ICO without whitepaper

[turagsoy123456]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

I think the ICO without whitepaper is not credible,  and no one investor's trust to invest their money in that ICO without a proper guidelines and information's to their project. Whitepaper is very important because it serve as a guide to the investor's to admired and decides to invest their money that certain ICO. 

[1714326069]

1714326069

[1714326069]

1714326069

[1714326069]

1714326069

[1714326069]

1714326069

[straightliteral]

i automatically assume that the projects without a whitepaper are just scams

[kenman]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

it is alarming, i think. it is also show the lack of respect to potential users because it's kind of - all right guys, make up your minds and try to understand what ico is about

[ximabe]

It doesn't state that much any longer. For a frw hundred bucks an outsourced essayist can make you a truly not too bad whitepaper. A great deal of WPs are simply duplicated and utilized with a few changes made. You should take a gander at a group and on the off chance that they are who they say they are. Individuals utilizing their genuine names and faces. Making accomplices. Obviously, a whitepaper is essential and each ICO ought to have one at the season of their tokensale. Be that as it may, it doesn't mean it's a sure thing to add to them..

[runor]

The project simply must have a technical document, otherwise it will not find the right investors!

[Lorik777]

Yes, I fully agree with you. If the ICO does not have technical documentation, it is most likely a fraudulent ICO. Every time I choose ICO for myself I go to the site and look at many details. One of the most important details is the technical documentation. If it's not there, I'm leaving the site.

[adorathris]

All projects should have white paper because this is one of the main proofs that this is not scammers. Documents are almost all ICO and if there are no documents then there is no trust in the project either

[Badu1]

It is very scary to participate in ICOs who do not have whitepaper. You can lose your money within a twinkle of an hour and you can gain too but the probability of you losing is very high.

[jusertvaz]

All use white paper, if not, then the credibility of the project is also not because we don't know whom to give our money and what do they do with them. I think that even the crooks have long used the white paper to fool investors

[mr.nby]

It is very scary to participate in ICOs who do not have whitepaper. You can lose your money within a twinkle of an hour and you can gain too but the probability of you losing is very high.

ICO without whitepaper points to the lack of professionalism of the project team. This document should not be missing. It is necessary for investors to obtain comprehensive information about the project. The lack of whitepaper affects the transparency of the project and may discourage investment.

[BALIK]

It has become pretty much necessary to have a white paper in this day and age, though I don't think it should be like this. Not every project needs to be explained with a 50 page document most of it discussing how the market is doing shit. I think that a well designed informative website, plus a one pager and pitch deck are often sufficient.

[Vasyan]

If ICO has white paper in it, no one will invest money))) Documents provide an opportunity to understand the essence of the project and its potential. Therefore, the white paper required.

[awazieik]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

ICOs without a Whitepaper is like investing in a business without have a clue about what the business is all about. It is  true that even scams use Whitepaper to take investor's money but having no clue or understanding about the business is not going to make the ICO any better.

[Dextroboy]

Yes, it has been confirmed to be a scam, while many of the ico who use whitepaper are scams, especially ico who has no whitepaper.
By the way, I've never seen ico without a whitepaper

[Adhichan]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

ICOs without a Whitepaper is like investing in a business without have a clue about what the business is all about. It is  true that even scams use Whitepaper to take investor's money but having no clue or understanding about the business is not going to make the ICO any better.

maybe suitable word for this condition is we put our money into garbage.and maybe we do not need money anymore   .only silly people doing this action.

[olarrtt]

ICO without white paper that's to tell you the developers of the coin just wanna scam investors.even ICOs with white paper ain't doing very well right now let alone the one without white paper.
Just run away ,it's a scam coin

[dizzy1996]

Hello, look at the options mass, well, firstly it is a check on the services of the company's surveyed bounty, also you can study the project in detail, its technical documentation, web site and other constructive documents

[sngwinner]

I am actually yet to meet one. Did you create the thread out of imaginations or you have actually met or seen one. Personally I dont see why there will be an ICO without whitepaper. How would investors understand the idea behind the project. I wouldnt dare to invest in such a project. It only communicates lack of seriousness on the part of the team.

[sadortelk]

White paper is very important. We can learn about the project all the necessary information only from the document so if the white paper is not, then this project does not deserve our attention

[thenameisjay]

Personally , I don't think there should be an ICO without whitepaper. The whitepaper bridges the gap between an investor and a company. Can we say a ICO without a whitepaper is a scam? Or what can you say about an ICO without whitepaper

It's logic. All ICOs should have a whitepaper before it is considered an ICO. There should always be whitepaper because it dictates there the plan of the ICO and what it's planning in the future. You should never participate in a bounty campaign without a whitepaper.