Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com

[jelin1984]

Which is the higher diff per Titan we can put??

[1713549379]

1713549379

[1713549379]

1713549379

[1713549379]

1713549379

[1713549379]

1713549379

[TXSteve]

8192 or 16384 both work well on a 4 cube rig

[mindtrip]

i use 8192 on all my titans

[GenTarkin]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

[TXSteve]

just had a successful hard reset, so looks good

Attempting softreset of ASIC# 2 DIE# 0
{ "asic_3_voltage": { "die1": "-0.0513" }, "asic_3_frequency": { "die1": "325" } }
STATUS=S,When=1439762729,Code=92,Msg=PGA 0 set OK: Die setup Ok; asic 2 die 0 cmd RECONFIGURE,Description=bfgminer 5.2.0|
Attempting softreset of ASIC# 2 DIE# 0
{ "asic_3_voltage": { "die1": "-0.0513" }, "asic_3_frequency": { "die1": "325" } }
STATUS=S,When=1439762798,Code=92,Msg=PGA 0 set OK: Die setup Ok; asic 2 die 0 cmd RECONFIGURE,Description=bfgminer 5.2.0|
Failed multiple soft reset attempts, performing hard reset
Stopping bfgminer.
Power cycling ASIC# 2
INFO: Attempt to power down dc/dc
INFO: Attempt to power UP dc/dc
Starting bfgminer.

[GenTarkin]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

[GenTarkin]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

I wish I was that advanced, lol   I just used the knc 2.0 image and tried your v.85 img too

let me think about that, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this git stuff

actually starting to make some sense, thx for the tip

[GenTarkin]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

I wish I was that advanced, lol   I just used the knc 2.0 image and tried your v.85 img too

let me think about that, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this git stuff

actually starting to make some sense, thx for the tip

Oh, I see what you mean, the stock bfgminer is what you want?
Wasnt something broken in it.... isnt that why everyone wanted the latest? lol I dont know anymore.
Basically if you wanted that version again, u would need to go to the bfgminer_stock directory and just copy bfgminer from that folder to bfgminer folder then restart bfgminer. All of this is in /home/pi. Make a backup of the newest one first if you wanted to, by moving it to a diff filename. IE: mv bfgminer/bfgminer bfgminer/bfgminer_new_bak

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

I wish I was that advanced, lol   I just used the knc 2.0 image and tried your v.85 img too

let me think about that, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this git stuff

actually starting to make some sense, thx for the tip

Oh, I see what you mean, the stock bfgminer is what you want?
Wasnt something broken in it.... isnt that why everyone wanted the latest? lol I dont know anymore.
Basically if you wanted that version again, u would need to go to the bfgminer_stock directory and just copy bfgminer from that folder to bfgminer folder then restart bfgminer. All of this is in /home/pi. Make a backup of the newest one first if you wanted to, by moving it to a diff filename. IE: mv bfgminer/bfgminer bfgminer/bfgminer_new_bak

I used  cp -r /backup/bfgminer/* bfgminer ....  lol so easy, you wouldn't believe how complicated I was making that

thanks so much for another tip

when I do a git pull will it upgrade to 5.2 again?

[GenTarkin]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

I wish I was that advanced, lol   I just used the knc 2.0 image and tried your v.85 img too

let me think about that, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this git stuff

actually starting to make some sense, thx for the tip

Oh, I see what you mean, the stock bfgminer is what you want?
Wasnt something broken in it.... isnt that why everyone wanted the latest? lol I dont know anymore.
Basically if you wanted that version again, u would need to go to the bfgminer_stock directory and just copy bfgminer from that folder to bfgminer folder then restart bfgminer. All of this is in /home/pi. Make a backup of the newest one first if you wanted to, by moving it to a diff filename. IE: mv bfgminer/bfgminer bfgminer/bfgminer_new_bak

I used  cp -r /backup/bfgminer/* bfgminer ....  lol so easy, you wouldn't believe how complicated I was making that

thanks so much for another tip

when I do a git pull will it upgrade to 5.2 again?

Yeah, it will probably complain about local changes and needing to stash them, not sure tho =/ ... or it will just reupdate the file haha!

