I don't know who Peter Todd is but if he was HIRED to be a consultant for Monero it is really really unprofessional for him to be publicly defaming the code on twitter before privately giving his input to the devs. In the corporate world if say IBM were having some issues with their books and hired an outside accounting firm to come audit and straighten things out, then said firm went on twitter and publicly went "Hoo Boy! It's amazing IBM functions at all considering they basically use monkeys with crayons to do their accounting!" That would not fly and would immediately tank the price of the stock. When people have money on the line, why would this guy be publicly slandering the code when he has been hired as a consultant???
This is a reasonable question. Perhaps ask Peter Todd? I'm more bringing it to the attention of the devs who brought PT on board.... I would have thought that Peter Todd (previously a core bitcoin dev) would have enough on his plate as he recently (few weeks ago) joined the Viacoin dev team. I can only conclude that either it was an ill considered invite (and the Monero team surely understand enough about Crypto loyalties not to make an error), or there is some potential collaborative connection. Anyone else have an opinion ? |
|
|
|
I'm worried that the discussion on this forum has dropped to logos and is not getting much activity at all. I know there is a lot of work still going on in the back end and think the team is doing a great job, but we have to get more guys involved and more interest generated.
Can we offer anything to JL777's SuperNET? That has 3x our post volume, and it began about 4 days ago. If we could get ECC into the SuperNET we would be back in the spotlight. PLEASE think about it!
I can see you guys working all the forum threads. If you want to post publicity make your own ANN. Thank you for your understanding Not sure what you are talking about? Is the community no longer open to suggestions? Collaborate to survive. If Supernet is a good project, join it ! |
|
|
|
I made a merged mining patch for qubitcoin. i can help update q2c to LTC code and then hard fork it for myriadcoin mm
What does updating Q2C to LTC code means? If it means replacing all algorithms with the one that LTC is using (scrypt), then it is no longer Qubitcoin. Besides that, mining Qubit uses 50% power of what you need for LTC. I'm afraid that by doing this Qubitcoin would lose its identity. If someone wants to mine Qubit there is already a way and it is working fine. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I won't say you're wrong, but you're certainly misunderstanding what ahmed_bodi is offering to do here. In practice, from a current Q2C miner's perspective, nothing would necessarily change - except they'd be able to mine MYR alongside Q2C. From the perspective of Q2C as a coin, there is a huge benefit in terms of enhanced network security, with the MYR-qubit hashrate working to secure Q2C too. If you'd like to get a better feel for how Myriad merged mining currently works on the Myriad p2pool network, please visit http://myriad.p2pool.geek.nz/merge. On this page you will find details for the merged coins that are currently being mined on p2pool. We started off running scrypt merged mining, but are looking to branch out into the other 4 algos in due course, as and when the right coins are available. If you check http://myriad.p2pool.geek.nz/nodes, you will see that we have nodes for all 5 algos (I run the UK nodes). Adding Q2C would be straightforward if ahmed_bodi is permitted to proceed with his proposed patch. Please note that miners require a payout address for each and every coin that is merge mined on myriad.p2pool.geek.nz, and we provide links to download the full wallets for each coin. By doing this, we are looking to support coins that partner with us, by encouraging our miners to hold the coins they mine rather than auto-exchange or dump them. Collaboration is definitely the way forward for altcoins now. Those communities which are isolated cannot survive long term unless they are very large indeed. |
|
|
|
@richiela I think we are ready the close matter, as we are releasing new version. Please stay in touch. I accepted i failed to satisfy a good partner. And i will keep my word and get you still top exchange within other exchanges when market opened. Because others seem to me out of communication too long. This makes you still the best.
Good job, and correct response.  Please also keep Mintpal informed. |
|
|
|
We came to hard decision after reviewing two block chains and found that the blockchain used by exchange bittrex is mostly used, so we will revert back to that blockchain, so the impact to people will be the minimum. and we will work in favor of exchanges.
this appear less harm for the most. We act on good of most or all.
we are currently working on new version. It took time for us to investigate issue. You can believe we are honestly made our very best. Thank you for the patience. Please allow use few hours.
