I, and I believe theymos, are in favor of more personal freedom than about any current government allows.. I believe I read a quote from theymos even praising the liberty provided by dark net marketplaces..

We should be encouraging everything the forum can get away with with it being under US law and wishing for more IMO.. We shouldn't be trying to be banning quite soft things like tasers just because it might hurt the feelings of those that favor more oppressive controls..

BTW I have been tasered a few times by friends with common cheap tasers, and twice in one night by the US police dog piling me, and still bear the burn scars from their serious taser devices (when I was younger and crazier, best abs workout ever)..
I am still absolutely in favor of the right for free citizens of the world to own tasers even after being subject to some of the hardest hits by them..

We should allow everything right up to the brink of the law this forum is forced to abide by..

Did this guy get banned for trolling recently or was it some other reason??
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184917.0

Prove it to who? A mod? I don't think so..

Listen to TECSHARE and OgNasty.. I think you're fine..


Why would you want tasers prohibited?

Saw this..




https://www.scribd.com/document/427618359/Shokin-Statement

Yeah, now this is what I was talking about!


Is this any good? What is the ban for spamming?
Aren't straight permabans mostly for only plagiarism, ban evasion, and malicious links?
Could you easily redo it to count all bans?


I'd say ban the bounty/campaign manager a couple times before you go banning the signature URL..
If they have to replace the BM a couple times then maybe ban the URL, or if managed offsite then just ban the URL..

Then their will be risk to the companies if they agree to low quality with low quality managers, or risk for 1 strike and your out if they choose to manage offsite..
This will create incentive to hire quality managers and to not manage offsite for the companies..

I wanna see the bad BMs/CMs accounts get WREKT and push the companies to hire managers that do a good job and will only agree to do a good job.. So this would be good for the economy of the quality managers..

The girl is just a pawn..
If anything bad comes to her over this it is only the fault of her handlers..

She is a meme for both sides..

Whistle-Blower Is a C.I.A. Officer Who Was Detailed to the White House
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html


More deepstate coupe attempt..

Doesn't YoBit sig campaign accept red trust accounts?

This is supposed to be the transcript.. Or, "MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION"..
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Hasn't he been doing this all this time? Remember, "I was wiretapped" and them all calling him a liar..

I hope all the truth comes out no matter what it is, but isn't Trump already the biggest political scandal of all time? I'm not sure I've heard of this amount of insanity in history..
the left are even batshit crazy in their agendas of basically every last thing they talk about in the debates.. They all are extremists in every policy..

So you did actually contact the IRS regarding OGNasty?

Not me..
I just went on 2 small vacations and didn't touch my laptop for 3 days each.. No way I am posting from the Holiday Inn when I could be enjoying a drink with fine company, to make my quota of posts, to make only a few dollars a week..

I don't want to feel pressure to post when I don't want to.. Why can't I not post at all for a week or 2?
If I don't post what you want, don't pay me, fine.. But why should I get booted out of the gig for not meeting some spam quota?
It's like I'm discriminated against because I don't make sure I post for money..

You make a heck of a lot more than a signature payment doing what you do, and for that money I would stay on top of my commitments too for sure, but such a commitment to only make some dust?


These companies are missing out big not having their name under my posts because of their stupid rules..
My posts are more valuable than many in my rank payrate that are maxing out but no company is getting anything out of them, or me getting some dust out of them, because it simply has not been worth it to me to commit to some quota..
I can't even remember the last sig I got paid for.. The last many have been free.. I have done all my posting long since before the merit system absolutely for free for no other reason than I wanted to say whatever I had to say..

I want something for a signature deal but haven't found one yet.. (Maybe I have long advocated for strong action against poor campaign managers?)
Oh well..
I have been looking lately but haven't found anything.. PM if anyone has a sig for me..



Another though.. Maybe posters shouldn't be getting paid to post if you can easily tell that they are only posting to get paid..
Hmmm...

