Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[scryptr]

v5.3 works, but the temperature when I mine from both pools is around 10C higher - the cards are running now with 85C, should I be worry?

and the hashrate is 12MH per card - R9-280 instead 22MH?

I mine ETH from Dwarfpool and SIA from nanopool, any reason for me to mine both coins from nano?

Regards

TRY VERSION 6.0--

It has just been released early today.  And, hey... I noticed my 280X cards run cooler mining ETH/DCR rather than ETH/SC.  My  280X cards are still on v5.2, though.  I'll move to v6.0 this week.       --scryptr

[lokojones]

v5.3 works, but the temperature when I mine from both pools is around 10C higher - the cards are running now with 85C, should I be worry?

and the hashrate is 12MH per card - R9-280 instead 22MH?

I mine ETH from Dwarfpool and SIA from nanopool, any reason for me to mine both coins from nano?

Regards

TRY VERSION 6.0--

It has just been released early today.  And, hey... I noticed my 280X cards run cooler mining ETH/DCR rather than ETH/SC.  My  280X cards are still on v5.2, though.  I'll move to v6.0 this week.       --scryptr

what just I realised, when I do dual mining the harshrate get split?! If I mine only ETH my harshreate is correct... in other words if you want mine ETH only this miner will not help you?!
and the harsh rate is still showing lower arounf 2MH - I will run on this client for 72H and see ih the income changed... otherwise NO HIT at all.

[leonix007]

Hope the Linux version will also launch.. excited about this. TIA

[xlincn]

What are the speed's on the different cards?

i'm also interested in the speed for the 1070 on eth+decred or sia

win7 1070   eth 29m  sc 299m

[Claymore]

On win 8.1 64 with the 368.81 drivers, a gtx 1070 and a regular batch (it needs to work, I've got experience with it) it hangs.

You cannot mine ETH on 368.81 drivers, thanks to buggy nvidia drivers. So, firstly install 369.05 or later and then start miner.

hmm, but there is no 369 driver release for win7,8.1 yet , at least i cant find it. only in anniversary upgrade for win10 , provided by M$

NOT WANTING TO CONTRADICT THE MASTER--

But my MAXWELL (GTX9xx) cards  run fine on Win 7 x64, nVidia Driver 368.81.  It is too soon for me to update either my AMD or nVidia cards, the hardware has not been fully tweaked, and the drivers are the source of many complaints.  Red Team or Green Team, the bugs are eating the latest products alive.       --scryptr

@scryptr - You can't mine on 368.81 drivers WITH a 1070. Of course you can do it for GTX9xx cards, but the op was asking about Win 8.1 and GTX1070. I believe Claymores response wasn't specific because the OP was asking about Win8.1 & GTX1070 working specifically and not all Nvidia cards.

@mo35 - You will have to upgrade to Win10 for now if you want to use the GTX1070 at full hashing speeds under Windows. I've been mining under Linux while waiting for the drivers to be fixed, so about to make the switch now myself.

You are correct - to be more precise, you cannot mine ETH on 368.81 drivers on latest 10xx cards. You can mine ETH on 368.81 drivers on previous cards like 970 or 980.

[gribgo]

Hi! Claymore.. is siamining stratum supported in the new version?
Thank you!
peace

SiaMining.com [PPS] has added support for Claymore's Stratum on port 7777. See https://siamining.com/help for more info!

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal YourEthAddress.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://siamining.com:7777 -dwal YourSiacoinAddress.YourWorkerName -dcoin sia

authentification failed
tryed 5.3 and 6 version

[Claymore]

Hi! Claymore.. is siamining stratum supported in the new version?
Thank you!
peace

SiaMining.com [PPS] has added support for Claymore's Stratum on port 7777. See https://siamining.com/help for more info!

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal YourEthAddress.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://siamining.com:7777 -dwal YourSiacoinAddress.YourWorkerName -dcoin sia

authentification failed
tryed 5.3 and 6 version

This works for me:

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://siamining.com:7777 -dwal 3be0304dee313515cf401b8593a0c1df905ed13f0adaee89a8d7337d2ba8209e5ca9f297bbc2 -dcoin sia

[gribgo]

Hi! Claymore.. is siamining stratum supported in the new version?
Thank you!
peace

SiaMining.com [PPS] has added support for Claymore's Stratum on port 7777. See https://siamining.com/help for more info!

