5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
|
August 20, 2013, 04:24:51 PM |
|
Why tese happens, again two in a row ?
19682 2013-08-19 22:47:11 2:19:51 71506708 208054 0.06592060 253091 25.37953223 invalid 19681 2013-08-19 20:27:20 2:21:40 71930298 210595 0.07538372 253075 25.28987285 invalid
Hopefully Slush will do some troubleshooting. Both of these blocks showing valid on main chain.
|
|
|
|
cad_cdn
|
|
August 20, 2013, 05:11:03 PM |
|
is password reset on website actually working? I've been waiting for hours, nothing. not in spam etc. website doesn't return a 'confirmation' that the email was even sent.
|
|
|
|
cr1776
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4172
Merit: 1312
|
|
August 20, 2013, 06:08:42 PM |
|
Now it appears that they are both confirmed instead of invalid. Why tese happens, again two in a row ?
19682 2013-08-19 22:47:11 2:19:51 71506708 208054 0.06592060 253091 25.37953223 invalid 19681 2013-08-19 20:27:20 2:21:40 71930298 210595 0.07538372 253075 25.28987285 invalid
Hopefully Slush will do some troubleshooting. Both of these blocks showing valid on main chain.
|
|
|
|
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
|
August 20, 2013, 07:21:14 PM |
|
Now it appears that they are both confirmed instead of invalid. Why tese happens, again two in a row ?
19682 2013-08-19 22:47:11 2:19:51 71506708 208054 0.06592060 253091 25.37953223 invalid 19681 2013-08-19 20:27:20 2:21:40 71930298 210595 0.07538372 253075 25.28987285 invalid
Hopefully Slush will do some troubleshooting. Both of these blocks showing valid on main chain. Stealth Slush
|
|
|
|
Cosmos
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 02:57:26 AM |
|
19695 2013-08-20 16:36:14 2:42:38 83893598 69264 0.02116766 253220 25.20305002 invalid
another one popped up =/
|
Donation BTC: 1Pno5cingvmmC8CtpHgNJcoLqfyzSz6kEy
|
|
|
threedrules
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
August 21, 2013, 05:00:44 AM |
|
once again if you click it its valid
|
|
|
|
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
|
August 21, 2013, 05:19:21 AM |
|
19695 2013-08-20 16:36:14 2:42:38 83893598 11780 0.00344829 253220 25.20305002 invalid
Shows relayed by Slush and valid on Main Chain -- fix plz. Any idea why the pool servers are starting to throw these errors?
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
August 21, 2013, 07:06:08 AM |
|
19695 2013-08-20 16:36:14 2:42:38 83893598 11780 0.00344829 253220 25.20305002 invalid
Shows relayed by Slush and valid on Main Chain -- fix plz. Any idea why the pool servers are starting to throw these errors?
yeah valid....
|
|
|
|
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
|
|
August 21, 2013, 11:54:41 AM |
|
I have found a new block...do i get some more from it or is it just information?
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:04:17 PM |
|
I have found a new block...do i get some more from it or is it just information?
you get the same like everyone else...
|
|
|
|
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:08:56 PM |
|
So why the big fuzz that i have found a block in my statistics lol?
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:10:49 PM |
|
So why the big fuzz that i have found a block in my statistics lol?
well, you can be happy that you became a part of the bitcoin history
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:18:33 PM |
|
So why the big fuzz that i have found a block in my statistics lol?
People also use it to determine their individual luck. If you've found 5 blocks total, and have a total payout of 140 btc then your more profitable than you would be solo mining, hence lucky. However if you have found 5 blocks total but have only been paid out 100 btc, then you're less profitable than you would have been solo mining, hence unlucky. This is all assuming you only mined after the block halving. Personally, I've found 7 blocks, and have been paid out 468 btc. So I'm well ahead of the game (95% of those stats were earned pre-block halving so my blocks count as 50 btc).
