I think you don't know that Coinmarketcap is now owned by Binance since the first week of April and the result you are seeing now is not brought to you by the previous management of CMC but now with Binance operating above it.

Also they never had removed the adjusted volume in their metrics for ranking and they are still using it. Now the question on where they do get these adjustments are? They are still reflecting the data that has been submitted by these exchanges, they never had improved anything yet in terms of showing accurate and transparent data but I'm still expecting that this would change soon enough.

It sounds like you are looking for something like what Coinbase Commerce has to offer for you and your clients. Your customers can buy in their Coinbase Wallets cryptocurrencies using their credit cards while you can receive BTC payments that are converted to fiat straight to your bank account.  The good side about this one is they are the ones giving your the needed html codes for you to have the new checkout pages for accepting Bitcoin payments in your website. Other option is Bitpay which is a similar service, they also have crypto debit cards the same as what Coinbase is also offering.

If your website is eligible for Google Ad Sense I would recommend you on applying this in your website rather than crypto-paid Ad networks. From what I have seen their payout is considerably smaller compared to what Google Ad Sense can pay you. Their ads are sometimes also out of controlled and even make it disturbing for some viewers as they don't screen the ads very well. You'll also see a lot of HYIP sites, scams, sand even phishing sites being shows to your viewers depending on what sketchy ad network you will pick so really don't pick a ad network just because they pay in Bitcoin as it might not be worth it.

You cannot force a person to spend their own savings/money just to save their country's economy what they'll be doing is they'll be spending their money and buy unnecessary things which doesn't show any kind of solution to the problem at all. It's not the citizens fault with lockdowns in place I don't see why at this point they would be encourage to spend something if it's not safe to got outside. Aside from that the government is the one who needs to have the solution here from decreasing interests rates as well as businesses accepting thaty they also need to make their goods and services attractive in terms of lowering their prices. The citizens of the United States are in a pretty good position here if this thing is really serious as they will see a lot of prices going down not only stocks but also goods and services.

You might be confusing the term "halving" with the term "burning". Where burning occurs when a project decides to cut their own supply in order to adjust the intended demand of just burn/destroy unused or unsold cryptocurrencies from their sale, Bitcoin doesn't have this "burn" feature as it wasn't even introduced by Satoshi. Halving is totally different from burning since it doesn't cut the total supply of 21,000,000 BTC it only cuts the block rewards of miners when they are mining BTC, what it does is it essentially slows down the process for miners getting more and more of the last supply of unmined BTC.

If you are talking about crypto exchanges and some custodial wallets then you are right Bitcoin is vulnerable but it's not Bitcoin's fault but the vulnerability and security flaws those third party services are offering. But if you are talking about the existence of double spending or a 51% attack I believe that these two are something cannot be done in a large scale or can be greatly mitigated by waiting for 6 confirmations in your transaction, basically the hashing power of the pools we have now are too big and I don't think a certain individual has a lot of resources to overpower Bitcoin's network.



We already know that Bitcoin isn't anonymous as what was previously said to it.


Both people within the government as well as the ones doing criminal activities know that Bitcoin is traceable through Blockchain and other methods of tracking that's why they criminals are shifting to a more privacy oriented crypto such as Monero. Your two "disadvantages" seems to me are non-existent and is something disproven for a long time now.

It's the first time I'm seeing a crypto wallet asking for their client's social media account as part of their KYC verification process. I don't know about you but this feels sketchy af, as literally no government department will be requiring a service to mess around with their citizen's social media accounts for KYC approval it's not identification and verification anymore it's more a violation of privacy for me. Add in the other things they are asking for your KYC documentation it feels like they are more into stealing your identity rather than actually verifying your account. I would really try to avoid this service as I don't see any good on trying this out when other wallets don't have any issued like this.

From what I know not all crypto ATMs are KYC-free countries like the UK and New Zealand before you can even access their Bitcoin ATMs your account must be registered and KYC verified by there service, in some countries like the Philippines where there Bitcoin ATMs are services part of banks also require you to open a bank account from their bank and undergo a KYC process as well so definitely Bitcoin ATMs are not some kind of service where anyone has full access with it since looking at it right now it is now also under string AML compliance from their respective governments.

If you know the thread's title already I don't think that it would be a problem since most of the threads now are 2 to 5 pages long and using Ctrl + F and finding your username won't be a problem. However if you don't know both the thread title and when you have posted it they are right to say that you need to manually search for what you have written in your post history, I have found several of my past post that I want to quote/link in a new topic this way. Keep in mind that there is also a possibility that the thread or your post have been deleted that's why no matter how many times you skimmed through your post history you can't find that particular post since there is a chance that is may have been deleted. 

Not according to the law, if Bitcoin isn't an asset then technically these criminals are put to the stand for nothing as they stole Bitcoin that isn't have any value in terms of being an asset. If the judge agrees to their argument then the criminals would simply keep the Bitcoin and a chance of them being free as well.



