Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[mine_phun]

No, actually that is not true. There are people mining XSH ( Shield ) since the difficulty is more stable.

Best

Wijnand

About my question, why is showing xsh for people mining xvg?

Because it's the same Algo i think.

[Ratledge]

...

The whole Claymore's log from when the issue seems to start:

18:41:37:870   cc4   ETH - Total Speed: 99.571 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1173, Rejected: 0, Time: 34:22
18:41:37:870   cc4   ETH: GPU0 13.016 Mh/s, GPU1 12.974 Mh/s, GPU2 13.037 Mh/s, GPU3 13.019 Mh/s, GPU4 23.765 Mh/s, GPU5 23.760 Mh/s
18:41:38:355   1738   srv_thr cnt: 1, IP: 192.168.XX.XX

WTF? 

I know, right? How could people copy that huge wall of text?

A) Devil is in the details. I'm running over 25 miners with 6-8 GPUs each almost all alone by myself. Build from scratch. many different models. RX. R9. GTX, ... And I had no exp in these stuff 9 months ago. I managed to do all of this, get a perfectly stable system with little to none problems, only by paying a great deal of attention to details. So I do the courtesy to others who may want to help me, by giving them "the option" to see and read the details.

B) If you get off your high horse, you'll see that I put the important parts short and sweet in the beginning. Giving the line of error which I think is the main thing. System spec. And few lines on what's up. THEN. Only then, I wrote "the whole log file from which the problem starts". So the post is not in anyway or from defined by the log file. You can simply ignore it. You don't need to quote it. And it will take 2 sec to scroll past it.

So if you don't have anything to say, stop talking. It's not Facebook or twitter, or text messages with your bff. It's a  forum. You can expect time to time a lengthy post. And as long as it's not messy, it's perfectly fine.

Ah, but I don't own a horse.  The issue is not with lengthy USEFUL posts, it's people quoting the "README!!.TXT" file entirely or such.

Never-the-less, it tends to be "drinking from a firehose" analogy: it's not useful and people just aren't thinking about what they are posting when they decide they - for whatever reason - include the entire "ReadMe" file in a post.  Sure, you can scroll right by it, hardly the point: somebody is paying for the storage here, and I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone needs multiple copies of that file, and it's not just the OP, it has been quoted.  WTF?

[Metroid]

Because it's the same Algo i think.

Also, there are problems with hashrate  and that is because your pool might need a faster internet connection to accommodate the users or you need to disable the torrents. I'm not joking, or if is nothing of what I said then it might be something holding your pool internet connection back cause the hashrate is nothing like used to me.

Maybe the payment is not as good as antminer because of the internet connection issues. Download and upload speed is the key here, need to be top notch.

[Golempl]

I had some claymore 11 crashes, this seems happend on linux only, and when dual coin pool is not reachable/down:

ETH: 02/19/18-20:26:11 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 188.072 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2773, Rejected: 0, Time: 40:40
ETH: GPU0 26.884 Mh/s, GPU1 26.849 Mh/s, GPU2 26.868 Mh/s, GPU3 26.868 Mh/s, GPU
s
 B2S - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 6915, Rejected: 19
 B2S: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s, GPU4 0
 B2S: Stratum - Cannot connect to s.antminepool.com:9009
 B2S: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 7 sec...
Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!


Also when 2nd coin pool is down, then main mining speed is affected, not that much.

I did some tests with antminepool, 30500MH/s (24 hours of stable mining) , I did receive 145 XVG , whattomine says it should be 162. Seems orphans.

[goodbitprofit]

we are currently wasting hashpower mining xvg at nlpool, as we are mining all blake2s coins there. the way i see it, if we set c=xvg, we aren't paid for mined xsh (currently, because i think this pool is not exchanging for us).

please fix it nlpool devs.

Does antminer pay?

My friend has been mining xvg at http://mine.nlpool.nl for more than 24 hours and I must say that is much less than it was on antminer so far.

Yes Antminer is paying, once per hour, but with my 15kmhs.... around 7 verge per hour

[Metroid]

I did some tests with antminepool, 30500MH/s (24 hours of stable mining) , I did receive 145 XVG , whattomine says it should be 162. Seems orphans.

Come on, you are complaining for something so close, If the difference was 30% then yes but your case is only 10%.

I guess a stable xvg pool is needed.

[l30z1n]

Because it's the same Algo i think.

Also, there are problems with hashrate  and that is because your pool might need a faster internet connection to accommodate the users or you need to disable the torrents. I'm not joking, or if is nothing of what I said then it might be something holding your pool internet connection back cause the hashrate is nothing like used to me.

Maybe the payment is not as good as antminer because of the internet connection issues. Download and upload speed is the key here, need to be top notch.

The pool ADM has already reported a few pages back that the pool is receiving attack packages, and he has already informed that he is working to do the update on the firewall.

[Metroid]

The pool ADM has already reported a few pages back that the pool is receiving attack packages, and he has already informed that he is working to do the update on the firewall.

I missed that. That is another problem.

I was talking to my friend and told him there are too many issues with existent xvg pools, so I gave him an alternative and he will do it, solo mining is the best thing to do. There are no reliable pools around.

