From the thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=519714.new#new      Please consider the issues.
 
[/quote]
About changes:  I can code whatever community decides to use. If you people want me to grow back block reward to 1024 and triple total coins created I surely can do that. It will be applied when community adopt new wallet as good.
About the wallet: I have Linux and OSX wallets running without any issue (any of them in 2 different cpus [one virtual, one real]  and using my new clean safe builds from source on github) until this moment (may crash next second of course... its software...).
Are you reporting about Windows? Its a known fact that some windows builds had problems when using some LTC spin off time ago as this coin is made... (doge was one of them as I was told... I never use windows except for full hard testing of my work) because built over some buggy dependencies. Strange your dev didn't spot and change that... as far as I can evaluate for now he was good...
About active devs: when I am dev coder I code. I mean,  I have better things to do than discuss lines with someone. If community decides I am the coder then I will be the coder. When community decides to change mind they just don't download wallet they don't like... simple. Usually so called devs don't say this... but its the reality: imagine you community tell me I am new dev and I decide to code that reward goes to 10000... if no one download that new wallet it will not happen - simple.
About optimizations: a good optimization  takes lots of time and testing (a millisecond today, ten milliseconds tomorrow - you learn that after coding for aviation soft). If I understood what you talking about, lets put that on 4th or 5th place in our list.
About global sense of existing a dev... who controls twitter, forum, site, whatever? Everything must be changed/moved or it will be just a joke.
I must say I used my answer to your post to clarify my global vision about everything involved. Thank you for helping me do that.

[/quote]


Thanks for that .. I think, judging by the upvotes, the community approves you as the developer coder !

 As I see it, the community has  decisions to make in several areas:

1. Marketing /Media.. Who runs Twitter, BTCtalk thread, alternative new forum. Who will step up for those ?

2. Image and wallet software. The 'Cube' logo is good and very distinctive. The wallet might benefit from a little graphical tweaking.

3. Coding for a fork : block reward and any other issues.


IMO the wallet and code for blocks are functional and have some degree of optimisation, so do not warrant messing with first... unless that is required to get the coin onto new exchanges (was that a sticking issue or not ?.. I am not technically competent to answer)

Begin with a new forum if someone has the experience to run it.

As far as longer term block reward goes, from my own experience, I believe that the current 128 is fine (because the community holders can fund projects and redistribute existing coin) but the halving should be of a longer period now, like 3 months. An inflation of 5% permanently will not hurt, because this is a model that other coins have eschewed, and it separates Q2C from the others. I have 30 years experience in financial industries and will gladly debate and inform on this point.

i suppose that one idea could be to change halving time at next interval, when coins per block be 128, and we could use more optimisations of the wallet, it tends to stop syncing after while while and you have to close it and run again, then also  i guess some optimisations between wallet and pool mining,  and in global sense that coin have an active dev or devs, in a combination with good comunity gives other ppl more confidence into our coin.
[/quote]
About changes:  I can code whatever community decides to use. If you people want me to grow back block reward to 1024 and triple total coins created I surely can do that. It will be applied when community adopt new wallet as good.
About the wallet: I have Linux and OSX wallets running without any issue (any of them in 2 different cpus [one virtual, one real]  and using my new clean safe builds from source on github) until this moment (may crash next second of course... its software...).
Are you reporting about Windows? Its a known fact that some windows builds had problems when using some LTC spin off time ago as this coin is made... (doge was one of them as I was told... I never use windows except for full hard testing of my work) because built over some buggy dependencies. Strange your dev didn't spot and change that... as far as I can evaluate for now he was good...
About active devs: when I am dev coder I code. I mean,  I have better things to do than discuss lines with someone. If community decides I am the coder then I will be the coder. When community decides to change mind they just don't download wallet they don't like... simple. Usually so called devs don't say this... but its the reality: imagine you community tell me I am new dev and I decide to code that reward goes to 10000... if no one download that new wallet it will not happen - simple.
About optimizations: a good optimization  takes lots of time and testing (a millisecond today, ten milliseconds tomorrow - you learn that after coding for aviation soft). If I understood what you talking about, lets put that on 4th or 5th place in our list.
About global sense of existing a dev... who controls twitter, forum, site, whatever? Everything must be changed/moved or it will be just a joke.
I must say I used my answer to your post to clarify my global vision about everything involved. Thank you for helping me do that.

[/quote]


Thanks for that .. I think, judging by the upvotes, the community approves you as the developer coder !

