You can create a new bank account solely for the purposes of your transactions related to your business. And I wouldn't worry about the authorities breathing down my neck because of it as long as I have the records of a business transaction had taken place when it comes to the exchange of goods for cash, receipts are ideal but records of negotiations and bank transactions as well as proof that the product exist can be sufficient for you if you are asked about it. You might even be at more risks if you tried to mask your business transactions via Bitcoin and don't report any earnings at all. As long as the business is legal and you are paying tax I don't think you have to worry about anything at all.

You may say I'm biased since I'm part of the campaign but I was one of the first members that got accepted and ever since one user have posted his opinion about accepting inactive members that has merit murat actually listened and removed them all. Even if you say you have created a reputation thread against him before doing this, the point is he listened and have removed them and replace them with new members. Other than that it is his campaign and he manages the promotion of that project he has in his every right who will be part of the campaign or not, signature campaigns are not some kind of democracy where if your account wasn't selected it will suddenly become unfair because they have accepted others. And as far as for his future campaigns will go, I think he will learn from this situation and start accepting members who are actually active in the forum.

There is nothing revolutionary with what you are offering, to be frank your site looks like it will be going to fail in no time. You are like one of those new exchanges who thinks that they are unique yet they are in fact offering a much worse service compared to the already existing ones. For me to see that you are just masking the fees to make it look like your service is free with a paid membership is really wrong, there is really nothing revolutionary about that. It just makes it harder for you to enter the market in this way since it would really be unappealing to any potential clients that will visit your site.

So a Bundesliga team, Hertha Berlin, made two of the biggest transfers this January transfer window. With them signing Krzysztof Piatek and Lucas Tousart they spend a total of around 52 million euros to sign those two players from Milan and Lyon respectively. And to be honest I really don't know who their team even is and how they made such a whopping transfer a day before the deadline. I know they made this transfer to prevent from being relegated but I just can't figure it out on where did they get their money from, anyone knows who owns/manages Hertha Berlin?

Hello there @Murat I'll be wearing the appropriate signature and avatar once accepted. Thank you.

Btctalk name: Harlot
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=869186
Rank: Hero Member
Merit: 615
Current post count: 4918 (+1)
BTC address :  37rLFTnRYdjaAtgPsD1nDS25U2LYTpXuJj

That kind of curator content is something not suitable to be put on a stand-alone website, you would basically have no viewers for it as the market is too small, even crypto news curator websites have little to no interest in them. These types of list are much suitable too be placed in forum like websites like BCT or Reddit where you can target specific people who already have interest in what you are offering. A list of crypto related podcasts can be put on threads like the Bitcoin discussion and the Altcoin discussion section of this forum and you'll definitely have personal reviews on their own experience about this podcast.

When I always see a podcast for cryptocurrencies I always think about this post where he promoted his podcast found in spotify. After going back to it I'm surprised that it is still alive and he still have new content at least every once a week. I only watched the first three episodes but all I can say is that they never repeated the content. He also have guess speakers in the show which gives different perpectives about crypto in general. So if you yourself would be starting your own idea I think it will be good if you try to follow the footsteps of what he is doing or in general be interesting like what other podcasts have been doing. Remember podcasts are still new and the crypto industry is still considered as a small market so don't expect to have thousands of followers.

^If we are only talking about Bitcoin payments here and being able to liquidate it after, you wouldn't have any problems with it as long as your country has labeled legal to be traded/own and you have buyers for that Bitcoin or you have 3rd party wallets that can convert it directly to cash then you will have that cash in no time.


However on this one where the buyer ask you to sign up on something or they will be the one introducing you to the escrow this will be a common red flag in any scam transaction out there. Bitcoin wallets should be coming from your own choosing as well as an escrow that is trusted or at least neutral to both parties. Them controlling the escrow part or what kind of wallet you have only means a scam will just go down in your transaction.

I would accept this KYC requirement if they have announced it prior to the freezing of the accounts like they have given more time for the users to move around their funds, but what they did is something like a scam ICO project would do where all of the sudden they'll be asking for KYC before they receive payment for the bounty or receive the token/crypto they have bought. It some kind of ambush where the users really have no choice but to comply or else their money would be loss. I know that companies in the crypto industry such as Localbitcoin needs to comply with enhance KYC requirements for them to be able to operate in these countries but a surprise like this for their users is simply unacceptable in any way.

From what I know the U.S. Treasury owns money to several agencies of their own and that is including your own Department of Labor which I think handles the 401(k) accounts. The government itself cannot borrow your benefits, pension, and other plans for you when a financial crisis happens since those benefits are solely allocated to you, they can only borrow the allocated budget the agency have or if they have any excess or unused budget left lying around. Not unless there is a law where it clearly states that the US government has the power to legally steal your own retirement benefits when times like this happen there is no way I see that the government will be taking your money.

