Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2020, 12:10:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 152 »
961  Economy / Reputation / Re: scam scare on: November 17, 2019, 02:33:06 PM
This is why I like deals discussed and agreed upon in open transparent threads, not in PMs, and much less on Telegram..
The redundant formalities seen in lending threads of a formal loan request, a formal contract offer, and a formal agreement to the contract by both parties before any coin or collateral are sent, is great protection for both parties because then everyone can see exactly what the contract is and that both parties agreed to it..

I refuse offers to migrate to Telegram from Bitcointalk.. That in itself is a huge red flag according to me..
I have done deals on telegram but only when it started on Telegram in the first place, and have offered to use BTCT escrow from Telegram, not the other way around..

The only time I have ever been scammed in Crypto was on YIM taken there from the Cryptsy trollbox long before I ever registered an account on BTCT, and learned my lesson.. Was like a $30 amazon gift card I was trying to sell for BTC and got ripped off.. Oh well..


I don't think that ALL cases of refusing to accept escrow, or refusal to deal on your legit terms, is proper grounds for a tag, but can be, and are often 100% suspicious..

Your case does sound extremely suspicious like they were trying to scam you, and if you have any reason to believe that they are also targeting others with this possible scam attempt, maybe you should bring awareness of it to the community..
It does sound like a somewhat sophisticated scam attempt aiming at a big target..
962  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests for other users too!) on: November 17, 2019, 01:20:30 AM
Well that was easier than expected. Grin
Why has this thread become quiet?  Cry

This thread got some action because you got called out on your threat, but since it was however unsurprisingly an empty threat, and with your speed to decline to follow through on your threat, much less accept a wager on the premise thereof (that was the hype), it got real boring again real fast..

People saw what happened and their really isn't much to say about it that hasn't been beaten to death already before..
963  Economy / Reputation / Re: Feedom of speech on: November 15, 2019, 03:15:45 AM
@Royse777: Can you add an "r" to the title? It took me this long to notice "Feedom".
It's fine. It's a subliminal message trying to condition us into paying a fee for speech.
Nice punchline to..
Perhaps we should do it the Bitcoin way and charge a TX fee for each post Smiley
I got it Wink

~snip~
I think you and Lauda should have a drink together may be you can some beep beep beep ...

Only if I am the pleasuree in the leopard pants..


aka reeeeedom of speech
Like..


Or..


Huh

Either or tho really.. That's cool..
964  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests for other users too!) on: November 14, 2019, 04:41:16 PM
Since lauda still appears to be on DT where can we obtain the data that reveals which of the 100+ members theymos requested exclude the scamming trust abusing scum bag REFUSED to do so?

