Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 09:49:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [PRE-ANN] OPAIR | Decentralized Debit Cards | OCaml | New Blockchain Platform  (Read 127601 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Dank Frank
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 04:55:18 PM
 #1501

You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714470549
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714470549

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714470549
Reply with quote  #2

1714470549
Report to moderator
1714470549
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714470549

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714470549
Reply with quote  #2

1714470549
Report to moderator
tomsmith26
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 512


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 04:56:22 PM
 #1502


As we said previously to the release date we should reach a consensus with SJ. This is the final plan we both agreed:

1) Define the 9% PoW before Friday. // By far the most voted option at the moment is "b".
2) On Friday communicating the decision to SJ.
3) Release the qt wallet before September 19th.
4) On September 19th the refund period will ends and the remaining funds will be released.
5) Start the distribution.
6) List on exchanges.
7) Launch the beta during October.

The distribution of the coins can not start earlier because it would be totally unfair to investors in the first phase as SJ he said:

Quote
How about making a timeframe of two weeks from the day we have an agreement settled. This should be sufficient time for investors to check for the status of the coin and make a decision.

The problem is that if wasserman99 would release the coins now to ico 1 investors then I either would have to refund all ico 2 users or forward all coins of users that do want a refund. The latter is no real choice. The reason is that they could hedge against the price of the coin otherwise. Ask for a refund with the coin price drops or ask for the coins when they rise in value.

If wasserman99 sends coins before that timeframe to ico 1 then a refund to ico 2 has to happen to not make it possible to force a forwarding.
If coins are sent to ico 1 and 2 then still ico 2 bitcoins has to be refunded for the same reason.

We are in touch,

Regards

Hi,

The most voted option was b). Thus, we continue with that in mind for the wallet. So will be pure PoS with 3% Annual Interest. The qt wallet will be ready before the september 19th but the distribution will start after that date for reasons that can read above, agreed by the escrow.

Regards
Thank you for your information.
I'm waiting for releasing the wallet and distribution on that day. all agreements are resolved ?
Nice works!
equator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 05:00:12 PM
 #1503

After seeing so much of problems after the ICO finish , i am in doubt now that as soon as the coin gets launched in exchange every one will try to just cashout their coins at what ever rate it may be. So mostly this coin is going to get highly dumped on launching time.
termion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 533



View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:19:39 PM
 #1504

After seeing so much of problems after the ICO finish , i am in doubt now that as soon as the coin gets launched in exchange every one will try to just cashout their coins at what ever rate it may be. So mostly this coin is going to get highly dumped on launching time.

I think so...  Developers must do something interesting and REAL with project  BEFORE launch in exchanges...  
looking4thegrail
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:24:03 PM
 #1505

You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.

Voting wasn't that important. The option that's best for the project if it's legitimate, was chosen. It would have been better to have the coin distributed and on exchanges first, but it's easier for SJ this way. I guess phase 2 people will have to judge based on the quality of the github commits and anything else he releases.
Rkana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 281
Merit: 250

RK Coin Services - Alt Coins Dev (ETH-BTC & More)


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:25:09 PM
 #1506

You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Escrow will not do that. Funds will be released in parts.

I Do COIN SERVICES (WEB JsWALLET + INSIGHT EXPLORER | ELECTRUM)
I Can Make You an ETH OR BTC ALTCOIN And OTHER COIN DEVELOPMENT - PM Me For More Info
tinaken_v
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 561
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:33:00 PM
 #1507

so when will the signature been paid?

btc476476
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:37:01 PM
 #1508

although some people don't support you,but I think that people should have dream,good luck to you.
menace.bit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457
Merit: 250

Generation Blockchain.


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 07:44:30 PM
 #1509

although some people don't support you,but I think that people should have dream,good luck to you.

yes people dream - in their sleep.lol...

so much FUD in here. wondering when dev will deliver something or when the CEO Frank show up - i do not see that in wasserman's plan.
Dank Frank
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 08:22:11 PM
 #1510

What were the options again to vote on? My majority of coins are in phase 2.
Dank Frank
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 08:27:46 PM
 #1511

You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.

Voting wasn't that important. The option that's best for the project if it's legitimate, was chosen. It would have been better to have the coin distributed and on exchanges first, but it's easier for SJ this way. I guess phase 2 people will have to judge based on the quality of the github commits and anything else he releases.

Easier for SJ, you do get he receives BTC7.5 for being the escrow. His job shouldn't be easy, but the most honest way.

All we see is wasserman99, he didn't email investors (at least I got no email) refuses to pay out signature bounty from the BTC65 in hands, no updates on github and where is Frank H. Rettig and Hao Wang?
BasementRot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 01:37:05 AM
 #1512

You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Escrow will not do that. Funds will be released in parts.

No, not anymore. Sebastian has decided to offer stage 2 people refunds and then giving Wasserman all the remaining money for basically nothing.