Is Mintpal on that fork ? I have 3 transactions missing with Mintpal: I have been in contact with support since 29 Aug, but I am not sure if they are following developments. It would be as well to keep them informed properly. |
|
|
|
the price on bter is like shit now  Looks quite good to me. 7080 LTS (which was the free distribution to several thousand Share and Football coin holders) is worth around $200 at the current bid. I am still well in profit on the ones I bought a few weeks ago, and of course, the free ones yet to come. LTS is a novel distribution model, slow-burning, and there should be plenty available in the next year or so. I would look to buy some more below 2000 sats. when the freebies start getting sold.. |
|
|
|
@Richie i want you to understand, we as dev team are not trying to lose you. I told this also at irc chat. After your first post, i posted my answer and came to IRC in less than 2 hours I speak about myself i am not the all dev team but decisions taken like fork or extra coin minting together as team. I said you what i can do like putting in front of others more ads and future business. This is not a way of saying go away. We still hold bittex in OP and want to keep so. So i wait from you the decision please do your best to handle, i am not an exchange manager. and certainly you are a good one. So you do your job and allow me i do mine. thx. for post and hope you give our community some good news So, if I read this right, you're rejecting the proposals already on the table, and waiting for the exchanges to propose something that you find acceptable. In the meanwhile investors are facing the prospect of being left heavily out of pocket with a coin operating on Two (or more) forks. If this isn't resolved very soon the coin will be Dead and the matter will be academic. No other exchanges will trust a coin in terminal decline with developers and exchanges fighting over who's to blame. It's not just the job of the exchanges to monitor the health of the coin. The developers have a responsibility to monitor it's progress and ensure that it is working without issues. Other coins have weathered similar storms through Hard Work, Hard Forks, Cooperation and Compromise. Pleas make it happen while there's still some goodwill left in the community. The fact that this post leads off with "So, if I read this right...." furthers the point that the largest trouble here is communication and understanding. Dev, if you are working for the good of the coin, team, & community, you will be more fluid with your ideas for conflict resolution. Working through this whilst opposing exchanges will breed contempt and distrust from the investors. Working through this cooperatively with exchanges will show solidarity and build trust amongst investors. Your counter proposal of 'I said you what i can do like putting in front of others more ads and future business.' speaks in terms of potential future payouts. Your asking the exchange to take on more potential risk for one of many possible outcomes. In short, you're demanding respect from the exchange that isn't yet entirely deserved. There has to be a more neutral solution. Why cant we just roll back trades & blockchain to before the fork and restart from there? [I'm not technical, so if this is absurd, excuse me.] You can cancel all transactions form any point that you choose... but you can't force the return of any goods or bitcoin not connected to the blockchain. Reconstruction or reinstatement of those transactions would seem virtually impossible. So anyone who's bought coins or sold goods and services on the wrong fork has effectively lost out. And it's not yet certain which is the 'wrong' fork, as the exchanges control a significant portion of the blockchain. Yes, that's right. However , it's important to distinguish 'Trades' from 'Transactions' . Transactions either happened on the correct fork, or didn't happen, and coins will be back where they started (not lost) when everyone is on the correct fork. 'Trades' are buys or sells for other currencies, and therefore there is a potential loser if they are rolled back. That is the important distinction for an exchange and its customers. |
|
|
|
I am surprised at the level inaccuracies by the dev team here. Please get your facts straight before asserting them as fact. We have great reward for exchanges daily %100 PoS coins. Usually they don't share these coins with you. the longer they keep coins in their exchange more they can produce coins.
I am afraid we may have to interrupt the relation ship with these current 4 exchanges in our OP. Because they not answer back we don't know what's with them. I cant hold in my OP not working exchanges so long.
And we may have to find new one and continue from there. I am watching the issue.
