Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2018, 02:24:44 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3230 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 415 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 4014

Pages: « 1 ... 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 [438] 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 ... 1142 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [2.5+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4326819 times)
oroboras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:16:35 PM
 #8741

So many blocks discovered in Germany - I guess someone there has an ASIC already - or phenomenal luck!
1527387884
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527387884

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527387884
Reply with quote  #2

1527387884
Report to moderator
1527387884
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527387884

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527387884
Reply with quote  #2

1527387884
Report to moderator
1527387884
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527387884

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527387884
Reply with quote  #2

1527387884
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:25:06 PM
 #8742

So many blocks discovered in Germany - I guess someone there has an ASIC already - or phenomenal luck!

if you are going by the map on the block's page, i've been told that is where the first verification was made.
oroboras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:38:08 PM
 #8743

Ahh, thanks for that - I was hoping for me to appear one day too!
mikesheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:46:05 PM
 #8744

Hey Slush,
our last block 237574 didn't register with the database / didn't process.
I am interested in seeing this event resolved.

Archain.org | Whitepaper | Bitcointalks Thread
Decentralised Archive of the Internet
stslimited
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:49:41 PM
 #8745

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2013, 11:52:09 PM
 #8746

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?

Slush's pool != the entire network.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
stslimited
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 23, 2013, 11:58:55 PM
 #8747

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?

Slush's pool != the entire network.

I understand that , but how long before we revert to a mean? I would like our luck to stay up this high indefinitely!
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 12:01:25 AM
 #8748

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?

Slush's pool != the entire network.

I understand that , but how long before we revert to a mean? I would like our luck to stay up this high indefinitely!

All I meant was that luck at Slush's pool was not going to significantly affect the entire network mining difficulty.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 241
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:04:24 AM
 #8749

Hey Slush,
our last block 237574 didn't register with the database / didn't process.
I am interested in seeing this event resolved.
Block 237574 found by Deepbit, not Slush pool.
mikesheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:08:51 AM
 #8750

Hey Slush,
our last block 237574 didn't register with the database / didn't process.
I am interested in seeing this event resolved.
Block 237574 found by Deepbit, not Slush pool.
I was looking at this:  http://blockchain.info/block-index/385234/00000000000000f595dabc67b09229d6cd93224da85c46415f5c782e09ab576f
Where did Deepbit get credit?

Archain.org | Whitepaper | Bitcointalks Thread
Decentralised Archive of the Internet
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 241
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:11:58 AM
 #8751

Hey Slush,
our last block 237574 didn't register with the database / didn't process.
I am interested in seeing this event resolved.
Block 237574 found by Deepbit, not Slush pool.
I was looking at this:  http://blockchain.info/block-index/385234/00000000000000f595dabc67b09229d6cd93224da85c46415f5c782e09ab576f
Where did Deepbit get credit?

blockchain.info - right on front page  Shows different from block explorer.   Funny thing.  Might want resolving...

Height   Age          Transactions   Total Sent   Relayed By   Size (kB)
237599   10 minutes           322    3,805.84 BTC   BTC Guild   243.24
237598   11 minutes           776   13,371.07 BTC   BTC Guild   243.26
237597   47 minutes           275    1,246.75 BTC   BTC Guild   130.16
237596   53 minutes            29     1,194.95 BTC   BTC Guild   12.94
237595   53 minutes           601    4,628.18 BTC   50BTC       242.51
237594   1 hour 6 minutes   334    2,183.12 BTC   Deepbit      146.34
237593   1 hour 12 minutes   459   2,298.85 BTC   Slush         243.29
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


Dacsee


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:20:04 AM
 #8752

Hey Slush,
our last block 237574 didn't register with the database / didn't process.
I am interested in seeing this event resolved.
Block 237574 found by Deepbit, not Slush pool.
I was looking at this:  http://blockchain.info/block-index/385234/00000000000000f595dabc67b09229d6cd93224da85c46415f5c782e09ab576f
Where did Deepbit get credit?

blockchain.info - right on front page  Shows different from block explorer.   Funny thing.  Might want resolving...

