Dank Frank
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...
|
|
September 09, 2016, 04:55:18 PM |
|
You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
tomsmith26
|
|
September 09, 2016, 04:56:22 PM |
|
As we said previously to the release date we should reach a consensus with SJ. This is the final plan we both agreed: 1) Define the 9% PoW before Friday. // By far the most voted option at the moment is "b". 2) On Friday communicating the decision to SJ. 3) Release the qt wallet before September 19th. 4) On September 19th the refund period will ends and the remaining funds will be released. 5) Start the distribution. 6) List on exchanges. 7) Launch the beta during October. The distribution of the coins can not start earlier because it would be totally unfair to investors in the first phase as SJ he said: How about making a timeframe of two weeks from the day we have an agreement settled. This should be sufficient time for investors to check for the status of the coin and make a decision.
The problem is that if wasserman99 would release the coins now to ico 1 investors then I either would have to refund all ico 2 users or forward all coins of users that do want a refund. The latter is no real choice. The reason is that they could hedge against the price of the coin otherwise. Ask for a refund with the coin price drops or ask for the coins when they rise in value.
If wasserman99 sends coins before that timeframe to ico 1 then a refund to ico 2 has to happen to not make it possible to force a forwarding. If coins are sent to ico 1 and 2 then still ico 2 bitcoins has to be refunded for the same reason. We are in touch, Regards Hi, The most voted option was b). Thus, we continue with that in mind for the wallet. So will be pure PoS with 3% Annual Interest. The qt wallet will be ready before the september 19th but the distribution will start after that date for reasons that can read above, agreed by the escrow. Regards Thank you for your information. I'm waiting for releasing the wallet and distribution on that day. all agreements are resolved ? Nice works!
|
|
|
|
equator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 09, 2016, 05:00:12 PM |
|
After seeing so much of problems after the ICO finish , i am in doubt now that as soon as the coin gets launched in exchange every one will try to just cashout their coins at what ever rate it may be. So mostly this coin is going to get highly dumped on launching time.
|
|
|
|
termion
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:19:39 PM |
|
After seeing so much of problems after the ICO finish , i am in doubt now that as soon as the coin gets launched in exchange every one will try to just cashout their coins at what ever rate it may be. So mostly this coin is going to get highly dumped on launching time.
I think so... Developers must do something interesting and REAL with project BEFORE launch in exchanges...
|
|
|
|
looking4thegrail
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:24:03 PM |
|
You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Voting wasn't that important. The option that's best for the project if it's legitimate, was chosen. It would have been better to have the coin distributed and on exchanges first, but it's easier for SJ this way. I guess phase 2 people will have to judge based on the quality of the github commits and anything else he releases.
|
|
|
|
Rkana
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
RK Coin Services - Alt Coins Dev (ETH-BTC & More)
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:25:09 PM |
|
You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Escrow will not do that. Funds will be released in parts.
|
I Do COIN SERVICES (WEB JsWALLET + INSIGHT EXPLORER | ELECTRUM) I Can Make You an ETH OR BTC ALTCOIN And OTHER COIN DEVELOPMENT - PM Me For More Info
|
|
|
tinaken_v
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:33:00 PM |
|
so when will the signature been paid?
|
|
|
|
btc476476
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2016, 06:37:01 PM |
|
although some people don't support you,but I think that people should have dream,good luck to you.
|
|
|
|
menace.bit
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 457
Merit: 250
Generation Blockchain.
|
|
September 09, 2016, 07:44:30 PM |
|
although some people don't support you,but I think that people should have dream,good luck to you.
yes people dream - in their sleep.lol... so much FUD in here. wondering when dev will deliver something or when the CEO Frank show up - i do not see that in wasserman's plan.
|
|
|
|
Dank Frank
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:22:11 PM |
|
What were the options again to vote on? My majority of coins are in phase 2.
|
|
|
|
Dank Frank
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Too Weird to Live. Too Rare to Die...
|
|
September 09, 2016, 08:27:46 PM |
|
You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Voting wasn't that important. The option that's best for the project if it's legitimate, was chosen. It would have been better to have the coin distributed and on exchanges first, but it's easier for SJ this way. I guess phase 2 people will have to judge based on the quality of the github commits and anything else he releases. Easier for SJ, you do get he receives BTC7.5 for being the escrow. His job shouldn't be easy, but the most honest way. All we see is wasserman99, he didn't email investors (at least I got no email) refuses to pay out signature bounty from the BTC65 in hands, no updates on github and where is Frank H. Rettig and Hao Wang?
|
|
|
|
BasementRot
|
|
September 10, 2016, 01:37:05 AM |
|
You guys do realize after all shadiness from this ICO, wasserman now only have to release a cheap ass qt wallet for full escrow funds and didn't notify any investors by email on what to vote and how to vote.
