Joshua.Dan
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 161
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 07:13:02 AM |
|
2) Non standard transactions being propagated by Cryptsy. These transaction are more 100kb in size. By default anoncoin clients do not send out transaction of these size and standard miners do not accept them. Cryptsy has refused to acknowledge that they are doing anything wrong. And then what? Coins will stay in then middle of nowhere forever? Cryptsy said The transaction does not need to be resent as it is a valid transaction. but you told non standard transaction. I thing you should patch anoncoin client asap because when this "non standard transaction" has valid txID and in that case it's a valid and should be send and confirmed. I just got replied from cryptsy. There is an issue with the ANC blockchain where larger withdrawals do not confirm right away. They eventually do confirm but it is out of our control. Our wallet specialist is working with the developers for a fix. If you want your withdrawal to confirm faster the only ones that can help are the ANC developers.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg9191531#msg9191531
This can be evidenced by the links above where I point out the issue with the blockchain and the developers acknowledge that its a problem with the blockchain and not cryptsy.@meeh how to fix that problem? please help.
|
|
|
|
ntrn500
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 07:30:45 AM |
|
...
PS Coin is not dead, it is project in progress. Time will show the results! Delay is what led price back down, and that's all new folks and you who advertise your scam here last day.
By you you mean gnosis and his imaginary deadlines?
|
|
|
|
drAGon925
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 07:37:12 AM |
|
...
PS Coin is not dead, it is project in progress. Time will show the results! Delay is what led price back down, and that's all new folks and you who advertise your scam here last day.
By you you mean gnosis and his imaginary deadlines? No, you saw that 6M/3weeks scams, and gnosis is not a coin. Don't care much of his interests. ANC is bigger than that, for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
btc38
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 08:41:33 AM |
|
Some of our user give us a feedback that their deposit is not credited. Our engineer check those deposit and find there are no record on block chain. So if there are deposit issue, please check block chain first. Please note: Our ANC withdrawal works well. We have also made Proof of Reserve. Total amount of ALL Users:115949.9262 Address of the Cold Storage:AQ4X6FMaSwX4ARenfK1mCTNAfa46TUnCR5 You must login to our website to check above information. BTC38 team
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:05:07 AM |
|
Good News, I finished the front-end for a darknet ANC/BTC exchange. I expect to have something online before the ZC mainnet ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You are part of that pump and dump with your imaginary darknet exchange. A liar covering another one! No doubt
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
ntrn500
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:16:26 AM |
|
I like the new price ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.ctrlv.in%2Fimg%2F14%2F10%2F21%2F5446404f95188.png&t=665&c=L_kH7PALCL7fCQ)
|
|
|
|
DeAlquezar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:19:58 AM |
|
854520% ? Nice Hehe, so I'm fucking millionaire ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Maybe in a few years we will see Anoncoin with that price ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
Arbitrageur
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:21:21 AM |
|
when you try to withdraw from cryptsy it says something about negative balance.. so totally fucked up, this coin can't be moved anywhere.
|
|
|
|
lihao1989311
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:23:26 AM |
|
You just knew it ,it had happened few days.
|
|
|
|
TheKoziTwo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:32:36 AM |
|
is it possible to get a reply on this comment summarizing the reason behind the dump, .. thanks.
its hard to say exactly who dumped the 30k dump at the top was by thekozitwo its hard to say who dumped after the delay announcement, ... You just said that Kozi was part of that pump and dump plan. That's explain why he come to ANC and run out so fast with profit. I'm not part of any pump and dump plan. I discovered anoncoin in march this year so I have been here much longer than you have been on bitcointalk. I have seen all the delays anoncoin has had with the zerocoin implementation. As I stated on IRC I dumped 30k after gnosis announced that there would be 7 days delay. I would have dumped the rest of my coins on the announcement of 3 months further delay, but unfortunately my transaction is still pending for 30h+.
|
|
|
|
JMcGrath
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:42:32 AM |
|
Hello,
I really hope people don't jump all over me for asking this, I see that it has been asked before but I don't see any specific answers...