1) This coin is not 100% PoS daily nor is it for us. 2) Exchanges never stake hot wallets. It's not feasible. So no, we are not producing coins. I hope you understand why. 3) We have contacted you and told you what we needed to move forward. You basically told us to go away. To be completely transparent to the community: a) We monitor blockchains very closely for our deposits/withdrawals. Problem is, when we use the official blockexplorer which is incorrect, and we were lead to follow a bad fork until it was too late. All this without a single notification. b) When we tried to move to the "new" fork, we had 110 deposits that were orphaned which equated to approximately 700k of SUPER coins. c) We have asked that you mint the coins caused by the forks to cover the difference in the forks. We are happy to work with the community on solving this, and we don't even mind covering some of the losses, like we have in many other forks, but the number of coins here is over 30% of our wallet size and not practical. If we cannot come to a solution, we will just close the market and leave the wallet open on the old for for people to withdraw. We have not heard back from Mintpal yet, but wanted to get ahead of this. Thanks, Richie Thanks for the update. I'm not sure how 'minting' coins would work to cover losses. It would seem undesirable for developers to be able to mint coins at will. But perhaps a relaunch would work, with a reduced pos scheme for everyone, to cover losses, and maintain confidence in the coin. That would entail a hard fork with the whole community plus exchanges on board. The details could be thrashed out with input from experienced independent developers. If the price of a stable coin is a massive reduction in pos rewards, then in my own view it would be worth it. PoS high % is the life blood of the coin. If it is reduced, that will be a big mistake. (I for one would be out immediately). Better to increase PoS and have larger staking operation for compensation. (Dilute all holders a little) |
|
|
|
This is my point exactly. Piss poor communication breeds piss poor confidence, breeds confusion, and dissolves coins. Dev, Team, we know your mother tongue is not English. PLEASE work with someone for PR who can competently communicate with all parties. If your business sense was as well thought out as your tech, we'd be much more likely to have serious trading volumes. It happened once - it can happen again, but not when you put up walls with anyone who doesn't see it exactly your way. Successful business is work & compromise, not defensive aggression.
+1 I buy 0.41 btc of super just before the suspension of the market. I am only interested to see the problem solved, and bittrex market unlocked. Me too. Just want my coins back, and problems to be solved. Patience: see my post above. Coins do not disappear, they are just in different addresses. |
|
|
|
This is my point exactly. Piss poor communication breeds piss poor confidence, breeds confusion, and dissolves coins. Dev, Team, we know your mother tongue is not English. PLEASE work with someone for PR who can competently communicate with all parties. If your business sense was as well thought out as your tech, we'd be much more likely to have serious trading volumes. It happened once - it can happen again, but not when you put up walls with anyone who doesn't see it exactly your way. Successful business is work & compromise, not defensive aggression.
+1 I buy 0.41 btc of super just before the suspension of the market. I am only interested to see the problem solved, and bittrex market unlocked. You need to wait until all the exchanges and wallets are on the correct fork. All coins will then be in their 'correct' places. Either Bittrex will have your BTC or your Supercoin. You can take that up with them when they have resolved and checked their wallet. |
|
|
|
This situation is becoming a problem.
Both sides need to come to an agreement soon. And also supercointeam, exchanges are a must. In business you need to often set aside differences for the good of making money. A coin without exchanges like bittrex, mintpal, cryptsy, is like a car without an engine, it won't go anywhere. Please do not say we are simply going to dump these exchanges and move on. That would be a terrible business move for supercoin. Everyone must settle their differences an be on the same page so we can all move on.
Exchanges should update their wallets so we can move coins that are just sitting there. Its quite hypocritical of bittrex to say "dev provided no plan for aiding those impacted in recovering lost funds" when the main reason we have lost funds is because exchanges aren't updating their wallets and many of us have coins at exchanges or in transit waiting to arrive to or from exchanges once a wallet is updated. Where is bittrex plan in aiding lost funds? A simple update would be a good plan.
Also where is mintpal? They haven't even disabled trading or supercoin transactions. Not every holder is able to check this thread daily, mintpal should be aware enough to not let people withdraw thousands of Super on an old chain, pretty irresponsible.
Can some third party translate me from english to english?
I am non-native english speaker , so there is slight chance i didn't understand well...
Exchanges had terms like this: Today 100 coins, tomorrow 200 coins, the day after tomorrow 400 coins... 100% daily is that?
