iluvbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
|
 |
November 29, 2017, 05:44:01 PM |
|
Am I the only one who's bankroll investment on SD is always negative 
|
Looking for a signature campaign.
|
|
|
Bitfort
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 339
invest trade and gamble wisely
|
 |
November 29, 2017, 07:18:53 PM |
|
Am I the only one who's bankroll investment on SD is always negative  Aren't you playing with kelly? Currently the bankroll is down indeed but I'm still in green. Depends on when you started.
|
MY HINTs ◄M► MINING ◄G► GAMBLING ◄E► EXCHANGE
| ◄E► (KCS) Kucoin-Staking, Auto-Lending, Trading-Bot ◄E► (BNB) Binance-Staking, Savings, 10% RefBack ◄E► (TRX) Poloniex-Staking, Lending, Fee Discount ◄E► (LEO) Bitfinex-Staking, Auto-Lending
| ◄G► Betfury-Faucet, Dividend Earnings (BFG holders, mine BFG by playing) ◄G► Bitvest - Faucet, Bankroll Invest ◄G► CryptoGames-Faucet, Lotto ◄G► PrimeDice-Faucet
| ◄M► Prohashing (Multipool)-Payout in any coin, get 0.50% bonus for 30 days ◄M► MiningRigRentals (Marketplace)-buy hashrate or rent your miners ◄M► Viabtc (Pool)-payout to Coinex (exchnage) without fees
|
|
|
|
iluvbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
|
 |
November 29, 2017, 09:31:45 PM |
|
Am I the only one who's bankroll investment on SD is always negative  Aren't you playing with kelly? Currently the bankroll is down indeed but I'm still in green. Depends on when you started. I am. My third time investing here, third time negative  At first it covered my last negative (this deposit), but again I ended up with -0.025 (1 BTC investment).
|
Looking for a signature campaign.
|
|
|
Bitfort
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 339
invest trade and gamble wisely
|
 |
November 29, 2017, 09:39:12 PM |
|
Am I the only one who's bankroll investment on SD is always negative  Aren't you playing with kelly? Currently the bankroll is down indeed but I'm still in green. Depends on when you started. I am. My third time investing here, third time negative  At first it covered my last negative (this deposit), but again I ended up with -0.025 (1 BTC investment). That's it. You are just unlucky (or unskilled  ). When you set 2x kelly right in time someone is winning your funds are disappearing 2x quickly... but when casino is winning and you have just 1x kelly or 0.5 ... Catch my drift?
|
MY HINTs ◄M► MINING ◄G► GAMBLING ◄E► EXCHANGE
| ◄E► (KCS) Kucoin-Staking, Auto-Lending, Trading-Bot ◄E► (BNB) Binance-Staking, Savings, 10% RefBack ◄E► (TRX) Poloniex-Staking, Lending, Fee Discount ◄E► (LEO) Bitfinex-Staking, Auto-Lending
| ◄G► Betfury-Faucet, Dividend Earnings (BFG holders, mine BFG by playing) ◄G► Bitvest - Faucet, Bankroll Invest ◄G► CryptoGames-Faucet, Lotto ◄G► PrimeDice-Faucet
| ◄M► Prohashing (Multipool)-Payout in any coin, get 0.50% bonus for 30 days ◄M► MiningRigRentals (Marketplace)-buy hashrate or rent your miners ◄M► Viabtc (Pool)-payout to Coinex (exchnage) without fees
|
|
|
|
|
flip4flop
|
 |
November 29, 2017, 10:22:38 PM |
|
Gave it a try to test out deposit, rolls and withdrawals. Everything worked as intended. Ended up profiting about $20 after about 35 rolls. Wanted to play with the entire process before committing any more funds and I am fairly confident everything with SafeDICE works as intended. Will be playing again soon, thanks for putting together a easy to understand system and quick transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gizzig
|
 |
November 30, 2017, 12:08:23 AM |
|
Hi Monero withdrawal doesn't work for me (tried it yesterday and today several times): "Something went wrong, hot wallet may be empty please be patient or contact us via email in the FAQ section." Please help, they are only 0.54 XMR
|
|
|
|
|
gizzig
|
 |
December 01, 2017, 01:42:46 AM |
|
Today again the same message: "Something went wrong, hot wallet may be empty please be patient or contact us via email in the FAQ section." Please, fix this now 
|
|
|
|
Rousse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 05, 2017, 10:12:19 AM |
|
BE AWARE new comers, this gambling site has no support AT ALL, 3 DAYS since i joined and XMR Deposit / Withdraw is OFF and of course transaction is stuck => $$ GONE
No one answer in chat, no one answer via support, hot wallet empty... DON'T deposit coin !!
