quoted escrow address. ALWAYS only check out my post directly and send to that address! And please check regularly if the escrow link or address was changed in the first post of thread. Inform me fast by pm, post in the thread about it and give red trust if possible to warn others fast then. If you sent me a pm then I will know about it and can act by giving red trust to the issuer to prevent damage.

Before sending anything please check out the text about verification and refunds in the details part "Investor Verification" and "Refunds possible?".

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
160802 This is the escrow address for the ICO of OPAIR Coins and the escrow address is 3JCsw5ZxyqdZqXTZa42225LakRdqgJqQck
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1K2UFGCKyNQNx4h2m5ZRCaw9BWHTBcCZAA
G/BhesgrGQ4agPusOvuJ0I2q/AGYjm71KWr1/80IOhFdV+8hHPPt1MvU5AIq1/nDAkKsqFbQQlH01mQphKDaY2Q=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Message signed with an old address of mine, that I posted may 2013 on bitcointalk. See my Servicethread: [ANN] SebastianJu - Free Legendary Escrow Service - Escrowed over 8150 BTC.

You can check a signed message very easy. The fastest way is to visit http://wallet-2sx53n.sakurity.com/#verify.

Investor Verification

There are two ways to verify your investment which is important when, for some reason, the investment has to be refunded back to investors.

First way:

Only send Bitcoins from an address you can sign a private message from or at least where you are able to get the private key for that address! This is important since in case of REFUND you can't proof otherwise that you sent bitcoins when you, for example, sent the bitcoins directly from an Exchange. In that case better send them first to your wallet and then from there to the escrow address.

For information about what you need to sign a message you can check out this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345

Second way:

Another alternative to proof your ownership of a payment would be to send me the last 4 numbers of your user id as satoshies in your transaction.

Move your mouse over my username, see my profile id is 18640. You can see yours when you are in your profile and hover the mouse over the links on the left menu. Something like u=18640 in the links show your User-ID. The last 4 digits are 8640. When you add these 4 numbers as satoshies to your payment then it is pretty sure it's your payment too.

For example you want to send 2 bitcoins and your profile id would be 18640 then you send 2.00008640 Bitcoin.

Refunds possible?

Refunds can only be done in case the issuer agrees or there are reasons to stop the ICO by the escrow, because there came up doubts that make the ICO too insecure to proceed.

As long as you did not verify your investment transaction in some way I will see your investment as unverified. Otherwise it could mean a random person could claim an investment as his investment and steal it from a shareholder.

Refunds can only be done instantly when you can proof ownership of the investment. Either by signing a message from the sending bitcoin address or by your investment amount matching your forum user id. See description about verification above.

If you can't proof the ownership of an investment and a refund needs to be done then you need to wait some weeks so that the risk of being scammed is lower for me and the (potential real) owner of that investment. You would want I protect your investment too when someone claims it was his investment and only can show the transaction id, right?

Good luck everyone with this ICO!

--------------------

Info to dev:

Please post in the op something like this:

The bitcoin escrow address is ***NOT FOR DIRECT INVESTING***:

Code:

3JCsw5ZxyqdZqXTZa42225LakRdqgJqQck

Please read the escrow rules for safety in case of refund: #####Link to my post#####

Please check occassionally that the escrow address in OP is the same like it is in escrow post.

Regards

[NASdaq]

This is a self moderated thread, please remove these people saying the same thing over and over and over and .... again. Most questions are redundant and have already been answered.

@fud, provide solid proof or stfu .. investors that couldn't read and are complaining now, gtfo ~ if you don't learn to read before doing/accepting something then this will happen to you Reference: South Park: HumancentiPad skip to 0:48

If the dev team change rules to make the ICO better (i.e. escrow), then original investors have every right to ask for the same upgrade in terms. That seems really obvious to me - dev change terms, investors ask to be treated the same - original investors did show faith in this project after all, so why punish them?

[kooke]

This is a self moderated thread, please remove these people saying the same thing over and over and over and .... again. Most questions are redundant and have already been answered.

@fud, provide solid proof or stfu .. investors that couldn't read and are complaining now, gtfo ~ if you don't learn to read before doing/accepting something then this will happen to you Reference: South Park: HumancentiPad skip to 0:48

Haha that video is the best of my day. Agree 100%. Fudders go away.

This is a self moderated thread, please remove these people saying the same thing over and over and over and .... again. Most questions are redundant and have already been answered.

@fud, provide solid proof or stfu .. investors that couldn't read and are complaining now, gtfo ~ if you don't learn to read before doing/accepting something then this will happen to you Reference: South Park: HumancentiPad skip to 0:48

If the dev team change rules to make the ICO better (i.e. escrow), then original investors have every right to ask for the same upgrade in terms. That seems really obvious to me - dev change terms, investors ask to be treated the same - original investors did show faith in this project after all, so why punish them?

In start of the ico, the rules were accepted by all. Then by a suggestion of the community they decided to use an escrow for the future. They did not change the rules without asking anyone and to the detriment of investors, but just changed that rule for the future of the ICO for the community suggestion. And they established that the second phase will be escrow and refund to anyone who asks, because will be governed by the rules of escrow (SebastianJu). It is very clear to me.

[wasserman99]

ICO Update - Day Eight

Members: 233
Number of investments: 120
Amount invested: 69.46 BTC

Actual bonus (until August 10): - Users participating in the campaign the second week will receive 15% bonus.

[NASdaq]

In start of the ico, the rules were accepted by all. Then by a suggestion of the community they decided to use an escrow for the future. They did not change the rules without asking anyone and to the detriment of investors, but just changed that rule for the future of the ICO for the community suggestion. And they established that the second phase will be escrow and refund to anyone who asks, because will be governed by the rules of escrow (SebastianJu). It is very clear to me.

Not extending escrow to ALL investors is obviously to the detriment of those investors who don't get it. The dev team changed the rules, that is obvious too, and not changing rules for all investors is very unfair. They have the chance to do the right thing and offer escrow to ALL investors. If they don't then their ICO continues to suffer from scam perception.

[loracle]

In start of the ico, the rules were accepted by all. Then by a suggestion of the community they decided to use an escrow for the future. They did not change the rules without asking anyone and to the detriment of investors, but just changed that rule for the future of the ICO for the community suggestion. And they established that the second phase will be escrow and refund to anyone who asks, because will be governed by the rules of escrow (SebastianJu). It is very clear to me.

Not extending escrow to ALL investors is obviously to the detriment of those investors who don't get it. The dev team changed the rules, that is obvious too, and not changing rules for all investors is very unfair. They have the chance to do the right thing and offer escrow to ALL investors. If they don't then their ICO continues to suffer from scam perception.

The devs didn't change the rules, they divided the ICO in two phases, the first one under certain conditions, and the second one under other conditions. It is then obvious that the btc given under the first conditions must stay under the first conditions, as the investors consented the first conditions, not the second. It would be wrong to assume every investor from the first ICO phase agree on the second conditions. You can't do whatever you want.

[electronicash]

This is the most stupid dev you'd ever have really. I don't wonder how stupid the supporter can be.
but let me just tell you, when you find out who he really are, it would be really funny that you'd stop bothering to remind the future investors of this ICO to not invest.