Height   Age          Transactions   Total Sent   Relayed By   Size (kB)
237599   10 minutes           322    3,805.84 BTC   BTC Guild   243.24
237598   11 minutes           776   13,371.07 BTC   BTC Guild   243.26
237597   47 minutes           275    1,246.75 BTC   BTC Guild   130.16
237596   53 minutes            29     1,194.95 BTC   BTC Guild   12.94
237595   53 minutes           601    4,628.18 BTC   50BTC       242.51
237594   1 hour 6 minutes   334    2,183.12 BTC   Deepbit      146.34
237593   1 hour 12 minutes   459   2,298.85 BTC   Slush         243.29


That's xxx594 not xxx574.

K.

.Dacsee  █
    █
    █
    █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █
  █
  █
  █

  █
  █
  █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
    █
    █
    █
    █

 
 
  ▄▄████████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀      ▀▀███▄
  ▄██▀              ▀██▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
  ▄████████  ██████████████▄
  █████████     ████████████
  █████████        █████████
  █████████          ███████
  █████████        █████████
  ▀████████     ███████████▀
  ▀███████   ████████████▀
  ▀████████████████████▀
  ▀███▄▄      ▄▄███▀
  ▀▀████████▀▀
 
   
Forum

 
   
Blog

 
   
Whitepaper

 
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 241
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:23:57 AM
 #8753

To be quoting American TV hero Homer Simpson  ....D'oh....
Original correct - block missing.
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


Dacsee


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 12:30:26 AM
 #8754

To be quoting American TV hero Homer Simpson  ....D'oh....
Original correct - block missing.

 Cheesy good quote Cheesy

K.

.Dacsee  █
    █
    █
    █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █
  █
  █
  █

  █
  █
  █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
  █ █
    █
    █
    █
    █

 
 
  ▄▄████████▄▄
  ▄███▀▀      ▀▀███▄
  ▄██▀              ▀██▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
  ▄████████  ██████████████▄
  █████████     ████████████
  █████████        █████████
  █████████          ███████
  █████████        █████████
  ▀████████     ███████████▀
  ▀███████   ████████████▀
  ▀████████████████████▀
  ▀███▄▄      ▄▄███▀
  ▀▀████████▀▀
 
   
Forum

 
   
Blog

 
   
Whitepaper

 
kanta
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 01:56:32 AM
 #8755

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?

We had a lucky day today, earlier this week we had a couple of unlucky days as well. It all balances out. You can't use a single day or even a single week as a basis for expectations of how the future will pan out, you need to look at a much larger sample size. Compare all of today on all of the large pools for example, then average the data from all of those pools for a month. Our good luck benefited us today, but it's just a small ripple in the ocean when you start looking at the big picture
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175
Merit: 100


< My mining rig >


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 02:07:44 AM
 #8756

Hm, today's luck has been around 144% , does this mean difficulty is going to rise pretty high next adjustment?

We had a lucky day today, earlier this week we had a couple of unlucky days as well. It all balances out. You can't use a single day or even a single week as a basis for expectations of how the future will pan out, you need to look at a much larger sample size. Compare all of today on all of the large pools for example, then average the data from all of those pools for a month. Our good luck benefited us today, but it's just a small ripple in the ocean when you start looking at the big picture

Yeah, luck was good.  Would've been even better if Block 237574 had made it into the pool database.

[Edit]  Wonder where it went.
Uliss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:20:09 AM
 #8757

1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC



Why do we need it?
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:24:28 AM
 #8758

1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC



Why do we need it?

We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?
laughingbear
Deflationary champion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 631
Merit: 500


www.cryptobetfair.com


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 03:27:34 AM
 #8759

1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC



Why do we need it?

We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?

+100 

Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!
stslimited
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 03:43:54 AM
 #8760

1 NMC = 0.0075 BTC



Why do we need it?

We don't, but since it doesn't cost anything, why not make it?

+100  

Please add NMC to stratum... Pretty please!?!

if NMC was added to Stratum then we would make a lot more NMC and have a lot more blocks, I wonder if we would accidentally 51% it
Pages: « 1 ... 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 [438] 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 ... 1142 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!