cablepair
|
|
May 11, 2011, 10:26:56 AM |
|
not bad, getting about 5mhashs with my intel i-core 3 330m (2 core 4 threads)
good work!
|
|
|
|
Nythain
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 11, 2011, 11:28:49 AM |
|
0Mhash/s problem with BTC Guild using bitcoin-miner -g no -a 5 -o http://btcguild.com:8332 -u XXXX_XXXX -p XXXXXXXX tried it with a trailing / tried changing the -a to various numbers from 4 to the default 15, still no luck. Any advice?
|
|
|
|
cablepair
|
|
May 11, 2011, 12:06:32 PM |
|
be mindful of proper cooling on amd chips, I tested on quad core 2.5 ghz with one of those stock heat sinks and fans, core temps were hitting high 70's celcius....
intel chips mine much cooler with it
|
|
|
|
|
Dayofswords
Member
Offline
Activity: 138
Merit: 11
Exchange BTC in Telegram https://bit.ly/2MEfiw8
|
|
May 11, 2011, 09:16:20 PM |
|
just updated, i lost 4mhash/s from 14 to 10 on pure CPU
|
|
|
|
varepsilon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2011, 05:07:50 AM |
|
Funny Yes, I did exactly what you did (except I'm using gcc-4.6), and ran into 0 MHash/sec as I sad The bug fixed, please redownload sources. Thank you very much! I increased my Mhash/s 3 times compared to jgarzik miner! Unfortunately my blocks seems not being accepted by deepbit.net 3.12 MHash/s Result FOUND: %2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%12.05.2011 00:42:57 Not accepted.2I64X%2.2I64X ....... Processed: 90803 Mhash, 28363s with average Rate: 3.2 MHash/s Accepted: 0, average: 0 shares/min
|
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 12, 2011, 05:51:32 AM |
|
i5 quad cpu
with bitcoin client I was getting 5-6MHash/s with your miner i'm getting solid 14MHashes very nice speed improvement!
-g flag is not working with my GTS250, no biggie, just letting you know
|
|
|
|
walidzohair
|
|
May 12, 2011, 08:30:47 AM |
|
Funny Yes, I did exactly what you did (except I'm using gcc-4.6), and ran into 0 MHash/sec as I sad The bug fixed, please redownload sources. Thank you very much! I increased my Mhash/s 3 times compared to jgarzik miner! Unfortunately my blocks seems not being accepted by deepbit.net 3.12 MHash/s Result FOUND: %2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%12.05.2011 00:42:57 Not accepted.2I64X%2.2I64X ....... Processed: 90803 Mhash, 28363s with average Rate: 3.2 MHash/s Accepted: 0, average: 0 shares/min
Confirmed ... 50%+ gain on my test Intel M 1.86 processor .. ubuntu Nauthy..... but no accepted share at all .. mining at http://mining.bitcoin.cz
|
|
|
|
walidzohair
|
|
May 12, 2011, 03:08:01 PM |
|
Any one to confirm successful CPU mining with ufasoft ?
And any help about the "not accepted share" problem ?
|
|
|
|
ufasoft (OP)
|
|
May 12, 2011, 05:51:30 PM |
|
3.12 MHash/s Result FOUND: %2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%12.05.2011 00:42:57 Not accepted.2I64X%2.2I64X
Thank you for bug report! FIXED, please redownload source code. Reason: printf("%I64X", ...) don't work in GCC (it is VC extension), should be printf("%llX", ...).
|
Bitcoin donations: 18X598V8rVdjy3Yg1cjZmnnv4SpPthuBeT
|
|
|
shivansps
|
|
May 12, 2011, 06:05:47 PM |
|
i have to admit... under winpe enviroment your miner is the only one that works out of box...
|
|
|
|
varepsilon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
May 12, 2011, 07:03:36 PM |
|
3.12 MHash/s Result FOUND: %2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%2.2I64X%12.05.2011 00:42:57 Not accepted.2I64X%2.2I64X
Thank you for bug report! FIXED, please redownload source code. Reason: printf("%I64X", ...) don't work in GCC (it is VC extension), should be printf("%llX", ...). Thank you very much! Now it accepts my work. If I mine a lot of bitcoins (which is highly unlikeley ;>) I promise to send you some.
|
|
|
|
aeMaeth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 13, 2011, 02:51:49 PM |
|
Funny Yes, I did exactly what you did (except I'm using gcc-4.6), and ran into 0 MHash/sec as I sad The bug fixed, please redownload sources. confirmed .. working now on ubuntu natty (naughty) FINALLY and it is hashing too! Iw ill confirm about teh performance gain later and if it actually hash out some milicoins I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong?
|
|
|
|
Silverfang
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 13, 2011, 08:24:56 PM |
|
[....cut...]
I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong?
Had the same problem only to find out that I saved the miner's name wrong: Names are case sensitive. So check if you've spelled your data correctly when running bitcoin-miner.exe. (I'm new to bitcoin and mining, so this is my only idea about what could have went wrong. I still hope it helps...) Silverfang
|
|
|
|
aeMaeth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2011, 06:43:57 AM |
|
[....cut...]
I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong?
Had the same problem only to find out that I saved the miner's name wrong: Names are case sensitive. So check if you've spelled your data correctly when running bitcoin-miner.exe. (I'm new to bitcoin and mining, so this is my only idea about what could have went wrong. I still hope it helps...) Silverfang Thanks for the reply I had mostly done what walidzohair did already, but repeated the steps just to be safe, at that point we both had the same/similar problem. i'm using the latest version not sure what more could go into this
|
|
|
|
walidzohair
|
|
May 14, 2011, 01:12:37 PM |
|
Funny Yes, I did exactly what you did (except I'm using gcc-4.6), and ran into 0 MHash/sec as I sad The bug fixed, please redownload sources. confirmed .. working now on ubuntu natty (naughty) FINALLY and it is hashing too! Iw ill confirm about teh performance gain later and if it actually hash out some milicoins I still get 0MHash/sec and 0% cpu usage, what am i doing wrong? Well test for the 0MHash/sec on ubuntu naughty and the recent source (today) and reply
|
|
|
|
slothbag
|
|
May 14, 2011, 02:34:42 PM |
|
Any chance of getting the hash rate output to the stdout instead of stderr so "guiminer" can display hash rates?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
aeMaeth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2011, 11:12:57 PM |
|
Any chance of getting the hash rate output to the stdout instead of stderr so "guiminer" can display hash rates?
Thanks
does adding "1>&2" at the end of the command work for you? although i don't know guiminer, so just taking a shot in the dark Well test for the 0MHash/sec on ubuntu naughty and the recent source (today) and reply I'll try the recent source, but if the solution is 11.04, i don't want to be right, i'll just end my trials here.
|
|
|
|
shivansps
|
|
May 14, 2011, 11:20:16 PM Last edit: May 15, 2011, 06:20:21 AM by shivansps |
|
you have the same idea, i also wondering how to export the hash rate to a file. just do this bitcoin-miner.exe -v -a 5 -o wharever -u wharever -p -t -g no 1>all.log 2>&1 parsing it its hard, because of the unknown character at the begining of the mhash reading messing the things up, but i got a code up, it may fails to read the last value sometimes when the reading got cut, but when it fails it will just use the last known value. im coding it for my project
|
|
|
|
slothbag
|
|
May 15, 2011, 09:31:18 AM |
|
I tried to compile the source for bitcoin-miner on windows with no luck. Tried MinGW, VS2011, and installing the Ufasoft LISP package with VS2011.
Thanks guys, i'll try see if guiminer works with output redirection.
|
|
|
|
|