Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 02:58:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 [2150] 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761537 times)
Silmarils
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:09:41 AM
 #42981

Can somebody send me some testnxt?

13833580105988652617

Thanks in advance
Daedelus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:10:37 AM
Last edit: March 11, 2014, 10:23:03 AM by Daedelus
 #42982



I think the second one is best, it is explicit.

For "Includes fee", as a beginner you may not have picked up what the fee is so you don't have clarity on what you are actually paying. Plus the fee will change in the future so it will always be clear if you msis the announcement of the fee change.

Or just this?

[image removed]

Yes, I think this is what I said while we were typing Smiley

Maybe change the word "total" to make clear that only 1 nxt will come of of the account until the assests are actually sold. Some may think that as they are *selling* they will get the 1000 and 1 nxt immediately and not realise what they are actually doing is *putting them up for sale*.

(Drifted into Ciyam's style for a second there, I don't know what came over me)

wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:12:14 AM
 #42983



I think the second one is best, it is explicit.

For "Includes fee", as a beginner you may not have picked up what the fee is so you don't have clarity on what you are actually paying. Plus the fee will change in the future so it will always be clear if you msis the announcement of the fee change.

Or just this?



Yes, I think this is what I said while we were typing Smiley

Maybe change the word "total" to make clear that only 1 nxt will come of of the account until the assests are actually sold. Some may think that as they are *selling* they will get the 1000 and 1 nxt immediately and not realise what they are actually doing is *putting them up for sale*.

(Drifted into Ciyam's style for a second there, I don't know what came over me)



To what?

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE SOLD)

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE BOUGHT)

? anything better (shorter)?
Daedelus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:22:23 AM
 #42984




I think the second one is best, it is explicit.

For "Includes fee", as a beginner you may not have picked up what the fee is so you don't have clarity on what you are actually paying. Plus the fee will change in the future so it will always be clear if you msis the announcement of the fee change.

Or just this?

[image removed]

Yes, I think this is what I said while we were typing Smiley

Maybe change the word "total" to make clear that only 1 nxt will come of of the account until the assests are actually sold. Some may think that as they are *selling* they will get the 1000 and 1 nxt immediately and not realise what they are actually doing is *putting them up for sale*.

(Drifted into Ciyam's style for a second there, I don't know what came over me)



To what?

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE SOLD)

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE BOUGHT)

? anything better (shorter)?

Maybe add a tiny question mark icon to hover over to give more explanation for me and Kodtycoon  Grin. Then it won't clutter your nice interface too much.

Otherwise:

Sum when sold
Sum of sales completed
...

Nothing works that well..
Daedelus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:30:18 AM
 #42985




I think the second one is best, it is explicit.

For "Includes fee", as a beginner you may not have picked up what the fee is so you don't have clarity on what you are actually paying. Plus the fee will change in the future so it will always be clear if you msis the announcement of the fee change.

Or just this?

[image removed]

Yes, I think this is what I said while we were typing Smiley

Maybe change the word "total" to make clear that only 1 nxt will come of of the account until the assests are actually sold. Some may think that as they are *selling* they will get the 1000 and 1 nxt immediately and not realise what they are actually doing is *putting them up for sale*.

(Drifted into Ciyam's style for a second there, I don't know what came over me)



To what?

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE SOLD)

TOTAL VALUE (ONCE BOUGHT)

? anything better (shorter)?

Maybe add a tiny question mark icon to hover over to give more explanation for me and Kodtycoon  Grin. Then it won't clutter your nice interface too much.

Otherwise:

Sum when sold
Sum of sales completed
...

Nothing works that well..


Why not...

"
Total
100 NXT once all assets have sold
"

You have a string of text for the first option so it wouldn't hurt to do the same here, IMO.
mcjavar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:39:00 AM
 #42986

I've completed the 1st draft of my article about forging from a probabilistic point of view: http://www.docdroid.net/9yub/forging.pdf.html

Comments, suggestions, (and donations Wink) are welcome!

Please, discuss it here: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=836 (or send me a PM). Unfortunately, I won't be able to follow this thread in the next few days.


e.g., if  an  account  has  more  than,  say,  300K  NXT,then it forges as if it had exactly 300K NXT

Are you planning to run the math for the optimal forging limit figure?


Edit:  Are we looking at something like...  Optimal Forging Limit == 333,333,333 / Total Number of Nxt Accounts

Or are we looking at something like...  Optimal Forging Limit == [(Total Amount of NXT Forging)/3] / Total Number of Nxt Accounts


Caught this by the way...

(corresondingly correspondingly, at least 1=2 in the case of Exp-algorithm)


Really glad Nxt has you on board!    Smiley

This should be added to the whitepaper. Can someone do it?
w4llace
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:41:25 AM
 #42987

Is testnet down? I cannot connect with Wesleyh client.

Works for me. Error? Which browser?

I can register a new acc, but can't log in.
It says "Could not connect."

Chrome, btw.

