chup
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 08:23:13 AM |
|
2 Claymore
Just tried "e" button to switch to pool from epools.txt list without restarting the whole miner. Very convinient! But when I switch to pool from epools.txt it treats it as Failover pool and switches back to main pool after some time (to the pool from starting command line the miner was run). Is there a way to manually switch to the pool and it will be the main pool during this miner session and others become Failover pools?
I believe You can achieve that if You use config-file and no pools specified in starting command line. Changing config file as well as epools/dpools files should bring You there.
|
|
|
|
AlainC
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 08:29:44 AM |
|
@claymore As I understand ethdcrminer can overclock,under/overvolt, GPU or VRAM independently from the bios. if you want to over/underclock a Polaris card, (RX470/480/570/580...) what is the minimum set of mod ? I guess: - Memory strides (shifting stride from lower freq to higher freq)
- downclocking GPU because ATI does not allow downclocking with the API you use
and for all the rest: -cclock -mclock -cvddc -mvddc -powlim -tt -fanmin -fanmax am I right? Is atitweak still useful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
pwpwpw
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 08:50:04 AM |
|
What can I expect from the MSI Radeon RX 570 GAMING X getting 22 from my RX470 Gaming X
You can expect a month long wait while you RMA their defective crap. I'm betting eventually they just hand me back the garbage cards and tell me to eat it. What cards are you recommending - sub $200 with 22+ hashrate Buyer beware with MSI, my Gigabyte RX card is working perfectly. I heard r9 390 MSI cards OC the best and have the highest hashrate/stability, the RX series MSI suck ? About gigabyte, I bought 3years ago 3x r9 280x gigabyte and 5x asus dc2t, all of the gigabyte still run, after almost 24/7 3 years and 4 of the asus died within a year, all had fan failures withing 6months but 1 simply can't display anything, crashes during driver load. So in my opinion, gigabyte is pretty good, it's usually the cheapest card and maybe I've been lucky but they are quite durable, right now they are on zec mining with 380hour+ uptime. All I know, avoid asus, it's pretty easy now that they are priced the highest tho 
|
|
|
|
r79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 09:41:24 AM |
|
Been fiddling around with the -r 1 param, but I could not make it work. Working on Ubuntu 16.04: - I created "reboot.sh" in the claymore-dir, put in the reboot command, chmod 755, tested it manually, worked flawlessly. - waited for the miner to crash, apparently the miner did try to reboot using the script, but it seems like the script never got called. Is there any way to debug this? Any way to test it? What does Claymore call exactly? Is it beeing called as the superuser, as I'm starting ethdcrminer as root? Any help is highly appreciated 
|
|
|
|
|
infowire
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:01:43 AM Last edit: May 02, 2017, 10:24:54 AM by infowire |
|
NVIDIA DRIVERS:
9xx cards in Windows 10 x64: you have to use old drivers (for example, 352.xx) and miner built for cuda6.5.
GTX 970 The driver 352.84 did not work, still MH's 3.x. I use 347.52 and it works except i can't run: C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvidia-smi" -acp UNRESTRICTED" C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvidia-smi" -ac 3505,1455 It works on 352.84... but MH's is 3.... Edit: 350.12 Works! http://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/83819/en-us
|
|
|
|
|
woodaxe
Member

Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:15:43 AM |
|
Running 6x 470 nitro + oc 8gig one card hashes at 19m/hs the others at 29 m/hash i assume the one running at 19 M/hash is the card ive got the monitor plugged into do i need a dummy plug and to use teamviewer to get the card up to 29 m/hash the same as the others and if so any links to suitable dummy plugs for sale
some help would be good thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
AlainC
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:18:25 AM |
|
Been fiddling around with the -r 1 param, but I could not make it work. ...
did you put #!/bin/sh as first line? Are you running as root... shutdown often need to be root (via sudo, but as server you cannot ask a password...). To trace maybe you can add "-x'" to trace the script. #!/bin/sh -x add echo command before and after, in case problem is with shutdown itself... I run something like /sbin/shutdown -r 1 (restart in 1 minute) check the path of shutdown with whereis shutdown It works well, and I even send email including a journalctl extract with ssmtp during the last minute.
|
|
|
|
|
r79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:29:57 AM |
|
did you put #!/bin/sh as first line? yes Are you running as root... shutdown often need to be root (via sudo, but as server you cannot ask a password...).