 As I see it, the community has  decisions to make in several areas: 

1. Marketing /Media.. Who runs Twitter, BTCtalk thread, alternative new forum. Who will step up for those ?

2. Image and wallet software. The 'Cube' logo is good and very distinctive. The wallet might benefit from a little graphical tweaking.

3. Coding for a fork : block reward and any other issues.


IMO the wallet and code for blocks are functional and have some degree of optimisation, so do not warrant messing with first... unless that is required to get the coin onto new exchanges (was that a sticking issue or not ?.. I am not technically competent to answer)

Begin with a new forum if someone has the experience to run it.

As far as longer term block reward goes, from my own experience, I believe that the current 128 is fine (because the community holders can fund projects and redistribute existing coin) but the halving should be of a longer period now, like 3 months. An inflation of 5% permanently will not hurt, because this is a model that other coins have eschewed, and it separates Q2C from the others. I have 30 years experience in financial industries and will gladly debate and inform on this point.

Not listed, not in the imminent list.

We do not want to go on too soon, and start in the Low Volume second division. Better to wait until trading is established on several exchanges.

My investors are looking forward to buying decent size stakes in ECC if 'whales' start dumping.

There is a lot of misunderstanding about markets, and of course most people worry about there being too many coins when the real problem is that most do not have enough available.

Anyone with the capital and skill to really promote is not going to bother unless a big stake is available for them to invest.

That is why premines are good, not bad...and large holders are good not bad... and dumps are good not bad, because someone is buying the ones that are sold.

I am just flying a kite to see what reaction I get: thanks for yours !

 I am also in a learning curve.

You see, I believe the whole alt. market is due for a big shake down (or up, whatever). I have investors who are looking to get into situations, and before committing funds I am trying to evaluate what life there is in each technically viable coin.

Here it is... use it

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=519714.msg5750130#msg5750130

Q2C, Qubitcoin has an invite (winning polls) to go onto new exchanges, but the dev is in Ukraine and has some personal problem.

The coin has novel hash and works extremely well (BTCtalk thread is 175 pages after a few weeks, so there is a substantial community). If you want a finger in this pie, go to the Q2c thread and check it out. The price is pretty bombed out now, and has been taken down with a lot of the other also-rans.

This one has the makings of another Quark (check the history of that before it x500 in Nov), for several other reasons as well.

There are a lot of new coins but not many with all the right elements. ECCoin is smilar to DC in that the mining period is swift and it goes 99% to PoS after that. ... The difference is it works smoothly and the dev is highly active

+1.

ECC is only 11 days old. There is organic growth in the community, and it will be discovered. I personally would not rush to list on an exchange: keep watching for an opportunity. The coins that pay highly for listings are more likely to be pump+dump.

I will send another application when ECC hits an older established exchange. Better if e can go in the 1st Tier, not low volume 2nd division.

Maybe better to mine dismal coins instead.

EC Coin is much improved on mint...

The mining stage actually only produces 17Bn coins.

PoS is 25% in first year: that is the incentive which will keep wallets and network open. Reduces gradually after that to counteract inflation.

Dev is more proactive, and there are more connected community members.

I filled it.  Suggest raise payout to 50 Q2C when ready.

I just added 15k to the faucet,to these addresses..

GY1C2Azm2j4UgUtjzE6uuZMSQgHcD8yX4W

GQhVfdeRu9N1jecgehHNAo8YtgoyFzEHtH

Thor has excellent code and genetics. It is just overlooked atm.

Doesn't mean it will certainly be picked up, but the price is reflecting no prospects now. A great gamble, put in what you can afford to lose, either lose it, or make 20x

Dev please ..are there plans for a proper (abe type) block explorer ?   That would help adoption.


Is there a moderator or dev on this thread ?

The opposite may be true.   

The owner of Poloniex is trying to do the right thing. Anyone who can afford it should give him support.

PoS gives a different type of security. It is more secure in most cases, because a takeover of the network (like a 51% attack) requires ownership of the majority of the coins. If you own it , you own it anyway.

I am sure the dev. will confirm shortly, but my understanding is that stake can be minted on coins held in the wallet for 42 days. Start point is genesis (because the coin is hybrid PoW/PoS right now), no minimum.

 Have a look at the website which gives some concise information..there will be more promotion and information later....Then have a think about it for a few weeks..

In the one pager, need to change spelling of COMPETITIVE.

I am happy to edit for professional English and good communication. I have done this for a number of currencies' sites and promotions. I understand aspects of Cryptos as well as being a writer... just let me know how.