Escrow will not do that. Funds will be released in parts. No, not anymore. Sebastian has decided to offer stage 2 people refunds and then giving Wasserman all the remaining money for basically nothing. ... 51% attack is when 1 person/group controls over 50% of the network mining hash rate. Then they have blockchain control and can reverse transactions, double spend coins and block other peoples transactions at will.
Many exchanges have more than 50% coins and no one attacks POS coins all those theoretical problems doesn't happening. All drama is to hyped abut that. PS: Exchange can give such POS 200-400 confirmations before they are usable if they aware Of course Poloniex isn't' going to 51% attack some shitcoin. lol But on a PoW system, a miner doesn't need to control very much of the coin, only the hashrate to do a 51% attack. I kept asking if Wasserman had a PoS system ready for launch and he just now responded. As far we knew it was going to be PoW with 0 reward. Which would have been easy to 51% attack.
|
|
|
|
Mouse020
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 303
Merit: 250
No one like you
|
|
September 10, 2016, 02:38:39 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
geopolisch
|
|
September 10, 2016, 03:30:03 AM |
|
As we said previously to the release date we should reach a consensus with SJ. This is the final plan we both agreed: 1) Define the 9% PoW before Friday. // By far the most voted option at the moment is "b". 2) On Friday communicating the decision to SJ. 3) Release the qt wallet before September 19th. 4) On September 19th the refund period will ends and the remaining funds will be released. 5) Start the distribution. 6) List on exchanges. 7) Launch the beta during October. The distribution of the coins can not start earlier because it would be totally unfair to investors in the first phase as SJ he said: How about making a timeframe of two weeks from the day we have an agreement settled. This should be sufficient time for investors to check for the status of the coin and make a decision.
The problem is that if wasserman99 would release the coins now to ico 1 investors then I either would have to refund all ico 2 users or forward all coins of users that do want a refund. The latter is no real choice. The reason is that they could hedge against the price of the coin otherwise. Ask for a refund with the coin price drops or ask for the coins when they rise in value.
If wasserman99 sends coins before that timeframe to ico 1 then a refund to ico 2 has to happen to not make it possible to force a forwarding. If coins are sent to ico 1 and 2 then still ico 2 bitcoins has to be refunded for the same reason. We are in touch, Regards Hi, The most voted option was b). Thus, we continue with that in mind for the wallet. So will be pure PoS with 3% Annual Interest. The qt wallet will be ready before the september 19th but the distribution will start after that date for reasons that can read above, agreed by the escrow. Regards I see you guys completely ignoring Bounty payments.... when will you pay signature bounty? because you decide to pay in BTC, I don't think there is any reason to delay signature bounty till wallet launch and distribution etc. I want to request lutpin to ask SebastianJu to consider signature bounty also... (is SebastianJu only holding ICO funds?)
|
|
|
|
stepmike
|
|
September 10, 2016, 06:47:24 AM |
|
wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
|
|
|
|
XbladeX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 10, 2016, 01:47:05 PM |
|
wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already. His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"... Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC, -7BTC will be -7BTC all time period. If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with 65 or 58 BTC at end.
|
Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
|
|
|
MoneyJ
|
|
September 10, 2016, 02:58:10 PM |
|
wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
This has been already answered.
|
|
|
|
tomsmith26
|
|
September 10, 2016, 03:13:29 PM |
|
wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already. His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"... Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC, -7BTC will be -7BTC all time period. If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with 65 or 58 BTC at end. I do not know if you are an investor or not? but it seems that you hate this project too much you know that the more people hate it , the more sucessful it will be once it launchs , many people will regret
|
|
|
|
ROBERTO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1421
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 10, 2016, 04:29:18 PM |
|
Hello, i'm waiting my sig bounty (like lot of people). Fund are already sent to the dev or not? Can be nice if the dev can give us a expected date to receive our signature bounty
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Foex
|
|
September 10, 2016, 04:35:11 PM |
|
wasserman99 how long are you not going to notice issues for the payment of the signature bounty? Please answer why you don't answer on this question?
Maybe because in real he don't want do it if he want he would done it already. His answer makes no sense at all "he need to know how much money he can get :Daut of ICO"... Answer is simple ICO -7 BTC all time true what difference is that will be 65 BTC or 150 BTC, -7BTC will be -7BTC all time period. If you want run away then it would be 65BTC - 7BTC = 58BTC and there is a difference with running away with 65 or 58 BTC at end. I do not know if you are an investor or not? but it seems that you hate this project too much you know that the more people hate it , the more sucessful it will be once it launchs , many people will regret I dont know about launch. But can you explain the absentism of Hao n Frank, github n the whitepaper. On what grounds and reasons, you termed this project success. Can you explain?
|
0xdB9A9D39B17F1223BF590a3F9D1FC7f2058eB111
|
|
|
|