|
|
|
|
|
Rousse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 05, 2017, 10:54:52 AM |
|
Gave it a try to test out deposit, rolls and withdrawals. Everything worked as intended. Ended up profiting about $20 after about 35 rolls. Wanted to play with the entire process before committing any more funds and I am fairly confident everything with SafeDICE works as intended. Will be playing again soon, thanks for putting together a easy to understand system and quick transactions.
Here is the complete opposite version, so let me ask you something, are you a bot/grunt from safedice? cause it shouldn't be possible than in 1 week from your message this site goes to wonderfull to HORRIBLE nightmare !!!
|
|
|
|
|
puthre
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 05, 2017, 11:26:43 AM |
|
I also have issues withdrawing XMR. Support replied 10 days ago to reassure me that they are going to fix it. Nothing happened yet...
|
|
|
|
|
maximuss
Member

Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
 |
December 05, 2017, 11:40:46 AM |
|
This is just like a broken record. Timeline: 1.) Deposits/withdrawals works for a week. 2.) Deposits/withdrawals stops processing. 3.) Many players wait for one, two, even three weeks. 4.) Admin comes back online after a month, says he's very sorry and they'll work on better support. 5.) Repeat.
|
|
|
|
|
Rousse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 05, 2017, 11:58:02 AM |
|
This is just like a broken record. Timeline: 1.) Deposits/withdrawals works for a week. 2.) Deposits/withdrawals stops processing. 3.) Many players wait for one, two, even three weeks. 4.) Admin comes back online after a month, says he's very sorry and they'll work on better support. 5.) Repeat.
4.) Admin refund??? I'm so sad i didn't see that timeline before... not digged enough, lesson learned
|
|
|
|
|
monerostruggles1111
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 10:01:20 AM |
|
Gizzig you seemed to miss this last time I posted so ATTENTION PLEASE: GIZZIG PUTHRE ROUSSE I can't speak to deposits but XMR withdrawals are currently working. You need to specifically use a standard "old style" address and a 64 character hex string for the payment id. Without either of those the withdraw will fail. Follow this checklist and most likely your withdrawal will succeed. Yo gizzig. I just messed up another withdrawal and came here to check if the hot wallet was empty but then I realized that I made a mistake. It's very easy to mess up XMR withdrawals on SafeDice and it's never obvious what you missed so I made this checklist to help myself. I think it will help others here as well. SD withdraw checklist 1.Check you have enough xmr balance. Investors need to divest first. 2.Use only basic standard address. No integrated addresses. 3.Payment ID is mandatory. Use a 64 char hex string. If sending to a wallet you control, use this https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm4.2FA is not optional if you have it set up. Check the time on 2fa device(phone) is correct. 5.If it still fails try a lower amount. The hot wallet may be low or empty. Check the BCT thread. If you mess up any of these things besides 2fa you will get the same error message as if the hot wallet was empty. When I had the same issue support never responded to me, so yes, the support is dog shit but the site does actually work most of the time as long as you follow the rules (which are stated nowhere and you need to figure out on your own unless someone tells you).
|
|
|
|
|
Rousse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 11:08:54 AM |
|
Thanks for your advice on withdraw mate, for me the problem come from Deposit.
