NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information

[ChuckOne]

Saddam didn't approve global warming.

srs bsns.

[MyZhre]

+1
sorry ricky, i think james got a better point. he is thinking the bigger picture. we should not limit nxt.

+1, james please don't shutdown, 

[wakasaki808]

James just do your thing. Many people support your ideas. Do what you want to do and don't let people get in your way.

[igmaca]

NXT will always be needed to create an entry into the public ledger as a transaction fee, and should gain in value as more uses are created.  (And IMHO, fees should be kept exceptionally low to encourage widespread adoption and use -- money flows to efficiency).

wise words!!

[Fatih87SK]

I think we should vote again about how much fee NXT should have. Because we know much more today, than we did last month during the poll about Fees.

Or would this disturb the development of NXT? If yes, then I said nothing.

[bitcoinpaul]

He said the v-word.
He said the f-word.

Right now fee is not a real incentive to forge and run a node. Let's keep it this way and lower it to .01 for smooth AE trading.

[igmaca]

I think we should vote again about how much fee NXT should have. Because we know much more today, than we did last month during the poll about Fees.

Or would this disturb the development of NXT? If yes, then I said nothing.

fee upgrade must be dynamic and automatic

[Daedelus]

I think we should vote again about how much fee NXT should have. Because we know much more today, than we did last month during the poll about Fees.

Or would this disturb the development of NXT? If yes, then I said nothing.

fee upgrade must be dynamic and automatic

OpC has been banging his head against the wall with this being related to the size of the transaction (CfB agrees as it also solves a technical problem of spam prevention (it is in his posts from when this was discussed a while back)).

Igmaca has suggested ammendments to OpC.


These two points are where the discussion should continue from, I don't think we need a poll as there appears to be at least one technical solution.

[bitcoinpaul]

Poll doesn't make sense and is a waste of time.

[Fatih87SK]

Poll doesn't make sense and is a waste of time.

Alright 

[igmaca]

I think we should vote again about how much fee NXT should have. Because we know much more today, than we did last month during the poll about Fees.

Or would this disturb the development of NXT? If yes, then I said nothing.

fee upgrade must be dynamic and automatic

OpC has been banging his head against the wall with this being related to the size of the transaction (CfB agrees as it also solves a technical problem of spam prevention (it is in his posts from when this was discussed a while back)).

Igmaca has suggested ammendments to OpC.


These two points are where the discussion should continue from, I don't think we need a poll as there appears to be at least one technical solution.

Here there are a proposal

https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,4474.0.html
https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=882

[okaynow]

I don't think we need a poll

i've been following this thread since december, the fee discussion was debated so many times so far, that i believe this should be left to the dev team to decide. There are a few subjects that seem to derail the conversation completely.
I feel that, like daedalus said, since there appears at least one technical solution the tech guys could settle this for us.
Just a sardines' opinion.

[jsgayo]

it's working

[igmaca]

I don't think we need a poll

i've been following this thread since december, the fee discussion was debated so many times so far, that i believe this should be left to the dev team to decide. There are a few subjects that seem to derail the conversation completely.
I feel that, like daedalus said, since there appears at least one technical solution the tech guys could settle this for us.
Just a sardines' opinion.

is what I did yesterday. I send a proposal to the dev team decides to

[bitcoinpaul]

focus an the people that have full faith in your abilities an forget about the rest...

I think this advise is bad.

James should do what he thinks is right, but ignoring skeptics and opinions is wrong. "Yeah, just do your thing. Because you are god and always right"

[Meizirkki]

Any updates on wesleys client? When shall it replace NRS?

The NxtWallet for OSX was so brilliantly easy and user-friendly to install and use I could see anyone using it.

IMHO improving the user experience should be a top priority at this point.

[wesleyh]

Any updates on wesleys client? When shall it replace NRS?

The NxtWallet for OSX was so brilliantly easy and user-friendly to install and use I could see anyone using it.

IMHO improving the user experience should be a top priority at this point.

I will release an update today if all goes well and it should be included in one of the next versions of NRS too. Jean luc decides when.

[verymuchso]

What is the logic behind allowing multiple assets with the same name?
How are client developers supposed to deal with this?

Assets have a unique identifying ID. There's really not much reason to restrict to unique names. I have proposed a way to for asset issuers to assign themselves company names, attach images, etc.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FsyumJLmQ9ckLNkHlmW1oPRGOoK3oAg_pVjFz3s0fNw/edit#slide=id.g1ce2334a0_00
With tags and sorting, I think the AE will be rather organized.
Pandaisftw

Wow, you have put a lot of work into that. Is there any consensus on this is this being implemented? I was thinking of a similar scheme which (obviously) I think is better Is this being implemented in the reference client?

[rickyjames]

James, I am not going to question or even comment further on any of your ideas.  It seems to me that every time I do, you take it as distracting  neanderthal personal attack and threaten to quit NXT development because both your work and your vision for NXT is so unappreciated.  This is never my intention.  I have only intended to initiate respectful, honest debate on critically important topics.

I do not believe it is appropriate that you have someone you apparently consider to be an ongoing adversary to serve as a treasurer for the funds you control.  Please identify whom you trust to serve in this role and upon their concurrence I will deliver to them passcodes to NXTcommunityfunds, NXTcashoperatingfund and NXTcashcompletionfund.

Best wishes to you and to NXT.

[rickyjames]

James, I am not going to question or even comment further on any of your ideas.  It seems to me that every time I do, you take it as distracting  neanderthal personal attack and threaten to quit NXT development because both your work and your vision for NXT is so unappreciated.  This is never my intention.  I have only intended to initiate respectful, honest debate on critically important topics.

I do not believe it is appropriate that you have someone you apparently consider to be an ongoing adversary to serve as a treasurer for the funds you control.  Please identify whom you trust to serve in this role and upon their concurrence I will deliver to them passcodes to NXTcommunityfunds, NXTcashoperatingfund and NXTcashcompletionfund.

Best wishes to you and to NXT.

Hey now...  take it easy there...  the discussion ended when CIYAM informed the Nxt community that it could be done through AT...  thus making it a non-issue...  poll should be ended/locked...  and you need to hold on to the passcodes...  PERIOD!    

Poll has been locked as requested.  My request to James that he identify an alternate treasurer stands.