Scientific proof that God exists?

[Astargath]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

[1715160730]

1715160730

[BADecker]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

These scientific truths show that it was definitely God that did the creating, even though they don't explain what God really is.

[Astargath]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

These scientific truths show that it was definitely God that did the creating, even though they don't explain what God really is.

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

[Kaiser72]

I really doubt there is any scientific proof to describe god existence.

Who need proofs about unicorn or flying spaghetti monster?

So true.
That's why its called a religion. That's why there are many religions. That's why there was mythology.
It's just a matter of believing, not proof-concept of existence.

This is perfect!!!

[BADecker]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

These scientific truths show that it was definitely God that did the creating, even though they don't explain what God really is.

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

[Astargath]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

These scientific truths show that it was definitely God that did the creating, even though they don't explain what God really is.

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

We live in a simulated reality because we are programmed like the matrix, just as an easy example. Aliens that are very intelligent and capable of creating universes. And your argument is a logical fallacy because you are doing an argument from ignorance, oh what else could it be, so because you can't think of a better explanation it means it's God?

[2hot2handle]

does someone really need a scientific explanation before believing?

[qwik2learn]

Actually you took this out of context, horace. Skeptics use often use a double standard, that is their fallacy:

https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/skeptical_misdirection#skeptical_misdirection_double_standard

The other common tactic is known as Misrepresenting The Scientific Evidence.

I took what out of what context? Speak to me, explain, come up with arguments, enough with the links already. If you are not able to speak to me and you always need to give me links with what others think that us 'skeptics' are wrong about, then you do not understand anything of it. More than that, I can't understand what you are talking about because you solely posted a link. If you want to answer to what I have said, talk about that, you have it there, you can analyze it and tell me what do you believe is wrong and why. In that way, we can have a proper conversation. Otherwise it will be the same as it is with Badecker, everyone trying to have a conversation and a monkey saying anything that crosses his mind. Let's keep this simple and efficient.

The extraordinary evidence (in favor of parapsychology and survival) has already been provided. I also linked to some examples where this evidence was deliberately ignored by skeptics. Since that information is in the link above, I am including it in our conversation by way of reference; surely you have the ability to read through an essay on the topic of skeptical misdirection because it clearly relates to our discussion about parapsychology.

Psychics and telekinesis were tested by the CIA and other spy agencies and on camera by psychologists.

I have posted a lot of other extraordinary evidence, yet skeptics insist there is no reliable evidence. Why keep up the charade? Skeptics should just come out and say what is so unreliable about the tests done to prove telekinesis.

Sources:
On-Camera test: http://eegym.com/can-eeg-tell-if-telekinesis-is-a-magicians-trick-2/
Test by the United States CIA: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/66xy95/zhang_baosheng_confirmed_cia_psychic_ability_to/

Skeptics in this thread consistently ignore the evidence I posted and it demonstrates that they are not here to learn, instead they like to argue and pat themselves on the back.

[Horacewoodwood]

Explain how complexity shows god exists, don't just say it does. Where is your argument

With regard to the info in my links, above, explain how God doesn't exist. Don't just say He doesn't. Nobody has rebutted the scientific proof that God exists. But why don't you at least try?

I have done several times, it's even quoted by you here lol. ''The cause could be many things, claiming it was God it's like claiming it was aliens, no proof for any of them. '' Your links, if everything is true there, which might not be but for the sake of it we will say it is, only proves there is a beginning and a cause for the existence of the universe, it does not say anything about the cause itself. The cause can be many different things and you can only speculate what it is.

You miss the point. The point is that no matter who or what started cause and effect, it is God.

The fact of the "kind of" complexity that cause and effect produces, shows not only that it was absolutely God Who started it, but that God is way beyond the imagination of mankind in the wisdom, knowledge, power, and glory that He has and is.

Well then we are back to the problem. You said the bible is true, therefore only the god from the bible could be the one who started cause and effect. It can't be anything. It can't be Zeus or aliens. Do you not understand your failed logic here?

You are mixing yourself all up. Focus on the links, and you will prove God to yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

You love loops, don't you? As I said, even if everything there is accurate, the only thing you are proving is that something created the universe. However you don't know what that something is and you are just assuming is the god from the bible because you believe in him.