[Neu_Cinetico]

Hello,

I have a rig mining ETH but i want to change for ETC. looking for pools and in etc-etherminer.org i saw a miner like this:

https://imgur.com/a/MZ85R

he have all stable and the AVG lot more than the reported hash.

Is that normal?? my AVG hash are smaller than my reported, the current are not that stable.


is this normal?? i want my miner like that lol

[timotybg]

I did some tests with antminepool, 30500MH/s (24 hours of stable mining) , I did receive 145 XVG , whattomine says it should be 162. Seems orphans.

Come on, you are complaining for something so close, If the difference was 30% then yes but your case is only 10%.

I guess a stable xvg pool is needed.

If losing 10% of your earnings is not a big deal for you feel free to share 5% here 0xb44c78CFC669a3EEE0338A4F46Ab9D12caD2df51   
but you are right about the pool

[strelly83]

Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about 2 weeks in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
After the 1st payment my Nicehash "profitability" has dropped (from 0.0005-6 BTC/day to 0.0001 BTC/day)... Gh/s and difficulty are the same...Do you have similar experiences? thank you

[Metroid]

If losing 10% of your earnings is not a big deal for you feel free to share 5% here 0xb44c78CFC669a3EEE0338A4F46Ab9D12caD2df51  
but you are right about the pool

10% less or more is normal, now more or less than that no. People should always check their 24 hours hashrate, if it was a constant 24 hours hashrate then they can complain if more than 10%.

Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about 2 weeks in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
After the 1st payment my Nicehash "profitability" has dropped (from 0.0005-6 BTC/day to 0.0001 BTC/day)... Gh/s and difficulty are the same...Do you have similar experiences? thank you

You should never mine at nicehash unless you are okay with their payments, is always 40% - 150% less than you would receive mining on a proper pool. I did some tests just to check the earnings on nicehash, I was supposed to earn $8 on a proper pool and nicehash paid $3.40, that is just an example.

[LearningGuy]

May be a stupid question, but I recall reading in the Claymore readme file that we should not overclock when dual mining. I have noticed when I overclock mining eth alone I’m good, however when dual I end up with one specific card having openCL. But I have also noticed many of you are over locking. Should I or shouldn’t I?

[Metroid]

May be a stupid question, but I recall reading in the Claymore readme file that we should not overclock when dual mining. I have noticed when I overclock mining eth alone I’m good, however when dual I end up with one specific card having openCL. But I have also noticed many of you are over locking. Should I or shouldn’t I?

There is nothing wrong overclocking your gpu as long as you know what you are doing. You have a lot to read.

[strelly83]

Hi, I'm using claymore v11 since about 2 weeks in dual mining mode ETH + BLAKE2S with Ethermine pools for ETH and Nicehash for BLAKE2S.
After the 1st payment my Nicehash "profitability" has dropped (from 0.0005-6 BTC/day to 0.0001 BTC/day)... Gh/s and difficulty are the same...Do you have similar experiences? thank you

You should never mine at nicehash unless you are okay with their payments, is always 40% - 150% less than you would receive mining on a proper pool. I did some tests just to check the earnings on nicehash, I was supposed to earn $8 on a proper pool and nicehash paid $3.40, that is just an example.

Ok thank you...Do you have any suggestions on which second coin / pools to mine without dropping mh/s with ethermine? Is DCR with dcr.suprnova pool still a possibility?

[cryptoillusion1]

No, actually that is not true. There are people mining XSH ( Shield ) since the difficulty is more stable.

Best

Wijnand

About my question, why is showing xsh for people mining xvg?

Because it's the same Algo i think.

@mine_Phun
Same problem here- mining XVG only and it shows XSH and XVG

1. So will the XSH showing on the website be converted to XVG

2. Also i see a XSH wallet address with some balance - But this wallet does not belong to me- I only have a XVG wallet
what is this XSH wallet?

see https://ibb.co/cW6ji7

[Marvell2]

all these pools are trash the http://mine.nlpool.nl , been up and down all day , crashing my damn rigs with thier bull shit

umining are straight up thieves , somone like nanopool needs to start a legit pool

[Metroid]

all these pools are trash the http://mine.nlpool.nl , been up and down all day , crashing my damn rigs with thier bull shit

umining are straight up thieves , somone like nanopool needs to start a legit pool

Probably rival pools are dns attacking nlpool. Best thing right now is solo mining until a good pool like nanopool adds xvg.

[Marvell2]

all these pools are trash the http://mine.nlpool.nl , been up and down all day , crashing my damn rigs with thier bull shit

umining are straight up thieves , somone like nanopool needs to start a legit pool

Probably rival pools are dns attacking nlpool. Best thing right now is solo mining until a good pool like nanopool adds xvg.

how to solo mine this ? can you mine to the wallet ?

checked the instructions at the github pool page
https://github.com/vergecurrency/VERGE


will this work for a conf like this :


rpcuser=user rpcpassword=pass rpcport=20102 port=21102 server=1 listen=1 daemon=1 algo=blake gen=1

-dpool  http://192.168.xxx.xxx:20102
 -dwal user
 -dpsw pass
 -dcoin blake2s
 -dcri 36

[fanisk21]

Antmine with new server.

https://i.imgur.com/2To4lAL.png
47TH