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-09_Sat_06.11h/101872.html


Lauda's judgement is Trusted by:
1. dishwara (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Soros Shorts (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW Balthazar (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (73 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. EpicFail (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. qwk (Trust: +13 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (23) 1179 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. BitcoinEXpress (Trust: neutral) (8 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Anduck (Trust: +19 / =2 / -1) (DT1! (4) 55 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. DiamondCardz (Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 86 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. philipma1957 (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 952 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. subSTRATA (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (43 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. KWH (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. monkeynuts (Trust: +28 / =1 / -0) (190 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. Gimpeline (Trust: neutral) (7 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. Operatr (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. jimhsu (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. TMAN (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (1057 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. vizique (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (341 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. wwzsocki (Trust: neutral) (798 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. yogg (Trust: +27 / =0 / -0) (927 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. TheQuin (Trust: neutral) (462 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. leancuisine (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. klaaas (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (32 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. Bitze (Trust: neutral) (27 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. hybridsole (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. hedgy73 (Trust: +24 / =0 / -0) (68 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. scutzi128 (Trust: neutral) (173 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. hilariousandco (Trust: +17 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (37) 687 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Avirunes (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (Cool 263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. iluvpie60 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. gysca (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. JayJuanGee (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1081 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. NeuroticFish (Trust: neutral) (353 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
33. whywefight (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
34. owlcatz (Trust: +40 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (23) 239 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
35. JohnUser (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (208 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
36. sapta (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (7) 177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
37. BitcoinPenny (Trust: +42 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (17) 545 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
38. txbtc Banned! (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
39. Zepher (Trust: +34 / =5 / -0) (86 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
40. P4ndoraBox7 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
41. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (1240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
42. Patatas (Trust: neutral) (106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
43. Limx Dev (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (321 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
44. ezeminer (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (9) 95 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
45. Vadi2323 (Trust: +1 / =3 / -1) (118 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
46. mocacinno (Trust: neutral) (812 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
47. klarki (Trust: neutral) (128 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
48. CanadaBits (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
49. Miyslovenic (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
50. kken01 (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
51. bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (706 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
52. The Pharmacist (Trust: +23 / =0 / -0) (2146 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
53. Funny (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
54. PrivacyLock (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
55. vCardVideo (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
56. tennozer (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
57. asu (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 505 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
58. anakinisme Banned! (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
59. Joel_Jantsen (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (234 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
60. Arpetuos (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
61. mexxer-3 was chosen (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
62. condoras (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (106 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
63. Slow death (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (249 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
64. lienfaye (Trust: neutral) (14 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
65. Gunthar (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (94 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
66. bias (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
67. cInfiniteBtcLetsShare Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
68. Hhampuz (Trust: +65 / =2 / -0) (1236 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
69. finaleshot2016 (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 527 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
70. jenia1 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (17 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
71. crwth (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 400 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
72. Henkkaa (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
73. Polar91 (Trust: neutral) (154 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
74. sud (Trust: neutral) (51 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
75. Aerys2 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (259 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
76. khaled0111 (Trust: neutral) (508 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
77. Squishy01 (Trust: neutral) (16 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
78. roycilik (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (4) 1013 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
79. GDragon (Trust: neutral) (25 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
80. yazher (Trust: neutral) (300 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
81. Gambit_fr (Trust: neutral) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
82. tweetbit (Trust: neutral) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
83. Silent26 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 222 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
84. mosprognoz (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (135 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
85. Trofo (Trust: neutral) (319 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
86. amishmanish (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (290 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
87. BeEvil Banned! (Trust: neutral) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
88. icopress (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (21 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
89. Airtube (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
90. BitCryptex (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1062 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
91. sheenshane (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (465 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
92. theyoungmillionaire (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (959 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
93. sufferer123 (Trust: neutral) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
94. AleksandrKosov (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
95. catur_072 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
96. Maus0728 (Trust: neutral) (87 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
97. pandukelana2712 (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 875 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
98. Heisenberg_Hunter (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (629 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
99. asche (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (Cool 791 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
100. anonymousminer (Trust: +22 / =0 / -0) (503 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
101. nakamura12 (Trust: neutral) (127 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
102. Alex_Sr (Trust: +5 / =0 / -0) (898 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
103. lehuyaxib1 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
104. TalkStar (Trust: +7 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 349 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
105. Strufmbae (Trust: neutral) (20 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
106. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
107. pirashki (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
108. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
109. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
110. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
111. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
112. NEW Debonaire217 (Trust: awaiting update) (37 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
113. twiki (Trust: neutral) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
114. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
115. mubashar002 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
116. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)




Whew...
Now that I look at it, my bet might have been pretty dangerous.. Quite the formidable opponent I have found myself at odds with over the years...

I don't understand why all these people trust lauda but I am not capable of understanding all of the universe..
965  Economy / Reputation / Re: Feedom of speech on: November 14, 2019, 04:20:47 PM
Requested will be accepted if only Lauda accepts the challenge :-P
Come on Lauda! You are adorable :-)

Sigh.. Lauda backed down so I guess you can lock it, but really this is the sort of stuff everyone should get to see and comment on IMO..
Locking it will just protect Lauda from public scrutiny..

Bumping because of this:

@Lauda I hereby challenge you to a 0.25BTC bet that you will not get a flag supported against me for advocating freedom of speech.. @ 1 week after your flag creation, so it has time to settle in ya know.. Let everyone get some time to support or oppose..
I don't play stupid games, not with libtards, not with anyone. eddie needs to stop being a virtue signalling wanker and start growing up. "Challenge" denied. Anything else? Kiss

"Challenge" denied.
Awwwwsss... Come on grumpy kitty.. You know you want that string..
ya braindead cunt
lolz
You tosser must have mistaken me for someone else; I can't change that title - it poses no relevance anymore.  Smiley No challenges, nada. Stop derailing the thread. No further responses are necessary.

I guess the challenge is denied Sad
966  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests for other users too!) on: November 14, 2019, 04:10:41 PM
I debated the account sales flags until they were green-lighted and then I acted upon it.

Should we ask Theymos for a green light to flag freedom of speech virtue signalers? Who should we ask for a green light?

I doubt anyone would mind just giving it a whirl to see what happens..
Like all those other unsupported flags you created.. One more can't hurt.. Right?
967  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests for other users too!) on: November 14, 2019, 04:03:20 PM
"Challenge" denied.
Awwwwsss... Come on grumpy kitty.. You know you want that string..


ya braindead cunt
lolz

968  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests for other users too!) on: November 14, 2019, 03:56:20 PM
Bumping because of this:

@Lauda I hereby challenge you to a 0.25BTC bet that you will not get a flag supported against me for advocating freedom of speech.. @ 1 week after your flag creation, so it has time to settle in ya know.. Let everyone get some time to support or oppose..


