ICO without whitepaper

[wedar001]

All things considered, it relies upon the venture, a few activities do begin their improvement from building the network part and mindfulness before the making of site and whitepaper, so before closing, you have to inquire as to whether they have an arrangement to dispatch a whitepaper or not. Be that as it may, remember it that any ico without a whitepaper is a trick.

[1714235519]

1714235519

[1714235519]

1714235519

[1714235519]

1714235519

[1714235519]

1714235519

[paulscathedral]

ICO without whitepaper is definitely a waste of time and effort. If you invest your money in such a project - be prepared to lose money, because such projects are extremely unreliable and dangerous. I am never considering seriously such projects. I think this is the safest position.

[titanslayerz]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Don't invest on ICO that has no whitepaper, they should have created it on the first place before they conduct an ICO.

[castiloros]

not entirely be said scam. but at least the existence of a clear communication can provide whitepaper from the ICO that runs. the existence of this certainly gives confidence to investors to invest in ICO from on that doesn't have a whitepaper. better looking for safe and looking for a whitepaper. many are too dismissive of this and many are entered into the scam and many fled with no results.

[RixtonTrain]

An ICO project that does not have whitepaper will make you very scam, no white paper, you will not know how the project works and how their roadmap and ambition are. Everything is very ambiguous and it is difficult for you to know what you are investing in.

[LegendOF45]

In my personal opinionn, ICO without whitepaper is potentially a scam, it seems that they are not serious about making all the details, from the various experiences that I experienced having been exposed to such a scam.

[CRYPTOGANGSTERs]

I, in General, do not really trust ICO. 95%, at least, is a fraud of pure water. It is necessary to rotate in certain circles to understand what ICO is real,and it is better to be its Creator.

[blockchainmarketus]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

This is a scam ICO, even plagiarizm ICO whitepaper is one of indication of scam. This is ICO without WP? How can you imagine a project without WP? WHere is the team? or just done by a person? who lazy to write wp? If the program is real it can be no problem but when the program unrealistic? this is scam project

[zero9119]

I will never trust and invest in ICO projects without the whitepaper. That demonstrates the lack of professionalism and does not care to project the DEV team. I often research the whitepaper of ICO projects so I highly appreciate the careful investment in whitepaper.

[dgoswami12]

Yes , never believe in ICO s without whitepaper. A ICO without Whitepaper looks very much phishy. And I thinl peoples are smart enough that they avoid those types of ICO s . In this cryptocurrency market many frauds are taking place im different ways , different manners, we need to be carefull for that.

[blockchainmarketus]

Whitepaper is a book or guidance where investors will see the project in detail in the future. In whitepaper mention roadmap, team and abstarct. It is measurable to know how good the project with whitepaper. When project have no whitepaper, means the projects have no plan in the future.

[tom14cat14]

The whitepaper is an explanation of all the steps the company should take. I would not invest in a project that does not have a whitepaper

[marcitosi]

it is impossible to say that this is a fraud because everything that is happening on the market right now is illegal and we do it at our own risk

[dlhezter]

Whitepaper is like an eye of every project. Even ICOs with whitepaper end of achieving nothing. The thing is I believe every project would be fully prepared before they try to have an ICO process.

Without a whitepaper it can be said that they don't have a clear team, maybe only personal ambitions to become a scammer, I'm sure that 99% ICO without whitepaper will be a scam.

White paper is needed for the road map and how the project will takes place, Its progress and time frame It think it will be good if the team who are behind a specific project should produce this in able for the viewers to know more about the project they are introducing for,
It always been in an ICO to have a white paper on their behalf to support the details about the project.

[loragean03]

Whitepaper is like an eye of every project. Even ICOs with whitepaper end of achieving nothing. The thing is I believe every project would be fully prepared before they try to have an ICO process.

Without a whitepaper it can be said that they don't have a clear team, maybe only personal ambitions to become a scammer, I'm sure that 99% ICO without whitepaper will be a scam.

ICO white paper is important for the users and investors, It contains information about the roadmap of the platform, i think it the team must provide whitepaper for the clarification and understanding of their project and for the needs of the viewers, It will serves as the summary of their ICO, Time line and other informations.

[plr]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

For me, it's very important it is where you can access everything you need to know about the project, this is why in the service section creating a whitepaper command a good price from freelancers and this is where investors looked to check if the project is worth investing.

[darkangel020716]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

Unfortunately the whitepaper is the very important part this you can see if the project is scam or not by just reading on it, and the investors want to see the whitepaper first because all the details regarding on the project should be written on it so that if there is no whitepaper then don't invest, one more thing sometimes whitepaper is copy paste from the work of other so it was very important.

[chabapok]

Whitepaper is the most important thing about icos. So there shouldnt be a ico without whitepaper. Icos need to explain their visions and projects in whitepaper detailly. and investors can choose these icos with reading whitepaper.

[sudeshkumar]

ICO is made popular on the strength of the project which is the roadmap,and the information is provided through white paper .So it is an important part can not be ignored with.

[Loopper]

Whitepaper is needed by an ICO because with the whitepaper, people can see the development and what they will do with their project. it is very needed.