...
51% attack is when 1 person/group controls over 50% of the network mining hash rate. Then they have blockchain control and can reverse transactions, double spend coins  and block other peoples transactions at will.

Many exchanges have more than 50% coins and no one attacks POS coins all those theoretical problems doesn't happening.
All drama is to hyped abut that.
PS: Exchange can give such POS 200-400 confirmations before they are usable if they aware

Of course Poloniex isn't' going to 51% attack some shitcoin. lol

But on a PoW system, a miner doesn't need to control very much of the coin, only the hashrate to do a 51% attack.

I kept asking if Wasserman had a PoS system ready for launch and he just now responded. As far we knew it was going to be PoW with 0 reward. Which would have been easy to 51% attack.
Mouse020
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250

No one like you


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 02:38:39 AM
 #1513

 Huh Huh Huh
the last is : luanch basic wallet get all money?
geopolisch
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 511


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 03:30:03 AM
 #1514


As we said previously to the release date we should reach a consensus with SJ. This is the final plan we both agreed:

1) Define the 9% PoW before Friday. // By far the most voted option at the moment is "b".
2) On Friday communicating the decision to SJ.
3) Release the qt wallet before September 19th.
4) On September 19th the refund period will ends and the remaining funds will be released.
5) Start the distribution.
6) List on exchanges.
7) Launch the beta during October.

The distribution of the coins can not start earlier because it would be totally unfair to investors in the first phase as SJ he said:

Quote
How about making a timeframe of two weeks from the day we have an agreement settled. This should be sufficient time for investors to check for the status of the coin and make a decision.

The problem is that if wasserman99 would release the coins now to ico 1 investors then I either would have to refund all ico 2 users or forward all coins of users that do want a refund. The latter is no real choice. The reason is that they could hedge against the price of the coin otherwise. Ask for a refund with the coin price drops or ask for the coins when they rise in value.

If wasserman99 sends coins before that timeframe to ico 1 then a refund to ico 2 has to happen to not make it possible to force a forwarding.
If coins are sent to ico 1 and 2 then still ico 2 bitcoins has to be refunded for the same reason.

We are in touch,

Regards

Hi,

The most voted option was b). Thus, we continue with that in mind for the wallet. So will be pure PoS with 3% Annual Interest. The qt wallet will be ready before the september 19th but the distribution will start after that date for reasons that can read above, agreed by the escrow.

Regards
I see you guys completely ignoring Bounty payments.... when will you pay signature bounty? because you decide to pay in BTC, I don't think there is any reason to delay signature bounty till wallet launch and distribution etc.
I want to request lutpin to ask SebastianJu to consider signature bounty also... (is SebastianJu only holding ICO funds?)
stepmike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 06:47:24 AM
 #1515

wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
XbladeX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002



View Profile
September 10, 2016, 01:47:05 PM
 #1516

wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?

Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already.

His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"...
Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC,
-7BTC will be -7BTC all time period.

If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with
65 or 58 BTC at end.

Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
MoneyJ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 504


GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 02:58:10 PM
 #1517

wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?

This has been already answered.

█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
████▀▀ ▄▄▄ ▀▀████▀ ▄▄▄▄ ▀████
███▀ ███████▄ ██ ▄██████▄ ███
███ ████▀▀▀▀▀  ▀█████████████
███▄ ███████▀ █▄ ▀██████▀▀███
████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▄████▄ ▀▀▀▀ ▄████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
.GoMeat.  300+ STORES ALREADY ONBOARD
 THE FIRST PROJECT OF ITS KIND

ONLY 160K TOKENS REMAINING
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████▀▀  ███████
█████████████▀▀      ███████
█████████▀▀   ▄▄     ███████
█████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ████████
█████████ █▀        ████████
█████████ █ ▄███▄   ████████
██████████████████▄▄████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
tomsmith26
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 512


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 03:13:29 PM
 #1518

wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?

Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already.

His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"...
Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC,
-7BTC will be -7BTC all time period.

If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with
65 or 58 BTC at end.

I do not know if you are an investor or not? but it seems that you hate this project too much
you know that the more people hate it , the more sucessful it will be

once it launchs , many people will regret
ROBERTO
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1421
Merit: 1001


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 04:29:18 PM
 #1519

Hello, i'm waiting my sig bounty (like lot of people). Fund are already sent to the dev or not?
Can be nice if the dev can give us a expected date to receive our signature bounty

Thanks
Foex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250


Bitrated user: Foex.


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2016, 04:35:11 PM
 #1520

wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?

Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already.

His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"...
Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC,
-7BTC will be -7BTC all time period.

If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with
65 or 58 BTC at end.

I do not know if you are an investor or not? but it seems that you hate this project too much
you know that the more people hate it , the more sucessful it will be

once it launchs , many people will regret

I dont know about launch. But can you explain the absentism of Hao n Frank, github n the whitepaper. On what grounds and reasons, you termed this project success. Can you explain?

0xdB9A9D39B17F1223BF590a3F9D1FC7f2058eB111
Pages: « 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 [76] 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!