Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 04:55:05 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 [475] 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3859361 times)
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 01:20:13 PM
 #9481

All backends should be up again. The problem is, as far as it looks, routing issues caused by floods in Prague. I'm setting up new temporary database server in another location for the case the routing issues will appear again.

Still showing 1 out of 4 workers not updating on the website slush - doubled checked and the worker is definitely submitting...

[EDIT] just tried restarting the worker - reconnected ok and submitting shares - but still not updating on the website.

donations not accepted
1475297705
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475297705

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475297705
Reply with quote  #2

1475297705
Report to moderator
1475297705
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475297705

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475297705
Reply with quote  #2

1475297705
Report to moderator
1475297705
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475297705

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475297705
Reply with quote  #2

1475297705
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 01:23:15 PM
 #9482

I'll resolve missing block asap.

FYI: my miners connecting to 95.211.52.40 are the ones showing increasing hash but not recorded at the website, connecting to 54.215.3.101 is showing as connected at website. thanks.
DoomDumas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


Bitcoin forever !


View Profile WWW
June 03, 2013, 01:55:12 PM
 #9483

Slush as efficient as usual !  Smiley  Thanks a lot for real good service maintaining the pool Slush, you rule Smiley
I'll mine in this pool forever !!!

Soap for BTC - Pure, Natural, Unique..   - PDF - BTCTalk - Email
bobsmoke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 02:19:24 PM
 #9484

Slush as efficient as usual !  Smiley  Thanks a lot for real good service maintaining the pool Slush, you rule Smiley
I'll mine in this pool forever !!!

Well done Slush!
weevil
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 02:20:55 PM
 #9485

Yes - strong customer support is at the heart of any good customer relationship.
Well done.
Herp-a-derp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 02:26:44 PM
 #9486

Thank you Slush!
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 02:46:04 PM
 #9487

I'll resolve missing block asap.

Thanks a bunch, everything getting sorted out with your personal?


Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
PrintMule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 02:51:10 PM
 #9488

That flood was all over the news yesterday

mikimoto
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 03:44:44 PM
 #9489

Thanks slush for your quickly response....  Wink

PrintMule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:03:06 PM
 #9490

Recent luck attracts more users? 12 GH/s now

Slush went up from 8% of total network hashrate to 10%

In ideal conditions more = better

But will it blend? (server loads)

KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 614


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:15:26 PM
 #9491

Based on the time it took to catch-up there is enough room for more miners

BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:18:12 PM
 #9492

it goes between 11 and 9 all the time.

seems more so during the day (north america)

or more sense night in europe

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:20:17 PM
 #9493

Anyone else seeing the earlier problem recurring? 1 of my 4 workers is submitting shares ok but website not updating for this one worker - 12 mins now...

[EDIT] hmm - restarted the worker and it's updating on the website now...

donations not accepted
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:27:29 PM
 #9494

Recent luck attracts more users? 12 GH/s now

Slush went up from 8% of total network hashrate to 10%

In ideal conditions more = better

But will it blend? (server loads)
Luck makes pool look bigger also... Speed is estimated. Pool doesn't ask users what is there speed. It estimate it based on shares. Same goes for network share. If pool is lucky it will get bigger...
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:29:07 PM
 #9495

Anyone else seeing the earlier problem recurring? 1 of my 4 workers is submitting shares ok but website not updating for this one worker - 12 mins now...

[EDIT] hmm - restarted the worker and it's updating on the website now...
You had stratum error. If you restart the worker it starts recording shares but you still need to wait to get the missing shares back.
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 614


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 05:37:56 PM
 #9496

Luck makes pool look bigger also... Speed is estimated. Pool doesn't ask users what is there speed. It estimate it based on shares. Same goes for network share. If pool is lucky it will get bigger...
That's not the case if you ask organofcorti Smiley

There is something which is partially true (IMHO) by the way: 'Pool doesn't ask users what is their speed' - true, but most of the miners are sending their hashrate anyway, then the problem is that the value can not be trusted so the pool should either confirm the value or ignore it completely with the second being easier. For the network it is completely true, as it does not interact with the miners or pools, but deducts their hashrate from their submissions.

BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
June 03, 2013, 07:56:16 PM
 #9497

...but most of the miners are sending their hashrate anyway, then the problem is that the value can not be trusted so the pool should either confirm the value or ignore it completely with the second being easier.
Thanks, didn't know that...
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 614


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 08:44:08 PM
 #9498

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Getwork#noncerange and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=24336.0 and at least CGminer is sending it (based on my tcpdumps)

EDIT: The problem is that it send my total hashrate while i am load-balancing between several pools, so there is no way it can be trusted

BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 09:22:44 PM
 #9499

...but most of the miners are sending their hashrate anyway, then the problem is that the value can not be trusted so the pool should either confirm the value or ignore it completely with the second being easier.
Thanks, didn't know that...

regardless. if you say the hashrate going from 10543.740 Ghash/s 2 weeks ago to 11543.740 Ghash/s is because of luck then you are declaring ALL miners are having increased luck which is not how probability works. Cluster performance looks like it is showing the actual hashrate to the assumed hashrate.  for example 2 of my 6 miners are presently lower than their normal hashrate, one is well above and the last 3 are dead on.
Now the pool is hitting 12543.740 Ghash/s a week after it when up 1000 gh/s it has gone up another 1000 gh/s. the only answer has to be that 1000 gh/s of miners joined Slush 2 weeks ago and 1000 gh/s of miners joined this week.
All I know is every 1000 gh/s increase negates one of my miners grrr... I just added 2 to make up for the 1000 from 2 weeks ago!
diskodasa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


BTC 1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy


View Profile
June 03, 2013, 09:32:58 PM
 #9500

The rule: Higher pool luck = higher payments, lower pool luck = lower payments!

1Hek4mF4sHcpEJpQdeKwN2i1rVrK5JcZuy
Pages: « 1 ... 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 [475] 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!