Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2021, 03:04:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 [2132] 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 ... 2559 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2760946 times)
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 01:55:57 PM
 #42621


THIS IS  ANOTHER REASON WHY WE HAVE LOST FOCUS!

Lock this thread and let's move to a new forum.

If we have a debate for something the whole thread get's derailed and you have the impression that NXT project is chaotic etc.

Having specialized topics like TF, Instant TXs, AT, AE etc will help a lot both progress and get rid of this feeling that progress is stalled, situation is fuzzy etc. that puts us in a negative feedback loop!


I agree with you.....I have realized the cons of staying on this thread now greatly exceed the benefits.


Hopefully once the committees are set up and run they will set up different threads/forums for each committees and the projects will be managed better. It maybe be a a good idea that each project will have a coordinator in each committee to a kind follow and assist it closely.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1621220665
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1621220665

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1621220665
Reply with quote  #2

1621220665
Report to moderator
1621220665
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1621220665

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1621220665
Reply with quote  #2

1621220665
Report to moderator
1621220665
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1621220665

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1621220665
Reply with quote  #2

1621220665
Report to moderator
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:06:49 PM
 #42622

Is it correct ?
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=10388

I think this short wallet number.

No, it isn't , the account with the shortest number is :


http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=1


opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:07:14 PM
 #42623

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)
opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:08:15 PM
 #42624

I'm not sure of the exact balances - but yes I do think they were "set aside" and will stay there no matter what happens "with the price".

When you look into the design of TF it certainly favours larger accounts and I don't think that was "by accident".

But the bias is very small, right?  I mean, extremely minute, right, by like .0001 or something like that, right?  At least this is how I understand it from the other thread where this was discussed.
starik69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:08:36 PM
 #42625

Is it correct ?
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=10388

I think this short wallet number.

No, it isn't , the account with the shortest number is :


http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=1



And the lowest account number is
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=0
Smiley
opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:13:47 PM
 #42626

Im glad to see TF fully coming to fruition soon.  Though to realize its 100% full potential will require all the forgers to begin to lease forging power to accounts that TF forge on public nodes that publish IP address.  Otherwise then when its time for an account to forge a block that is not participating with a published IP address for TF, then it cannot receive direct transactions from clients - clients will have to rely on the current broadcast mechanism for their transactions.

And I really wish we could limit effectiveBalance.  Not to punish the whales, since they can just lease out their power to different pools.  But to actually force a measure of distribution out there.

FTR, Im planning on running a forging account on of the nxtcrypto.org VPSs.  I will beef up its CPU/mem, and will see about getting some DDoS protection built in.  Will have to shut down API/User interfaces and just leave P2P port open.  I will create a vanity account with a very short acct# (currently looking for an 8 digit account, may have to use a 9 digit one) and it will forge with only 1 NXT and everyone can lease out their effectiveBalances to it.  Hopefully the other VPS admins out there will do the same thing.  Ill work on a HA system for a pair of VPSs that can work together and each can forge with the account if the other is having issues.  So hopefully will have a very high uptime % figure.
coloredcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 101


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:17:06 PM
 #42627

Is it correct ?
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=10388

I think this short wallet number.

No, it isn't , the account with the shortest number is :


http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=1



another

http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=2
CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1004


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2014, 02:20:41 PM
 #42628

But the bias is very small, right?  I mean, extremely minute, right, by like .0001 or something like that, right?  At least this is how I understand it from the other thread where this was discussed.

I thought it was higher than that - but I don't have any exact figures (maybe check with the math guy on that).

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
redsn0w
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:21:10 PM
 #42629

Did you want some TestNxt ?

Please send some to me, if you haven't already.

TestNXT to 2299216276842660095 please.

Sent 15K TestNxt , enjoy it Wink.
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:22:50 PM
 #42630

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)

Here's my new logic for my client http://nxtra.org/nxt-client (to be available later today, not yet uploaded)

Start page:



When clicking on the "not registered" link:

(first image is only necessary in older browsers, the newest browsers have cryptographically random numbers built in)



Secret phrase is auto generated



User is required to re-type the secret phrase



The user can still choose his own password too...



If you log in with an insecure password, you get a warning



Thoughts?
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:23:32 PM
 #42631

But the bias is very small, right?  I mean, extremely minute, right, by like .0001 or something like that, right?  At least this is how I understand it from the other thread where this was discussed.

Bias depends on BaseTarget. At some point we'll have to set it in stone and this will define the bias.
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:35:41 PM
 #42632


Here's my new logic for my client http://nxtra.org/nxt-client (to be available later today, not yet uploaded)



This is absolutely great!

- Change "register" to "create" (Not an Account yet? Create one)
- order and capitalization matters

edit: In the future, I would like to see an option for storing the passphrase in a wallet file.
Fatih87SK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:36:49 PM
 #42633

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)

Thoughts?


Are those 12 words that will be generated safe enough? Because I see no capitals and no #&(*&!#* or something.

bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:38:34 PM
 #42634

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)

Thoughts?


Are those 12 words that will be generated safe enough? Because I see no capitals and no #&(*&!#* or something.

Depends on the size of the dictionary. Wesleyh?
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:38:50 PM
 #42635


Here's my new logic for my client http://nxtra.org/nxt-client (to be available later today, not yet uploaded)



This is absolutely great!

- Change "register" to "create" (Not an Account yet? Create one)
- order and capitalization matters

edit: In the future, I would like to see an option for storing the passphrase in a wallet file.

Example of where order and capitalization is wrong?

Wallet.dat may be done in the future.
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:39:02 PM
 #42636

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)

Thoughts?


Are those 12 words that will be generated safe enough? Because I see no capitals and no #&(*&!#* or something.

Depends on the size of the dictionary. Wesleyh?

electrum database. (1626 words)

Larger diceware database could also be used.. if that's what the people want.
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:41:13 PM
 #42637


Here's my new logic for my client http://nxtra.org/nxt-client (to be available later today, not yet uploaded)



This is absolutely great!

- Change "register" to "create" (Not an Account yet? Create one)
- order and capitalization matters

edit: In the future, I would like to see an option for storing the passphrase in a wallet file.

Example of where order and capitalization is wrong?

Wallet.dat may be done in the future.

Wink I meant: "their order and capitalization matters

bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:41:54 PM
 #42638

electrum database. (1626 words)

Perfect.
Eadeqa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:45:29 PM
 #42639

I bring forward a motion for Jean-Luc to modify the NRS client to check string length of the passphrase and reject it if less than 15 characters AND it has zero transactions. (dont want to lock out any people that do have NXT with a 15 char password)

Here's my new logic for my client http://nxtra.org/nxt-client (to be available later today, not yet uploaded)

Start page:



Can we get only "Login" and "Register" links here without the field  to enter any random password as first option?

After clicking "Login" then the user will be able to enter the old password.

Also, I think if the user chooses his own password, 35 is way too long.  Maybe drop that to 25



NXT-GZYP-FMRT-FQ9K-3YQGS
https://nxtforum.org
cc001
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 10, 2014, 02:46:17 PM
 #42640

electrum database. (1626 words)

Perfect.

hm, I'm not sure if that is perfect...
35 random characters (let's say from 50 different characters, numbers and signs) gives 10^59 possibilities.
12 words (or characters) out of 1626 are "only" 10^38 possibilites...

▀▀▀▀▀▀     BRIDGEX NETWORK  │ LEND · BORROW · CONVERT · SEND    ▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄▄▄         Whitepaper       Telegram       Twitter       Medium       Facebook       LinkedIn          ▄▄▄▄
Pages: « 1 ... 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 [2132] 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 ... 2559 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!