I looked through your little post here. There isn't even any attempted rebuttal of science. You simply jump into religion.

Come on. Surely you can find a rebuttal to cause and effect, entropy or complexity... or their combined application in science. I mean, since you are so against science, and in favor of religion, that should be an easy thing for you to do, right?

What? No rebuttal? Awe, that's too bad. Gonna miss you in Heaven, though. But only for a tiny moment.

Are you autistic? Cause and effect, entropy and complexity do not prove or show who or what created the universe.

These scientific truths show that it was definitely God that did the creating, even though they don't explain what God really is.

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

Sorry for the long break, I had some work to do and I was gone for a while. In the meantime, I see our little retard went loose and started growing his rotten teeth again. Well, here we are, episode 23 that proves the stupidity of Badecker, an episode named simply 'Apologeezus'.
 Badecker has done and said many shit while I was gone, but most of it was the same loop of Badecker where he always goes back to the links after a fail. We've seen a very good question from Astargath regarding how complexity works combined with cause and effect and how does that lead to God and of course he never got an answer, Badecker went around the question and somehow got to religion only to accuse Astargath later of talking religion and to change the subject. We already knew Badecker knows nothing about physics, biology, cosmology, etc so nothing new in the fact he can't really answer how the laws presented in his links 'work'.
 However, there is something he hasn't done until now, not in this way: admit he is an apologist. The apologist went full retard again and actually admitted to being an apologist by saying he believes God created the universe because there isn't anything else, to be more specific, because he has no answer to what was the cause of the universe so he just believed in God because he learned about it since he was a baby. That is what an apologist is. What is even funnier is that by admitting that, he denied his whole 'scientific' theory and even his God again, only with the superficiality of the mindset. While believers are tolerated and understood because they need something, they feel they can believe in something great, in something that they call beautiful, apologists are simple idiots who can't admit that they don't know the answer to a question, so they just rule out the question by answering with 'God'. That makes the whole God thing even more superficial and pitiful than it already is nowadays, since that is how religions appeared in the first place, because the lack of knowledge. Now we have the knowledge, but some retards still answer scientific questions with 'God'. One of these retards is right here, and we have 77 more episodes to prove what an idiot he is. Applause for our retarded apologist Badecker for coming out of the closet and stay tuned folks, I ain't going anywhere.

[BADecker]

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

We live in a simulated reality because we are programmed like the matrix, just as an easy example. Aliens that are very intelligent and capable of creating universes. And your argument is a logical fallacy because you are doing an argument from ignorance, oh what else could it be, so because you can't think of a better explanation it means it's God?

Well, thank you for the help   You just turned aliens into God.

[bebejhen]

No one can tell if really God exist. No one sees Him. But for me, God exist in the heart of each person that believes in Him. I really don't believe in what on the bible said, or the priest said, or anyone stories. I just believe that He's there watching us. As long as I exist, God exist in my heart and soul.

[Lancusters]

No one can tell if really God exist. No one sees Him. But for me, God exist in the heart of each person that believes in Him. I really don't believe in what on the bible said, or the priest said, or anyone stories. I just believe that He's there watching us. As long as I exist, God exist in my heart and soul.

There is no God. When people create an excuse for myself that God exists in their hearts, minds or souls is an attempt to find a compromise with the mind that says that there is no God. This position is the first step to atheism.

[bebejhen]

No one can tell if really God exist. No one sees Him. But for me, God exist in the heart of each person that believes in Him. I really don't believe in what on the bible said, or the priest said, or anyone stories. I just believe that He's there watching us. As long as I exist, God exist in my heart and soul.

There is no God. When people create an excuse for myself that God exists in their hearts, minds or souls is an attempt to find a compromise with the mind that says that there is no God. This position is the first step to atheism.

I'll respect your opinion, but still no one can tell. There's no proof if He really exist or not.

[Bardman]

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

We live in a simulated reality because we are programmed like the matrix, just as an easy example. Aliens that are very intelligent and capable of creating universes. And your argument is a logical fallacy because you are doing an argument from ignorance, oh what else could it be, so because you can't think of a better explanation it means it's God?

Well, thank you for the help   You just turned aliens into God.

You just went full retard this time badecker. Just admit that you failed. There is no point in continuing this thing you are doing, you aren't convincing anyone but yourself, it's obvious at this point that you are struggling to accept what you have been taught for so long and you are doing anything it takes to convince yourself of it, seek some help.

