Care to explain what kind of customization has led to a price increase of around "$1,300"?

That looks like an excuse to not post their pictures!

No escrow?

---

Btw, what happened to the miner ^{[one of the HonorKnight miners}] that you were supposed to send to @MoparMiningLLC for a review ^{[your previous thread]}?

The upcoming or rather the future forum software ^[Epochtalk] is already mobile-friendly ^[responsive] and you can even try it out and see how it'll feel when it's released ^{[it's not the final version]}: Coinbistro.com - Epochtalk testing grounds
^{- Personally, I really enjoyed viewing it with a mobile device.}

• In the meantime, you can try the following workarounds:
  
  
  Quote from: SFR10 on May 16, 2021, 11:50:03 AM
  • Wap2 ^[responsive]: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?;wap2
    
    • The remaining versions are:
      
      • Wap ^{[it doesn't come with the ability to create posts but it's responsive]}.
      • Imode ^{[it comes with the ability to create posts but it's not responsive]}.

  
  Note: Every single one of these versions has its own limitations and depending on how each post is formatted ^{[e.g. those with tables]}, viewing it using any of the above versions might be a nightmare.
  

In addition to what @shield132 posted, you can find a few other missing exchanges from the following thread: Crypto exchanges that accepting Lightning Network ^{[make sure to also read the other comments/links on that thread]}.

Privacy isn't the only problem when it comes to such exchanges ^{[e.g. not having full control over your funds and few other things...]}.

Have you tried Phoenix? I'm not one of its users but based on some of the "discussions", it appears to tick all the boxes ^{[for the most part]}.

Not sure if you're the one who published "this" article ^{[because of its date]} or you were simply inspired by that article, but regardless of the answer, make sure to always include the source ^{[you might want to edit your post and add the source in question]}!
^{- It's not direct plagiarism, but still...}

---

But we're not dealing with a normal pool here. They chose to stay under the radar from the beginning and they kept it until the very last days of their operations.

The only thing that I could find about them was this:

• Quote from: https://news.8btc.com/china-based-lubian-com-boasts-the-largest-compliant-bitcoin-mining-farm-in-iran
  Said Liu Ping, one of the cofounders of Lubian.com, their group cooperates with a local private power plant, whose investors are Chinese and Iranians, the plant generates electricity by burning waste and energy.
  ~Snipped~
  Said Liu Ping, there are four partner shareholders of Lubian.com, who control all the computing power, and they never participate in any activities in the crypto space.
• For those that are interested in connecting the dots, their "address" still has a lot of BTCitcoin ^{[they might move it in the near future]}.

Based on the location of the miners ^{[Iran - most of them]} and the timing of the events, I have a strong feeling it has something to do with the new president and government in place ^{[I could be wrong]}.

Looks like you have a habit of ignoring all of the obvious signs! In case none of us were clear enough, no matter which wallet you download, you "can't sign a message with the public address" alone and since you mentioned you don't have access to the private key of that address, then there's no way for you to import it to any wallet!

• Quote from: Davidyyyyy on September 14, 2021, 08:21:42 AM
  But I not have private key . I only have public address
  

Then why on earth you're asking for multiple loans with different amounts ^{[€200 [this thread], €60 and around €475 [the one @examplens quoted]]}?

---

Read "this ^{[especially the second post]}" thread > Lock this thread ^{[lock button is in the bottom left corner of the page]} > Stop asking for different types of loans without a "valid" collateral!

That's not enough... You have to sign a message with it, in order to prove that you have the private key ^{[full control]}.
^{- Just scroll up and follow the proper format [three parts: Message, address, and signature].}

I do know we're still missing most of the details, but from what I've seen and understood, their cryptocurrency bill isn't that unique.

Unfortunately, it's a lie that they continually tell everyone so they could have a perfect excuse to regulate it.

I think what they really meant to say was: "5% of the customers that received Nano Xs"
^{- In other words, those with multiple orders and replacements were counted as one [it's not a fact, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case]!}

This problem has existed for three and a half months and they decided to post an announcement just five days ago ^[SMH] and on top of that, it took them months to come up with a so-called "sustainable resolution" while we know how much it really takes to fix or prevent the issue in question!

And yet customers aren't allowed to choose "which batch" their replacements come from!

Yeah right! So that's why some of the users have received "multiple" faulty replacement units
^{- I wonder what would've happened if they didn't "intensively test" the units that they sent out!}

I'm not a Bitcoin core user but judging by the error that you're getting, I have a strong feeling that you didn't generate the address in question, on that wallet.

