Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:54:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 1557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 2032135 times)
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 03:50:47 PM
 #3461

is the "gold folding like a cheap suit" analogy still considered trolling?   Grin  molecular?
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
1714150496
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714150496

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714150496
Reply with quote  #2

1714150496
Report to moderator
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 04:28:57 PM
 #3462

Dash for Digital Cash.  That's not an observation; it's advice.  While you can.
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 06:32:48 PM
 #3463

I'm looking for ~$1650/$30 by the end of the month. Bitcoin ~$9-10 within the same time frame.

The potential separation between paper/physical pricing in PMs is very unlikely to occur with Bitcoin at its current stage of derivative/secondary market maturity.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 06:35:23 PM
 #3464


The potential separation between paper/physical pricing in PMs is very unlikely to occur with Bitcoin at its current stage of derivative/secondary market maturity.

no shit Sherlock.  you can throw in The Tungsten Effect as well.  not to mention a little Deflation.

*and don't tell me you've been arguing this all along*
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 06:46:27 PM
 #3465

i can hear Hank Paulson now "Order please, we need order!"  Order my ass...

Translation:  "Small fry don't panic, we need to let the Big Boys out first please.  Move aside!"
miscreanity
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 07:32:11 PM
 #3466

The potential separation between paper/physical pricing in PMs is very unlikely to occur with Bitcoin at its current stage of derivative/secondary market maturity.
no shit Sherlock.  you can throw in The Tungsten Effect as well.  not to mention a little Deflation.

*and don't tell me you've been arguing this all along*

Such hostility. I've stated several times that Bitcoin-related derivatives are insufficient to dictate price movements to the extent that is done in PMs, in this thread and others. The occurrence of fake gold bars is more akin to Bitcoin wallets being stolen than broken encryption.

Read up. Read more.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 08:15:05 PM
 #3467

The potential separation between paper/physical pricing in PMs is very unlikely to occur with Bitcoin at its current stage of derivative/secondary market maturity.
no shit Sherlock.  you can throw in The Tungsten Effect as well.  not to mention a little Deflation.

*and don't tell me you've been arguing this all along*

Such hostility. I've stated several times that Bitcoin-related derivatives are insufficient to dictate price movements to the extent that is done in PMs, in this thread and others. The occurrence of fake gold bars is more akin to Bitcoin wallets being stolen than broken encryption.

Read up. Read more.

no hostility at all.  its just that this physical/paper disparity argument has been such a central tenet of your entire argument for the last year.  need to get the facts straight.  Wink
thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 08:30:47 PM
 #3468

cypherdoc, I've been reading this thread for quite some time and find your comments insightful but it seems you think that gold will descend significantly vs. fiat currencies long term.  But that certainly is counter the typical expectation on these forums which seems to be predicting hyper or high levels of fiat currency inflation long term.  This of course would mean both BTC and GLD increase against USD... although BTC might increase much faster then gold as adoption increases.  Can you clarify what you think bitcoin and gold will do against fiat (long term, i.e. 1+ years) and against some classical commodity like milk or oil and why? 

Silverbox jokes about gold "collapsing upwards" but is that your actual position? -- i.e. the buying power of an ounce of gold in other commodities will collapse while simultaneously its price in USD increases?

Thanks!
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 09:21:06 PM
 #3469

cypherdoc, I've been reading this thread for quite some time and find your comments insightful but it seems you think that gold will descend significantly vs. fiat currencies long term.  But that certainly is counter the typical expectation on these forums which seems to be predicting hyper or high levels of fiat currency inflation long term.  This of course would mean both BTC and GLD increase against USD... although BTC might increase much faster then gold as adoption increases.  Can you clarify what you think bitcoin and gold will do against fiat (long term, i.e. 1+ years) and against some classical commodity like milk or oil and why? 

Silverbox jokes about gold "collapsing upwards" but is that your actual position? -- i.e. the buying power of an ounce of gold in other commodities will collapse while simultaneously its price in USD increases?

