You could've sold those rigs in a matter of days, but instead of spending a minute to capture and upload their images here, you chose to leave false retaliatory feedback on my account!
^{- Almost four months have passed and nothing has happened yet}

---

By the time you give up, I'm sure most of us would be able to write a book based on your contradictory comments!

And rob them with your buddies!

What happened to your previous account ^{[mathesond684]}?

• Quote from: mathesond684 on July 25, 2021, 06:08:14 PM
  My Whassapp \ Telegram : +40733245573
  

---

Let me guess, you'll be the one to choose the sealer in question and there'll be no way for the seller to know if you're connected to that person or not!

I wouldn't recommend trusting him/her even if @Linebtc1 provides one ^{[it's not that hard to manipulate images]}.
^{- The same thing applies to video proofs [there are certain ways to temporarily alter the content of a website (from your side) without hacking it].}

It never occurred to me that they would hide local versions behind the language selection part ^{[worst possible place, no wonder why a lot of their previous local versions are dead now]}.
^{- Thank you for finding the solution}

Exactly ^{[e.g. the "Turkish" version has a lot of those]}!

Back in the day, CoinTelegraph had a list of its international sites in the footer area of its website, but that's no longer the case!
^{- I do know they're publishing a lot of repetitive articles on each of those sites but from time to time, you'll find a bunch of unique articles as well.}

Does anybody know where I could find the complete "updated" list?   (Update - Solution ^{[by Potato Chips]})
^{- I've already looked at all of the places on their main site but had no luck.}

These are the only ones that I could find from "an old archived page" that was taken in Jan of 2017:

• Active
  
  • CT-Japan
  • CT-Germany
  • CT-Italy
  • CT-Spain
  • CT-Arabia ^{[credits to Potato Chips]}
  • CT-China ^{[credits to Potato Chips]}
  • CT-Korea ^{[credits to Potato Chips]}
  • CT-Brazil ^{[credits to Potato Chips]}
  • CT-Turkey ^{[credits to Potato Chips]}
  • CT-Serbia ^{[credits to examplens]}
• Inactive
  
  • CT-UK
  • CT-Czech Republic
    ^{- Redirects to ".com" extension.}
  • CT-Greece
  • CT-Brazil
  • CT-Slovenia
    ^{- Redirects to ".com" extension.}
  • CT-Philippines
    ^{- Redirects to ".com" extension.}
  • CT-Serbia

Let's assume for a second that there's no issue with their support or you're just dealing with Gemini, how much ^{[or a rough percentage]} a US-based customer could save by opting for the Coinbase route?

I'm still quite confident that it would reach what I "predicted" before ^{[or at least close to it]}.

• I forgot to upload the following screenshots when I made that prediction:
  ^{- In both of the following periods, prices in September were slightly higher than in June and the spike happened while it headed towards December [with a little exception in 2013, since November had a higher value].}
  
  
  • 2013
  • 2017

That might work for small amounts, but for larger ones, they'd probably have to deal with problems like insufficient supplies... Sooner or later, that'll lead to expanding the group and that's where it gets tricky!

Depending on how they do it, they could still get caught if they're not careful enough ^{[unfortunately]}!

Even if that happens, I highly doubt they'd give those to "normal" individuals!

I quickly checked those that had "No" in front of them and found the following changes:

• Bech32 support
  
  • BitcoinWhosWho
  • Insight
• Identifiable P2SH format
  
  • SoChain

- SmartBit halted its operations "2 months ago".
- "Bitcoin.com (Owner: BCash)" redirects to "Blockchair.com", so we should probably just keep the latter one in the list!

---

Found another explorer:

Name (link)	Bech32 supported?	SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifyable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating  )	Rated by	Comments
__________________________	___________________	___________________________________	_______________________________	____________________	___________________________________
Crystal Explorer	Yes (09/2021)	No (09/2021)	0 / 10 Points	SFR10	Because of the "team that's behind it", I expect it to be like "walletexplorer"!

In regards to the reading part, I'd recommend doing what @acroman08 suggested ^{[landscape view]} and for those that are interested in a better experience for posting stuff, I'd recommend combining the landscape view with a portable Bluetooth keyboard while using the "quick reply" feature!

• Quick reply feature
  
  • Profile > Look and Layout Preferences > Use quick reply on topic display > show, on by default > Change profile

Alternatively, you can try the following things as well:

• Quote from: SFR10 on May 16, 2021, 11:50:03 AM
  • Wap2 ^[responsive]: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?;wap2
    
    • The remaining versions are:
      
      • Wap ^{[it doesn't come with the ability to create posts but it's responsive]}.
      • Imode ^{[it comes with the ability to create posts but it's not responsive]}.

  
  Note: Every single one of these versions has its own limitations and depending on how each post is formatted ^{[e.g. those with tables]}, viewing it using any of the above versions might be a nightmare.
  

