d3m0n1q_733rz
|
|
August 21, 2011, 09:12:25 PM |
|
Source Code of 0.20 for Linux released. GCC requirement lowered to 4.4 AMD CAL/OpenCL supported (compilation works, but really not tested under linux). OMG! Thank you! I will get right on this to test its comparative hashing power against cgminer. Remember everyone who intends on testing; test average results, not hashing speed as efficiency is a huge factor as well.
|
Funroll_Loops, the theoretically quicker breakfast cereal! Check out http://www.facebook.com/JupiterICT for all of your computing needs. If you need it, we can get it. We have solutions for your computing conundrums. BTC accepted! 12HWUSguWXRCQKfkPeJygVR1ex5wbg3hAq
|
|
|
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
|
|
August 22, 2011, 12:15:32 AM |
|
Source Code of 0.20 for Linux released. GCC requirement lowered to 4.4 AMD CAL/OpenCL supported (compilation works, but really not tested under linux). Was that so hard?
|
BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
|
|
|
village.idiot
|
|
August 22, 2011, 12:25:56 AM |
|
So let me know when someone has dumbed down instructions so I can run it in Linux
|
|
|
|
|
village.idiot
|
|
August 22, 2011, 12:40:22 PM |
|
yeah, I missed that one. Thanks, I'll see if it's dumb enough
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
August 24, 2011, 01:51:44 AM |
|
My hashrate went from 440MHs with 0.19 to 315MHs with 0.20. So I'm sticking with 0.19 for Windoze for now. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
shaps
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2011, 08:19:02 PM |
|
I think you should try to inquire as to what malicious behavior it contains. It sounds to me like they are reselling rebranded software and have no clue what they are talking about. I was able to get Symantec and GFI to reclassify the previous version as a potentially unwanted tool, which is accurate, unless there is behavior that would classify it as something else.
Sent them an email asking them to clarify. Will see what they respond with... Got a response from them: Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your recent inquiry.
The file is riskware and the detection could be renamed to SPR/BitcomMiner.A. The new detection will be available with one of the next VDF updates.
For further questions don't hesitate to contact us.
|
|
|
|
The00Dustin
|
|
August 24, 2011, 10:21:52 PM |
|
Got a response from them: Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your recent inquiry.
The file is riskware and the detection could be renamed to SPR/BitcomMiner.A. The new detection will be available with one of the next VDF updates.
For further questions don't hesitate to contact us.
Good deal. That's legitimate, companies and people should be made aware that such software is on their computer (if they aren't already), and there is potential risk involved with the software (potential legal liability or electrical costs, for instance). So long as it isn't flagged as a trojan or other malware, another AV company is getting it right. Hopefully the AV software in question has the option to not detect riskware (as they call it, every company has their own categories) and/or the option to specifically allow that risk (via definition instead as opposed to exclusion).
|
|
|
|
|
mrx
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
August 31, 2011, 02:14:18 PM |
|
Thanks! I can run the CPU-only binary on a 64-bit server w/o any problems(except moving a lib to /usr/lib32). Now I don't need to compile it on a vm myself, since I still can't manage to compile this miner under 64-bit. bitcoin-miner 0.20 Copyright (c) 2011 Ufasoft http://ufasoft.com/open/bitcoin Mining for http://SC.btcguild.com:8332 Using CPU (8 threads) 31.08.2011 22:07:20 Result: 722A06C2E566BD0E60FC8B49A26D0BB2E306B3010D1E24F72830C2ED00000000 accepted 28.2 MHash/s 0@$ log 1@$ mem 2@$ top 3*$ miner 4-$ wiab 5@$ iftop 6$ shell
|
|
|
|
Zenitur
|
|
September 01, 2011, 10:45:29 AM |
|
You don't need to move libraries in /usr/lib32! Just run application with whis string: LC_ALL=C LD_LIBRARY_PATH=lib ./bitcoin-miner. Or use myself writed script.
|
|
|
|
Paul4games
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
September 01, 2011, 10:48:43 AM Last edit: September 20, 2011, 03:58:09 PM by Paul4games |
|
Ufasoft are you still updating the miner?
|
|
|
|
Sleepy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2011, 07:42:29 PM |
|
I encountered an Problem with Ufasoft and PoolServerJ. It seems PoolServerJ only accept lowercase Results and Ufasoft sends it uppercase... However, till this behavior is fixed in PoolServerJ, I´ve got a little fix for Ufasoft: In bitcoin-client.cpp: At BitcoinMiner::SubmitResult insert right before String r = wc.UploadString(GetCurrentUrl(), arg); If you want the displayed result also in lowercase, insert before TRACE_BITCOIN(cout << (isatty(fileno(stdout)) ? "\r" : "") << DateTime::Now() << " Result: " << shash << (r ? " accepted" : " rejected") << endl); Since the conversion is only performed when an result is already local tested it should not affect the performance at all.
|
|
|
|
shads
|
|
September 26, 2011, 07:35:33 AM |
|
I encountered an Problem with Ufasoft and PoolServerJ. It seems PoolServerJ only accept lowercase Results and Ufasoft sends it uppercase...
