Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 03:33:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 [116] 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 ... 265 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)  (Read 530703 times)
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:04:59 AM
 #2301

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:08:40 AM
 #2302

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

ANCDRK, or TODO?
 Cheesy

what about PoS?
Skaia has brilliant ideas!
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:34:43 AM
 #2303

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

ANCDRK, or TODO?
 Cheesy

what about PoS?
Skaia has brilliant ideas!

wrt dark

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:38:53 AM
 #2304

Last Block 232 295  , 12h ago,

geekz, report?


EDIT: geekz on vacation, that's it : )

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175822
Coolstoryteller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:54:20 AM
 #2305

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

+1

Thank god. Seriously though k1773R, a ticker change to [ANON] would be legit. No way on the full name change though.

"Buy, sell, trade, chat. Leave nothing but a Shadow." - www.shadow.cash
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 08:56:24 AM
 #2306

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

+1

Thank god. Seriously though k1773R, a ticker change to [ANON] would be legit. No way on the full name change though.

xD  you mean that I was serious with this name change??
lunokhod2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 09:01:38 AM
 #2307


Does anyone have an opinion on a 100% proof-of-stake system, similar to Peercoin? (actually, they use a mixed POW and POS system.)

The benefit is that there is little energy used with POS compared to energy hungry POW algorithms.

The downside is that there is built in monetary inflation (albeit, very low at 1% for peercoin, if I remember correctly).

People are more attracted to 100% proof of stake in new coins now. Only miners don't like it. For the coin and the value of the coin 100% proof of stake is better than regular mining.

regular mined coins / btc, ltc etc / 1 star

proof of stake / nxt, cap, etc / 2 stars

innovative productive / xpm, ric etc / 3 stars

innovative productive variation of proof of stake / huc, etc / 4 stars

Going to 100% regular proof of stake is like adding a piece of celery to a bowl of rice.
Is it an improvement? Yes.
a significant improvement? No.
Nothing creative or new about it but yes, rice with celery is better than rice without celery.

With a block reward of 2.5 ANC in some months, we will loose all small miners against big centralized miners that will control the network as they want.

Then, in my opinion, PoS would be a good option. They could program the inflation rate to have same coins distribution as the actual PoW algo (4 million ANC at the same approximated date).
With regard to the block reward halving: This has always bothered me.

Halving the block reward every X blocks is nearly equivalent to an exponential decrease in the block reward with time. Why don't we just hard code the block reward to be

reward = C * exp (-b/lambda)

where b is the block number, lambda a decay constant, and C a constant that depends on the total number of coins?

Using step functions was a dumb idea from the start, and I don't know why Satoshi did this. It seems to me that it would be trivial to update the anoncoin code to have a continuously decreasing block reward, if everyone thought it was a good idea.
meeh (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


:)


View Profile WWW
August 27, 2014, 09:26:49 AM
 #2308

Notice

For all pools and people mining, please apply the following three lines bellow to the anoncoin.conf file:
blockminsize=0
blockmaxsize=1000000
blockprioritysize=1000000

And restart Anoncoind. The blockchain got spammed with some huge transactions, and this would solve the issue.

K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 09:57:05 AM
 #2309

So, what is with this new cryptsy walls,   somebody wants to make panic sale,  selling to "himself" and going down with steps?
what do you think?
It looks strange to me..


No doubt that there is some heavy pressure on the Anoncoin price. It looks very strange to me...
For all this work that is being done ... nothing!

I mean, even if ZC gets implemented  Huh will there be a significant rise? hm... debatable

Can we change name to AnoncoinDark or something , maybe will be more volume and success : )

Obviously there is some group of ppl who support few coins and go from one to another to pump.
Maybe ANC is on they TODO list   Grin
this wont happen.

+1

Thank god. Seriously though k1773R, a ticker change to [ANON] would be legit. No way on the full name change though.
You have to ask meeh for this

[GPG Public Key]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 11:26:33 AM
 #2310

 May I suggest that we stop mining ANC, and let it how it is on 1.2M

I think drk do that from 84M to 22M

 Wink
alincoln
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 01:01:19 PM
 #2311

Best for anonymity would be to automatically convert all ANC to ZC so that the total number of ZC coins and addresses is high.
I don't see why users should be given an option to send ANC without anonymity... the vision for ANC is anonymity, not a choice to send anonymously.

