|
siagirl
|
 |
February 26, 2020, 08:44:52 AM |
|
how much hash px580 makes on a handshake 
|
|
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 488
Merit: 37
|
 |
February 26, 2020, 09:07:16 AM |
|
how much hash px580 makes on a handshake  AMD cards not supported atm
|
|
|
|
narousberg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1754
Merit: 1007
|
 |
February 26, 2020, 07:46:22 PM |
|
tested Cuckatoo31 on 1.98 and back to 1.96
|
I AM NOT SELL MY BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT !!!
|
|
|
siagirl
|
 |
February 27, 2020, 12:24:28 PM |
|
how much hash px580 makes on a handshake  AMD cards not supported atm Thank you
|
|
|
|
crsminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
|
 |
February 27, 2020, 09:58:38 PM |
|
Using this string: --algo handshake --server stratum+tcp://hns.f2pool.com --port 6000 --user addy.$rigName --pass x --api 3333 --oc1
in smos, i get this error:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' what(): stoi /root/xminer.sh: line 151: 8513 Aborted /root/miner/$MINER_PKG_NAME_/_$MINER_FILE $MINER_OPTIONS_GO
Thx!
|
|
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 488
Merit: 37
|
 |
February 28, 2020, 09:15:02 AM |
|
Using this string: --algo handshake --server stratum+tcp://hns.f2pool.com --port 6000 --user addy.$rigName --pass x --api 3333 --oc1
in smos, i get this error:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' what(): stoi /root/xminer.sh: line 151: 8513 Aborted /root/miner/$MINER_PKG_NAME_/_$MINER_FILE $MINER_OPTIONS_GO
Thx!
remove "stratum+tcp://"
|
|
|
|
Freelancer76
Member

Offline
Activity: 386
Merit: 10
Hello fellow miners
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 07:00:45 AM |
|
Guys, why do I have this hard regression on my hashrate over time in Handshake with 1.98? My rig starts at 897 MH/s and after 10 mins or so drop all the way to 877 MH/s. I am only using Gminer on my NVidia rigs and haven't seen this much of a drop on any algo so far. Using standard command line miner.exe --algo handshake --server hns.f2pool.com:6000 --user xyz.rig1
|
|
|
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 08:29:29 AM |
|
Guys, why do I have this hard regression on my hashrate over time in Handshake with 1.98? My rig starts at 897 MH/s and after 10 mins or so drop all the way to 877 MH/s. I am only using Gminer on my NVidia rigs and haven't seen this much of a drop on any algo so far. Using standard command line miner.exe --algo handshake --server hns.f2pool.com:6000 --user xyz.rig1
so you say that 2% hashrate loss is a hard regression? 
|
|
|
|
Freelancer76
Member

Offline
Activity: 386
Merit: 10
Hello fellow miners
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 08:34:39 AM |
|
Guys, why do I have this hard regression on my hashrate over time in Handshake with 1.98? My rig starts at 897 MH/s and after 10 mins or so drop all the way to 877 MH/s. I am only using Gminer on my NVidia rigs and haven't seen this much of a drop on any algo so far. Using standard command line miner.exe --algo handshake --server hns.f2pool.com:6000 --user xyz.rig1
so you say that 2% hashrate loss is a hard regression?  Dude, since profitability of mining is marginal, yes, every % is really important, and I am getting like over 5% drop. Luckily, elec. usage is dropping slightly as well And it is even more now, even goes to 840-850 MH/s... Anyone has an idea why this is happening, or is this normal for this algo?
|
|
|
|
ronelord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 10:48:22 AM |
|
When can we expect new version with new KDA mining ?
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 06:58:14 PM |
|
Could you please consider adding 6gb solvers for ct31? You already have this for ct32 and it would allow 8gb cards to mine this algo under win10. 4gb solvers for everything would also be cool 
|
|
|
|
darkneorus
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 3
|
 |
February 29, 2020, 10:48:44 PM |
|
Could you please consider adding 6gb solvers for ct31? You already have this for ct32 and it would allow 8gb cards to mine this algo under win10. 4gb solvers for everything would also be cool  it's pointless and does not worth it.
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
 |
March 01, 2020, 06:27:44 PM |
|
it's pointless and does not worth it.
Pointless for grin maybe, but mwc will stay on this algo without fading.
|
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
 |
March 02, 2020, 07:33:16 PM |
|
BBC doesn't work anymore ? 1.99, was the same on 1.97. 
|
|
|
|
Vladegg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 03, 2020, 05:53:23 AM |
|
Is possible to make dual Ethash+BFC?
|
|
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 488
Merit: 37
|
 |
March 03, 2020, 08:07:28 AM |
|
BBC doesn't work anymore ? 1.99, was the same on 1.97.  BBC is no longer supported by gminer, sorry Is possible to make dual Ethash+BFC?
BFC is memory hard algorithm (cuckoo cycle), it is not possible mix it with ethash
|
|
|
|
narousberg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1754
Merit: 1007
|
 |
March 03, 2020, 03:41:33 PM |
|
on my RTX2080TI with --OC1 best miner version still 1.96
|
I AM NOT SELL MY BITCOINTALK ACCOUNT !!!
|
|
|
TBOEMC
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 1
|
 |
March 03, 2020, 07:10:35 PM Last edit: March 06, 2020, 06:27:08 AM by TBOEMC |
|
GMiner v1.99 available for download v1.99 + improved cuckaroom29 performance + improved perforance for handshake algorithm + added Ethash+Handshake dual solver
hello, my cards on CuckarooM29 - mining at Nicehash: GTX 1070 Ti - improved from 3.520 G/s to 3.704 G/sGTX 1080 - improved from 3.710 G/s to 3.840 G/sRTX 2070 - improved from 4.880 G/s to 5.150 G/sRTX 2070 S - improved from 5.510 G/s to 5.770 G/sThx man, good job
|
|
|
|
|