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3 References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:22:06 PM |
|
I found 5 blocks (one before halving) and I was paid out 27 BTC, so I'm sponsoring the pool
|
|
|
|
inevertell
|
|
August 21, 2013, 01:40:39 PM |
|
Doesn't your luck in finding blocks within the pool sort of differ from finding blocks on your own solo-mining? Like ...the blocks you find would probably not be looked at by your miners unless you were within the pool so therefore you probably wouldn't have found those specific blocks... but i guess with that logic, you still have the same chances of finding a block either way. I was on bitminter for 1 week when I found my first block. I'm running 20 gh/s, with pool mining I will basically never get to 25btc. Does this mean that technically I had the same chances of finding that block while solo mining? And if so, does anyone think I could actually find a block using a 20 gh/s, from my understanding its basically a crapshoot or near impossible. Or was my 1 block in 1 week a total anomaly? Just wonderwandering here... So why the big fuzz that i have found a block in my statistics lol?
People also use it to determine their individual luck. If you've found 5 blocks total, and have a total payout of 140 btc then your more profitable than you would be solo mining, hence lucky. However if you have found 5 blocks total but have only been paid out 100 btc, then you're less profitable than you would have been solo mining, hence unlucky. This is all assuming you only mined after the block halving. Personally, I've found 7 blocks, and have been paid out 468 btc. So I'm well ahead of the game (95% of those stats were earned pre-block halving so my blocks count as 50 btc).
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
August 21, 2013, 02:06:21 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure your odds are the same. Pool difficulty is less than the network difficulty, but every time you find a share you are solving the pool problem. The pool just compares your result against the network problem to see if you solved the block.
But just because the odds are the same, doesn't mean you will find a block solo mining after 1 week. There are calculators out there that can tell you based on the difficulty and your ghash how long it SHOULD take you to find a block solo mining, but that doesn't mean that is how it will turn out.
People tend to use pools because they equal steady income over time. Solo mining is more like playing the lottery. But in the long term (years) they should just about equal out.
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3 References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
digital
|
|
August 21, 2013, 02:11:34 PM |
|
This is a good place to check if you're thinking about solo mining... http://www.bitcoinx.com/profit/
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3 References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
August 21, 2013, 04:09:49 PM |
|
But in the long term (years) they should just about equal out.
Just FYI, to equal out over the course of years, you would need a decent amount of speed (50 GH/s+ right now) that continues to grow proportional to overall network speed. Otherwise, you're looking at a time frame of decades/centuries or more :p. Right now, 50 GH/s on average won't even find a block per month, meaning you'll on average see 2-3 difficulty changes between solves. A bad luck round is normally 3-5x expected time frame, which at 50 GH/s [and upgrading each difficulty increase] would be 5-9 months. Extremely bad luck rounds (which do happen) are up to 10x difficulty (and very rarely, even worse). It would likely take you years to recover from that bad round, assuming you continue to increase your hash rate proportional to the network difficulty the entire time. The flip side is, you could end up _way_ ahead with some good luck rounds early on.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
digital
|
|
August 21, 2013, 04:20:23 PM |
|
But in the long term (years) they should just about equal out.
Just FYI, to equal out over the course of years, you would need a decent amount of speed (50 GH/s+ right now) that continues to grow proportional to overall network speed. Otherwise, you're looking at a time frame of decades/centuries or more :p. Right now, 50 GH/s on average won't even find a block per month, meaning you'll on average see 2-3 difficulty changes between solves. A bad luck round is normally 3-5x expected time frame, which at 50 GH/s [and upgrading each difficulty increase] would be 5-9 months. Extremely bad luck rounds (which do happen) are up to 10x difficulty (and very rarely, even worse). It would likely take you years to recover from that bad round, assuming you continue to increase your hash rate proportional to the network difficulty the entire time. Yep. Just more specific. That's all info they can get from the link I provided above. And they can include more variables as well, such as electricity costs, startup costs, etc.
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3 References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
jarhed
|
|
August 21, 2013, 05:58:47 PM |
|
........And if so, does anyone think I could actually find a block using a 20 gh/s, from my understanding its basically a crapshoot or near impossible. Or was my 1 block in 1 week a total anomaly?
Just wonderwandering here...
I was under the impression our jobs as pool miners was to let the pool know which Nonce isn't the right hash? If I want Blocks I'd go solo.
|
|
|
|
|