Proper commands:

• dumpprivkey
• signmessage

He probably used an address from a cryptocurrency exchange ^{[custodial wallet]}.

---

@Davidyyyyy
If I was right, then there's no way for you to sign a message, but if that's not the case, then you should mention the name of the wallet in question, so we could try to find a solution ^{[if there's any]}.

In theory, it should have a positive impact on the price but not to an extent that it'd break ATH ^{[we need a chain reaction of some sort to achieve such a thing again]}...
^{- I do agree with @thecodebear's comment.}

I posted the following "prediction" back in June.

I downloaded the "PDF file" from their websites and it seems that they're selling shares in order to buy BTCitcoins ^[screenshot]. Although I don't know every single detail, it still appears to be quite risky!

They made BTCitcoin a legal tender, not cryptocurrencies as a whole and I highly doubt they could follow in BTCitcoin's footsteps anytime soon.

Internet: How many threads do you want about El Salvador accepting BTCitcoin?
TS/OP: Yes

Kakatapos ko lang irecord ito ^{[video link]}... Hindi ko sya tlga maiaccess pag normal IP yung gamit ko kaya balak ko sana subukan with a Philippines IP para mas sigurado na hindi magkakaroon ng red flag yung account ko.
- Isa sa mga issue ko is, more than 2 years na ako wala sa Pinas and wala rin akong any recent bill ^{[past 6 months]} at kung hihingan nila ako ng anything to reverify my address, wala akong maipakita sa kanila.

Nung time na umalis ako sa bansa, walang coverage yung roaming ng Globe dito kaya di ko sya niloadan yung mga huling araw at kahit na recently nagkaroon sya ng coverage dito, I doubt na active pa yung prepaid sim card ko and on top of that, kailangan mahanap ko muna sya.

Nako po! Bakit biglang nagkaroon ng yearly verification? Naghahanap pa naman ako ng mga VPNs na may Philippines IP para lang magamit ko ulit yung wallet ko at ilabas yun natira kong BTCitcoins!
^{- Level 3 verified yung account ko, so mukhang risky masyado kung subukan ko sya}

@aoluain
Why you didn't go with the bigger version ^[LCFW30100] that could provide a bit more ^[84°C] fire protection for an hour ^{[instead of 30 minutes]}?

• Don't get me wrong, I'm still not convinced that this security chest is going to be enough when "normal building fires could reach up to 1,100°C" and I just watched a video about a similar product ^{[different brand]} that after a test, the entire lock mechanism popped out and based on the last image that you've uploaded, I expect the same thing to happen since it's just connected to the plastic part and that part could easily melt in a fire.

I do like your plan to implement a 2-of-3 multi-sig setup with escrow providers, but by allowing other members to sign up as escrow providers, you're basically giving them the chance to use an alt account, a friend, or an accomplice to trick the system ^{[you might want to reconsider that part]}.

This is bound to happen at some point but IMO, it's not going to happen in its first year because of the following reason:

• A recent survey showed 2/3rd of Salvadorans either hate or have very limited knowledge about BTCitcoin and what that means is, it takes time before they would learn how to buy & transfer BTCitcoin to their loved ones in the country and until that happens, I'm pretty sure they'd stick to the traditional methods ^{[despite those disadvantages]}.

Yes, there's no dedicated column in the table, but Pmalek has listed the top 5 "highest withdrawal amounts" after the table...
^{- I believe the ones I've found would automatically replace [assuming that their FAQ pages were updated] a few from that list.}

Thank you for the links ^{[I drew a line on that part]}.

Update:
Just finished cross-checking those with the table and you're right ^{[my bad (SMH)]}.

Update 2:
Thank you as well for the changes ^{[it's much more clearer now]} and you did the right thing to check everything with new accounts ^{[I suspected some of them might've been outdated as well]}.

As someone that just used google translator to see what those lines exactly meant in the stickers, I didn't like the ones used in Starbucks and Pizza Hut ^{[it translates to "EXCLUSIVE BOX OF bitcoin", which is weird]} while the way McDonald's did ^{[it translates to "NOW you can pay with BITCOINS at McDonald's"]}, made more sense.

- Does anybody know what the line below the mobile icon says in the McDonald's ad ^{[this is the "clearest" one that I could find, but I can't still read all of the letters]}?

Wow, you're right... That was surprisingly smooth ^{[Strike, please expand to more countries ]}!