Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 10:37:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 [185] 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 ... 334 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Analysis  (Read 941446 times)
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 05:54:57 PM
 #3681

It means it is very strong

Not broken yet

Can you define "broken"?

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
1715035057
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715035057

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715035057
Reply with quote  #2

1715035057
Report to moderator
davidorentol
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 07:22:10 PM
 #3682


Can you define "broken"?

Can you define "un-broken"?
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
September 17, 2015, 07:24:06 PM
 #3683

It means it is very strong

Not broken yet

Can you define "broken"?

when you look at it and it's broken you just know it's broken. If you're unsure, it's not broken.

PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
Eivind Nag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 07:40:22 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2015, 08:09:13 PM by Eivind Nag
 #3684

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
https://i.imgur.com/RkzXcY1.jpg
Fakhoury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1027


Permabull Bitcoin Investor


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:23:20 PM
 #3685

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:


Thank you for this awesome anaylsis, respect !

Could you elbarote more about this please,

Quote
If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Could this be the Historical wave III luc was talking about ?

Quote from:  Satoshi Nakamoto
Feb. 14, 2010: I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
Afrikoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1003


alan watts is all you need


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:23:50 PM
 #3686

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
*clipped*


Mask of Zorro!

Very smart looking chart, thanks for sharing.

2 question

1. What if there are extensions on the 5 wave/A, what is your time estimate then?

2. After A,presumably, B and C follows. Do you have a time estimate for that? or a target price?



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





Eivind Nag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:29:40 PM
 #3687

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
https://i.imgur.com/RkzXcY1.jpg

Thank you for this awesome anaylsis, respect !

Could you elbarote more about this please,

Quote
If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Could this be the Historical wave III luc was talking about ?

1163 was Historical I. Master luc propose that his C was Historical II and that we are rising now to Historical III.
Im saying more or less the exact opposite, we are still headed down towards Historical II
Afrikoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1003


alan watts is all you need


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:31:54 PM
 #3688

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:

*snip*


I feel the top at C, should be followed by i, ii, iii and now iv. Looks like a long iii



              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄██████████████████▄
       ▄████████████████████████▄
 ▄▄  ▄████████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████████████▄
 ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ██████████████████████████████████
   ▀████████████████████████████████▀
    ▀██████████████████████████████▀
     ▀▀██████████████████████████▀
        ▀██████████████████████▀
           ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
.
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....
.....





Eivind Nag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:34:36 PM
 #3689

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
*clipped*


Mask of Zorro!

Very smart looking chart, thanks for sharing.

2 question

1. What if there are extensions on the 5 wave/A, what is your time estimate then?

2. After A,presumably, B and C follows. Do you have a time estimate for that? or a target price?

1. Even with extensions i think the timeframe is resonable.
2. If B is a standard ZigZag it should retrace 38.2 or 61.8% of Wave A. Expect a violent rally upwards in the range of 450 to 650 or around there.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:37:05 PM
 #3690

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
https://i.imgur.com/RkzXcY1.jpg

This would bring us the "despair" I've heard so much about.

"I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse." - Robert Metcalfe, 1995
Fakhoury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1027


Permabull Bitcoin Investor


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:40:42 PM
 #3691

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
https://i.imgur.com/RkzXcY1.jpg

Thank you for this awesome anaylsis, respect !

Could you elaborate more about this please,

Quote
If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Could this be the Historical wave III luc was talking about ?

1163 was Historical I. Master luc propose that his C was Historical II and that we are rising now to Historical III.
Im saying more or less the exact opposite, we are still headed down towards Historical II

Thank you for the quick reply, appreciated.

In your context, when we could reach Historical III and what it's time-frame ? And would it be $100K as it's peak as Master luc and other's talked about here ?

Quote from:  Satoshi Nakamoto
Feb. 14, 2010: I’m sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
Eivind Nag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:44:27 PM
 #3692

I think the assumption that the 152 bottom was C is flawed.

The 152 bottom was wave 3. The correction up to 317 was corrective up to wave 4. The correction was not a standard Zigzag because wave 2 was a Zigzag, rule of alternation. So from 152 to 317 it was a Flat correction. 3-3-5 pattern. The 309 top was A, 210 bottom was B and from 210 to 317 was C. The pudding here is that the rise from 210 to 317 was an impulse, that is how a Flat 3-3-5 pattern looks like. It fooled everyone into believing that the bull market had resumed. Sprinkle with breaking the downward trend line from 1163 and hopium was blinding everyone.

After the 4 top was reached the price immediately resumed falling. We are on wave 2 of 5 down to A!

Minor Wave 1 brought us through the trendline of the 4 correction. Minor wave 2 retested the trendine from below and was rejected. It has since fallen minuette wave 1 and 2 is soon finished correcting upwards.

If this is correct we are extremely close to starting wave 3 of wave 3 down towards 5 and A.