I don't see how half of them provide any valuable advertising at all.. I can hardly believe anyone is clicking signatures on page 47 of that spam megathread..
I only ever really look at a users signature if They come across as very smart and I am interested in what they have to say and want to know more..

I think companies should want their signatures under the best most viewed posts rather than the most posts everyone just skipps over because they aren't worth the time to read..
If I was a company I'd not like wasting my money paying for my advertisment to be posted under trash, it makes their company look like trash.. I would want my advertisement only under quality, because I wouldn't be trying to advertise anything that wasn't a quality product..
I just don't see how companies think they are getting anything from hiring poor quality posters at all other than hurting their reputation by doing so..

OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It all comes down to the campaign managers and the companies being responsible for their participants..

I think if a paid poster gets banned for spamming then whoever is paying them to do so should recieve a stern warning, meaning the campaign manager and the representetives of the company..

If the campaign manager gets a warning about his employee being banned, strike 1, Warn them one more time strike 2, if they keep paying employees that are getting banned for spamming then strike 3 permaban that manager..

Something like if you are a manager and 3 accounts you are paying get banned for the spam that you are paying for in a rolling month - Permaban that manager.
Same for plagiarism, you have been paying accounts to plagerise? Permaban..

Ha ha, by by shit manager.. Better not ban evade and come back with another account to shitmanage with either..
That would put a fire under the asses of managers to make darn sure they aren't incentivising spammers..

If you want to ban users for spamming I think it is perfectly logical to ban whoever is paying them to spam right along with them..


What needs to happen is the companies representatives are the ones that need to be held accountable for the actions of their employees..


You negotiate this with the companies don't you? Why don't you refuse to implement minimum weekly posts yourself? You can also refuse to accept low posting standards too..

Not you in specific Yahoo because you do a good job, but you would probably keep a lot closer eye on your employees post quality if you yourself risked a permaban by paying for spam wouldn't you?


Maybe not 3 banned employees a month, maybe 5, maybe 2, but I advocate putting the pressure directly on those who are supposed to be responsible for it in the first place..

Heh, lets not get into all that, but I have probably missed atleast a couple activity cycles in the last year so I doubt I have max bump power due to the 364 cap of merit or activity in the last year, whichever is lesser..

But you are right.. I got bored of it, especially them only lasting 3 day, now that I have that in mind, I have less incentive to go bumping stuff..

Bump power must expire or wear off of threads pretty fast then.. I don't remember...

Ah there it is..
Maybe that is a little too fast..

Good luck shorting the hunnybadger..

I see you barely made out beating the fees by the skin of your teeth on that one.. It looks like a trade that you cut short in the nick of time because it wasn't going your way..
It really isn't all that bad but not impressive by itself..

If that is your trading style then you need to fill 100 trades a day..
If you can make 100 trades a day and make 1-5% on say 65% of them like that, and take small losses like 1-3% on the other 35 or just break even to get out, then you can start making steady compounding gains every day..

To me about the only way a bot would be useful would be for HFT faster than I can trade.. To jump other bots.. To hold both sides of the spread.. To jump your orders.. To get your position back for sale immediately on the books after it hit.. To keep hail mary orders in the books infront of walls..

How many orders is your bot placing per day?
If it isn't placing even 1,000 orders a day then what is it doing? Swing trading?

And your bot held that trade for about an entire hour? Whew, that's a long hold for a small % flip like that.. If I was only looking for 1% I'd only buy it if I though I could sell it back almost immediately..

What % of your capital did you tie up in that trade? IMO that should have been like maybe 20% of your trading capital while you are still using the rest playing the books looking more more hits..

Lets see another 50 filled trades a day for the next 2 weeks..

Maybe it's this one.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745323.0

With the quality I saw of applicants he could have thrown darts at the list and made good choices.. This may as well have been a list of the best BTCT posters that aren't yet in ChipMixer, looking at the stats LoyceV provided..  Some very old good standing accounts, some famous accounts (enough to be accepted immediately), and some very well merited accounts..

It looks like CM/DS are still looking for good local boards posters, and more posters in more technical boards, which is likely a wise move for them..