|
TechPark
|
 |
April 26, 2017, 02:54:42 AM |
|
This is the activity of my miners:  The Yellow one is the only one on 9.1 and Eth Only What are the other colors for? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 02:56:17 AM |
|
Hi I recently started using Claymore  I run Kaspersky on my PC as it is not just a mining station. I have been forced to pause Kaspersky when running Claymore as it prevents Claymore from opening. My PC defaults to Windows Defender and I have set exclusions to allow Claymore to run. Is there a work around so I can keep Kaspersky running. I have added the Claymore folder to my exclusions list in Kaspersky but this is not working. Perhaps there is another setting I am missing? Any help appreciated. Best, You can setup exclusions on Kaspersky as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 02:59:50 AM |
|
I think Claymore did a wonderful job on this one.
At first i did get a decrease from 165Mh to 140-ish with dual ETH-DCR.
Then i played with it and got back up. Seems like the software is becoming more and more advanced, thus "needy"
These settings worked for me:
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0x3ba6Bec13899d67c4B9c37230bCd49dB822A6b35.minerx -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 -dwal 36PoLAKNUiYdUz22BuKDxBorSp2j1C7G9H.minerx -dpsw x -esm 1 -mode 0 -tt 70 -asm 0
Running 6x RX470 OCd
core voltage -30mv Core 1100MHz Mem clock 1950MHz (Using MSI Afterburner)
By ASM -0 you disabled one the main features of 9.2.. Where is your DCRI value? What is it? |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 03:02:05 AM |
|
A very unstable situation with windows 10 on version 9.0, 9.2 is even worse. The latest version of Windows can only support the driver 17.1.2. The video cards periodically drop one by one from 28-29 to 19-22mh / s and the next line is restored. As a result, a loss of up to 5% per day on chaotic jumps. Up to 28MHs this is a little overclocking and everything should work fine. I think there is a request to track the work on the driver 17.1.2 and make friendly changes for stable operation.AMD driver 17.1.2 is the last key driver for mining in the development of windows 10 for modified polaris. The rest, above, cause an increase in the work of the "system interrupt" processor. The rest, below, have an increased energy consumption during mining.
Do you have proof for "The rest, below, have an increased energy consumption during mining." How big is difference? |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 03:05:54 AM |
|
Hi guys ! Correct me if Im wrong. If i see 1100 watt from the wall on my wattmeter , so on 80+ Standard PSU its 1100*0.8=880 power load of PSU. And its good enough for PSUs working conditions (1000Watt Chieftech)?
I mean its about 85% of its full load.
Right ?
Affirmative. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 03:11:24 AM |
|
Hi guys ! Correct me if Im wrong. If i see 1100 watt from the wall on my wattmeter , so on 80+ Standard PSU its 1100*0.8=880 power load of PSU. And its good enough for PSUs working conditions (1000Watt Chieftech)?
I mean its about 85% of its full load.
Right ?
If you have a 1000W PSU how can you see 1100 at the wall? Something is wrong... The 80+ standard is a measure of efficiency. No PSU will deliver 100% of its nominal output, 10~20% is lost in heat. Therefore, a 1000W PSU will only deliver ~800W within a limited range of loads, and not at full load. Got it? A 1000W PSU will never "suck" 1100w from the wall.... That is not correct. See here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/corsair-ax1500i-titanium-power-supply,4276-4.html"Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements The first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the PSU's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the maximum load the supply can handle, in increments of 10 percentage points...... 1500W PSU Output - 1549.07W, efficiecny -89.04%, PSU input 1739.84W ......" |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 03:19:44 AM |
|
why -cvddc 900 on windows not working? it will use 1000 mvolt instead i checked on gpu-z XD  (rx 480 nitro+oc 1190/2240) Confirmed. I did notice this as well. Some models (I have a mixture of 470-4, 480-4, 480-8 from the same brand) will not take values from -cvddc. So I had to use MSI AB to set voltage. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 04:00:49 AM |
|
I am not Claymore  I think we should let him to focus on the coding work ! Use DDU to uninstall the current driver and install 16.11.5 and choose NOT to update to the the latest version. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 04:05:31 AM |
|
Hey guys,
hopping is the right place to ask
one question please ...
found a few articles where is saying that Sapphire Radeon NITRO+ RX 480 4GB or 8GB - is the best option for Ethereum mining.
Is that correct?
lets suppose I have electricity for 0$.
thanks!
Simple question = simple answer > It is not correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
TechPark
|
|
April 26, 2017, 04:06:21 AM |
|
Is last version of Claymore miner have any viruses?