Just look at the pattern from my proposed 4. Everything going down from 4 to Minor 1 = impulse waves, everything going up = corrective.

The bear market is in full swing.

Price targets for 5/A are less than 152, more than 65.

Ive made an image that explains my view in more detail:
https://i.imgur.com/RkzXcY1.jpg

This would bring us the "despair" I've heard so much about.

You better believe it. The fear, anger, frustration, resignation, capitulation associated with a C was never present in the 150 low. The entire affair passed without triggering nothing more than a 'meh'. The mood for wave A is described as:

Corrections are typically harder to identify than impulse moves (no kidding!). In wave A of a bear market, the fundamental news is usually still positive. Most analysts see the drop as a correction in a still-active bull market.

I think that is a very fitting description of current sentiment and sentiment all the way from 1163
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 08:58:55 PM
 #3693


This would bring us the "despair" I've heard so much about.

You better believe it. The fear, anger, frustration, resignation, capitulation associated with a C was never present in the 150 low. The entire affair passed without triggering nothing more than a 'meh'. The mood for wave A is described as:

Corrections are typically harder to identify than impulse moves (no kidding!). In wave A of a bear market, the fundamental news is usually still positive. Most analysts see the drop as a correction in a still-active bull market.

I think that is a very fitting description of current sentiment and sentiment all the way from 1163

Thanks, I see what you're saying. This burns my thinker though. I was expecting a sharper climb after the last finex crash if we'd left the bear market, I am not comfortable ATM.

"I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse." - Robert Metcalfe, 1995
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2015, 09:00:38 PM
 #3694


This would bring us the "despair" I've heard so much about.

You better believe it. The fear, anger, frustration, resignation, capitulation associated with a C was never present in the 150 low. The entire affair passed without triggering nothing more than a 'meh'. The mood for wave A is described as:

Corrections are typically harder to identify than impulse moves (no kidding!). In wave A of a bear market, the fundamental news is usually still positive. Most analysts see the drop as a correction in a still-active bull market.

I think that is a very fitting description of current sentiment and sentiment all the way from 1163

Thanks, I see what you're saying. This burns my thinker though. I was expecting a sharper climb after the last finex crash if we'd left the bear market, I am not comfortable ATM.
This.
8up
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 618
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 17, 2015, 09:09:38 PM
 #3695

If your analysis turns out right (which I give a slightly higher probability than masterlucs scenario) and 'A' reaches $110 to $65 where do you see 'C'? ~$20 to $10?


Always wrong until not.
Eivind Nag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 09:15:04 PM
 #3696

If your analysis turns out right (which I give a slightly higher probability than masterlucs scenario) and 'A' reaches $110 to $65 where do you see 'C'? ~$20 to $10?



I will try to see how low it can possibly go without invalidating the entire wavecount. But maybe A and C would be a double bottom or very close. I dont think there is so much room downward under 70 before it would invalidate. I have to sleep now but i can try tomorrow to make a guesstimate on tima and amplitude of C.
SmoothCurves
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 09:42:56 PM
 #3697

I'm leaning more towards MasterLuc's count. This chart could set up for an epic bear trap.
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 17, 2015, 09:46:14 PM
 #3698

I'm leaning more towards MasterLuc's count. This chart could set up for an epic bear trap.
Bears are more sensible usually and put tight stoplosses. Bulls are more delusional and  deny to see the truth.

So I don't expect that if this goes above 245 there would be many shorts open.
RyNinDaCleM
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009


Legen -wait for it- dary


View Profile
September 17, 2015, 10:40:38 PM
 #3699

If your analysis turns out right (which I give a slightly higher probability than masterlucs scenario) and 'A' reaches $110 to $65 where do you see 'C'? ~$20 to $10?



I will try to see how low it can possibly go without invalidating the entire wavecount. But maybe A and C would be a double bottom or very close. I dont think there is so much room downward under 70 before it would invalidate. I have to sleep now but i can try tomorrow to make a guesstimate on tima and amplitude of C.

Wave 2 has no invalidation except a move below the beginning of wave 1. In this case, that would be a price of $.05 from the Gox chart in 2010. Since this is extremely unlikely, it is all a waiting game.

For the record, I agree 90% in your analysis. The other 10% is only that I don't think your 1 was a 1. I do have a count where that same leading diagonal is drawn but is a wave A. Even if that means it was A of an even larger A that we are waiting to complete. Or the other possibility that we are in a triple zigzag. Either way, I have had the belief that we will see LL's (with double digits likely) before we see ATH's for many months now. I can only show my PoV so many times before it becomes boarder line spam. Tongue Everyone here knows my stance on this.

BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164



View Profile WWW
September 17, 2015, 11:06:12 PM
 #3700

If all the EW theorists turn bearish that might be considered a good reason to go long.

Pages: « 1 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 [185] 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 ... 334 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!