I'll start this post with a disclaimer that I have been around PremiumCodeX (OP) for quite some time and therefore have a certain level of personal trust with them to hold coin for me, and faith in their code/bots/skills, but this shouldn't be interpreted as a complete vouch for this service/product/or user... .. .. . Yet... 



Your provided example is somewhat confusing..
Can you elaborate further on how this 30% is charged? Be it every trade, once a month, or only upon withdrawal?

I assume that if I for example put 0.1 BTC into the account and leave it for 3 months, and say it grows to 0.2 BTC, for a profit of 0.1 BTC, I could then withdraw 0.17 BTC including my principle investment plus 70% of all accumulated gains? (possibly minus a WD fee?)
I also imagine exchange fees come out of every trade as the exchange charges them.. Right?

Do you charge a withdraw fee? If so, what?
How often can withdrawals and deposits of principle be made?
Can I withdraw in part or full from my account with your service at any time? Can I deposit to increase my investment at any time?
I can understand you discouraging a high volume of WD/DP activity for simplicity but what intervals would you consider acceptable?

What is the withdraw procedure?
I imagine it needs to be more complex than a simple PM requesting such as this would leave open the increased possibility of identity scams..
Do you require a cryptographically signed message (such as signing a BTC address or PGP key) to request withdrawals? What safety measures do you have in place to prevent identity impersonation?


How to deposit into your account?
I can choose the base currency of Bitcoin and trading will therefore aim to increase my BTC balance specifically regardless of its fluctuation against USD?


I see in your ⚙️ AUTOTRADING - RESULTS ⚙️ thread that you have 23 accounts currently under management..
Where and how did you come upon these customers? Mostly telegram I assume?

Not that I doubt you, but the 3 reviews in this thread from zero merit newbies don't really mean shit to anyone glancing as they can easily be faked/socked..
The image may even be counterproductive depending on how cynical the observer is.. Which I am not because of above disclaimer..


I think my last question for now would be, what would you recommend for an initial deposit from me to get my feet wet in this investment/service and give it a try?
Against a standardised exchange WD fee I understand that higher amounts would be optimal due to relative percentages but is their a balance threshold that you would deem optimal?
I am thinking of starting with less than the 0.5 BTC which would include your "guarantee".. (maybe I would trust your word on your "guarantee" but I doubt many other would TBH)

You say their is no minimal deposit, but taken to extremes, only a few K Satoshis would seem ridiculous and not even cover redemption fees..
What would you say would be a minimum recommended deposit?

Can you post an example of a "a private, detailed report in a private message from me" to see? Like just quote one and remove their name/addresses or something?

On the contrary, some empowered users have severely lax standards of DT operation well past the threshold of this example..

Not that I agree with it, but it is what happens..

I agree..
He would not be lone among the company of other previously account-selling and even sock-escrowing users who are still now very reputable, but who have taken different paths or who have displayed different dispositions..
These are not irredeemable actions if a good path to redemption is taken or are just past flaws in an otherwise trustworthy user behavior..

I am unaware of any seriously heinous crimes committed by QS other than not knowing when to put down the shovel to stop one's self from digging a deeper hole..

Making me feel old..
 

Good luck all!! 

Nah..
The guy would just get his ass beat and thrown in the river..

Funny you would appeal to the word of theymos..
I am not in favor of the reduction of standards of the use of DT..
Using the new tools for harsher warnings on older cases of absolutely proven scammers is correct..
I do not believe that I have ever had the red warning text on my profile..

Timelord being timelord is nothing new.. This is why he is not on DT..
Everyone knows (should) to verify his accusations of account linking, and to safely ignore his "findings" that are not factually based..
I suppose he could be tagged for false accusations if you feel the need..

I do not find the fact of more tools being added (flags) to greatly increase the leniency of the use of the old system (tags), and would be careful who you take advice from regarding to the proper use of the trust system(s)..  

I am fresh back from an unexpected work/vacation back and forth across 4 states getting a lot of looks wearing my (actual) Bitcoin hat
It almost made a life insurance saleswoman/scammer I was trolling shit themselves after a series of events in a conversation including them doubting me and thereafter presenting with some BTC schwag blowing their mind that I wasn't just talking shit, lol..



I don't think we are into that kind of pump yet..
I think gains like that will happen slightly after the halving but who knows..

Nay..

Finally broke out of my downward channel lines just now..

End to the bear for a while now?
$10k in 2 months?

I'm spending more time on the forum mostly because it is winter and cold AF..

I haven't worn a paid signature in so long that I wouldn't know..
Someone should rent my sig space so we can find out..

I tend to believe you and I'm assuming this is a case of PN7 declines to deny the assertion that he is QS? Or something like that..

Would you make up your mind already?
Wanna see how "undeniable" it is?         Watch..         I deny this claim.. 


I thought you were the legendary scambiter? What do you expect them to do that you can't?
Anyway, I look forward to speaking with them.. It will be much lolz..

He did not reveal any "bad stuff" about me.. (probably because their is none)

He just accuses me of being someone that I am not, and accuses that person of being a scammer, thereby unfoundedly accusing me of being a scammer, and threatening "further investigation" of me if I don't do what he wants..

He doesn't actually have anything on me.. If you doubt this then I will urge you, or anyone, to "investigate" all you want, same as I told him..


Investigate away, but I only ask that you don't just believe this crap about me being a scammer at first glance..

If you don't know.. This started by him trying to attack me over a 2017 rating I left.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2445639
And now I guess he is a "scammer" and I am him according to his recent posts.. Which isn't true at all but go ahead and investigate..

I don't think newbies can vote in polls.. I gave him a merit though so he can soon or whatever..

I don't think we want to be like facebook banning any speech "they" don't agree with..

I would say we shouldn't necessarily follow the laws of any government, but the forum has to abide by the laws of the USA, to the minimum of keeping illegal content off the site (according to the US laws) or it would be shut down I imagine, the way the forum is currently hosted/owned or whatever..

The US law says that this site CAN delete anything it wants, but only says that it HAS to delete content that is illegal to host..

I would prefer the site to be under the law of an elwar seastead owned by the forum instead of any existing government, but I would still advocate for deleting some possible distasteful content..

His accusations against me have absolutely no merit/truth whatsoever..
It is a complete fabrication..

All governments are wrong..
It just so happens that the US government is less wrong on most points when it comes to the question of individual liberty due to its founding principles, which could definitely still be improved upon atleast in terms of interpretation..

The least amount of intervention on a society by any "authority" the better IMO..

Answer: Maybe yes afterall actually..


It was briefly entitled "Paranormal Invesetigations" also?
Quite fitting but still spelled wrong..

Holy smokes!
I just references this yobit scam a bit ago because I remember it happening/starting.. I think I remembered it as the first time I knew yobit was a scam..

So you actually bought in to that WAYYYYyyyyy back then .. and ... .. . let me get this right  ... . Still selling the bags since 2015!!

That's quite incredible..

You ROI yet? How's your ROI prospects look after all this time?