No errors here in chrome.. weird.. Right click, inspect element anywhere on the page and choose "console" tab. Any errors in there?

Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT http://node9.mynxtcoin.org:6876/nxt?requestType=getTime&random=0.25611720932647586
Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT http://node9.mynxtcoin.org:6876/nxt?requestType=getAccountId
Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT http://node9.mynxtcoin.org:6876/nxt?requestType=getState&random=0.6319412882439792


This could be an failure on my side. Can't connect via Marcus' NXTsolaris to any node for days...

When you click on the above links manually, do they load? If not, then yes it's on your side. Perhaps it's blocking access to port 6876?

Yah, can't connect to the links above. But inside my router and my modem I can't find any port blocking!?
chanc3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 253



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:42:29 AM
 #42988


There is a display of nodecoins earned, paid out, etc. It would be nice if half a dozen testers could just run in in a console window. Need to make sure the client/server networking is stable.

James

Put it on all 4 testnxt nodes let me know if it causes a problem...

chanc3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 253



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:49:28 AM
 #42989

can parallel chains be 1min blocks and 1s, 5s, or 10s out of sync so every 1s, 5s, or 10s one chain is forging?

Not sure.

If the block time is 60s,.... what defines when in a minute the 60s starts and can this be adjusted per chain perhaps?

Ian

CIYAM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1078


Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 10:55:52 AM
 #42990

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.

With CIYAM anyone can create 100% generated C++ web applications in literally minutes.

GPG Public Key | 1ciyam3htJit1feGa26p2wQ4aw6KFTejU
salsacz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 504


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 10:59:45 AM
 #42991

I've completed the 1st draft of my article about forging from a probabilistic point of view: http://www.docdroid.net/9yub/forging.pdf.html

Comments, suggestions, (and donations Wink) are welcome!

Please, discuss it here: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=836 (or send me a PM). Unfortunately, I won't be able to follow this thread in the next few days.


e.g., if  an  account  has  more  than,  say,  300K  NXT,then it forges as if it had exactly 300K NXT

Are you planning to run the math for the optimal forging limit figure?


Edit:  Are we looking at something like...  Optimal Forging Limit == 333,333,333 / Total Number of Nxt Accounts

Or are we looking at something like...  Optimal Forging Limit == [(Total Amount of NXT Forging)/3] / Total Number of Nxt Accounts


Caught this by the way...

(corresondingly correspondingly, at least 1=2 in the case of Exp-algorithm)


Really glad Nxt has you on board!    Smiley

This should be added to the whitepaper. Can someone do it?
I published there a link to the full paper and some conclusions Smiley
mcjavar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:02:48 AM
 #42992

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.


What the hell?
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:03:47 AM
 #42993

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.


 Shocked

This is sad.
mcjavar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:05:09 AM
 #42994

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.


 Shocked

This is sad.

No, this is a fucking big loss for Nxt.
I don´t know what happened, but would like to have this clarified.

And would like CIYAM to stay and help us.
Daedelus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:05:17 AM
 #42995

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.


I am sure the community would like the software to be engineered for its long term success and devs can be influenced by the community. This is out of the blue to me so can we not come to some understanding on this?

Won't you reconsider? Or at least give us some background that we might have a chance to fix this?
l8orre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:08:15 AM
 #42996

Just to let you guys know that I will be "unwatching" the topic shortly.

It has certainly been an interesting ride but it has been made clear to me that "software engineering" is not wanted by those writing the software and therefore I feel that I have nothing more to contribute.

I wish you guys all the best.


I am sure the community would like the software to be engineered for its long term success and devs can be influenced by the community. This is out of the blue to me so can we not come to some understanding on this?

Won't you reconsider? Or at least give us some background that we might have a chance to fix this?

TechDevFund and InfraStructureFund would be the places to start with proper project management - why not start with those two committees?

Of course this monster thread is monstrously unsuited for project management!

bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:09:34 AM
 #42997

He only leaves this monster topic.
Fatih87SK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:13:57 AM
 #42998

He only leaves this monster topic.

I hope it is what you think.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:22:43 AM
 #42999

@ Native English people

Guys, I'm working on Digital Goods Store and need few words/phrases/terms for the following:

- To place goods for sale
- Opposite to above (when u cancel selling this goods)
- A comment that is left by a customer when they r (not) satisfied with the quality of purchased goods
- A tag that is used to describe goods to make it easier to find them (like "game", "online", "mmorpg" for online game codes)
- A process of send goods to buyers (actually it's publishing encrypted text on the blockchain)
bitcoinpaul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:26:29 AM
 #43000

@ Native English people

Guys, I'm working on Digital Goods Store and need few words/phrases/terms for the following:

- To place goods for sale
- Opposite to above (when u cancel selling this goods)
- A comment that is left by a customer when they r (not) satisfied with the quality of purchased goods
- A tag that is used to describe goods to make it easier to find them (like "game", "online", "mmorpg" for online game codes)
- A process of send goods to buyers (actually it's publishing encrypted text on the blockchain)

nice Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 [2150] 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!