I could possibly write a webgui box & submit that allows a pulldown of which miner to use and restart the miner w/ selected version. But thats more than I have time to code atm, if you really want it Im sure I could do that sometime this week. More donations would get me coding it for sure haha =P

[TXSteve]

Hey, TXSteve ....
How is my latest firmware changes working for ya?
I think its working well on my single titan, its done some soft / hard resets once or 2x ... my code handled it as intended .. I think =)

Whats ur experience been?

Im gonna make an updated official release soon if all keeps going well.

I think it's ok too, still waiting for word on the 5.1/5.2 issue on the bfgminer thread

haven't had much in the way of hard resets yet to confirm, temp control is solid !!

Luke-Jr saying to use the git bisect command, you know anything about that?  Looks like it checks revisions to find where a bug is introduced

Nope, I dont =/

yeah it is beyond me too, would it be too much trouble to get a 5.1 version? that way I'll at least have temp control on that rig and then use 5.2 on the others
 I suppose many don't use load balance, but probably going to be a problem if anyone else tries it with 5.2

btw I did have a successful hard reset today, seems to be working

Very cool, Im glad the soft / hard reset is finally working as intended.... thus far.... fingers crossed ... LOL

If ur just using 5.1 for one rig, couldnt u just git clone 5.1 to that pi and compile it for yourself? Thats what I assumed u did anyways to run the comparisons no?...

I wish I was that advanced, lol   I just used the knc 2.0 image and tried your v.85 img too

let me think about that, I'm trying to wrap my brain around this git stuff

actually starting to make some sense, thx for the tip

Oh, I see what you mean, the stock bfgminer is what you want?
Wasnt something broken in it.... isnt that why everyone wanted the latest? lol I dont know anymore.
Basically if you wanted that version again, u would need to go to the bfgminer_stock directory and just copy bfgminer from that folder to bfgminer folder then restart bfgminer. All of this is in /home/pi. Make a backup of the newest one first if you wanted to, by moving it to a diff filename. IE: mv bfgminer/bfgminer bfgminer/bfgminer_new_bak

I used  cp -r /backup/bfgminer/* bfgminer ....  lol so easy, you wouldn't believe how complicated I was making that

thanks so much for another tip

when I do a git pull will it upgrade to 5.2 again?

Yeah, it will probably complain about local changes and needing to stash them, not sure tho =/ ... or it will just reupdate the file haha!

I could possibly write a webgui box & submit that allows a pulldown of which miner to use and restart the miner w/ selected version. But thats more than I have time to code atm, if you really want it Im sure I could do that sometime this week. More donations would get me coding it for sure haha =P

well, this is what I found out.
If I start with your v.9 img, then restore 5.1, then do a git pull it'll grab your updates and leave 5.1 intact.
If I start with v.93, then restore 5.1,  5.1 overwrites some of your stuff and git pull doesn't get it back
maybe it has to do with an index or something where git keeps track of what's been updated, and if you change it git doesn't know -- but I am just speculating
let me think about that box, I am still not done messing around here

[GenTarkin]

TXSteve,  I just laid some ground work for a box in webgui to select BFGminer versions.

[TXSteve]

TXSteve,  I just laid some ground work for a box in webgui to select BFGminer versions.

that would be easier

I saw some file changes ..webgui-update-branded and unbranded ?? or is that something else?

I took a guess and ran branded lol

[lenart_o]

Hi,
For me this is issue with cube I had the same (or similar problem) I send cube to KNC
Every time when I trying connect broken cube to board I have the same effect (cube with connected power cable and without too)
board blinking 5 times big white led and titan won't start,

[GenTarkin]

TXSteve,  I just laid some ground work for a box in webgui to select BFGminer versions.

that would be easier

I saw some file changes ..webgui-update-branded and unbranded ?? or is that something else?

I took a guess and ran branded lol

Yeah, branded adds my donation addy =) unbranded takes it off, its supposed to be for the difference between people who just download my image vs the ones that are being sold ha

[majestymage]

from their press release should we understand that they will not sell miners anymore?