|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
BitcoinForumator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:27:33 AM |
|
That was part of the plan and modifying the plan is something the people in this topic simply can't agree on so I don't think that there is any point in you bringing that up *again* (it has been brought up several times before).
I hope you do realise that CfB is simply proceeding with the plan and ignoring all of this discussion (and personally I think he is making the right choice in doing so).
Hey C-f-B... is there any chance we get BCNext's 3rd plan ahead of schedule?  ...it will make more sense to decide/agree on modifications once we have the full picture... BAM!
|
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:29:36 AM |
|
yes, we need to slightly modify forging algo to prevent this:
.. I don't think that there is any point in you bringing that up *again* - this will solve the problem of one big pool. Fear of one big pool prevent CfB from development of a forging power leasing (with Acc Control). I hope you do realise that CfB is simply proceeding with the plan and ignoring all of this discussion (and personally I think he is making the right choice in doing so).
- no, hi did not: I decided to use my right not to follow BCNext's orders that I don't like (it's allowed by the contract). ... No need to stick to the plan, IMHO. ...
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | , the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
farl4web
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1201
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:30:18 AM |
|
New version of NxtWallet for Mac available: http://nxtra.org/mac/NxtWallet.zipShows blockchain download progress. Tomorrow or monday I will release the same version for windows. It connects to TestNet at first start. you can switch to Main Net via tools menu. I suggest you test everything out in TestNet first as there may be bugs. We need someone to do an audit of the web code. If you want the old interface, simply go to http://localhost:7875 (main net) in the browser when the app is running. My Nxt id is : 8189784314684138350 - thanks for any donations.  Is NxtWallet for the Mac replacing NxtMac for the Mac?
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:31:24 AM |
|
Is NxtWallet for the Mac replacing NxtMac for the Mac?
Soon.
|
|
|
|
KyLins
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:33:10 AM |
|
Hello, I want to test Can I join you
How can I
|
WavesBank:www.wavesbank.com ▄████▄ ▄████████▄ ▄████████████▄ ▄████████████████▄ ████████████████████ ▄█▄ ▄███▄ ▄███▄ ▄████████████████▀ ▄██████████ ▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██ ▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██████████████▄ ████████████████████████████ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀█▀ ██ ▀████████████████████████▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ▄█▄ ▀██▄ ▄██▀ ██ ▀████████████████████▀ ▀███▀ ▀███▀ ▀█▀ ▀███▀ ▄███████████████████████████████████▀ ▀████████████████▀ ▀████████████▀ ▀████████▀ ▀████▀
| ║║ ║█ ║█ ║║ | .
| .
║║ ██ ║║
| .
| .
║║ ██ ║║
| .
| ║║ █║ █║ ║║ | |
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1030
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:34:32 AM |
|
no, hi did not:
You missed his later post where he stated that the Instant Transactions *needs* TF and was proceeding to implement TF as per the plan.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:37:29 AM |
|
Hey C-f-B... is there any chance we get BCNext's 3rd plan ahead of schedule?  ...it will make more sense to decide/agree on modifications once we have the full picture... Ask him directly. Salsacz knows his real account.
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:37:37 AM Last edit: March 10, 2014, 10:34:10 AM by 2Kool4Skewl |
|
yes, we need to slightly modify forging algo to prevent this:
That was part of the plan and modifying the plan is something the people in this topic simply can't agree on so I don't think that there is any point in you bringing that up *again* (it has been brought up several times before). I hope you do realise that CfB is simply proceeding with the plan and ignoring all of this discussion (and personally I think he is making the right choice in doing so). I'm glad Come-from-Beyond is proceeding with the plan. Maybe in the future, suggestions can be proposed and voted on using Nxt's voting system. 1 Nxt = 1 Vote. Those that have the most to gain or lose have the greatest say. I'd like to see more NXT projects listed on CIYAM's project management system.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:39:41 AM |
|
1 Nxt = 1 Vote.
Let's discuss this. 