It is no different that a usual wallet staking... Super has %100 yearly PoS rewards for the first year then it will drop to %50 and the following years %1. In your previous post you claimed that Exchanges have a DAILY 100% pos scheme. Now you are saying that they're no different to Investors, who have a YEARLY 100%pos scheme. Which is it? You are not helping the situation with this confusion. It will be better for all concerned if this is cleared up immediately. +1 and +1 This is my point exactly. Piss poor communication breeds piss poor confidence, breeds confusion, and dissolves coins. Dev, Team, we know your mother tongue is not English. PLEASE work with someone for PR who can competently communicate with all parties. If your business sense was as well thought out as your tech, we'd be much more likely to have serious trading volumes. It happened once - it can happen again, but not when you put up walls with anyone who doesn't see it exactly your way. Successful business is work & compromise, not defensive aggression. Here is my explanation , both for technical and non-technical persons. The PoS is 100% per anum : that is true for any wallet, including exchanges. The 'daily' quote is incorrect. The Fork is merely another (incorrect) version of the ledger. Any transactions which have been carried out in the fork are not reflected in the 'correct' ledger. The coins in the 'correct' ledger are still all there, they will simply not show the transactions carried out in the forked ledger. When the explorers are on the correct chain, they will show true balances. This is true for exchanges as well as the individual wallets. |
|
|
|
What IS important is if the growth trend is slowing or not. Agree. For example, it is reasonable to suggest that "pregnancy" is shorter for early adopters and longer for general population. Then it would be steep curve in the very beginning, then less and less steep later on. Something like this: [IMG size=200]https://i.imgur.com/6iN9ZSA.png[/img] EDIT: It's real data  This has probably already been mentioned at some point, but have you given any thought to 'the chasm' that is inevitably encountered during adoption of a disruptive technology? This feature (unique to disruptive innovations, in contrast with sustaining innovations) occurs after the innovators and early adopters (who, in total, account for the first 16% of total adopters) and before the early majority jump in. It appears while the innovators and early adopters revel in the adoption of a change agent, the early majority are much more comfortable using existing tools/methods and hesitate before adopting something that requires a fundamental change to their current operations. This hesitation forms 'the chasm'. Using 2.1 million as the value of current adoption (taken from My Wallet), and assuming we have reached the chasm, that puts the future total number of Bitcoin adopters at approximately 13 million. (Granted, this value does seem a little low, especially considering it is only 9% of PayPal's current users.) Anyway, it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this... I don't know much about chasms. Usually new technology adoption is drawn just like smooth S-curve. Are there real-life adoption curves where the chasm is visible? Would be interesting to compare with our graphs. Bitcoin is not just a new technology being adopted : It is fundamentally money, and the reflexive dynamics of profit apply. When you start looking at assets which trade in a profit pursuing environment, standard relationships and theories are not helpful (they are likely to be 'proven' wrong as soon as they are recognised) |
|
|
|
One way to make something popular is to offer something that people ogle and get jealous if others have it and they don't. Humans hate to miss the party. Humans are social. This is the game of life. I suspect the reason my CoolPage reached 300,000 to a million users in the first 3 years (multiply by 10 in today's internet), was because people visiting the websites created with it, saw the little sky blue background with golden font advertising button that was on every page that used the free version. At the time (1998 to 2001), possessing a custom designed webpage on Yahoo Geocities was a status symbol of being really cool and hip with the new technologies. And we offered them "drag + drop creation and one click publishing". Later 100s of editors followed suit but we were (ahem "I" the one-man company was) one of the first to offer that in 1998 in an ad-button supported freeware download. And I put a lot of effort into making the GUI really user friendly and even added point-and-click DHTML programming GUI. Technically CoolPage sucked. I was so embarrassed I stopped developing it.  