Scientific proof that God exists?

[sirazimuth]

yo hey guys... what round is this anyway?
i scrolled thru last page and counted 14  "anythings" in red ..do i win a prize?
i think this is absolute proof that science proves beyond a shadow of a doubt
 the existence of the all powerful almighty invisible omnipotent immortal sky daddy,
creator of the universe no less (don't ask who created the sky daddy, that's forbidden)

[qwik2learn]

yo hey guys... what round is this anyway?
i scrolled thru last page and counted 14  "anythings" in red ..do i win a prize?
i think this is absolute proof that science proves beyond a shadow of a doubt
 the existence of the all powerful almighty invisible omnipotent immortal sky daddy,
creator of the universe no less (don't ask who created the sky daddy, that's forbidden)

I can ask a similar question: what came before the universe? Why something instead of nothing?
All theories regarding the origin of the universe imply self-existence, so all theories are literally inconceivable! This was explained by Herbert Spencer in his book First Principles .

Some atheists and pseudoskeptics will say that science has removed the need for God as an explanation for the existence of the natural world. The quotes here demonstrate that many of the greatest scientific minds believe just the opposite, that the scientific evidence is best explained by the existence of an intelligent designer of the universe.

https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/eminent_researchers

[Vod]

I can ask a similar question: what came before the universe? Why something instead of nothing?
All theories regarding the origin of the universe imply self-existence, so all theories are literally inconceivable!

Nonsense.  I can conceive of time being a circle.

[lucasclara246]

I believe in god .Not only me every one have that one situation that we realize that god is there.
But we can't prove that god exists.
We only feel  about god but we can't see.

[HannesRumpel]

satanism is on rise why? this bad guy exist - and also our creator exist,

just watch the video to the gotthard tunnel swiss, this satanic ritual and the net is full of this things !

time to wake up before the judgement come !

[Katashi]

This is interesting but for people like me. i really believe that arguing with others and contesting if there is real God or not is nonsense. don't find this sarcastic but if you come to think of it God in every religion says be good. so try hard to be good even if it's not that easy. because at the end of the day if God really exist or not at least you die living a good life.

[BADecker]

Since this is a science topic, find some sensible rebuttal to the proof that God exists. Anybody can have feelings this way or that. The reason we need rebuttal to the proof is to find out if the proof can stand, logically.

The proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

[Astargath]

Since this is a science topic, find some sensible rebuttal to the proof that God exists. Anybody can have feelings this way or that. The reason we need rebuttal to the proof is to find out if the proof can stand, logically.

The proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Your arguments are not arguments, they are talk, backwards talk showing that they are false. Your arguments are simply talk-arounds therefore debunking themselves

[BADecker]

Since this is a science topic, find some sensible rebuttal to the proof that God exists. Anybody can have feelings this way or that. The reason we need rebuttal to the proof is to find out if the proof can stand, logically.

The proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Your arguments are not arguments, they are talk, backwards talk showing that they are false. Your arguments are simply talk-arounds therefore debunking themselves

If this is what you truly think, pick a point, and explain what is wrong with it. Using the words of other people to do this shows you do not personally, really know.

[Astargath]

Since this is a science topic, find some sensible rebuttal to the proof that God exists. Anybody can have feelings this way or that. The reason we need rebuttal to the proof is to find out if the proof can stand, logically.

The proof:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Your arguments are not arguments, they are talk, backwards talk showing that they are false. Your arguments are simply talk-arounds therefore debunking themselves

If this is what you truly think, pick a point, and explain what is wrong with it. Using the words of other people to do this shows you do not personally, really know.

They are all wrong unfortunately, It's just circular referencing leading to nowhere. Everything is already self-refuted.

[shams]

Science and Religion have a coherent bond with one another where one cannot exist without the other. To answer that question first one must ask what is God, who is He, is He a single entity or is He spread across all creations. If you do not know what you're looking for, you will never find it, hence neither can science or and any other thing help you prove God's existence until you do not define Him in the best of ways.

[qwik2learn]

I can ask a similar question: what came before the universe? Why something instead of nothing?
All theories regarding the origin of the universe imply self-existence, so all theories are literally inconceivable!

Nonsense.  I can conceive of time being a circle.

You can conceive of the past being caused by the future?
You are preaching nonsense.

[Astargath]

I can ask a similar question: what came before the universe? Why something instead of nothing?
All theories regarding the origin of the universe imply self-existence, so all theories are literally inconceivable!