The user doesn't even have to know what's going on behind the scene with ZC, and the QT may even show amounts in ANC only.

This would 1) maximize anonymity and 2) make it simpler for users. 

It has been explained already: the mint process requires a high computational effort which will be rewarded with fees an order of magnitude greater. So it's not feasible or desirable to only have an anonymous send function.
sorrros
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 954
Merit: 104


ludenaprotocol.io


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 01:16:41 PM
 #2312

Best for anonymity would be to automatically convert all ANC to ZC so that the total number of ZC coins and addresses is high.
I don't see why users should be given an option to send ANC without anonymity... the vision for ANC is anonymity, not a choice to send anonymously.

The user doesn't even have to know what's going on behind the scene with ZC, and the QT may even show amounts in ANC only.

This would 1) maximize anonymity and 2) make it simpler for users. 

It has been explained already: the mint process requires a high computational effort which will be rewarded with fees an order of magnitude greater. So it's not feasible or desirable to only have an anonymous send function.


True anonymity has a cost I'm pretty sure ANC users would be willing to bear.
On the flip side, using a "Anon-send" button would provide lower anonymity at the same fee magnitude...

Re feasibility; you say this approach is not technically feasible? 

► LudenaProtocol ◄ ♦️ A Gamified Social Platform for Worldwide Gamers ♦️ ► LudenaProtocol ◄
───●●───●●───●●───●●───●●─[   Bounty Detective   ]─●●───●●───●●───●●───●●───
Website|Twitter|Medium|Telegram|Instagram|Whitepaper
shtako
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 779
Merit: 502


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 02:30:06 PM
 #2313

May I suggest that we stop mining ANC, and let it how it is on 1.2M

I think drk do that from 84M to 22M

 Wink

That is an incredible stupid idea. Almost as bad as your name change suggestion. Why would you want anoncoin to act like a scam coin?
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 02:45:13 PM
Last edit: August 27, 2014, 03:41:52 PM by drAGon925
 #2314

May I suggest that we stop mining ANC, and let it how it is on 1.2M

I think drk do that from 84M to 22M

 Wink

That is an incredible stupid idea. Almost as bad as your name change suggestion. Why would you want anoncoin to act like a scam coin?

Scam coins have value, and blockchain works too, just trying to help here
And I want to hear how ppl react when they nervous
 Roll Eyes
  
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 04:44:19 PM
 #2315

And where is Pablo now? Angry

The rats are leaving the ship!

+1

you took nick and words from my mouth

 Grin Grin
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 04:47:22 PM
 #2316

http://anonmining.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

Time Since Last Block   20 hours 51 minutes 33 seconds

WTF?

Calm down, it is not even 24h
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 04:54:07 PM
 #2317


Who told you that?
It is just spam, we must create spam folder.

WE CARE, but we wait for meeh news..  
I hope that this is just a psychological attack, without damage.

EDIT2: not Monday News   Grin

drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 04:59:23 PM
 #2318


Who told you that?
It is just spam, we must create spam folder.


Same spam folder as gmail? Grin

Yes, but with ANC logo
SmokingSkull
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 05:04:41 PM
 #2319

Really weird with the Blockchain.

 Undecided There's nothing serious, is there?

 Huh Huh

5 days and my ANC transaction from Cryptsy is still on hold...  Angry

Most Coins are Shitcoins
drAGon925
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 27, 2014, 05:06:11 PM
 #2320

Really weird with the Blockchain.

 Undecided There's nothing serious, is there?

 Huh Huh

5 days and my ANC transaction from Cryptsy is still on hold...  Angry

These are 2 problems, I think.
Cryptsy sucks we know that,
and now this spam attack.. I hope that will be solved soon!
Pages: « 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 [116] 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 ... 265 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!