I start claymore with an @reboot cron in a screen, so technically it should be running as root (the screen is in the "root"-screenlist). To trace maybe you can add "-x'" to trace the script. #!/bin/sh -x add echo command before and after, in case problem is with shutdown itself... Good idea, did not get to that when I fiddled around with it yesterday evening, gonna check that at home. I run something like
/sbin/shutdown -r 1 (restart in 1 minute)
You put this command in a "restart.sh" file inside the claymore folder or into bin? I was lazy and just put a "restart" into my script, I'll check your way aswell (sounds wise giving the cards some time to cool before rebooting). It works well, and I even send email including a journalctl extract with ssmtp during the last minute.
Holy damn, that sounds epic 
|
|
|
|
|
bayloth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:31:53 AM |
|
Hi there I got problem ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... My worker: - 6x MSI rx 480 4g gaming x - windows 10 64bit - Claymore v 9.3 - crimson v 15.12 - firewall off - my .bat setting: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX.rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -eworker t1 -esm 1
Please help me. thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
adly3000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:40:13 AM |
|
Hi there I got problem ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... My worker: - 6x MSI rx 480 4g gaming x - windows 10 64bit - Claymore v 9.3 - crimson v 15.12 - firewall off - my .bat setting: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX.rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -eworker t1 -esm 1
Please help me. thanks!
Remove "-eworker t1" and try again it should be: ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX/rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -esm 1 otherwise try different pool. as dwarf sometimes fail to connect
|
|
|
|
|
bayloth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 10:59:15 AM |
|
Hi there I got problem ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... My worker: - 6x MSI rx 480 4g gaming x - windows 10 64bit - Claymore v 9.3 - crimson v 15.12 - firewall off - my .bat setting: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX.rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -eworker t1 -esm 1
Please help me. thanks!
Remove "-eworker t1" and try again it should be: ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX/rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -esm 1 otherwise try different pool. as dwarf sometimes fail to connect Removed -ewoker t1 + change pool to asia1.ethermine.org:4444 but still got this problem  ((( http://imageshack.com/a/img923/3708/dfSgZu.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
Yutard
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 11:43:20 AM |
|
hi guys,my gpu rx480 4gb,anyone can help mod it?speed just 24.xx mh/s really appreciate it
You can search the forum. It is quite easy.
|
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 11:47:31 AM |
|
Hi there I got problem ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... My worker: - 6x MSI rx 480 4g gaming x - windows 10 64bit - Claymore v 9.3 - crimson v 15.12 - firewall off - my .bat setting: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX.rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -eworker t1 -esm 1
Please help me. thanks!
Remove "-eworker t1" and try again it should be: ethdcrminer64 -epool eth-hk.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal XXXXXX/rig1 -mport 0 -mode 1 -esm 1 otherwise try different pool. as dwarf sometimes fail to connect Removed -ewoker t1 + change pool to asia1.ethermine.org:4444 but still got this problem  (((  15.12 and 480s! You want to be 1st to make it happen? Use any between 16.9.1 to 16.11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 12:54:53 PM |
|
v9.3: - improved dual mining speed stability in ASM mode. - added "-altnum" option for alternative GPU indexing. - a few minor bug fixes and improvements.
Oh bugger ... just spent the last hour updating all my rigs to 9.2 ... LOL  Thanks Claymore, not complaining! Soon I will add ability to update miners on all rigs with EthMan so it will be easy. @claymore: WOW!! That will be a very useful feature, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
666mrga999
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 01:00:42 PM |
|
I get 4-5% more effective speed (24h average) on pool side with 9.3 patch (ethermine). From 89 MHps tp 94 MHps effective average speed.
Is this intended Claymore? Please confirm
tnx
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teress
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 02:19:07 PM |
|
Hi Claymore and Community.
I'm switched from 8.0 to 9.3 and noticed that time of share accepted increased 2-3 times. And totally effected pool average hashrate. See below, (dual-mining or single mode result the same):
Version 8.0 ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
Version 9.3 ETH: Share accepted (156 ms)! ETH: Share accepted (172 ms)!