I follow every step proposed by SD, Wallet Public Adress+Payment ID, i had funds on my exchange and the transaction is complete.
The worst part for me on this ? => There is absolutely NO ONE from admin/dev team who answer.... no mail, no chat, no support, nothing. So pardon me if i'm wrong but i must advertise newcomer to take care of this site.
|
|
|
|
|
Timetwister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1202
Merit: 1047
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 07:44:44 PM |
|
I just deposited 0.01 BTC to invest them and try the casino. Shortly after clicking on invest all and on Risk Level 2x Kelly, it became 0.00999998 and it said I have 0.00139939% of the total site investment. Therefore, total site invested must be 2*0.00999998/0.0000139939=1429.19 BTC. It says, however, that site bankroll is 272.09401489. Therefore, an average kelly factor of 5.25 is being used. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Allowing a kelly factor as big as 5.25 (actually that means there's people using a bigger one, as that's the average) is quite risky, and may cause another drama as when on April 2016 a player won about 100 BTC and basically destroyed ultra leveraged investors. So a maximum 2x for everyone would be not only much safer (which is good for the casino long term), but also fair for people investing now, which otherwise are getting diluted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Josepht
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 11:24:14 PM |
|
I just deposited 0.01 BTC to invest them and try the casino. Shortly after clicking on invest all and on Risk Level 2x Kelly, it became 0.00999998 and it said I have 0.00139939% of the total site investment. Therefore, total site invested must be 2*0.00999998/0.0000139939=1429.19 BTC. It says, however, that site bankroll is 272.09401489. Therefore, an average kelly factor of 5.25 is being used. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Allowing a kelly factor as big as 5.25 (actually that means there's people using a bigger one, as that's the average) is quite risky, and may cause another drama as when on April 2016 a player won about 100 BTC and basically destroyed ultra leveraged investors. So a maximum 2x for everyone would be not only much safer (which is good for the casino long term), but also fair for people investing now, which otherwise are getting diluted.
A kelly factor of 5.25 isn't wrong at all. If you look at yolodice for example, their average investment factor is 9+. Personally, I like really high investment factors. You can deposit only a tiny amount of your total BTC you want to invest. The amount of money you're losing when the site shuts down, or is hacked is way less then you would have lost when you would have deposited all of the BTC. Besides, it's up to the investors how much risk they want to take. If some investor doesn't mind that all his invested BTC is risked in 1 bet, why shouldn't you allow it?
|
|
|
|
|
Timetwister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1202
Merit: 1047
|
 |
December 06, 2017, 11:29:14 PM |
|
I just deposited 0.01 BTC to invest them and try the casino. Shortly after clicking on invest all and on Risk Level 2x Kelly, it became 0.00999998 and it said I have 0.00139939% of the total site investment. Therefore, total site invested must be 2*0.00999998/0.0000139939=1429.19 BTC. It says, however, that site bankroll is 272.09401489. Therefore, an average kelly factor of 5.25 is being used. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Allowing a kelly factor as big as 5.25 (actually that means there's people using a bigger one, as that's the average) is quite risky, and may cause another drama as when on April 2016 a player won about 100 BTC and basically destroyed ultra leveraged investors. So a maximum 2x for everyone would be not only much safer (which is good for the casino long term), but also fair for people investing now, which otherwise are getting diluted.
A kelly factor of 5.25 isn't wrong at all. If you look at yolodice for example, their average investment factor is 9+. Personally, I like really high investment factors. You can deposit only a tiny amount of your total BTC you want to invest. The amount of money you're losing when the site shuts down, or is hacked is way less then you would have lost when you would have deposited all of the BTC. Besides, it's up to the investors how much risk they want to take. If some investor doesn't mind that all his invested BTC is risked in 1 bet, why shouldn't you allow it? In practice, leverage isn't used like that in general. People either are risking more than they should (I don't believe they have the rest of BTC ready to be deposited, especially considering big losses happen suddenly) or they are forced to be more leveraged than they would want to so they are not deluded. It happens the same on Just Dice, where you can have up to a 25 multiplier.
|
|
|
|
|
puthre
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 07, 2017, 10:28:05 AM |
|
Thanks for your advice on withdraw mate, for me the problem come from Deposit.