If Bitcoin isn't identified as an asset like I previously said it will be a thing that doesn't have any value, if this happens even on a lower court like this one this can still have a precedent on other future cases which would be bad for Bitcoin overall in China. It isn't even about the basic definition of what an asset really is as the Judge even stated that Bitcoin was never not classified as an asset and has been recognized as one in a long time now.

Why are people overreacting to this and thinking that this is something negative towards Bitcoin? Obviously the wrong thing that JK Rowling did is ask "What is Bitcoin" in the internet on a social media platform where a lot of trolls exists. The answers she would get will obviously be not correct or at least be stupid enough for Rowling to be confused. If you read the article now you will see all replies to her are answers about Bitcoin in relation to her books which will confuse anyone who really don't know what they are looking for.

Aside from Paypal you have the option like I said to have Bank wire transfers, I don't know about the fees but it will be a quick way to send the funds to your clients you also have the option for them to be the one shouldering the fees. I think bank transfers is the best way to go since Paypal is know for their charge backs where your users might feel uncomfortable about it especially if you are a new service.

I honestly don't see any big moves from Juventus happening especially if they are one of the first ones financially affected by the Coronavirus. They are the first Serie A teams to cut off their staff salaries as well as lay off some workers and a few weeks after that there were also rumors about them offloading some key players like Dybala to earn some cash. With a lot of financial problems going with Juventus I think we won't see them making any kind of summer splashes in this upcoming transfer window. Although everything could change with some sponsorship and some other strategies to add funds but this will be an unlikely scenario.

Well if you are prepared to ride it out based from your findings you gave in the OP I'm afraid that's a bad way of analyzing price predicting, you are more speculating rather than do any kind of analyzing itself. Just like how people predicted that Bitcoin will FOMO just because of the halving, and we all have witness that nothing spectacular has happened. This is just one example of one kind of event doesn't lead into some price action that's why you should not always stick one event and assume it will benefit the price.

Venmo isn't really that big outside of the United States, I don't even know if they are available in other countries or not. So maybe changing your payment method to a widely available one for sellers is a better option or at least add in some other options like wire transfers to make it widely available. But if you are solely choosing Venmo because you are focusing in the U.S. market maybe is a good choice but also you need to consider that not all people there are using their services as well so really other payment methods is a must.

LOL!!!!! How did you even come up with this kind of "rumor" that people will just be converting their USDT to BNB? Even though people have deposited a billion worth of currency in an exchange you can't automatically assume where that money will be headed without any kind of fact supporting it.



As far as developments within an existing cryptocurrency exists Ethereum 2.0 as for ETH will just be like SegWit and Lightning Network for Bitcoin. Both of which didn't cause any kind of pump for Bitcoin so why do you think Ethereum 2.0 will cause some kind of pump for Ethereum? I won't really be believing the headlines for this  development right now as it is too much hyped.

Based on how you currently described your situation my guess is what you are trying to say is if averaging down with cryptocurrency is possible? If that is what you are asking the question is it depends on you. Are you willing to take a paper loss and still continue to buy the same asset for a better margin of safety? If you are you can average down right now and hold Bitcoin at a loss temporarily. Keep in mind that this is really not a common method since people tend to the what is best which is shorting the crypto asset which aside from giving you some profit you will also buy them at a cheaper price with a bigger capital from your gain. If you have the ability to short crypto assets right now I would recommend you on doing that.

Like what they have said  I won't recommend you availing any kind of services related to Telegram promotions as based from the services I have seen they are always about boosting the numbers of your member up by either using bots or members who will be dead in terms of activity in a month. I won't also recommend you availing campaign managers to promote your channel since it would be the first time I'll see someone only wanting to promote a Telegram channel without a product/project behind it, plus it will be expensive for your part. The best thing you can do right now is to promote your channel on your own through social media groups related to your channel or just simply asking your existing members to promote your channel for you, like how Youtube channels ask their subscribers to "share and subscribe to show support".

Bro the rent won't be that high if the shops weren't able to afford it. We always need to put into consideration about "location" and since Manhattan New York is one of the most densest cities in the world I doubt that they don't even earn any profit from it at all except right now where the pandemic is actually causing a lot of trouble I know these business owners aren't really having trouble paying their rent because they can. Next time you are there and when all things clear out maybe dedicate a month to see if they surpass 1,000 customers in a month to see if they are able to earn any profit, and that is assuming that these customers are just purchasing one 5$ meal.

Research? More like stalking for me. The guy created a pseudoym to remain anonymous and what you want is to find out more information on him? It won't really be "cool" if you ask me if this stalking can turn into a manhunt for Satoshi, I mean look at the consequences first in tracking him down, you are basically trying to make his life in danger. If your research has really no purpose behind it or you have a hidden agenda I think you should back off now since you aren't respecting Satoshi's anonymity.