That some big accusation you got there, if a hack is staged or not by the exchange these event will hunt them for the rest of their business life especially the reputable ones since not only their reputation for being safe is damage the eyes of the authorities will suddenly shift towards them. If millions of dollars are loss then you know investigations like this won't only view an external problem but also internally. They would like to see all angles and they won't waste their time on a lead they don't even have so expect them to investigate them internally first before them going to other routes. Just take a look at Mt. Gox or QuadrigaCX millions of dollars are loss and until now the authorities are still breathing under their necks.

Being in line with your scenario, what the government would be doing is illegal. The 51% attack would mean fraud when it comes to transactions happening in Bitcoin's blockchain even the disruption of the system alone will make the government commit a crime what more if they try to double spend in some transactions? This alone would simply make them liable in several criminal things and the worst thing that could happen to them is that the international body would intervene with the sick thing they are doing. Also if they want to destroy Bitcoin and the entire industry wouldn't it be much easier for them to do it by creating unfavorable laws and regulations under their country which will be much cheaper for them to do.

So which is it? A scam or a mistake? The forum has seen several reasons already all served in the same plate and there is really nothing new on blaming it on one team member hoping to get untag from their negative feedback. Changes this big wouldn't go unnoticed especially if you "checked all things" as physical changes from both your website and whitepaper is something the rest of your members has access on. But for us to be fair I don't think it will hurt us to learn more how this web developer has "scammed" you and why plagiarizing a whitepaper and changing your website is one of his motives?

It's not the rare to see a lot of people after the bearish happens market happens suddenly they make bullish predictions or have high price targets that will happen in the future and more often than not they will be right. They are just taking advantage of the market cycle to increase their chances of having the right prediction. Now if Bitcoin will be suddenly pumping prices and after the market noise will disappear suddenly they will make predictions that Bitcoin will go down and they will of course be right since this is how a cycle work, it makes them look smart on what they are doing but what the general population don't know is that all this predictions are set on how the cycle will move. So do expect them to bearish after BTC have hit another stride in the market.

I think that some members here in the thread already pointed it out. If you have a potato pc running your OS I don't think there is the point of upgrading your PC to Windows 10. If you are upgrading an OS to Windows 10 might as well upgrade your PC, a lot of people are already complaining that they are getting blue screened because the new Windows 10 OS is Ram heavy and I don't think old pcs with 8gb or less ram can handle the requirements of such OS. That's why people here are suggesting to upgrade their OS to a much lighter weight OS such as Ubuntu and Linux.

I'm pretty sure that even if some members are spreading false or even true accusations to those turkish applicants Darkstar's decision would remain unbiased and he will just accept the best members of the forum applying for their campaign. Darkstar would still personally check each applications and do some background checks but mostly the one who will get that spot will be about who posts the educated and of high quality posts here in the forum. And maybe it is the main reason why the Turkish board isn't having any members part of ChipMixer.

It's either this scandal or Micree Zhan who will finally put a nail in their coffin. They won't really last in the US  market with scandals like this one especially at this very early stage and it would really be a good idea to back out their plans of a US IPO since their stock prices would just be affected at their first trading day. If they still plan to go thriugh with their IPO they need to wait this out first until they are out of the headlines so that their stock performance won't be affected.

I'm not against this actually, as long as the OP is actually involved with the conversation and not just do some cheesy lines after posting the source link I think that is allowable an can't be counted as illegal advertising. It's just like how a normal member will be posting an article they found and actually got curious with some questions and need to find out more about it. However this cheezcarls guy isn't interested into having any conversation, he just wants to post the source link and ask maybe a question or your opinion in that matter but after that you won't see him replying to his thread. This is something commonly done in the Press section buy news promoters and they aren't really contributing anything to BCT, in fact they are just taking advantage of the forum for illegally promoting their website.

Hey there Hhampuz, Ill be wearing the signature code for this campaign if accepted.

Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=869186
Current amount of posts (including this one): 4906
Amount of merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 11
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q0ev0zeu6g2nu5kdy2au4x0n502gc0n8v88yep9

This kind of academy would be more effective if the people who you are trying to teach are already familiar or at least know what you are talking about. Since no one would really be interested from lessons like this even if they are free. Aside from that is your country even considered as a crypto-friendly country or are they even aware what cryptocurrencies are? Because if they aren't then teaching them about Blockchain and cryptocurrencies wouldn't matter at all since your country isn't even prepared for the changes, the teachings they will receive would be with no use when there is not adoption happening for your country. So maybe see first if your country is currently at least moving in the right direction before you start building your academy.