Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2024, 11:55:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 [2156] 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761621 times)
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:20:44 PM
 #43101

Many thanks guys, I'm on it!
BrianNowhere
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 04:26:16 PM
 #43102

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.

NXT: 4957831430947123625
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:26:29 PM
 #43103

l8orre,

Thank you for responding.  That Android client is a gem and  yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now.  All it really needs is GUI  re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet.  But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:27:56 PM
 #43104

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.

I think spam protection is the reason. Spam protection for Nxt is not solved yet, so the fees are in place.
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:32:11 PM
 #43105

l8orre,

Thank you for responding.  That Android client is a gem and  yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now.  All it really needs is GUI  re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet.  But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.

No reason my HTML client couldn't be converted to android / iphone app down the road too. More options Smiley
bitcoinrocks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:36:21 PM
 #43106

Could someone help me out?

I tried to withdraw from DGEX and they emailed me with:

"As your IP and withdrawal address have changed, we need to verify the ownership of your DGEX account to mitigate hacking cases. Could you please send the NXT account token from one of the following addresses:"

What exactly do I need to do?  How do I "send the NXT account token"?

Click that little key icon next to the lock in NRS...  then input whatever text you like as the website and generate a token.

Send the token to dgex and tell them what you typed in the website field...  they will decode it and see that you are in control of the account...  just make sure you do it from one of the accounts that was in their email.

Wait a sec.  The two account numbers in the email from DGEX aren't mine.  This is my first DGEX withdrawal and I've only ever deposited BTC there before.  What's going on?
msin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1006


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:39:36 PM
 #43107

Someone should take the lead in launching Parallel Blockchain (NXG)  CFB has offered his expertise and help in doing this and it will benefit development of several current projects; NxtCash, X-Chain Transactions, etc...  I don't have the technical know how, but would suggest ChuckOne, Chanc3r, Zahlen.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg5600243#msg5600243

Also, please register at CIYAM.org to follow AT progress and give your input.
l8orre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:40:37 PM
 #43108

l8orre,

Thank you for responding.  That Android client is a gem and  yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now.  All it really needs is GUI  re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet.  But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.



Hey NxtMinnow - gotta run, fetch my wife from the train - I'll PM you later,
Cheers,
l8orre




bidji29
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 04:45:20 PM
 #43109

Wait a sec.  The two account numbers in the email from DGEX aren't mine.  This is my first DGEX withdrawal and I've only ever deposited BTC there before.  What's going on?

Seems like your account got hacked.
Fortunately, DGEX stopped them with their verification system.

You should say to them that those account are not yours, and change your password

http://www.freebieservers.com/  100% FREE GAME SERVERS
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 04:50:52 PM
 #43110

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.
This is why we need to go to .01 NXT, at that price it probably wont be much of an issue. Also, this is why I think overall forging revenues will go UP when we reduce the min tx fee. Elasticity of demand based on price

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
zorke
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:00:02 PM
 #43111

Wait a sec.  The two account numbers in the email from DGEX aren't mine.  This is my first DGEX withdrawal and I've only ever deposited BTC there before.  What's going on?

Seems like your account got hacked.
Fortunately, DGEX stopped them with their verification system.

You should say to them that those account are not yours, and change your password

Yes do this ASAP!
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:00:08 PM
 #43112

To wesleyh and/or Come-From-Beyond (most likely the latter)

just my .5 nxt but In my most humble opinion, charging a fee for placing a buy or sell order has the
strong potential to be a deal breaker for many many people who trade.

No other exchange charges a fee for placing an order that may or may not go through and it's common practice for people to use buy and sell orders strategically, such as whales and their psychological maneuver using the order book to intimidate or elicit a hoped for buy or sell reaction. Sure whales can afford the fee but for many this will be a matter of principle and they'll go elsewhere.

Even regular people might put in a somewhat ridiculous limit order, just in case there's a quick spike in price. When the gambit doesn't work and the price moves even further away, you cancel the order. People are going to be pissed getting charged a fee for that.

These kinds of behaviors are important to people who trade.

Also, Ripple (a main competitor) has no fee (or an infinitesimal one) for trading even when the order goes through.

Any way to either eliminate the fee for trades, make them very very tiny (similar to Ripple) or at the very least only
charge the fee when the order goes through?

I am really hoping that this is considered and that it's not another thing that's "impossible" with NXT infrastructure.