Thanks!

the essence of the deflationary theory is that the debt contraction will overpower the money printing thus decreasing the money supply as i define it:  money + debt extended.  Ben can say he will print to eternity but he is constrained as i believe the PTB won't let him destroy the reserve currency status the US enjoys.  the reserve currency is after all why the US remains #1. you're already seeing the UST market pulling in the reins the last few months as reflected by the recent significant rise in TNX.  if Ben keeps pumping up risk assets the bond vigilantes will/have attack.  i think the banks have already offloaded much of their bad debt to the Fed and and want to increase the value of their remaining debts extended to corporations and the citizens.  they do this via deflation, not inflation.  don't even begin to think that Ben will inflate the US debt away; its not in the best interests of the banks.  there is a dichotomy of interests btwn the ppl and the corporate/financial/political elite.  when one wins, the other loses IMO.  i always think in these terms.

gold, IMO, is at the end of a 13 yr bull market and was the last risk asset to inflate due to the longterm USD devaluation.  i think the USD devaluation process is coming to an end and you will see the USD skyrocket.  we saw this for a brief period during the 2007-9 crisis but the deflation was not allowed to clear the bad debts.  the banks used the last 4 yrs to shed what they could to the Fed and rebuild their balance sheets with free money from Ben.  inflationists think in linear terms; that the future will be like the past, as in straight up.  i believe in cycles where the long 40 yrs plus of inflation will be followed by a significant deflationary cycle. 

i think Bitcoin is going to help enforce this deflationary correction.  i know that its counterintuitive that Bitcoin could rise while gold falls in deflation.  however,  its bull is only a couple of years old and its born of, from, and for the Internet.  its too good of an idea and there are too many ppl who want it to succeed.   its too practical not to be used and its democratic nature ensures its success.  the fixed supply will cause it to rise in value and act as a significant store of wealth as well.

the Internet, BTW, is contributing to the deflation as it enables the flow of information and bits which is enabling price discovery which so far has been confined to technology but which is now spilling over to risk assets like stocks, bonds, RE, and commodities.  you guys need to read "This Machine Kills Secrets" by Andy Greenberg.  i just received my copy yesterday and i'm 40% of the way thru it already.  it shows the future by explaining the past.  the history of the Cypherpunks/Wikileaks and hacktivists is critical to understanding how Bitcoin represents the culmination of a movement to revolutionize money and privacy on the Internet.  its a great, riveting read and helps explain why Bitcoin is impenetrable and destined for great things.
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 09:41:09 PM
 #3470

who is Andy Greenberg?  http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/AndyG

as to how important was this Cybersecurity Conference? well, Janet Napolitano was the leadoff speaker, head of the DHS. Andy was the Keynote Speaker.   she had to listen to his talk  Cheesy.  no applause for him.
thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 09:53:09 PM
 #3471

Interesting.  You have a great point that with the fed owning so much debt they would want to cause deflation.  But I forget, they don't benefit from profits like this do they?  I don't agree with you about the debt contraction within the next 4 yrs, except possibly in the short term, neither US candidate seems that committed to reducing govt debt, for example.  But I can see that it could go either way.  I think USD will attempt to remain the reserve currency simply by failing slower then everybody else... 70s style inflation, not hyper.  And remaining the currency of last resort will help reduce apparent inflation by expanding the defacto scope of the USD even more into other countries.   But a significant hidden inflation will essentially transfer value from international holders of USD (China and countries that end up using USD due to their currency failure) to the USA, and from holders of USD or USD denominated instruments (mostly middle and low income families, the gold and farmland price appreciation is indicative that the smart money has already moved) to debt holders (US government).  This will ultimately reduce the tax burden for the very rich because while they may pay a lower % of earnings if I remember correctly they pay a higher % of all taxes.

cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 10:41:49 PM
 #3472

Interesting.  You have a great point that with the fed owning so much debt they would want to cause deflation.  But I forget, they don't benefit from profits like this do they?

no, they pay their interest payments minus expenses back to the Treasury.  but the banks hold alot of consumer debt like mortgages.  do they want that devalued?  no.

Quote
I don't agree with you about the debt contraction within the next 4 yrs, except possibly in the short term, neither US candidate seems that committed to reducing govt debt, for example.

who says that the UST bond market is going to cooperate with them in terms of low interest rates?  as i pointed out above, the TNX has been rising and we could be on the verge of the bond vigilante awakening.  this is going to, in aggregate, force the stock mkt bubble to collapse as money is diverted to UST's to try and control interest rates.  whether they succeed or not is irrelevant; there is going to be a selloff in other risk assets.