I recently purchased some ANC over at Cryptsy and tried to withdraw them to another exchange where I keep most of my coins. I have done this in the past without any problems, however all of my withdrawals are confirmed and show a txID but none can be found in the blockchain / explorer.
I see that other people have complained about the same thing and a few people blaming Cryptsy for either running an old version of the ANC client/server, or for sending too large of a transaction at a time (over 100Kb). I have contacted Cryptsy twice about this issue and asked them how long it would take and if it is because of these issues - both times I got a reply blaming it on an issue with ANC and not their fault, but they claim to be working with the developers of ANC. Both times they also directed me to this thread for more info and although I was very active with BTC in the early days, I really don't understand a lot of the technical side of altcoins (or even BTC for that matter).
Again, I hope I don't get bashed for asking this again - I have looked through a LOT of posts and haven't found an answer that helps me yet. Maybe I did and just did not understand the tech side of it?! Now days I am just a trader, and really just looking to get my coins back so I can get back to trading!!
If someone would be kind enough:
1) In lamens terms, what is holding up these transactions?
2) Will the transactions ever actually go through, or are they lost forever?
3) How long of a delay am I looking at to get my ANC in my other wallet? (Hours? Days? Weeks? Longer...??)
Thanks in advance!
I tried asking Cryptsy these same questions and got what looked like an automated response saying they had no timeline when all I was looking for was a rough guess!
FYI - If it helps at all, I have 3 separate txID's in different amounts: one is for 1,800 ANC, another for 240 ANC, and another for 100 ANC.
|
|
|
|
ntrn500
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:47:03 AM |
|
I also tend to suspect that the consecutive delay is fake and this time the team is still on track. Someone trying to get in just before the start of testnet? We'll see.
|
|
|
|
thelibertycap
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:51:23 AM |
|
Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.
Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.
If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.
|
|
|
|
darkota
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 11:53:47 AM |
|
Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.
Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.
If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.
Gnosis has done nothing. The only possible explanation for him giving timelines, and then always postponing them(He said the 15th was tn date, now its postponed to 2-3 months later), is that he's pumping Anoncoin from the news, and dumping right before he postpones the date. It's all a pump and dump game, he hasn't done jack shit about implementing zerocoin.
|
|
|
|
thelibertycap
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 12:04:56 PM |
|
I also tend to suspect that the consecutive delay is fake and this time the team is still on track. Someone trying to get in just before the start of testnet? We'll see.
its like ~1% probability I have though about but why would they do that? if they were serious about the ZC implementation in the first place, they could have acquired cheap coins before announcing the ZC implementation, this coin is quite old. also - why would anybody with a good product make a complete fool and a lier out of himself? If it is just a big charade, it will not succeed because nobody will support such a horrible project So I doubt it. Occam's razor says its just a regular pump and dump - we can only hope they are at least trying to implement the ZC meanwhile fucking everybody in the ass. Btw, what team? You mean the one man programmer show or the team of clowns around?
|
|
|
|
00Smurf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 12:17:44 PM |
|
Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.
Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.
If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.
Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions. This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term.
|
|
|
|
thelibertycap
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 12:33:53 PM |
|
Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.
Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.
If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.
Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions. This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term. Did I forget to mention I am not interested in scams? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0Also, I was interested in zerocoin, not zerocash which needs a trusted setup of the initial parameters - if I understand things correctly - I would certainly trust zerocash more (even if NSA evesdrop) than some shadowcash people who could generate infinite amount of coins.
|
|
|
|
00Smurf
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2014, 12:36:00 PM Last edit: October 21, 2014, 12:49:04 PM by 00Smurf |
|
Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.
Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.
If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.
Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions. This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term. Did I forget to mention I am not interested in scams? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.0Also, I was interested in zerocoin, not zerocash which needs a trusted setup of the initial parameters - if I understand things correctly - I would certainly trust zerocash more (even if NSA evesdrop) than some shadowcash people who could generate infinite amount of coins. So because of that thread you denounce the entire project? Shadows implementation, will be trustless on the initial setup parameters.
|
|
|
|
|