[sirazimuth]

Actually you took this out of context, horace. Skeptics use often use a double standard, that is their fallacy:

https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/skeptical_misdirection#skeptical_misdirection_double_standard

The other common tactic is known as Misrepresenting The Scientific Evidence.

I took what out of what context? Speak to me, explain, come up with arguments, enough with the links already. If you are not able to speak to me and you always need to give me links with what others think that us 'skeptics' are wrong about, then you do not understand anything of it. More than that, I can't understand what you are talking about because you solely posted a link. If you want to answer to what I have said, talk about that, you have it there, you can analyze it and tell me what do you believe is wrong and why. In that way, we can have a proper conversation. Otherwise it will be the same as it is with Badecker, everyone trying to have a conversation and a monkey saying anything that crosses his mind. Let's keep this simple and efficient.

The extraordinary evidence (in favor of parapsychology and survival) has already been provided. I also linked to some examples where this evidence was deliberately ignored by skeptics. Since that information is in the link above, I am including it in our conversation by way of reference; surely you have the ability to read through an essay on the topic of skeptical misdirection because it clearly relates to our discussion about parapsychology.

Psychics and telekinesis were tested by the CIA and other spy agencies and on camera by psychologists.

I have posted a lot of other extraordinary evidence, yet skeptics insist there is no reliable evidence. Why keep up the charade? Skeptics should just come out and say what is so unreliable about the tests done to prove telekinesis.

Sources:
On-Camera test: http://eegym.com/can-eeg-tell-if-telekinesis-is-a-magicians-trick-2/
Test by the United States CIA: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/66xy95/zhang_baosheng_confirmed_cia_psychic_ability_to/

Skeptics in this thread consistently ignore the evidence I posted and it demonstrates that they are not here to learn, instead they like to argue and pat themselves on the back.

 Sorry for the long break, I had some work to do and I was gone for a while. In the meantime, I see our little retard went loose and started growing his rotten teeth again. Well, here we are, episode 23 that proves the stupidity of Badecker, an episode named simply 'Apologeezus'.
 Badecker has done and said many shit while I was gone, but most of it was the same loop of Badecker where he always goes back to the links after a fail. We've seen a very good question from Astargath regarding how complexity works combined with cause and effect and how does that lead to God and of course he never got an answer, Badecker went around the question and somehow got to religion only to accuse Astargath later of talking religion and to change the subject. We already knew Badecker knows nothing about physics, biology, cosmology, etc so nothing new in the fact he can't really answer how the laws presented in his links 'work'.
 However, there is something he hasn't done until now, not in this way: admit he is an apologist. The apologist went full retard again and actually admitted to being an apologist by saying he believes God created the universe because there isn't anything else, to be more specific, because he has no answer to what was the cause of the universe so he just believed in God because he learned about it since he was a baby. That is what an apologist is. What is even funnier is that by admitting that, he denied his whole 'scientific' theory and even his God again, only with the superficiality of the mindset. While believers are tolerated and understood because they need something, they feel they can believe in something great, in something that they call beautiful, apologists are simple idiots who can't admit that they don't know the answer to a question, so they just rule out the question by answering with 'God'. That makes the whole God thing even more superficial and pitiful than it already is nowadays, since that is how religions appeared in the first place, because the lack of knowledge. Now we have the knowledge, but some retards still answer scientific questions with 'God'. One of these retards is right here, and we have 77 more episodes to prove what an idiot he is. Applause for our retarded apologist Badecker for coming out of the closet and stay tuned folks, I ain't going anywhere.

Ha!  welcome back my friend!  great episode as always.
thread was starting look to to like the Astergath smackdown of BADecker (no contest)
with a sprinkling of parapsychology nonsense.
 sorry qwik,  but telekinesis not even worth discussing, akin to debating a flat earth

[Astargath]

Actually you took this out of context, horace. Skeptics use often use a double standard, that is their fallacy:

https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/skeptical_misdirection#skeptical_misdirection_double_standard

The other common tactic is known as Misrepresenting The Scientific Evidence.