If i am not wrong, the fee is small and it is for anti-spam purpose. Blockchain is not like centralized database and it can not be very big. It is a trade off.
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:04:15 PM
 #43113

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.

?
NxtMinnow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:04:26 PM
 #43114

You can review the info here https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,797.0.html

I have had a rock solid experience (zero Force Closes) using this client.  You can select which node you want to use and watch any account.  I think at the end of the day, you are trusting the node you specify to connect to that is running Nxt NRS.  I do not know if SSL is used for the connection to the specified Nxt NRS node, but it should be if it isn't!  At the end of the day; if you are running a light client, you still have to trust someone in your network.  Obviously local signing is preferable to remove that need to trust someone in your network.

l8orre,

Thank you for responding.  That Android client is a gem and  yeuye000 released the source code to the community.

That Android client needs to be developed ASAP for Nxt to maximize it's potential.

I mean, right now.  All it really needs is GUI  re-skinned and re-colored and 1 spelling error fixed;
And the code reviewed / updated / security review.

I'm no coder yet.  But I do know my way around computers and networks.

I need a coder's interest to help with that Android client and I can help support the project and put together a proposal for Nxt Infrastructure Committee.

A functional good looking android client would be huge. How does this client actually work? Since we have no local signing yet, I wonder how the client works securely.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 05:07:22 PM
 #43115

Can someone really pound on nodeminer? I was expecting some bugs, a server crash, something.
Maybe I offer some bounty for bugs, but it is so young, it shouldnt be hard to find bugs.
Free nodecoins if you can hack the "mining" algo

James

https://github.com/jl777/multigateway

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:09:09 PM
 #43116

Someone should take the lead in launching Parallel Blockchain (NXG)  CFB has offered his expertise and help in doing this and it will benefit development of several current projects; NxtCash, X-Chain Transactions, etc...  I don't have the technical know how, but would suggest ChuckOne, Chanc3r, Zahlen.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg5600243#msg5600243

Also, please register at CIYAM.org to follow AT progress and give your input.

FYI:
I asked Ian a question about his site (CIYAM.org). here is Q and A:

Q: Your site (ciyam.org) has been contently crashed and users are not able to either log in or introduce themselves. It seems that the traffic suddenly become too big to handle by the site.


A: There is a bug that I will fix tomorrow that has caused the problem - it is nothing to do with traffic.

The problem is having a user name with spaces (I thought I'd already fixed it but it seems I missed a spot).
barbierir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 515
Merit: 502



View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 05:11:46 PM
 #43117

FORUMS.NXTCRYPTO.ORG users:

Adminius over there is btc24 here.  Seems to have just completely vanished, hit by a bus, something, whatever.  Last login on either site was end of January.  Not responding to any of my PMs on either site.  Im not sure as to how long his equipment is paid up for - what happens if 1 day its just shut off?  So do we wait for that day or do we try to do something now?

This extended absence coupled with the fact that we still have no email password recovery coupled with the fact that we still experience unknown reasons for logouts gives me reason to post here and ask the community what are the thoughts?  I will post this on the forums as a vote.
https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=865

If we want to migrate elsewhere, does anyone have any forums hosting they know we can use?  I can change the DNS A record for forums.nxtcrypto.org to be whatever IP address whenever it needs to change.

Community vote.  Or maybe btc24 comes back.

This forum is already functional and quite active:
https://nextcoin.org/index.php

◈▣ KOMODO ● Set Your Ideas Free ▣◈
.......AN ECOSYSTEM FOR NATIVE BLOCKCHAINS.......
Blockchain Generator | Decentralized Crowdfunding | Decentralized Exchange | Bitcoin Security | Zero-Knowledge Proofs | Blockchain Interoperability | Scalable Infrastructure
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:12:16 PM
 #43118

I'm waiting for an official sanctioned way by CFB on how to do local signing of transactions.

BCNext was delaying local signing to force ppl to install full nodes. I think we shouldn't wait longer and am going to implement prepareTransaction right after we launch Asset Exchange.

CfB, whats up with that?
rdanneskjoldr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:37:32 PM
 #43119

@wesleyh

Is there no kind of notification,for when users receive a message,or are transferred an asset,and those kind of things?
I miss a notifications tab.
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 05:40:18 PM
 #43120

*tumble weed rolls by*

I loled.
Pages: « 1 ... 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 [2156] 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!