As always. See the first post in this thread on page 1. |
|
|
|
|
Godm0de
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
April 26, 2017, 05:25:06 AM |
|
Well I have unplugged the power connector then plugged it back in, I don't know how else I can check it. What I can't understand is how can the risers be malfunctioning all of a sudden after days of mining? The miner doesn't move, the GPU's are secure. How can they work for days, then fail, then after a few restarts begin working again. There is no logic there unless I am missing something.
Hi rawbot, I have the same issue with my Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ cards. Sometimes they run several days without issues and then one card starts failing and rebooting doesn't help. The only solution for me is then, to power off the miner, remove the power card and wait 30 minutes. If I power on the miner again, everything is fine. It is not a temperature issue, I have checked everything. My guess is, that something gets weird in the GPU and only a longer power off phase resets this weird state. ^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
|
April 26, 2017, 06:14:59 AM |
|
Hi Claymore, thanks for your work. I believe I found a bug on Ethman I would like to use the http address of a PC instead of the IP address when adding the miner to ETHman Now, on the "Add Miner" window, when I write the http address as in " http://subdomain.domainname.com" the software strips out the "http://" part and add "http//" without the colon, hence is not working (I see that if I click on "view miner console"). Even if I input the http address without the http:// bit, as in "subdomain.domainname.com" it still doesn't work/update but if I right click and choose "view miner console" it direct the browser to the correct subdomain and the stats shows fine on the website but on the Ethman windows it shows nothing and the miner is shown in red. Could you please shed some light on why this is happening? Is it a bug or is http not meant to be used / not working straight into ETHman? :/ Im allsow not Claymore but i think your messing with ethman wrong way. Miner just opens monitoring port , lets say 3333. It is not web page , so dont put http:// or any http in add miner menu. Its just a service of the miner with can output info to your ethman , connecting to that IP:port. Just dont user http and domain name. Use Ip adress + port. BR. P.S. Yes. Miner can output stats in html format if you open your miners http://IP-ADDRESS:port in browser. But it not applies to ethman. |
|
|
|
|
|
zorvalth
|
|
April 26, 2017, 06:24:07 AM |
|
This is the activity of my miners: The Yellow one is the only one on 9.1 and Eth Only What are the other colors for? 6x GPU RX 470/480 rigs mining dual |
|
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
|
April 26, 2017, 06:28:15 AM |
|
Hi guys ! Correct me if Im wrong. If i see 1100 watt from the wall on my wattmeter , so on 80+ Standard PSU its 1100*0.8=880 power load of PSU. And its good enough for PSUs working conditions (1000Watt Chieftech)?
I mean its about 85% of its full load.
Right ?
If you have a 1000W PSU how can you see 1100 at the wall? Something is wrong... The 80+ standard is a measure of efficiency. No PSU will deliver 100% of its nominal output, 10~20% is lost in heat. Therefore, a 1000W PSU will only deliver ~800W within a limited range of loads, and not at full load. Got it? A 1000W PSU will never "suck" 1100w from the wall.... That is not correct. See here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/corsair-ax1500i-titanium-power-supply,4276-4.html"Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements The first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the PSU's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the maximum load the supply can handle, in increments of 10 percentage points...... 1500W PSU Output - 1549.07W, efficiecny -89.04%, PSU input 1739.84W ......" Interesting article. Looks like 50% As well as 100% load are not efficient mode of operation. from 80 to 90 % is the best PSU load. |
|
|
|
|
|
bp44
|
|
April 26, 2017, 07:37:06 AM |
|
Why the link v. 9.2 loads 8.0?!!
|
|
|
|
|
jackbox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024
|
|
April 26, 2017, 07:40:13 AM |
|
Why the link v. 9.2 loads 8.0?!!
Download from Mega not Google Drive. |
|
|
|
|
bp44
|
|
April 26, 2017, 07:47:19 AM |
|
Download from Mega not Google Drive.
I'mdownload from Mega, but 8.0 too. Bro, send me please zip v 9.2 bp44{}mail.ru |
|
|
|
|
raducuc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
April 26, 2017, 07:52:32 AM |
|
anyone had problems overnight with ethermine pool dropping ? miner hanged overnight until i restarted it this morning... 23:56:24:801 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:25:168 13d0 ETH: checking pool connection...
