It had already launched in the beta but I guess the work to release it as an open source forum software is still in progress. You can get more information here : http://epochtalk.org/ and here: http://epochtalk.org/map.html Should you wish to follow the repo : https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk

There is no ETA when we would officially migrate from SMF to EPOCH-TALK considering all the new implementations are still done on this forum.

It's quite easy for these farmers to just create a new account and join the bounty again even if removed by a bounty manager for the negative tag. Bitcointalk forum, posting are least of their concerns. As long as they are allowed to post their social media links in a bounty thread, they have nothing to care for. I bet some of these accounts tagged don't even know there is something called as a trust system here.

Oh don't you think the tech is broken then? You just need to create one account from an unused, not evil IP address and then you're good to access it from as many blacklisted IP addresses as possible? Thanks for correcting me.

Just to mention and for future reference: If in future your friend does some spamming on the forum and by any chance, the IP gets blacklisted, you will also be unable to use the forum using the same IP address without paying the evil point removal fees. So it's better you get a VPN which allows on-demand dynamic IP's.

That's a good one. When you come across stuff with relevant proofs, instead of waiting for the DT, you have to Join the bounty group where these accounts are cheating and report them there openly. Bounty Managers are forced to take an action that way!

Now I'm curious to know who is the auditor and whether they have the sufficient proofs for the connections mentioned above. Also Op, please remove his/her facebook link from your post and edit the pictures as you're invading their privacy policies without their consent.

Your only job now is to ask for proofs from the auditor. If he refuses to give it to you, you can appeal to the project managers/ higher management team.

That's why they get the term "freelancer"? Makes sense to you now? Moreover, no freelancer should be hired as a core team member for the obvious reasons. It's a very risky business for any developer to become a core team member. Their salary is not fixed, there is no guarantee the idea will ever blow up and find investments. Simply put, it's a waste of their time and efforts.

Aren't you operated by the same agency that runs bitcasino.io and vegascasino.io? Both are shady gambling sites with a number of scam accusations against them. Who is AnthonyBTCAgency on skype? Is that a common entity between all these sites?

The campaign manager who'd accept you for a signature bounty should be banned along with you.

I literally asked for an appointment with you in the nicest way possible.

If you say so. Let's wait for mprep/hilarious to tell what exactly you were banned for. Killing people is more productive and interesting of a task than bounty whoring.

(By no means I endorse killing people)

Bounties are not a privilege. The forum should not be taken for granted.

Sure, could you tell us what hours in a day work for you?  Given your busy bounty hunting schedule, you must be a very occupied person.

Man, what translation software do you guys use? Like I can't imagine your translation software makes spelling mistakes. Though my assumption is you're banned for plagiarism, your account also has too many red flags. For instance,

^^ There you go blog bounty cheater.

I have been managing one of the altcoin campaigns recently. Oh boy, it's a whole another world out there. The campaign is almost at the end of it but the time I have spent with the bounty participants is the worst time I have ever had on the forum.  I mean they're used to managers like the OP and when they're exposed to the real side of spam/plagiarism free management, they think their bounty rights have been invoked. Literally, people can't spell "stakes", I'm haunted by the unusual "stackes","streaks","sticks","steks" words in my telegram inbox.

I'm still waiting on an explanation for Why shouldn't one invest in adult start-ups. It's a hellova niche market with golden business opportunities, also an ever demanding market I may add. Xotia.tv or whatever that website was called certainly took it to another level. The companies you mentioned operated fraudulently, doesn't mean their idea had no potential. I mean if it didn't have the potential, they wouldn't raise anything.

The service that offers the infrastructure is THE intermediary! Take localbitcoins for instance, it's totally a peer to peer platform but in case of an issue between two parties, the final decision is left to them. They act as facilitators between two parties. Unless the dependency of a centralised facilitator exists, it's difficult to achieve decentralization.

The chances of getting your money recovered from Sepectrocoin are quite less. They're a fraud business as you might have noticed their feedback on the forum.Owner can be reached on this profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317543 You could have just googled for their reviews to know if they can be trusted with money.

Basically, what the bot does is -> Logins into my account -> checks for recent posts by the newbies, and if the length of the post is lesser than say 5 words, or just have a link, it reports them. Now, the bot can be programmed to do whatever we want after it logs in. I'm not sure what you mean by feeding the reports.

If you can establish a sort of pattern common to all of the newly created accounts, we can program the bot to act on those defined conditions. It would really automate the manual reporting process.

Need to ask Mitchell!

Not really. I'm pretty sure there is more than one coder doing the work. Although if this experiment turns out as a great success then maybe a 5% allocation would actually make sense. I think the terms should be conditional based on the money raised. Interesting project though.

Investors are dumber. If not called out by people like OP, they would never bother to do their own research. Even though this ICO will be flagged as a scam and a feedback would be left, there are still chances they would make money out of it. That's how their business works. Their victims are not the 60% of smart asses but the remaining 40% who get introduced to cryptocurrencies every-day with a hope to get rich. The only possible solution to put a stop on this is awareness.

Not sure if this one counts as funny but definitely counts as retarded. I know he had mental issues and stuff but this feedback is way too off, I mean I have no idea what pills have he had been swallowing. (Just so you know, I haven't met this guy in real life)