So, seems this affect hashrate and I lost around 10% in 24 hours period.
Any suggestion are welcome, thanks in advance.
Yes, I have also on v9.3 increased share submit time, from 31 to 70 ms on v9.0 to 150 ms and more on v9.3. Thats a huge step back, because it causes less accepted shares and huge drop on accepted hashrate on pool. So I'm back on v9.0 (RX470 4GBs, RX480 4 and 8GBs, nanopool) Also lots of ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec....
|
|
|
|
|
FaithlessCoinMob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 02:22:45 PM |
|
I can't believe people are having trouble with msi cards and hynix memory! First of all, with the 4gb hynix cards use the 1500memstraps! Second, lower the gpu speed (1095-1191mhz range). Finally, start with a voltage offset of at least -14 in watttool. You should be able to set the mem to 1900mhz, but you may have to lower the p7 mem/gpu voltages even further. I'm getting 27/730 eth/dcr hashrate with 9.3 -dcri27 on a 4gb 470 msi gaming x. My msi ref 480's 4gb with hynix mem have the memclock at 2000 with everything else the same and the hashrate is ~28.6/800 eth/dcr. According to kill-a-watt all of the 480's use <100w for dual mining, and all the 470's <90w. I've got dozens of polaris cards and for me msi is the best for mining!
|
|
|
|
|
EdjOne
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 02:52:58 PM |
|
Hi Claymore and Community.
I'm switched from 8.0 to 9.3 and noticed that time of share accepted increased 2-3 times. And totally effected pool average hashrate. See below, (dual-mining or single mode result the same):
Version 8.0 ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
Version 9.3 ETH: Share accepted (156 ms)! ETH: Share accepted (172 ms)!
So, seems this affect hashrate and I lost around 10% in 24 hours period.
Any suggestion are welcome, thanks in advance.
Yes, I have also on v9.3 increased share submit time, from 31 to 70 ms on v9.0 to 150 ms and more on v9.3. Thats a huge step back, because it causes less accepted shares and huge drop on accepted hashrate on pool. So I'm back on v9.0 (RX470 4GBs, RX480 4 and 8GBs, nanopool) Also lots of ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... Back to 9.0 is not a solution..... Need proper improvement or advice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teress
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 04:15:53 PM |
|
Hi Claymore and Community.
I'm switched from 8.0 to 9.3 and noticed that time of share accepted increased 2-3 times. And totally effected pool average hashrate. See below, (dual-mining or single mode result the same):
Version 8.0 ETH: Share accepted (62 ms)!
Version 9.3 ETH: Share accepted (156 ms)! ETH: Share accepted (172 ms)!
So, seems this affect hashrate and I lost around 10% in 24 hours period.
Any suggestion are welcome, thanks in advance.
Yes, I have also on v9.3 increased share submit time, from 31 to 70 ms on v9.0 to 150 ms and more on v9.3. Thats a huge step back, because it causes less accepted shares and huge drop on accepted hashrate on pool. So I'm back on v9.0 (RX470 4GBs, RX480 4 and 8GBs, nanopool) Also lots of ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec.... Back to 9.0 is not a solution..... Need proper improvement or advice. Lets hope Claymore read it and will find a solution.
|
|
|
|
|
bilbo333
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 02, 2017, 04:29:01 PM |
|
Hello. I have a couple questions to throw to the brain trust:
I am wondering if anyone out there is still mining SIA along with Ethereum? Does it makes sense as a second coin?
Also, I am running 2 RX 480's and I have a sapphire r9 270x. Any drawbacks to running an older, slower card with two new cards?
I am seeing the following hashrates 27.2 27.2 11.1
Thank you
You will make more using the 270x to mine something like ZCL or ZEC, Use the -di in your commandline .bat. Set the 480's to mine ETH and DCR. Set the 270x to mine ZCL. You will have two instances of Claymore open. Thank you for your reply. I see dwarfpool and nanopool no longer have DCR pools. Where is the best place to mine DCR? Does running more than one instance of Claymore increase total watts used?
|
|
|
|
|
|