Nonsense.  I can conceive of time being a circle.

You can conceive of the past being caused by the future?
You are preaching nonsense.

Prove it

[qwik2learn]

I can ask a similar question: what came before the universe? Why something instead of nothing?
All theories regarding the origin of the universe imply self-existence, so all theories are literally inconceivable!

Nonsense.  I can conceive of time being a circle.

You can conceive of the past being caused by the future?
You are preaching nonsense.

Prove it

It is up to you to prove the claim that causality can run in reverse.

In general, a process has many causes, which are said to be causal factors for it, and all lie in its past. Therefore, a cause from the future is out of sequence and nonsensical.

[qwik2learn]

Because if superpowers like those really existed everyone would know about them.
Is not like scientists are purposely hiding it from people, it's just that it doesn't exist.

No, that does not follow, you cannot say that the existence of a thing is entirely based on popular belief. Many people like yourself have prejudices such that they would deny TK even when presented with scientific evidence. Go figure!
Many people already believe in the supernatural, and parapsychology has a long history, and many eminent researchers believed in these ideas. The reason that most people do not know about the evidence is not important, the science stands by itself regardless of popular belief. To be rational means that you are capable of intelligently assessing new ideas when presented. You have not been able to do that, instead you propose a sort of bandwagon argument.
How can it not exist when I have 2 tests that prove it?
You are trying to cover up the results and say that TK does not exist but you refuse to address the experiments?

No response? You are full of shit, Astargath!

[Astargath]

Because if superpowers like those really existed everyone would know about them.
Is not like scientists are purposely hiding it from people, it's just that it doesn't exist.

No, that does not follow, you cannot say that the existence of a thing is entirely based on popular belief. Many people like yourself have prejudices such that they would deny TK even when presented with scientific evidence. Go figure!
Many people already believe in the supernatural, and parapsychology has a long history, and many eminent researchers believed in these ideas. The reason that most people do not know about the evidence is not important, the science stands by itself regardless of popular belief. To be rational means that you are capable of intelligently assessing new ideas when presented. You have not been able to do that, instead you propose a sort of bandwagon argument.
How can it not exist when I have 2 tests that prove it?
You are trying to cover up the results and say that TK does not exist but you refuse to address the experiments?

No response? You are full of shit, Astargath!

Yeah, I'm full of shit. So far my life has been the same, I have never seen telekinesis. I will probably die at 80 and not see telekinesis with my eyes, you know why? Because it doesn't exist. Stop believing nonsensical garbage, is not helping you with anything, is it?

[BADecker]

Yeah, I'm full of shit.

Have you tried prune juice?     

[qwik2learn]

Yeah, I'm full of shit. So far my life has been the same, I have never seen telekinesis. I will probably die at 80 and not see telekinesis with my eyes, you know why? Because it doesn't exist. Stop believing nonsensical garbage, is not helping you with anything, is it?

The claims you made do not follow each other and are not based in evidence: you never state that these tests are flawed, so what reason is there to reject them? Just because you were not a witness?

Chain of claims made by you:
I have never seen TK.
I will never see TK.
TK does not exist.
Knowing about (the existence of) TK is not helpful or practical.

You arguments never address the science. Not one of your arguments have ever addressed the evidence, you are covering up the results of these tests because you cannot explain them. I also linked to a test where the TK was recorded on video, but you did not care to see the tests since then you would NOT be able to claim that you have never seen TK.

[bebejhen]

I don't think that there is a scientific proof that God really exist. It just depend on the belief of each of us.

[Astargath]

Yeah, I'm full of shit. So far my life has been the same, I have never seen telekinesis. I will probably die at 80 and not see telekinesis with my eyes, you know why? Because it doesn't exist. Stop believing nonsensical garbage, is not helping you with anything, is it?

The claims you made do not follow each other and are not based in evidence: you never state that these tests are flawed, so what reason is there to reject them? Just because you were not a witness?

Chain of claims made by you:
I have never seen TK.
I will never see TK.
TK does not exist.
Knowing about (the existence of) TK is not helpful or practical.

You arguments never address the science. Not one of your arguments have ever addressed the evidence, you are covering up the results of these tests because you cannot explain them. I also linked to a test where the TK was recorded on video, but you did not care to see the tests since then you would NOT be able to claim that you have never seen TK.

I don't care. As I said, you can claim whatever you want but in the end you know it doesn't exist.