Scientific proof that God exists?

[Astargath]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

And in response also by BADecker is his own rebuttal of the points above.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19455088#msg19455088

Yes it is true.... he is delusional and suffers mental health conditions.

Just to show you how flawed your thinking is, the info your, above, link makes a distinction between knowing that God exits, and the fact that we don't really know what He is, even though we know that He exists.

Here you are, posting all kinds of stuff, and you can't even see that there is a difference between knowing that something exists, and not knowing what it is made out of.

However, thank you for your post. It shows how really ignorant you are. But your greatest ignorant part isn't simply being ignorant. Your true ignorance lies in the fact that you don't want to stop being ignorant.

Your link says you dont know what it is.... and you dont have the ability to fathom what it is.

That my furry little friend means your assumption of it being your god is flawed. You yourself have stated you do not have the ability to know.

Thank you for showing your delusional and this is purely your attempt to make your assumptions as fact.

Better luck next time.

Save your time, he already showed he is mentally ill. He debunks himself and says we don't know what the creator is and the next post he keeps talking about how science shows the creator is God. I suggest you to read this, badecker: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

[1715095024]

1715095024

[1715095024]

1715095024

[Horacewoodwood]

wow so glad i brought this thread back from the dead last year


but i think we need more memes folks, liven the place up a little , these walls of text are making my poor little brain cell hurt.  

So anyway here ya go folks...

a video of BADecker  spouting his nonsense in person!!!      comedy gold!
now you may ask, so why does BADecker never link to this retarded web page seeing how he parrots all the pious drivel the site spouts.
simple ...who'd wanna be exposed on bitcointalk for being an  ignorant moron?  (i know this place is full of em, but whatever...)
Sorry BADecker... aka  Ken Ham, i just blew your cover!!  lol



                       https://i.imgur.com/UrCSU2u.jpg
                  

Is this really legit?? I mean is this really badecker?? And wait, are thos dvd's really for sale?? And how did you mange to identify that it is really him?? I mean that's just difficult. But not impossible tho. One last thing, if that is really him, isnt that a bit too much?? I mean that can cause him serious trolling and other things now that his real identity is known..

Is that all you jokers can do? All you can do is attempt to pick on BADecker. You can't really even begin to rebut cause and effect, entropy, and complexity. You can't even begin to rebut the scientific proof that God exists. Pick a point in the proof. Rebut even one point in simple concise language if you can.

You retards belong in a funny farm, right along with the FE people.

oh jeezus!!! i just had the best belly laugh i've had in years!
oh cmon now, aren't you like  totally flattered that you could be mistaken for the likes of that
god fearin, bible lovin, evolution/science denying, character KEN HAM!!!
Come on dude...he built the   Creation Museum! complete with dinosaurs and humans in the same time period and Noahs Ark and Adam and Eve!!... ROFLMFAO!!!

What does Ken Ham have to do with scientific proof that God exists?

I had thought that within the Bitcointalk forum there would be a few people who understood the difference between science and religion. But here you are, another one focusing on religion rather than science.

Don't any of you jokers know even enough basic science that you can talk science rather than religion?

Interlude: 'The dream still stays on'
We've seen what we can call 'The end pf Badecker' these days, when he himself debunked his own theory that God created the Universe. Of course, it was foolish of him to let that out and now he is trying to 'repair' his mistake by saying he meant something else, going around the subject, etc. His classical method of deflecting the attention off his mistakes is blaming everyone of involving religion into a scientific subject. The hurtful truth for him, and those like him, is that the subject is of a religious matter, it has a religious motif (God) and it follows the religious story of a certain God. Yes, he claims to 'scientifically' prove the existence of God, but the 'scientific' research is in the domain of religion, so anyone who involves religion in the discussion has all the reasons to do so. Even more, almost all of the religious questions asked here are on subject and are reasonable, they should be answered in order to clarify some 'scientific' claims that bare no proof but assumptions. Badecker can't or won't understand that and he is stuck in his own little loop of mental errors, he is stuck on his same old debunked and pseudo scientific links that nobody cares for anymore. That is why, as we are gathering proof here, we can conclude again that he is indeed really stupid and stubborn in his stupidity. More to come, hang around folks.

[NJB18]

I think it is simply incompatible to talk about scientific proof and the existence of god (if the god that you mean here is the god to whom we say prayers) at the same time. When the Higgs boson was discovered, it was touted as the "God particle." But it does not actually have anything to do with the religious god. In the same manner that when Einstein believed that there must be a god out there, he did not mean any religious god at all.

It is because the god in any religion does not have any place in science. And science, on the other hand, cannot prove anything about the existence of a god. 

