ICO without whitepaper

[TastyChillySauce00]

There is no ICO without whitepaper, that is the basis of the formation of ICO projects from concepts, development, roadmap, and others and all of them have been arranged in the whitepaper

There is, and that ICO without whitepaper tend to be suspicious, unresourceful and unfinished. It's a way for some people to scam another by creating fake ICO
even they have no knowledge to create whitepaper so the project ended up having no whitepaper.
Usually, project that dont have whitepaper is for airdrop and the main purpose is to grab easy money.

[costgranda]

Almost all ICO have whitepaper and roadmap. The lack of one of these dokumentovvyzyvat huge suspicion. I wouldn't begin to participate such project for investments. It is very bad omen, in my opinion. It is necessary to look for such ICO which have these documents.

[best ever]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Perhaps a couple of years ago without white paper it was possible to raise money using ICO. Now without white paper investors will not consider a project for investment.

[Nikolas_the_Wonderworker]

ICO without a technical document is not a good decision for developers. No need to invest in such a project. Those people who are developing an ICO and are not making a technical document should not even pay attention to such a project.

[Ellionise]

White paper should be in any ico project, I think that the information should be open and accessible to all people and investors!

[Doovla]

I'm agreeing to you with this. It really shows unprofessionalsm towarda every interested user or bounty hunter to see bigger picture of development.
For sure it is must to have one.

[nikola22]

Almost all ICO have whitepaper and roadmap. The lack of one of these dokumentovvyzyvat huge suspicion. I wouldn't begin to participate such project for investments. It is very bad omen, in my opinion. It is necessary to look for such ICO which have these documents.

not much people read whitepapers of the ICO projects. of course such document must be developed but it doesn't give you a guarantee that the project is fair.

[khan149]

I believe ICO without having whitepaper is actually scams. Simply because personally, whitepapers are extremely essential. In the whitepaper, we are able to evaluate if the task is actually scams or even not really. I believe the actual achievement from the task can also be based on the actual whitepaper.

[futuristishe]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

of course projects that do not have documentation, want to leave at the expense of HYIP. And there is no documentation because they do not have it, it is a fraud. Who want to get investors through artificial HYIP.  Such projects should be avoided

[KingOfWinterfell01]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Most probably around 99% of ICOs without whitepapers are scams. The remaining 1% are probably charity ICOs that just give away tokens for the lols. But based on experience, I find it accurate that ICOs without whitepapers are more likely to be scams.

[sammyp]

A Whitepaper is an important aspect of a project especially when the project is running an ICO. It serves as a guideline for the project. This doesn’t also mean an ICO without a Whitepaper is a scam, it may surprise you to know that most of the ICOs with very attractive Whitepapers turn out to be scams. I personally haven’t seen an ICO without a Whitepaper and I don’t think one exists.

[uptown04]

some of them say the whitepaper is the heart of the ico but i am not sure about that because i think you can not name it scam becuase it does not have whitepaper i would follow all the moves it make and then decide for the conclusion.

[joletartare]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Hi,
For me that's a complete nonsense to run an ICO without having previously published a whitepaper.
It's irrespectful of investors ans it's like telling: "I'm not sure my idea is worth investing my time on it, so please first invest your money and then I'll work on it..."

[wumBowo]

people's rate the ico based on their whitepaper, teams, prospect of the projects, etc. So i think if there's no whitepaper then will simply rate it bad or leave thus ICO

[Iambatman]

I dint see any ICO that dont have a white paper but if they theres any i think its a scam. Im doing this for more than 1 yr and i dont see any of ico that dont have white paper

[moanna123]

i think that  the project without a whitepaper is not a project because it is the main thing of the project and we can directly understand that it is scam.

[critolika]

in my opinion, the whitepaper in the ICO is mandatory because if there is no whitepaper how can we find out more detailed content from the ICO, because in my opinion, the whitepaper contains all the important information about the ICO.

[danivan7]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

ico without whitepaper is like a you sell a car without document and you don't know about spec and material.
if any ico without whitepaper, they are making big joke.
so I definite this project are scam.

[DragonETH]

Almost all ICO have whitepaper and roadmap. The lack of one of these dokumentovvyzyvat huge suspicion. I wouldn't begin to participate such project for investments. It is very bad omen, in my opinion. It is necessary to look for such ICO which have these documents.

similarly, I believe that without white paper is a pure fraud. in any case, it should be described what the money is collected, how much the coin is worth and how it will be used

[FinanceX]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Check out this article to help choose the right ICO

The Evolution Of ICOs: What’s Changed?

https://medium.com/financex/the-evolution-of-icos-whats-changed-f3171201f7ff