Доказательства, пожалуйста, предоставьте. Голословные обвинения на форуме запрещены.

Тема перемещена в Trashcan
 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5402569.0

Причина: дубль многочисленных топиков про цену и будущее биткоина

That's not surprising, given the altcoin market environment. If this project had launched in mid 2021, I think it would have raised the necessary investment because at that time everyone was investing in all projects in a row. There was a hype back then, and people thought that by investing in gaming projects like this they would find a gem like industry leader p2e, axie infinity. But now, when even the top projects don't interest many people, what can be said about unknown newcomers in the GameFi industry.

I understand that Binance is the largest exchange, but why not start with a listing on less well-known and less expensive platforms. Listing on Binance is already a slightly different level, when large forces are involved in the project, there is a strong community and there are venture capital funds as investors.

In terms of attracting investment, have you conducted, for example, seed rounds to attract major investors?

And what prevents you from diversifying your staking and using 2 stablecoins? Why choose between 2 assets when you can have both in your portfolio and still balance your stablecoin portfolio and thereby reduce risk? To me, USDC is a slightly better asset than USDT. And I believe it will be a top stablecoin in the near future. Both USDC and USDT have similar problems with short-term loss of tethering and securing their tokens with real fiat.

And what real reflection of affairs does this poll show? What is its victory as the most common coin in the bear market? ADA has already lost over 80% of its value and could lose even more if bitcoin continues to fall. It might win in the poll, but in the market, right now ETH and BTC are losing their value more slowly than ADA.

NFTs are ICOs that were relevant in 2017, only 2021. NFTs have no value and the original idea of transferring art to blockchain has been drowned out in the floods of speculation, wasg trading and various manipulations. I have only occasionally seen real applications of NFT associated with real estate, it gave the right to acquire that very real estate, but those are isolated cases. The bulk of the acquisition of NFT has always been related only to one purpose, to more profitable resale to someone else.

When investing, many people fail because they use speculative rather than investment behavior. The main rule of investing is to remain calm, to sell when the market is rising and to BUY when the market is correcting. Most people have it the other way around, they buy when the market is rising and sell their portfolios for next to nothing on corrections. For investing you need to take into account only the fundamentals, and leave the various ups and downs to the traders at the exchanges.

It is unknown what competition between banks and cryptocurrencies will be after the widespread introduction of CBDC. It is unlikely that we will see the closure of banks in the next few years. Most likely, centralized finance and decentralized finance will develop and exist in parallel. Even if there is a direct threat to the banking system, governments are more likely to start restrictions for cryptocurrency than to destroy banking institutions. This is not beneficial to big capitals, and of course, no one will give full power to decentralized finance, where there is no state control. Therefore, replacing banks with DeFi is more of a fantasy.

I would not trust the judgement from some service, it could be a common manipulation, as youtube-influencers do. In any case, whether he is right or wrong, you can't make a decision based on his judgments. By the way, the service has some problems with data updates. Shows that the capitalization is 1.85 trillion, when it has long been below such values. If their portfolio is as up-to-date as their market data, then you can conclude that you should not trust this service.

Quoted and verified with Electrum.

Да, спасибо. Я тут у вас на сайте ошибочку нашёл:

USDC in centralized finance and DAI in decentralized finance. In my opinion, these are now the least susceptible to the loss of dollar pegs of all the stablecoins. It is possible that this is what has influenced the outflow of funds from USDT and the influx of funds into USDC. DAI was the best performer in the stablecoin market during May's turmoil. The most unreliable stablecoins at the moment are the algorithmic ones. Until there is a time-tested security mechanism for these coins, it is definitely not worth considering this asset for the long term.

Loss of binding is already at 5.6%. I read that with a 10% or more loss of the peg, a cascade of liquidations could begin, which could lead to an even greater loss of the peg and a repeat of the unfortunate events with LUNA and UST. Right now, the margin traders who used stETH as collateral for their credit are the first ones at risk.

There is nothing permanent in the crypto space. Everything constant always turns into floating, because projects can't pay out rewards all the time regardless of their market condition. You can try looking for conditionally constant ways to make money, like staking long-established projects that give a real APY of around 5-7%, for example. This is better in the long run than projects which give e.g. 1000% APY at the start and then start cutting rates after a while. This is normal practice for attracting liquidity providers.

The first thing I always pay attention to in such projects is where tokens are sold. Selling unknown tokens on a newly created website is not trustworthy, it very often has the signs of a scam. Tokens purchased in this way do not guarantee in any way any value of this cryptocurrency in the future. Couldn't you find the funds to listing on some more or less well-known launchpad?

Я же написал в вашем предыдущем посте комментарий. Его не видно? Тогда я напишу отдельным постом, чтобы было видно вам:

Ну ты и выдал Спасибо, конечно, за вариантик, но он абсолютно мне не подходит.

Во-первых, подарочную карту по твоему варианту нельзя купить за WMZ, в вариантах оплаты его нет:



Мне нужно использовать именно WMZ, смысл мне использовать фиат и крипту при покупке. Мне же нужно вывести WMZ.

Во-вторых, при покупке на пингвине нужно проходить своеобразный KYC, чего я, собственно, и пытаюсь избежать:



По поводу WM. Не знаю насчёт "вляпался"... Меня эта платёжка полностью устраивает, WMZ в фиат вывожу спокойно и быстро, комиссия за вывод 0,8%. Да, я могу спокойно купить крипту за фиат. Но... Я не хочу проходить этот грёбанный KYC, а без него никто не хочет продавать крипту за фиат. Это и есть основное препятствие для меня.

Также, я могу купить крипту непосредственно в обменнике WebMoney. Но, покупать, например, биткоин за 33 при курсе 27... Меня лично жаба давит

А вот идея с казиношками интересная. Есть казино и букмекеры, которые принимают WebMoney в качестве депозита. Найти бы таких людей, которые пользуются такими казино или букмекерами. Я бы мог пополнять им их счета в этих сервисах, а они бы мне переводили крипту. Я бы мог даже с бонусом переводить.

Very much like the shilling of the project in an attempt to advertise a new project, not an investment of a newcomer. The project site is some kind of slow, windows do not always open, and on the main page it says Tokonomics. I wonder, before launching all this, they checked the site for errors and performance?

If we talk about the project itself, now is not the best time to launch GameFi, the industry is going through bad times and the number of active users is constantly decreasing, there is no special influx in the industry, now if there are any cash inflows, they are concentrated around m2e projects, and the crypto game industry is now in a freeze.

On the OKEX exchange, it's a common case where they ask for additional data. I have encountered this myself several times. Usually it happens after some break between your sessions or frequent deposit/withdrawal operations with no trading activity.

In general, it is not clear who this option is intended for, because if I need a non-custodial wallet, I will create it outside the exchange. For convenience? But where maximum convenience, there tends to be less safety.