[BADecker]

I think it is simply incompatible to talk about scientific proof and the existence of god (if the god that you mean here is the god to whom we say prayers) at the same time. When the Higgs boson was discovered, it was touted as the "God particle." But it does not actually have anything to do with the religious god. In the same manner that when Einstein believed that there must be a god out there, he did not mean any religious god at all.

It is because the god in any religion does not have any place in science. And science, on the other hand, cannot prove anything about the existence of a god. 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

[sirazimuth]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

[BADecker]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

[XinXan]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

[BADecker]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

[Vod]

350 pages and still no proof.  lol

[Horacewoodwood]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

Episode 19: 'In deeper shit'
It has been a while, things cooled off and now Badecker, the retarded apologist went out of his lair not being afraid of his shadow anymore. He can eat shit again without the fear that everyone will laugh at him for debunking his own theory. He is happy and he has new answers...or not. Somehow he fails to see the great error in his mind, we don;t know why, but we've seen people speculate it might be mental illness...it probably is. What Badecker can't realize is that his mind is infected with the religious propaganda, his whole universe starts with the idea 'God exists', he can never take it out of the picture, not even in an imaginary way, because religion has always set its foot when talking about God: jokes were punished, the simple idea of not believing would have got you killed, mocking a God would have got you killed, etc. That is why the idea remained, it imposed itself through terror, and through generations it remained with it's laws but the terror is not needed anymore, because the world is infected properly in such a way that  very precise, time expensive surgery is needed to ever get out. It has been said before and it is a good comparison: religion is a North Korea dictatorship. Of course any idiot infected will say 'If Big Bang exists it must be God' because any answer is God for him, he can't think of anything else but God. In North Korea, everything is about the dictator, you think about him, not anything else in the world. Can this lead to a mental illness? Of course it can, it has all the possibilities of developing severe mental illnesses, but first of all, it's a mental delusion, a simulacra, it derives the 'believer' from reality and it makes him live in the simulation of a world that, he hopes, will never end because eternal life will be his reward for only 'believing' the lie. Yes lads, the shit goes deeper. Badecker might be mentally ill. We'll wait here for more so we can come with episode 20.

[mr.bitcoinerf11]

fuck god

[krampus854]

there are so many reason to believe in god, scientist don't even know where the life is begin with, so better to make our own research to make sure that there is a really god, i believe in god, but some people don't cause they are saying that they have nothing to proof it.

[stats]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

So going on BADecker's principle which is based on assumptions and not fact..... this is a banana.



It's yellow, and bent with folded down sides and it looks look a banana...... therefore it must be a banana.

NO dipshit.... it's a dog wearing a banana outfit.

[XinXan]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

So going on BADecker's principle which is based on assumptions and not fact..... this is a banana.



It's yellow, and bent with folded down sides and it looks look a banana...... therefore it must be a banana.

NO dipshit.... it's a dog wearing a banana outfit.

Nope. That's actually God. The retard calls everything God, he never even described what God really is. He said his God is the God from the bible which can't be the fucking big bang because that's not what the bible says, therefore he is contradicting himself again with this non sense. He doesn't even know how to make any sense of what he says, it's pretty sad to be honest.

[Horacewoodwood]

there are so many reason to believe in god, scientist don't even know where the life is begin with, so better to make our own research to make sure that there is a really god, i believe in god, but some people don't cause they are saying that they have nothing to proof it.

The proof, my friend, is the ultimatum, the last thing asked in order to establish the existence. The problem starts way before than proof. First of all, people start to sense something fake, a forgery, something man made, the stories behind all of the Gods are flawed, make no sense in reality, they take effect in a fiction writing. People understand that so they start to ask questions, they begin to research, they see how those writings, the only testimonials of Gods, are incompatible with the truth of our world, are not sustained by history, logic, physics, biology, cosmology, etc. The more they search, the less they believe because religion has always based it's power on the lack of knowledge. In the end, they all reach to the same conclusion: you can be as religious as you want, you can have faith, but keep it for yourself. If you claim that the world should acknowledge your God as a general truth, children must be baptized, people who marry must go to church, funerals must be attended by priests, religion must be taught in school, etc, then you must prove that your God exists and you have to do it categorically. So instead of blaming the scientists who actually do something instead of just praying for your soul who might exist or not and also get paid for it, you should start learning, research, appeal to common sense and reason and most important of all, don't start already set with the idea that God definitely exists. I don't expect you to leave your faith, I understand how impossible it is for you to conceive the fact that God might not exist at all, most people know for sure that smoking does really much harm to your health and they still smoke, it's a vice. Religion is worse than a vice, it is so widely spread that it is really hard to escape the simulacra. But that doesn't mean you have to preach your religion just because you believe it's the truth. It's not and as long as we have understanding for you and we don't even think about banning your 'thoughts' you should also have the understanding and keep it for yourself and the ones like you.