Heyyyyy, lets have some context if you are going to help throw me under the spotlight..

http://archive.is/tFnNS

Freedom of speech is worth a very high cost.. Untold thousands have paid with their lives trying to ensure its continuity..
Bitcoin is at the heart of freedom of speech.. It is its purpose..
That has nothing to do with this forum. Stop appealing to emotions. More people will lose their lives while we tolerate this virtue signalling and selective use of "freedom of speech" nonsense by libtards. No wonder this place has become a collective garbage pile of baboons.
Yes mr. cryptohunter, I am completely against freedom of speech when it is used by virtue signallers like eddie13 et. al, and libtards as they mostly only advocate it when it works in their favour. Not that that has anything to do with allowing any bullshit on this forum.
What are you gonna do about it kiddo? Roll Eyes
FYI, I'm still debating whether virtue signallers warrant a type-0 flag
969  Economy / Reputation / Re: Feedom of speech on: November 14, 2019, 03:29:36 PM
http://archive.is/tFnNS

Freedom of speech is worth a very high cost.. Untold thousands have paid with their lives trying to ensure its continuity..
Bitcoin is at the heart of freedom of speech.. It is its purpose..
That has nothing to do with this forum. Stop appealing to emotions. More people will lose their lives while we tolerate this virtue signalling and selective use of "freedom of speech" nonsense by libtards. No wonder this place has become a collective garbage pile of baboons.
Yes mr. cryptohunter, I am completely against freedom of speech when it is used by virtue signallers like eddie13 et. al, and libtards as they mostly only advocate it when it works in their favour. Not that that has anything to do with allowing any bullshit on this forum.
What are you gonna do about it kiddo? Roll Eyes
FYI, I'm still debating whether virtue signallers warrant a type-0 flag

Lauda, you seriously make me LMFAO..

Watch out eddie ... lauda says fall in line of get a flag.

I don't really want any drama but I don't think that I'm the one it would end badly for..

I've been sick as fuck so I haven't even posted in almost 3 weeks, I say basically "I like freedom of speech" in my first post back, and get jumped by Lauda, and threatened to get flagged?
Pretty hilarious..


Will be locking the topic in the next 24 hours.
Please don't Sad

I am completely against freedom of speech when it is used by virtue signallers like eddie13

lolololololololollollolololololoololololollololololololololololololol


You know what, screw it, let's have some drama..

@Lauda I hereby challenge you to a 0.25BTC bet that you will not get a flag supported against me for advocating freedom of speech.. @ 1 week after your flag creation, so it has time to settle in ya know.. Let everyone get some time to support or oppose..
DarkStar_ escrow agreeable to you?
970  Economy / Reputation / Re: Feedom of speech on: November 13, 2019, 03:38:29 PM
But in my opinion, there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech in public places (like this forum) because your freedom sometimes will violate someone else's rights.

It's a bit hard to violate someone elses rights with speech only.. People don't have the right to not be offended, or the right to be provided a safe space where they won't encounter controversial or politically incorrect ideas..

Freedom of speech should come with freedom to hear (or not) otherwise it'd just degrade to useless noise drowning out anything of value. Creating garbage speech is typically much easier than something worth hearing so a single asshole can flood the whole board with nonsense. We do have some tools to that effect (Ignore) but unfortunately they don't work when the forum favors 50-account trolls.

I understand that this board can't maintain absolute free speech..

Perhaps we should do it the Bitcoin way and charge a TX fee for each post Smiley

That would be an interesting dynamic to try somewhere.. It is proven quite effective at reducing spam..
Reminds me of..
"But you must understand, young hobbit. It takes a long time to say anything in old Entish, and we never say anything unless it is worth taking a long time to say."
971  Economy / Reputation / Re: Feedom of speech on: November 13, 2019, 02:32:39 PM
Freedom of speech is worth a very high cost.. Untold thousands have paid with their lives trying to ensure its continuity..
Bitcoin is at the heart of freedom of speech.. It is its purpose..
972  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: October 27, 2019, 04:52:20 PM
I'm curious how you intend to prepare these?

I think you are supposed to get a shaman, or a reindeer, to eat them, and then drink their piss..
973  Other / Meta / Re: 10th anniversary art contest on: October 20, 2019, 03:04:46 AM
heres my entry to the art contest. It is a sculpture. I call it Bitcointalk Deity.

Im not so good with words so I am using a sculpture to express my feelings about bitcoin and bitcointalk.

When I first learned about Bitcoin it seemed like scam. Then I learned more about it was. Its something that has never existed before. Something new and bizarre and magical and excellent.

Those are the feelings i tried to evoke in my here art.