I took what out of what context? Speak to me, explain, come up with arguments, enough with the links already. If you are not able to speak to me and you always need to give me links with what others think that us 'skeptics' are wrong about, then you do not understand anything of it. More than that, I can't understand what you are talking about because you solely posted a link. If you want to answer to what I have said, talk about that, you have it there, you can analyze it and tell me what do you believe is wrong and why. In that way, we can have a proper conversation. Otherwise it will be the same as it is with Badecker, everyone trying to have a conversation and a monkey saying anything that crosses his mind. Let's keep this simple and efficient.

The extraordinary evidence (in favor of parapsychology and survival) has already been provided. I also linked to some examples where this evidence was deliberately ignored by skeptics. Since that information is in the link above, I am including it in our conversation by way of reference; surely you have the ability to read through an essay on the topic of skeptical misdirection because it clearly relates to our discussion about parapsychology.

Psychics and telekinesis were tested by the CIA and other spy agencies and on camera by psychologists.

I have posted a lot of other extraordinary evidence, yet skeptics insist there is no reliable evidence. Why keep up the charade? Skeptics should just come out and say what is so unreliable about the tests done to prove telekinesis.

Sources:
On-Camera test: http://eegym.com/can-eeg-tell-if-telekinesis-is-a-magicians-trick-2/
Test by the United States CIA: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/66xy95/zhang_baosheng_confirmed_cia_psychic_ability_to/

Skeptics in this thread consistently ignore the evidence I posted and it demonstrates that they are not here to learn, instead they like to argue and pat themselves on the back.

If there was something like telekinesis, we would be seeing it all the time, everyone would know about it because it would be amazing to see someone doing it, you wouldn't need to convince people of it. The reality is different, there are only a few fake videos on youtube about it and that's pretty much it. Oh well and a lot of conspiracies and stories as usual.

[BADecker]

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

We live in a simulated reality because we are programmed like the matrix, just as an easy example. Aliens that are very intelligent and capable of creating universes. And your argument is a logical fallacy because you are doing an argument from ignorance, oh what else could it be, so because you can't think of a better explanation it means it's God?

Well, thank you for the help   You just turned aliens into God.

You just went full retard this time badecker. Just admit that you failed. There is no point in continuing this thing you are doing, you aren't convincing anyone but yourself, it's obvious at this point that you are struggling to accept what you have been taught for so long and you are doing anything it takes to convince yourself of it, seek some help.

Talk, talk, talk. All you have there is political science. Like the others, you haven't shown any unrebutted rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists. That's okay, though. We all know that God exists.

[Astargath]

Where is the evidence pointing to a God and not to something else?

The evidence is right in what you asked. There isn't anything else. So, all the evidence points to God.

Somebody might suggest that big bang is something else. But BB doesn't even scientifically define a method for intelligence in the universe. BB is out of the picture by its own design.

Do you have a "something else" that you can point at, that makes any sense at all?

We live in a simulated reality because we are programmed like the matrix, just as an easy example. Aliens that are very intelligent and capable of creating universes. And your argument is a logical fallacy because you are doing an argument from ignorance, oh what else could it be, so because you can't think of a better explanation it means it's God?

Well, thank you for the help   You just turned aliens into God.

You just went full retard this time badecker. Just admit that you failed. There is no point in continuing this thing you are doing, you aren't convincing anyone but yourself, it's obvious at this point that you are struggling to accept what you have been taught for so long and you are doing anything it takes to convince yourself of it, seek some help.

Talk, talk, talk. All you have there is political science. Like the others, you haven't shown any unrebutted rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists. That's okay, though. We all know that God exists.

I already did and you just ignored it and said that i turned aliens into God?? I mean, it's clear that you won't accept that there is no evidence for the existence of god and you are now desperately trying to convince yourself. It's ok, give it some time maybe you will awake one day.

[BADecker]

Talk, talk, talk. All you have there is political science. Like the others, you haven't shown any unrebutted rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists. That's okay, though. We all know that God exists.

I already did and you just ignored it and said that i turned aliens into God?? I mean, it's clear that you won't accept that there is no evidence for the existence of god and you are now desperately trying to convince yourself. It's ok, give it some time maybe you will awake one day.

The only thing you did was to SAY that you did it.   

[sashamoe]

God is there, if you have a religion must believe god, god only one and have no family, be it father, mother, child, grandchild or grandfather