I follow every step proposed by SD, Wallet Public Adress+Payment ID, i had funds on my exchange and the transaction is complete.
The worst part for me on this ? => There is absolutely NO ONE from admin/dev team who answer.... no mail, no chat, no support, nothing. So pardon me if i'm wrong but i must advertise newcomer to take care of this site.
It worked! Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
iluvbitcoins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150
Freedom&Honor
|
 |
December 07, 2017, 11:32:03 PM |
|
I just deposited 0.01 BTC to invest them and try the casino. Shortly after clicking on invest all and on Risk Level 2x Kelly, it became 0.00999998 and it said I have 0.00139939% of the total site investment. Therefore, total site invested must be 2*0.00999998/0.0000139939=1429.19 BTC. It says, however, that site bankroll is 272.09401489. Therefore, an average kelly factor of 5.25 is being used. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Allowing a kelly factor as big as 5.25 (actually that means there's people using a bigger one, as that's the average) is quite risky, and may cause another drama as when on April 2016 a player won about 100 BTC and basically destroyed ultra leveraged investors. So a maximum 2x for everyone would be not only much safer (which is good for the casino long term), but also fair for people investing now, which otherwise are getting diluted.
A kelly factor of 5.25 isn't wrong at all. If you look at yolodice for example, their average investment factor is 9+. Personally, I like really high investment factors. You can deposit only a tiny amount of your total BTC you want to invest. The amount of money you're losing when the site shuts down, or is hacked is way less then you would have lost when you would have deposited all of the BTC. Besides, it's up to the investors how much risk they want to take. If some investor doesn't mind that all his invested BTC is risked in 1 bet, why shouldn't you allow it? This is a factor that got me curious about yolodice, I set it at x3 since I was to afraid of an x10, if the site loses just 10% of the funds it's done. But that idea isn't bad really, I could cut 90% of my investment and set it at x10.
|
Looking for a signature campaign.
|
|
|
shield132
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1029
Metawin.com - Truly the best casino ever
|
 |
December 07, 2017, 11:57:46 PM |
|
I just deposited 0.01 BTC to invest them and try the casino. Shortly after clicking on invest all and on Risk Level 2x Kelly, it became 0.00999998 and it said I have 0.00139939% of the total site investment. Therefore, total site invested must be 2*0.00999998/0.0000139939=1429.19 BTC. It says, however, that site bankroll is 272.09401489. Therefore, an average kelly factor of 5.25 is being used. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Allowing a kelly factor as big as 5.25 (actually that means there's people using a bigger one, as that's the average) is quite risky, and may cause another drama as when on April 2016 a player won about 100 BTC and basically destroyed ultra leveraged investors. So a maximum 2x for everyone would be not only much safer (which is good for the casino long term), but also fair for people investing now, which otherwise are getting diluted.
A kelly factor of 5.25 isn't wrong at all. If you look at yolodice for example, their average investment factor is 9+. Personally, I like really high investment factors. You can deposit only a tiny amount of your total BTC you want to invest. The amount of money you're losing when the site shuts down, or is hacked is way less then you would have lost when you would have deposited all of the BTC. Besides, it's up to the investors how much risk they want to take. If some investor doesn't mind that all his invested BTC is risked in 1 bet, why shouldn't you allow it? Everyone likes investment with big profit but no one likes it with big chanse of lose too. And can you tell me any idea of investing tiny amount of bitcoin in "high investment factors"? Does it means anything if you get 10% profit from 0.001 bitcoin? If you lose 0.001, it won't affect you but that profit won't affect you too, so it's just a waste of time. Investing big is investment, not that. You should allow everyone of course.
|
|
|
|
|