[BADecker]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

So going on BADecker's principle which is based on assumptions and not fact..... this is a banana.



It's yellow, and bent with folded down sides and it looks look a banana...... therefore it must be a banana.

NO dipshit.... it's a dog wearing a banana outfit.

Nope. That's actually God. The retard calls everything God, he never even described what God really is. He said his God is the God from the bible which can't be the fucking big bang because that's not what the bible says, therefore he is contradicting himself again with this non sense. He doesn't even know how to make any sense of what he says, it's pretty sad to be honest.

Just to show you how stupid your thinking is, consider the human body for example. We know humans exist. We know they have bodies. We have examined their bodies and found out lots of things about their bodies. But even after thousands of years of human life, we still are finding new things about their bodies.

Science proves God exists. Just because we haven't found out a lot of stuff about Him, doesn't mean He doesn't exist. Are you trying to say that people don't exist because we haven't found out everything about them? You jokers are about as backward as they come.

[XinXan]

Thanks again for helping to spread the proof that God exists, by not rebutting the scientific proof found here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.
 

Romans 1:20:

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since Saint Paul shows the logical reason for understanding the existence of God, in this and other passages, why wouldn't there be scientific proof, as well?

                     

See? Even the devil knows that God exists. And he is way more scientifically capable than the rest of us.

 

Badecker also shows that cause and effect doesn't prove God existence. Then he proceeds to say that the rest of his argument doesn't prove God either because it points to ''something'' but we can't really know what that something is and then he admits he believes in God from the bible purely on faith. Then he goes full retard or maybe he has double personality and keeps posting the same links that he said didn't prove God because nothing can really prove God and he is trying now to deny that he said it. Why? It's right here, we can all see it, we can see what he wrote, why would he try to deny it now? Is there an explanation besides him being mentally ill?

You are not being logical. I don't generally us science fiction quotes, but Spock says it well in Star Trek (2009): "If you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable must be the truth."

The point is that, because of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, even if big bang were fact, then big bang would be God. As it is, we don't know if BB is fact, but the three scientific laws and principles existing together as they do, point to a something which fits what God must be.

God exists, even though we don't know much about Him from science. The fact that He exists is a scientific fact, as well as an observational understanding... from simply observing the world.

Now that we can all see it again, why not understand it?

So going on BADecker's principle which is based on assumptions and not fact..... this is a banana.



It's yellow, and bent with folded down sides and it looks look a banana...... therefore it must be a banana.

NO dipshit.... it's a dog wearing a banana outfit.

Nope. That's actually God. The retard calls everything God, he never even described what God really is. He said his God is the God from the bible which can't be the fucking big bang because that's not what the bible says, therefore he is contradicting himself again with this non sense. He doesn't even know how to make any sense of what he says, it's pretty sad to be honest.

Just to show you how stupid your thinking is, consider the human body for example. We know humans exist. We know they have bodies. We have examined their bodies and found out lots of things about their bodies. But even after thousands of years of human life, we still are finding new things about their bodies.

Science proves God exists. Just because we haven't found out a lot of stuff about Him, doesn't mean He doesn't exist. Are you trying to say that people don't exist because we haven't found out everything about them? You jokers are about as backward as they come.

What you said has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. What I said is that you contradicted yourself and said that there is no evidence for God and that you didn't prove god's existence. Now you are just trying to say you didn't say that when it's right here, everyone can read it, save yourself from more embarrassment, it's pointless to keep arguing, you already destroyed yourself, quit being a delusional idiot and use your brain. Do something productive with your life.

[BADecker]

Nope. That's actually God. The retard calls everything God, he never even described what God really is. He said his God is the God from the bible which can't be the fucking big bang because that's not what the bible says, therefore he is contradicting himself again with this non sense. He doesn't even know how to make any sense of what he says, it's pretty sad to be honest.

Just to show you how stupid your thinking is, consider the human body for example. We know humans exist. We know they have bodies. We have examined their bodies and found out lots of things about their bodies. But even after thousands of years of human life, we still are finding new things about their bodies.

Science proves God exists. Just because we haven't found out a lot of stuff about Him, doesn't mean He doesn't exist. Are you trying to say that people don't exist because we haven't found out everything about them? You jokers are about as backward as they come.

What you said has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. What I said is that you contradicted yourself and said that there is no evidence for God and that you didn't prove god's existence. Now you are just trying to say you didn't say that when it's right here, everyone can read it, save yourself from more embarrassment, it's pointless to keep arguing, you already destroyed yourself, quit being a delusional idiot and use your brain. Do something productive with your life.