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal YourEthAddress.YourWorkerName -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://siamining.com:7777 -dwal YourSiacoinAddress.YourWorkerName -dcoin sia

authentification failed
tryed 5.3 and 6 version

This works for me:

Code:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethpool.org:3333 -ewal 0xD69af2A796A737A103F12d2f0BCC563a13900E6F -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://siamining.com:7777 -dwal 3be0304dee313515cf401b8593a0c1df905ed13f0adaee89a8d7337d2ba8209e5ca9f297bbc2 -dcoin sia

my fault.. missed the last symbol of my wallet

[Mraking]

win 7 1070 OC 2000 core, 10000 memory
eth 29.5 mh/s sia 740 - 170W-180W dcri 65
the speed is very similar to 290-390 but consumes electricity much less

[Claymore]

Again, for people who don't have any experience with this miner:

You can change second coin intensity with "+" and "-" keys and see current hashrates with "s" key. This way you can select best value for "-dcri" option.

[ocminer]

To all requests: I will check them a bit later, don't want to postpone new version again and again.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.

Please, support solo mining with Parity v1.3.0

No problem, as soon as someone can explain me how to make it work. Step by step: download link, how to start/configure, etc. Because I spent a lot of time and still don't have any ideas why it does not download blockchain though Mist wallet works on same system.

I think, JSONRPC command packet which request the work from the wallet(parity), is not compatible with Parity and it just return Invalid Message Error, I am not sure the how packet has configured from this miner (if there is any option to see the message, let me try with Parity manually), or Could you show me the message in solo mining mode such as 'http://127.0.0.1:8584';

Note: after fully synced with parity 1.3.0;
I have tried with ethminer.exe from CPP-Ethereum;
I feel the packet from this miner has recognized by parity successfully
Thank you for the good support always,

Download WireShark and see what packets miner sends, especially packets with "eth_getWork". You can compare my miner and ethminer and see the difference. If you can see it, I can fix it and send you an update for tests.

@Claymore you have to sent correct headers to parity (Content-Type: application/json) otherwise it'll refuse to give work.

Will you implement suprnova's stratum type for Sia ? I still have some requests asking for it ...

1. It worked for 0.x geth, but fails in Parity. I doubt that I broke something, but it is possible. Anyway I could fix it in a minute if I could make new geth work. Weird situation.
2. Well, it seems you are the only Stratum pool that does not support my simple Stratum version. Again, I'm going to add your Stratum, but I need time for it because I don't use code from sgminer. I've been busy with nvidia for a few weeks and I still see some other important things to do. So if you cannot implement my Stratum, we need to wait some more time, may be 1-2 weeks or so.

The "simple stratum protocol" lacks a lots of simple features for basic share spoofing / exploit protection so it's a lot of more work todo on my side for validating shares, duplicates, difficulty etc which makes it rather a big risk instead of an advantage if implemented, but I guess if it takes another 1-2 weeks I'll have a look at it again..

There are 5 coins with 15 different flavours of stratum.. Maybe it's not the best to just implement the "simplest" protocol but the safest, even you miss some coins if the protocol is (ab-)used for fake/duplicate shares on the pool you're mining the dev fee

[z0n0]

What are the speed's on the different cards?

19.8MH/s ETH / 190MH/s DCR WITH GTX 980ti--

Running on Win 7 x64, nVidia Driver 368.81.  The card gets hot, and my GTX 970 cards on Linux also get ~20MH/s with Genoil's miner.  I am waiting on Claymore's Linux version, then I can test the GTX 960 and 970 rates.    

For comparison, a 280X will get ~20MH/s ETH / ~180MH/s DCR (or better).  I am running the 980ti at default intensities, and my 280X cards have lower DCR intensities to lower heat.       --scryptr

Hey mate, can you say what clock you on with 280x and pls paste your .bat lines.
I get just 17MH ETH only.
Thanks

[Claymore]

The "simple stratum protocol" lacks a lots of simple features for basic share spoofing / exploit protection so it's a lot of more work todo on my side for validating shares, duplicates, difficulty etc which makes it rather a big risk instead of an advantage if implemented, but I guess if it takes another 1-2 weeks I'll have a look at it again..