You did a great job at finding some of its other sisters/clones sites, but always remember to archive them as well:

• Archived versions:
  
  • festoBIT
  • profitXBIT
  • coinexBTC

---

I managed to find a few more as well:
^{- I've personally reported a lot of websites with that exact template and content, but unfortunately, some of them still exist.}

• omexBIT.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-05-15]}
• qualitativeCRYPTO.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-08-19]}
• kudoCHANGE.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-08-14]}
• coinsUNITY.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-08-19]}
• cryptoROZ.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-03-18]}
• coinTAZE.com ^{[archived - Creation Date: 2021-08-14]}

I'm curious to know what would happen if they couldn't find any crypto-asset in those houses?!

Does anybody know if that's per month or per year?
^{- If it's the latter one, then it's really bad in comparison to Slovenia [€15K per year].}

I've seen worse!

Based on what I've read last week, one of the main issues was about forming a monopoly ^{[to a large extent]}!

One of the many red flags on this post!

Regardless of "TOKYOTEL" scamming its users or not, you're still directly scamming the hotels in question and yet, you still have the audacity to comment about this unethical service not being a scam!

---

^Archived

Apart from the note that's been on the footer area since early 2016 ^{[archived version]}, I'm pretty sure back in the day, there was also a blog post about their connection ^{[tried my best, but couldn't find it]}.

Same "here"!

IIRC, that's not the first time that I've seen such behavior from CoinDesk authors.
^{-The same thing goes for some of the CoinTelegraph authors.}

That's strange ^{[I've always thought they were the ones that came up with half of those terms first (I was wrong)]}! I checked the source code of the above steemit link and it appears that @marketanalysis posted that image four days prior to the above tweet, so I've added that one as the main source on my previous post ^{[I've also double-checked that image and the ones posted by Glassnode on google, but couldn't find any other source prior to the above steemit link]}:

Utilize the free space that's available on top of the countertop display cases, with the help of a bunch of plastic sign holders and catchy phrases ^{[one in each and don't overdo it (main focus should be on why you accept BTCitcoin, as opposed to a BTCitcoin accepted sign)]}.

• In addition to @Lucius's suggestion about having a color, don't slap the whole print on the glass door ^{[trim the excess to make it look like a sticker]}.

If you're referring to the image that's on the bottom right corner, then it doesn't look good!
^{- You have to do a lot better than a partial BTCitcoin logo that's buried beneath other images.}

Can we see how it looks?

If you had a website, I would've suggested listing it on various crypto directories.

There's a project that's been around for a couple of years that in a way, it looks like a perfect match: Using crypto to help the homeless - (for real - with pics!)
^{- Apart from the donation part, other users can act as volunteers.}

By the look of things, they're allowed to hodle what they already have ^{[as long as they don't use it for their transactions]}.
^{- I wonder how they're going to deal with decentralized exchanges?}

I was surprised to see such moves are still being made in China... It doesn't take a genius to distinguish a normal data center from one that does other stuff ^{[all it takes is a single visit]}!

All of this is just because of their own CBDC!

They want to have full control and that's exactly the opposite of what a "U-turn" move would achieve.

It would've been great if that was really the case, but in reality, it's tied to ^{[for now - thanks to Strike]} users from El Salvador and the US ^{[except for two states]} and that equates to around "75M ^{[I'm referring to those that can receive, as opposed to those that can send]}". On top of that, you have to remove non iOS users from the equation ^{[for now]} and that leads to a much smaller number!

You might want to define what you exactly mean by "us"; if you're referring to hodlers, then I don't think it'll have a significant impact on the price!

In addition to the above comments, I would suggest narrowing down your choices to those with reproducible builds ^{[I do know it doesn't automatically equate to being 100% secure, but it's a good start]}.
Note: Some of them have recently gained a lot of mixed reviews ^{[e.g. first one on the following list]}:

• Walletscrutiny
  ^{- Scroll down until you reach the middle of the page.}

The following thread might come in handy: Opinions on Phoenix Wallet?

Yes, "some ^{[more than half]}" of the terms were given by Glassnode in an insight that they published back in February, while you can find the remaining half on "some" of the crypto glossaries ^{[e.g. this one]}.
^{- No, Bitcoin Ownership is not Highly Concentrated – But Whales are Accumulating}

• Quote from: https://insights.glassnode.com/bitcoin-supply-distribution/
  Bitcoin Supply Distribution
  We divide network entities according to their Bitcoin holdings into the following marine species:
  
  Shrimps (<1 BTC)
  Crab (1-10 BTC)
  Octopus (10-50 BTC)
  Fish (50-100 BTC)
  Dolphin (100-500 BTC)
  Shark (500-1,000 BTC)
  Whale (1,000-5,000 BTC)
  Humpback (>5,000 BTC).

---

Update (the following link is probably the main source instead):