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:39:55 AM |
|
Wikipedia.org update!Hey guys, after quite long time I finished creating new english version of Nxt wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NXT (it's always better to do something instead of chatting about it) We have a very nice german version, but you cannot simply translate the text - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nxt - you need to use new citations in used language. So it also means this article cannot be translated into languages where are missing published articles in that particular language. I think now it needs only some grammar corrections and more wiki links and it should finally work. 22 citations could be enough 
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:42:38 AM |
|
1 Nxt = 1 Vote.
Let's discuss this.  lol Let's vote on it.
|
|
|
|
Meizirkki
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:47:44 AM Last edit: March 10, 2014, 10:27:56 AM by Meizirkki |
|
New version of NxtWallet for Mac available: http://nxtra.org/mac/NxtWallet.zipShows blockchain download progress. Tomorrow or monday I will release the same version for windows. It connects to TestNet at first start. you can switch to Main Net via tools menu. I suggest you test everything out in TestNet first as there may be bugs. We need someone to do an audit of the web code. If you want the old interface, simply go to http://localhost:7875 (main net) in the browser when the app is running. My Nxt id is : 8189784314684138350 - thanks for any donations.  So much awesome. Tho I can't seem to get to the main net no matter what :/EDIT: I switched back to testnet and back. All good.
|
|
|
|
Meizirkki
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:50:18 AM |
|
Somebody send me textnxt? 15351855062256613553
|
|
|
|
marcus03
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:50:37 AM |
|
Hey C-f-B... is there any chance we get BCNext's 3rd plan ahead of schedule?  ...it will make more sense to decide/agree on modifications once we have the full picture... Ask him directly. Salsacz knows his real account. +1 My impression is that the original time frame holds us back.
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:51:37 AM |
|
what do you think of the idea of having parallel chains that draw security from the price of NXT on the main chain.
One of the reasons for wanting parallel chains is to address the "initial distribution problem" that has lead to clones. So although it could be something a parallel chain could do I would not at all want that to be mandatory (in fact the parallel chain should be able to use PoW rather than PoS if it likes). oh sure. i agree there. choice is always a good thing. let the market decide. im just imagining a future where we have thousands of DAC's, each one needing its own dedicated chain, it would be nice if security could be a function of the value of all chains combined rather than relying on the security provided by their own chain in isolation. Something like Bitshares?
|
|
|
|
marcus03
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:52:11 AM |
|
1 Nxt = 1 Vote.
Let's discuss this.  As long as it doesn't worsen the greenhouse effect, I'm in...
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:55:12 AM |
|
The reason we keep discussing things and never come to a final decision is because we don't have any deadlines.
The development committee needs to set deadlines on when certain decisions need to be finalized. Then we can all discuss the proposed suggestions and come to a final decision.
Finishing TF to ensure a high tx rate on the primary NXT blockchain needs to be done. Thank you Come-from-Beyond for doing this and proceeding with BCNext's plan.
|
|
|
|
Fatih87SK
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 09:59:39 AM |
|
The reason we keep discussing things and never come to a final decision is because we don't have any deadlines.
The development committee needs to set deadlines on when certain decisions need to be finalized. Then we can all discuss the proposed suggestions and come to a final decision.
Finishing TF to ensure a high tx rate on the primary NXT blockchain needs to be done. Thank you Come-from-Beyond for doing this and proceeding with BCNext's plan.
Good point. Maybe that's why we asked a deadline for the Asset Exchange because we feel the same. If there is anyone daring to set a deadline; nxtcountdown.com is waiting 
|
|
|
|
2Kool4Skewl (OP)
|
 |
March 10, 2014, 10:00:38 AM |
|
what do you think of the idea of having parallel chains that draw security from the price of NXT on the main chain.
One of the reasons for wanting parallel chains is to address the "initial distribution problem" that has lead to clones. So although it could be something a parallel chain could do I would not at all want that to be mandatory (in fact the parallel chain should be able to use PoW rather than PoS if it likes). oh sure. i agree there. choice is always a good thing. let the market decide. im just imagining a future where we have thousands of DAC's, each one needing its own dedicated chain, it would be nice if security could be a function of the value of all chains combined rather than relying on the security provided by their own chain in isolation. Something like Bitshares? DACs have to do with Automated Transactions (AT). I believe Ian is referring to parallel blockchains where the currency is distributed in a PoW manner. Come-from-Beyond was talking about releasing his own PoW currency on a parallel blockchain a while back.
|
|
|
|
|