Hey, man. Thank you for a couple of things. Thank you for thinking that I am important enough that you would focus on me rather than on the scientific proof for the existence of God. And thank you for the admonishment to "save" myself "from more embarrassment." Everyone needs thanks and admonishment now and again.

But you ARE having a bit of a bad day, aren't you? You know how it goes. If you can't destroy the message, "kill the messenger..." if you can.

So, somebody told you that I contradicted myself, eh? In an ongoing talk like this one, there are lots of things said. Some of them might sound like contradictions. But they aren't, necessarily. They might simply be unclear use of the language. Or they might be a misunderstanding of what was said. The point? I didn't contradict myself, even though you or others might have understood it that way.

The more important point? The scientific proof for the existence of God has always stood. Long ago Godly folks went on to other, more important things than sitting around, bantering with a bunch of jokers like you, who are unwilling to learn science.

Research the basic scientific laws and principles of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity. Then combine them, and show us how they DON'T prove the existence of God.

And thanks. You jokers are kinda fun. You are so easy to rebut.

[Horacewoodwood]

Nope. That's actually God. The retard calls everything God, he never even described what God really is. He said his God is the God from the bible which can't be the fucking big bang because that's not what the bible says, therefore he is contradicting himself again with this non sense. He doesn't even know how to make any sense of what he says, it's pretty sad to be honest.

Just to show you how stupid your thinking is, consider the human body for example. We know humans exist. We know they have bodies. We have examined their bodies and found out lots of things about their bodies. But even after thousands of years of human life, we still are finding new things about their bodies.

Science proves God exists. Just because we haven't found out a lot of stuff about Him, doesn't mean He doesn't exist. Are you trying to say that people don't exist because we haven't found out everything about them? You jokers are about as backward as they come.

What you said has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. What I said is that you contradicted yourself and said that there is no evidence for God and that you didn't prove god's existence. Now you are just trying to say you didn't say that when it's right here, everyone can read it, save yourself from more embarrassment, it's pointless to keep arguing, you already destroyed yourself, quit being a delusional idiot and use your brain. Do something productive with your life.

Hey, man. Thank you for a couple of things. Thank you for thinking that I am important enough that you would focus on me rather than on the scientific proof for the existence of God. And thank you for the admonishment to "save" myself "from more embarrassment." Everyone needs thanks and admonishment now and again.

But you ARE having a bit of a bad day, aren't you? You know how it goes. If you can't destroy the message, "kill the messenger..." if you can.

So, somebody told you that I contradicted myself, eh? In an ongoing talk like this one, there are lots of things said. Some of them might sound like contradictions. But they aren't, necessarily. They might simply be unclear use of the language. Or they might be a misunderstanding of what was said. The point? I didn't contradict myself, even though you or others might have understood it that way.

The more important point? The scientific proof for the existence of God has always stood. Long ago Godly folks went on to other, more important things than sitting around, bantering with a bunch of jokers like you, who are unwilling to learn science.

Research the basic scientific laws and principles of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity. Then combine them, and show us how they DON'T prove the existence of God.

And thanks. You jokers are kinda fun. You are so easy to rebut.

Episode 20: 'A bitchslap to heaven'.
There we go folks, the nasty religious attitude, the lack of morals, lying in our faces that he never did something that is there to be seen. He acts as if the post itself is not there and someone lied about him contradicting himself. He calls his categorical contradiction an 'unclear use of the language' or a 'misunderstanding of what was said'. He concludes he did not contradict himself, it's our fault, not his. That is a lie. Anyone here can check out a few pages earlier and see it. That is how delusional religious people have become nowadays. I can understand the use and appearance of religion in primitive times, people did not know any better, they were useless, they needed to call the 'unknown' somehow, in case the unknown gets mad and makes the volcano erupt. But today? It is for sure a mental illness, lying you did not kill the victim while holding its decapitated head in your right arm and a bloody knife in your left arm means you are completely ill. To maintain your idea, the same you have contradicted, after absolutely everyone has rebutted it is also a sign of delusion and illness. To believe you know something in a domain (science is general, scientists are most of the time based in a domain, some are physicists, some are evolutionary biologists, cosmologists, etc), to have the proof and demonstration that you know shit and to still believe you are the best and everyone else should study you, that is again delusional and a sign of a mental illness. Of course, we would have liked if Badecker was indeed that stupid, if he was not mentally ill and just super dumb. But he is ill, he is nuts. When the messenger repeats the same message frantically, you can let him go, he is crazy as fuck. Well, let us all hope he gets his bitchslap to his heaven and someone takes care of him by administering the proper medication.

[freegum44]

Not at all, it's an endless topic. >.<