The filipino artist modeled the Cool Page surfer dude on me, lol. But I designed the blue button and the custom font for CoolPage.Edit: I wrote upthread that anonymity could be unwound for ring signatures if authorities can require you to reveal your private keys (a.k.a. passwords), i.e. allow you to have privacy to the public but not to the government. Astute readers surely smugly ignored me thinking that if the authorities already know your identity in order to require your passwords, then you don't have anonymity. Well this unstated rebuttal falls apart on several levels. One as I said, you revealing your password lowers the anonymity set for those who didn't reveal. Secondly, you may wish to report for tax purposes some funds you bring from the non-reported anonymous world back into the mainstream fiat world, so then the authorities may require you reveal your passwords so they can verify the tax basis you claim for your capital gains. As you know the rulings for example in the USA is that mining is income and the tax basis for capital gains starts at the time of the coinbase transaction. I was too late. Our HTML editor few years later was not successful. As you remember there are view keys designed to reveal transactions when needed. So the problem of alleged requirements to reveal private keys can be exaggerated. Degree of anonymity is subjective. Very few people want full secrecy (ie off-grid), because to have a functioning society, there has to be government (read: civil protection) at some level. It can be Federal, State, County, Parish or Local, but human society is made of connected individuals. All those levels of govt. are interested (and not interested) in various degrees according to their remits. |
|
|
|
and until all the above is sorted out, can't see many buy orders will be going through
In fact there may be more buy orders than sell orders, because Supercoins cannot get to the exchanges, whereas BTC can. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the attention. I haven't fixed it yet (I am away) , but am confident in your competence, and expect it will all be sorted soon. |
|
|
|
I am using v3.0 wallet. Just want to share experience. My wallet is synchronizing,staking perfectly with almost 12 connections. I transferred little amount towards bittrex and is working fine. But the peroblem is with blocks. I am almost 9000 blocks ahead the estimated blocks. Estimated are 428435 and it is showing 437517.
May be this information help the tech team towards resolution. Thanks.
Again, here is another variation. |
|
|
|
Downloaded the new wallet, yet it wont sync. Stuck on block 428419. Please help
I have the same problem and where is the dev?can anyone help us? Same here, V3.1.0.0 Stuck @ 428419 Ran as administrator, stuck @ 428419 but now does not show activity, have to go to debug to see current and remaining blocks. Initial upgrade yesterday, deleted all but supercoin.conf and wallet.dat. Currently have 11 connections, has been as high as 19 this morning. Running on Windows 7 Professional, fully up to date and patched, 64 bit. Core i8 with 32 gigs RAM. EDIT: Progress display has appeared, all other conditions the same, no progress... Save your WALLET.DAT file.. and remove all data from APPDATA folder.. Than download al blokchain again.. this will help.. Wallet 3.1... Nope. v3.1.0 used twice, full instal, full sync. from scratch... Addnodes all match the OP. So we have a different issue. |
|
|
|
Downloaded the new wallet, yet it wont sync. Stuck on block 428419. Please help
I have the same problem and where is the dev?can anyone help us? Thanks, but same thing can't get past block 428419 I have a different problem : My wallet synched up to block ~437000 of ~431000 total ! I had up to 38 connections during the sync. Transactions are also wrong, so it must be a different fork. ...and this was from my 3rd full reinstall, using v3.1.0, and the .conf info in the OP. Note also I have transactions showing in the wallet (since 27 August) which are not showing on the blockchain (according to chainz explorer). There seem to be forks of which the dev. may not yet be aware, but I am sure he is working on it. So I conclude that there is a problem, and a fork, which needs fully addressing. |
|
|
|
I sent 160K super to Birrtex with supercoin wallet 3.0.But they didn't arrive.Can I get them back
Anyone can help me?
Check your address in the blockexplorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/super/if the coins are still in your balance, they have not been sent, and they will appear back in your wallet when you have the correct version and sync etc.. Just make sure you have backup of your wallet.dat, and your coins will be safe. The coins are not in my balance.They have been sent with 1700+ confirmations. Then you will need to send a support ticket to Bittrex. Just copy them the transaction details from the blockexplorer. What does the Bittrex address you sent to, show as its balance in the explorer ?edit: I see your post above. The blockexplorer balance is correct: it is only your wallet software which is wrong. Make sure your wallet.dat is backed up, and then you can start a complete new instal (v3.1.0) using the correct addnodes in the .conf file. |
|
|
|
I sent 160K super to Birrtex with supercoin wallet 3.0.But they didn't arrive.Can I get them back
Anyone can help me?
Check your address in the blockexplorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/super/if the coins are still in your balance, they have not been sent, and they will appear back in your wallet when you have the correct version and sync etc.. Just make sure you have backup of your wallet.dat, and your coins will be safe. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