The media i used are a banana and banana tattooing.

The art piece also incorporates a hungarian stamp for 5 million adopengo from 1946. This was the last stamp that i knwo of in the hungarian hyperinflation and according to wikipedia 1 adopengo was 2x10E21 pengo. So if wikipedia is correct this stamp was worth 1E29 pengo. At the beginning of 1946, sending a letter cost about 20 pengo. So you can figure out how much hyperinflation there was over the year of 1946. A lot!

The piece also incorporates some ganja and a blotter paper because bitcoin means the freedom to do whatever we want and bitcointalk means the freedom to discuss these things.
The most important parts of the piece are a woodscrew, a tupperware container, a vibrating cock ring and two razor blades that make up the deities mouth. The deity is part inspire by the demigorgon from stranger things. I will let you interpret it as you please.

I hope you all enjoy. i incorporated some other peoples artwork that isnt mine including the satori coin, the silk road blotter paper the ganja and i got some inspiration for the chicken and the knife from some clip art on the internet but i dont know who the original artists is for any of this artwork.

one more thing im a newbie account that means i cant reply to your pms fast but to answer all your ?s yes, i will auction this sculpture off after the contest ends if there is interest.






the last thing u see before it eats u up



signature:

btc address: bc1q7hkaj8re4a4e5m4tnwrul9czp8vexjxssmsfm4

somebody please quote so it shows my photos until i get enough merit from this masterpiece to post photos thanks

What in the actual fuck is this circumcised banana?
+5 merits for the silk road blotter...
974  Other / Meta / Re: 10th anniversary art contest on: October 19, 2019, 11:35:39 PM


Ha, it is the time of year for that!!

I thought about doing something with a bunch of branches like that but my main plan is still something else..
Someone might not think it's very BTC related but it is very similar in that it is liberty related..
975  Other / Meta / Re: 10th anniversary art contest on: October 18, 2019, 11:42:38 PM
I'm working on it.. I want one of them there badges Smiley
Looks like I have plenty of time to put some thought into it..
976  Other / Meta / Re: Question About Item Listings in Goods on: October 01, 2019, 05:10:20 AM
I, and I believe theymos, are in favor of more personal freedom than about any current government allows.. I believe I read a quote from theymos even praising the liberty provided by dark net marketplaces..

We should be encouraging everything the forum can get away with with it being under US law and wishing for more IMO.. We shouldn't be trying to be banning quite soft things like tasers just because it might hurt the feelings of those that favor more oppressive controls..

BTW I have been tasered a few times by friends with common cheap tasers, and twice in one night by the US police dog piling me, and still bear the burn scars from their serious taser devices (when I was younger and crazier, best abs workout ever)..
I am still absolutely in favor of the right for free citizens of the world to own tasers even after being subject to some of the hardest hits by them..

We should allow everything right up to the brink of the law this forum is forced to abide by..
977  Other / Meta / Re: Ban for trolling on: September 30, 2019, 06:05:43 PM
Did this guy get banned for trolling recently or was it some other reason??
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184917.0
978  Other / Meta / Re: Question About Item Listings in Goods on: September 27, 2019, 07:55:53 PM
And both parties involved in the sale would also have to show their license and prove they are from a jurisdiction that permits it's sale.

Prove it to who? A mod? I don't think so..

Listen to TECSHARE and OgNasty.. I think you're fine..

in my opinion tasers should be a prohibited item.

Why would you want tasers prohibited?
979  Other / Politics & Society / Re: REEE: [US Only] Impeachment Vote on: September 27, 2019, 02:53:08 AM
Saw this..




https://www.scribd.com/document/427618359/Shokin-Statement
980  Other / Meta / Re: Signature campaign stats: users, bans, posts, deleted posts on: September 27, 2019, 12:28:33 AM
Yeah, now this is what I was talking about!

I count only permabans.

Is this any good? What is the ban for spamming?
Aren't straight permabans mostly for only plagiarism, ban evasion, and malicious links?
Could you easily redo it to count all bans?

If any of these campaigns is having excessive numbers of their posts deleted for spamming, then that bounty manager should either do their job properly, or the campaign should be banned.

I'd say ban the bounty/campaign manager a couple times before you go banning the signature URL..
If they have to replace the BM a couple times then maybe ban the URL, or if managed offsite then just ban the URL..

Then their will be risk to the companies if they agree to low quality with low quality managers, or risk for 1 strike and your out if they choose to manage offsite..
This will create incentive to hire quality managers and to not manage offsite for the companies..

I wanna see the bad BMs/CMs accounts get WREKT and push the companies to hire managers that do a good job and will only agree to do a good job.. So this would be good for the economy of the quality managers..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 152 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!