I agree, if you don't support HTTP for Sia, proably it will take you more time to implement my stratum. But if you support HTTP it will be very easy because my stratum is just a wrapper around HTTP.

[ocminer]

The "simple stratum protocol" lacks a lots of simple features for basic share spoofing / exploit protection so it's a lot of more work todo on my side for validating shares, duplicates, difficulty etc which makes it rather a big risk instead of an advantage if implemented, but I guess if it takes another 1-2 weeks I'll have a look at it again..

I agree, if you don't support HTTP for Sia, proably it will take you more time to implement my stratum. But if you support HTTP it will be very easy because my stratum is just a wrapper around HTTP.

I know..  I already laughed at the 0x `stratum` ..  It's ridiculous to call it even stratum 

[mirny]

Hi Claymore,
are you planning to release v6.0 also for linux?
I see only miner for windows.

[mkimid]

Code:

**** with Claymore's Dual Miner

2016-08-15 10:25:09  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

2016-08-15 10:25:10  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

**** with Ethminer

2016-08-15 10:25:30  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")

2016-08-15 10:25:32  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}

Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue.
Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well.
but, with Miner, it shows as the error.

I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening,

[ocminer]

Code:

**** with Claymore's Dual Miner

2016-08-15 10:25:09  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

2016-08-15 10:25:10  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

**** with Ethminer

2016-08-15 10:25:30  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")

2016-08-15 10:25:32  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}

Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue.
Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well.
but, with Miner, it shows as the error.

I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening,

Headers are not displayed here.. The Content-Type needs to be set, as already mentioned before

[scryptr]

What are the speed's on the different cards?

19.8MH/s ETH / 190MH/s DCR WITH GTX 980ti--

Running on Win 7 x64, nVidia Driver 368.81.  The card gets hot, and my GTX 970 cards on Linux also get ~20MH/s with Genoil's miner.  I am waiting on Claymore's Linux version, then I can test the GTX 960 and 970 rates.    

For comparison, a 280X will get ~20MH/s ETH / ~180MH/s DCR (or better).  I am running the 980ti at default intensities, and my 280X cards have lower DCR intensities to lower heat.       --scryptr

Hey mate, can you say what clock you on with 280x and pls paste your .bat lines.
I get just 17MH ETH only.
Thanks

280X CLOCKED 1100/1500 CORE/MEM--

With the default clocks being 1030/1500.  My cards will crash with a higher OverClock (OC).  I've never been able to OC the memory.  The launch files are standard, with -tt 88, -cclock 1100, -ethcri 12, and -dcri 20 as the only performance modifiers.  And, yes, I usually get lower than 20MH/s depending on how hot the day is and how hot the cards run.  Genoil's miner gets 20.7 MH/s on the same cards and clocks.  Genoil's miner ran at 22MH/s in February, when the weather here was cold, the difficulty lower, and the DAG smaller.       --scryptr

[mkimid]

Code:

**** with Claymore's Dual Miner

2016-08-15 10:25:09  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

2016-08-15 10:25:10  TRACE rpc  Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")

**** with Ethminer

2016-08-15 10:25:30  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")

2016-08-15 10:25:32  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32  DEBUG rpc  Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33  TRACE rpc  Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}

Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue.
Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well.
but, with Miner, it shows as the error.

I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening,

Headers are not displayed here.. The Content-Type needs to be set, as already mentioned before

Thank you for your comment,
I have missed your post which has made before,
Thank you.

[leonix007]

Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner.
=========================


- Displays detailed mining information and hashrate for every card.
- Supports remote monitoring and management.
- Supports GPU selection, built-in GPU overclocking features and temperature management.
- Supports Ethereum forks (Expanse, etc).
- Windows and Linux versions.

Guys, is the linux version already available? I could not find it in download links. I Believe the one uploaded is for Windows version only.thank you