Quote
But I can see that it could go either way.  I think USD will attempt to remain the reserve currency simply by failing slower then everybody else... 70s style inflation, not hyper.  And remaining the currency of last resort will help reduce apparent inflation by expanding the defacto scope of the USD even more into other countries.   But a significant hidden inflation will essentially transfer value from international holders of USD (China and countries that end up using USD due to their currency failure) to the USA, and from holders of USD or USD denominated instruments (mostly middle and low income families, the gold and farmland price appreciation is indicative that the smart money has already moved) to debt holders (US government).  This will ultimately reduce the tax burden for the very rich because while they may pay a lower % of earnings if I remember correctly they pay a higher % of all taxes.

the only risk asset that the Fed has significantly been able to reflate to prevent a catastrophe has been the stock mkt.  i see that ending right about now.  the collateral damage has been significant in terms of rising food and gas prices.  even the latest gold price rise is damaging in that the inflationists have directed their money there and not the real economy.  the latest rise to 1794 was a red hot thermometer warning that Ben is out of control.  Mr. Market is going to punish Ben and relegate him to the annals of the worst CB ever.  if the Fed could control the economy like a machine you have to explain to me why their efforts failed twice in the stock market since 2000 and in the housing market.  you also have to explain why we're seeing deflations across Europe, Japan, and the ongoing collapse of the China miracle.
thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010


View Profile
October 22, 2012, 04:03:08 PM
 #3473

Quote
It is now more obvious than ever that gold is becoming the new global reserve currency. Continuous and aggressive central-bank actions from the United States and Europe are driving the demand for gold. Investors have not yet seen any of the real hyperinflationary pressures that seem likely down the road.

Whether you believe in commodities (BTC & gold) or just BTC, its interesting to see that the (previously tin-foil-hat) ideas thrown around this forum about fiat currencies are so mainstream now that they are simply referenced, not the core subject of the article (which is on estimated gold holdings and appetite broken down by top nations).

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-nations-that-control-the-worlds-gold-2012-10-20

cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 23, 2012, 10:47:40 AM
 #3474

Gold isn't doing so well tonite.
bracek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 530
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 23, 2012, 12:04:47 PM
 #3475

Gold isn't doing so well tonite.

maybe this 'll help

http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/15182799/counterfeit-aussie-gold-sold-in-china/

should we go long tungsten Smiley
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 23, 2012, 12:10:03 PM
 #3476


Gold has been hacked!
SkRRJyTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 23, 2012, 01:36:56 PM
 #3477

Gold and silver are going to go under their lows from 5 days ago (~1740 or ~34), but not below major support at ~1650 or ~30, before continuing to higher highs.

Just thought I should put one of my predictions to the test as well as bashing Cypher's Tongue

Under 1740 and 34... now to find support above 1650 and 30. Cheesy

My crystal ball is showing that the USDX just topped.  I think this week could contain one of those corners you like to look for Cypher.  Should be an exciting week.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
October 23, 2012, 01:40:31 PM
 #3478

Gold and silver are going to go under their lows from 5 days ago (~1740 or ~34), but not below major support at ~1650 or ~30, before continuing to higher highs.

Just thought I should put one of my predictions to the test as well as bashing Cypher's Tongue

Under 1740 and 34... now to find support above 1650 and 30. Cheesy

My crystal ball is showing that the USDX just topped.  I think this week could contain one of those corners you like to look for Cypher.  Should be an exciting week.

Too bad everything else has topped too, at least in the short term.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
SkRRJyTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 23, 2012, 01:42:33 PM
 #3479

Gold and silver are going to go under their lows from 5 days ago (~1740 or ~34), but not below major support at ~1650 or ~30, before continuing to higher highs.

Just thought I should put one of my predictions to the test as well as bashing Cypher's Tongue

Under 1740 and 34... now to find support above 1650 and 30. Cheesy

My crystal ball is showing that the USDX just topped.  I think this week could contain one of those corners you like to look for Cypher.  Should be an exciting week.

Too bad everything else has topped too, at least in the short term.

Really?  The way I am looking at things today or tomorrow will be a bottom for most things Smiley  Hence the excitement I guess!
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 23, 2012, 02:02:42 PM
 #3480

contrary to popular opinion, at least silverbox's opinion, looks like Ben Berspankme does NOT ride on a White Horse.

hallelujah!  there is a God! but it ain't Benny:  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-23/no-third-term-chairman
Pages: « 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 ... 1557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!