23:56:25:174 13d0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
23:56:25:195 13d0 got 248 bytes
23:56:25:200 13d0 buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0xc82b4938e6c6195db38760f39cf6444da400508ed566e61be7ffd677d249138c","0x44e0f68f2fdbda787677af3e01f27b6e0b59fa1c14f426ed549b29728829258d","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x36f0c9"]}
23:56:25:204 13d0 parse packet: 247
23:56:25:209 13d0 ETH: job is the same
23:56:25:215 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:35:184 13d0 ETH: checking pool connection...
23:56:35:193 13d0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
23:56:35:216 13d0 got 248 bytes
23:56:35:228 13d0 buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0xc82b4938e6c6195db38760f39cf6444da400508ed566e61be7ffd677d249138c","0x44e0f68f2fdbda787677af3e01f27b6e0b59fa1c14f426ed549b29728829258d","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x36f0c9"]}
23:56:35:237 13d0 parse packet: 247
23:56:35:243 13d0 ETH: job is the same
23:56:35:249 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:43:580 e50 ETH: put share nonce a95dbde84a29f13c
23:56:43:586 e50 ETH round found 1 shares
23:56:43:593 13d0 ETH: 04/25/17-23:56:43 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
23:56:43:603 13d0 send: {"id":4,"method":"eth_submitWork","params":["0xa95dbde84a29f13c","0xc82b4938e6c6195db38760f39cf6444da400508ed566e61be7ffd677d249138c","0xcab2ef93bc98be8a6336992b3a95e0534f4fbd788f40d12f82e9616b48141709"]}
23:56:43:630 13d0 got 39 bytes
23:56:43:640 13d0 buf: {"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
23:56:43:646 13d0 parse packet: 38
23:56:43:651 13d0 ETH: Share accepted (31 ms)!
23:56:43:657 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:44:778 13d0 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x66764f2", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000012ce6da1"]}
23:56:44:806 13d0 got 39 bytes
23:56:44:812 13d0 buf: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
23:56:44:819 13d0 parse packet: 38
23:56:44:824 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:45:215 13d0 ETH: checking pool connection...
23:56:45:222 13d0 send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
23:56:45:242 13d0 got 248 bytes
23:56:45:248 13d0 buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0xc82b4938e6c6195db38760f39cf6444da400508ed566e61be7ffd677d249138c","0x44e0f68f2fdbda787677af3e01f27b6e0b59fa1c14f426ed549b29728829258d","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x36f0c9"]}
23:56:45:255 13d0 parse packet: 247
23:56:45:262 13d0 ETH: job is the same
23:56:45:268 13d0 new buf size: 0
23:56:46:499 1de0 GPU0 t=77C fan=56%, GPU1 t=78C fan=38%, GPU2 t=63C fan=50%, GPU3 t=77C fan=28%
23:56:46:506 1de0 em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 62,
23:56:46:512 1de0 watchdog - thread 0, hb time 203
23:56:46:518 1de0 watchdog - thread 1, hb time 31
23:56:46:525 1de0 watchdog - thread 2, hb time 94
23:56:46:531 1de0 watchdog - thread 3, hb time 266
23:56:46:540 1de0 watchdog - thread 4, hb time 156
23:56:46:546 1de0 watchdog - thread 5, hb time 0
23:56:46:551 1de0 watchdog - thread 6, hb time 0
23:56:46:557 1de0 watchdog - thread 7, hb time 156
23:56:51:241 13d0 got 248 bytes
23:56:51:247 13d0 buf: {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x020f47a3ec9bb1769aba79ace208e031ebca02971864370224273ea853f1d2e3","0x44e0f68f2fdbda787677af3e01f27b6e0b59fa1c14f426ed549b29728829258d","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x36f0ca"]}
23:56:51:253 13d0 parse packet: 247
23:56:51:258 13d0 ETH: job changed
23:56:51:266 13d0 new buf size: 0 |
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
April 26, 2017, 08:43:51 AM |
|
Zou cant use 17.4.3 driver. Use 16.* .With 17.4.3 miner does not recogniye zour cards is not correct... Read my post... I wrote: with Original silent bios all works fine and i get 22.6Mhs...with 17.4.3 driver... after flashing with modded bios i get the essrror in the screen shot.. |
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
April 26, 2017, 08:45:02 AM |
|
Did you re-sign driver after updated it? Each time you update drivers, you will need to re-sign driver. (whole proccess again) hi tarnum!!! what did you mean with "Did you re-sign driver after updated it?" maybe i need to reinstall all after flasching the bios??? if so every time a flash a card, a need to reinstall driver?? |
|
|
|
|