However, till this behavior is fixed in PoolServerJ, I´ve got a little fix for Ufasoft:
This is now handled by poolserverj. Though I prefer the term workaround for Ufasoft's weird behaviour to fix. Why on earth would you convert the solution to uppercase?
|
|
|
|
ufasoft (OP)
|
|
September 26, 2011, 08:06:36 AM |
|
Where is it specified that hexadecimal data should be in lower case? Any parser should understand any- and mixed-case letters.
|
Bitcoin donations: 18X598V8rVdjy3Yg1cjZmnnv4SpPthuBeT
|
|
|
FalconFour
|
|
September 27, 2011, 05:23:57 PM |
|
Where is it specified that hexadecimal data should be in lower case? Any parser should understand any- and mixed-case letters.
+1 on this just for backup's sake... I work with a lot of hex stuff and while hashes are typically represented in lowercase, it's very poor form to make anything case-sensitive to hex values. Not even Linux is case-sensitive to hex values AFAIK... Anyway, I just stopped by to ask a quick question. Is there a way to set "aggression" in ufasoft's (rather efficient, it seems) CUDA miner? It makes my desktop almost completely unusable when I run it, and it'd be nice to be able to use the office PC I'm mining on at ~3 MHash/sec on an 8600GT
|
feed the bird: 187CXEVzakbzcANsyhpAAoF2k6KJsc55P1 (BTC) / LiRzzXnwamFCHoNnWqEkZk9HknRmjNT7nU (LTC)
|
|
|
ufasoft (OP)
|
|
September 27, 2011, 05:38:50 PM |
|
Is there a way to set "aggression" in ufasoft's (rather efficient, it seems) CUDA miner?
No. Aggression setting is not implemented
|
Bitcoin donations: 18X598V8rVdjy3Yg1cjZmnnv4SpPthuBeT
|
|
|
FalconFour
|
|
September 27, 2011, 06:28:29 PM |
|
No. Aggression setting is not implemented
Fair 'nuf I still use it for CPU mining - 11.3 MH/s on my Core 2 Quad Q6600 I just installed, but I split out the GPU mining to Phoenix with aggression=1, 2.7MH/s is a tiny but appreciable boost. All your work on this miner is much appreciated! I'll send something your way in donations - I've only made about 1.5bcn on mining to date, so I hope it's not too small...
|
feed the bird: 187CXEVzakbzcANsyhpAAoF2k6KJsc55P1 (BTC) / LiRzzXnwamFCHoNnWqEkZk9HknRmjNT7nU (LTC)
|
|
|
billywilly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2011, 06:38:32 AM |
|
Have an issue to install on linux miner4@miner4-pc:~/ufasoft_bitcoin-miner-0.20$ sudo CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 ./configure && sudo make && sudo make install checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... mawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for gcc... gcc-4.5 checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc-4.5 accepts -g... yes checking for gcc-4.5 option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of gcc-4.5... gcc3 checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++-4.5 accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++-4.5... gcc3 checking for g++-4.5... /usr/bin/g++-4.5 checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking for jwasm... jwasm checking for pcre_compile in -lpcre... yes checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes checking for curl_global_init in -lcurl... yes checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking for clock_gettime in -lrt... yes checking for gcc 4.4... yes configure: error: "set AMDAPPSDKROOT environment variable or run ./configure --disable-amdapp"
note that i've already running phoenix and poclbm --> OpenCL it's correctly running (11.6 & 2.4). Also tried whit this too --> sudo CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 AMDAPPSDKROOT=/opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx64/bin/x86_64/ ./configure && sudo make && sudo make install
|
|
|
|
ufasoft (OP)
|
|
October 01, 2011, 08:37:59 AM |
|
Also tried whit this too --> sudo CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 AMDAPPSDKROOT=/opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx64/bin/x86_64/ ./configure && sudo make && sudo make install
This command is not correct Do following: 1. sudo bash 2. CC=gcc-4.5 CXX=g++-4.5 AMDAPPSDKROOT=/opt/AMD-APP-SDK-v2.4-lnx64/bin/x86_64/ ./configure && make
|
Bitcoin donations: 18X598V8rVdjy3Yg1cjZmnnv4SpPthuBeT
|
|
|
|