americanpegasus
|
|
July 03, 2016, 04:13:49 PM |
|
That chart is erroneous. It doesn't account for the change in blocktime and thus erroneously shows a hashrate that is twice as high as the actual hashrate.
Damn. So on the uptick, but not as much as that chart would suggest. Is there an accurate one somewhere?
|
Account is back under control of the real AmericanPegasus.
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
|
July 03, 2016, 04:19:24 PM |
|
That chart is erroneous. It doesn't account for the change in blocktime and thus erroneously shows a hashrate that is twice as high as the actual hashrate.
Damn. So on the uptick, but not as much as that chart would suggest. Is there an accurate one somewhere? Any pool, like http://minexmr.com or http://mro.poolto.be, or an explorer like http://moneroblocks.info/ or http://minergate.com
|
|
|
|
_nur
|
|
July 03, 2016, 04:20:22 PM |
|
Maybe you should forecast a bear market since AmericanPegasus is the reverse indicator of Monero as MatTheCat is to Bitcoin.
a whale is pimping this coin, there is no doubt about that... i cant tell when the whale will leave this coin dry tho let it dry can we have another 25cents per xmr please
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2016, 05:45:20 PM |
|
That chart is erroneous. It doesn't account for the change in blocktime and thus erroneously shows a hashrate that is twice as high as the actual hashrate.
Damn. So on the uptick, but not as much as that chart would suggest. Is there an accurate one somewhere? Nothing wrong with your graph, as long as you disregard the MH/s (changed due to the fork). EDIT current network stats - Difficulty: 2140418213
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2016, 05:47:57 PM |
|
That chart is erroneous. It doesn't account for the change in blocktime and thus erroneously shows a hashrate that is twice as high as the actual hashrate.
Do you even mine bro ? Who cares about the MH/s, the pretty lines are OK
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2016, 05:52:32 PM |
|
The pools mentioned are all shitpools. If you take steep emission curve into consideration, the pool that definitely pays the most is the pool with the highest hash rate - monero.crypto-pool.fr
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
July 03, 2016, 06:27:57 PM |
|
That chart is erroneous. It doesn't account for the change in blocktime and thus erroneously shows a hashrate that is twice as high as the actual hashrate.
Do you even mine bro ? Who cares about the MH/s, the pretty lines are OK Well, here is a more clear picture then:
|
|
|
|
americanpegasus
|
|
July 03, 2016, 07:28:11 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for that chart! A true and permanent break of 20Mh/s will be incredibly bullish for Monero. Its been depressing seeing it perpetually at 13Mh/s - 15Mh/s for years but at least this defended it from trivial attacks. Just think - one day our network might even exceed a whole Gh/s!
|
Account is back under control of the real AmericanPegasus.
|
|
|
smooth (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
July 03, 2016, 07:56:51 PM |
|
The pools mentioned are all shitpools. If you take steep emission curve into consideration, the pool that definitely pays the most is the pool with the highest hash rate - monero.crypto-pool.fr Nonsense. The best pool is the one with the lowest latency to your miners, lowest pool orphan rate, best reliability, reasonably-frequent but not too-frequent payouts (no more than once per day; less is probably better), and lowest fees. That won't be the same for everyone.
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2016, 08:21:57 PM |
|
Nonsense. The best pool is the one with the lowest latency to your miners, lowest pool orphan rate, best reliability, reasonably-frequent but not too-frequent payouts (no more than once per day; less is probably better), and lowest fees. That won't be the same for everyone.
Miners with more than 50KH/s 1KH/s know what you just wrote is BS.
|
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
July 03, 2016, 10:17:54 PM |
|
Nonsense. The best pool is the one with the lowest latency to your miners, lowest pool orphan rate, best reliability, reasonably-frequent but not too-frequent payouts (no more than once per day; less is probably better), and lowest fees. That won't be the same for everyone.
Miners with more than 50KH/s 1KH/s know what you just wrote is BS. My preference with Monero is no pool, just solo mine. This is with less than 1 KH/s
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
July 03, 2016, 11:49:07 PM |
|
Ok, thank you for that chart! A true and permanent break of 20Mh/s will be incredibly bullish for Monero. Its been depressing seeing it perpetually at 13Mh/s - 15Mh/s for years but at least this defended it from trivial attacks. Just think - one day our network might even exceed a whole Gh/s!
Definitely pushing higher lately, but a whole Gh/s! Shivers! Anyone know what's up with https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.htmlHasn't updated for 16 hours...
|
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
July 04, 2016, 12:06:50 AM |
|
I get 19.75 MH/s on both my nodes. As to why there has been an increase in the hashrate? There has been a significant increase the XMR/USD exchange rate that has more than compensated for the drop in the block subsidy.
|
|
|
|
XMRChina
|
|
July 04, 2016, 04:10:55 AM |
|
My preference with Monero is no pool, just solo mine. This is with less than 1 KH/s
For those that don't mind infrequently finding blocks this is a perfect approach.
|
|
|
|
Whtwabbit
|
|
July 04, 2016, 06:44:18 AM |
|
On average how long would you expect to find a block solomining with 500h/s and the network hashrate around 16/18 M/hs?
|
██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████████ ██████████ Monero
|
| "The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." David Chaum 1996 "Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect." Adam Back 2014
|
| | |
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
July 04, 2016, 06:50:13 AM |
|
On average how long would you expect to find a block solomining with 500h/s and the network hashrate around 16/18 M/hs?
Once every two months
|
|
|
|
needmoney90
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2016, 06:52:37 AM |
|
On average how long would you expect to find a block solomining with 500h/s and the network hashrate around 16/18 M/hs?
Median of 16/18Mh/s is 17Mh/s 500/17,000,000 = 1/34,000 So, if a block occurs every 2 minutes, that means it will take about 34000 blocks, or 47.2 days (at the current hash rate) to mine a block. (I hope my math is accurate here)
|
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
|
July 04, 2016, 07:00:56 AM |
|
I get 53.72 days using the current hashrate of 19.34 MH/s.
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
July 04, 2016, 10:42:27 AM |
|
On average how long would you expect to find a block solomining with 500h/s and the network hashrate around 16/18 M/hs?
Once every two months Should someone with smaller hashing power factor the emission diminishing per block rate with reward variance in P/L calcs?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
July 04, 2016, 12:14:28 PM |
|
On average how long would you expect to find a block solomining with 500h/s and the network hashrate around 16/18 M/hs?
Once every two months Should someone with smaller hashing power factor the emission diminishing per block rate with reward variance in P/L calcs? The threat of increasing difficulty is more salient in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|