Its unlikely though. Most boxers which change their style on a rematch or make the adjustments to get the edge are somewhat skilled in the art of boxing. Wilder isn't much of a boxer, he's more a brawler, and relies on that right hand, which to be fair to him up until he came up against Fury, and even to a certain extent during the Fury fight has worked for him.

So, I'm not trying to say Wilder doesn't deserve to be in that ring, but I can't see him making drastic changes with a little over a year to do it in. Especially, since he lacks some of the fundamentals of boxing anyway. He will likely be counting on that big right hand of his again, and who knows Fury might get caught again. In the second fight, Fury didn't give him much time at all to wait for that perfect moment. Instead, he put him on the back foot, and quite frankly was boxing his head off. I don't think Wilder will come up with a solution to that, other than what he's been doing to his other opponents for a while; using that big ol' right hand of his to knock them on their arse.

Yeah, but the question is can "digital currency wallets" be hacked; which the simple answer would be; yes. However, you are quite right that there are factors to be considered when you are looking at an individuals wallet, how they secure it, how they use it, how often they use it, what medium is it stored on, do others have access to the computer, how secure is your password, and a bunch of other variables that I won't even get into to.

However, the simple answer is that given the right information or access a wallet that stores your Bitcoin could potentially be compromised, and therefore you should try every mitigating factor that is feasible to you to try, and prevent that.

In these instances given though, its not down to the software. Its down to how the user is using the software. So, how secure the user has made their password, how they intend to remember that password, i.e do they store it on paper, where do they store that paper, and does anyone else know that they use that password. In terms of physical access, that is another flaw in the persons security rather than the software itself. Same goes for the storage of the seed phrase, and wallet files. Although, definitely I'm not claiming that the software cannot be compromised, but the listed reasons would be down to the fault of the person, rather than the software used. Which would likely be the weakest part of anyone's security, the person as with most other things.

Have you ever considered using a bot to purchase, and sell at certain points. I'm not aware of many to be honest, but I know that Gunbot was a popular one back in the day. Basically, it allows all sorts of ways to invest, but at the very basic level you could set a buy price, and then a sell price. So, it would then do this automatically, even when you sleep which would remove any kind of emotion.

The only thing is; you would have to purchase Gunbot, and then you would have to find a hosting solution to be able to host it 24/7.

I haven't looked at LocalBitcoins in a while, but I was under the impression that you could choose to not use their built in escrow services, and contact your own if you wanted too?

I haven't used it in a few years, but I'm sure that was possible when I used it. Seems a bit odd that they would remove that feature, you know to promote being decentralized, and all that. I guess its less liability of their hands, if someone selects a untrustworthy escrow.

I'll be honest, if anyone wants to sponsor me to do expeditions, and carry your company flag around that would be my favorite way of earning Bitcoin. However, at the moment I treat Bitcoin as any other currency I would accept. My favorite way of earning full stop is when I'm proud of the work I'm doing, and hopefully it's allowed some creative freedom while doing that.

I actually quite enjoy getting paid for the moderation work I do here too. I love the forum, and I love contributing to the forum via helping out, and getting paid for it is the cherry on top. Lets not ignore signature campaigns either, I'm sure a lot of users, myself included appreciate that our posts are deemed substantial enough to earn money with them.

If you have the means necessary, and the budget. Mining is actually super rewarding. You get to tinker about with the system, and try optimize it as best as you can to earn as much as you can. Its pretty addicting if your a nerd like me, and like to keep the temperature at an acceptable level.

I said a while back that I would need to look at the team sheet before making a bet, but I believe Fred the main culprit I thought that was detrimental to that Manchester United team picked up an injury at the end of the last game I do believe. So, I'm actually a little bit more confident that United take this home. I just thought that Fred breaks up their fluid play, and against Liverpool he actually contributed more to the Liverpool attack than he did for any part of the game for United.

Completely disagree with this. Manchester United will want silverware to boast about, and not only that silverware directly translates to more money. The more money the club generates the more likely they are to part with their money for players, and wages. Plus, as someone who has played at a relatively low level I still wanted to win every game regardless. They definitely won't be treating this as a friendly, and the players certainly won't. Its their legacy at the end of the day, and there's only a few games left of the season.

When you step in the ring with someone like Wilder they always have a chance. Wilder probably still does have one of the biggest punches in boxing. Fury has got caught more than once with it, and of course the famous one, it was pretty damn close to being counted out. I think personally Fury will come in the same fashion as last time, put Wilder on the back foot, and as we saw last time Wilder doesn't really know how to fight while he is backpedaling.

For Wilder to have anything more than a chance of a big punch, he would have had to work on his jab, managing the distance better, working on fighting off the back foot, and moving his head more. I don't see him working on all of that in around a year, considering he had an injury which was originally the reason for moving the fight back.

Barrios to win via decision. He's got a tremendous height advantage, and also has the reach advantage by quite a significant margin. So, Davis is known for his knockout power, but Barrios has such the height advantage he should find it easier to keep the distance, and away from the power shots. I can see Davis having some success with uppercuts if he were to close the distance, but my gut is telling me Barrios will fight a smart fight, keep the distance, and utilize that jab of his.

From my interpretation, and understanding of Reddit's up voting system is its to up vote things that you believe deserve more visibility. Remember, that Reddit isn't by default sorted in chronological order, and while it can be filtered by new, most sub reddits are defaulted to "hot". Thus, whatever you upvote has more chance of being seen by others.

Merit isn't comparable since merit is less prone to abuse, doesn't effect visibility (you could argue that merit posts stand out slightly more, but it still doesn't effect the order of things), and is given to reward those for making substantial posts.

Reddit's system is therefore not even comparable. Remember, that anyone can upvote including those that just signed up. So, theoretically you could inflate upvotes or downvotes simply by creating an account farm. Here on Bitcointalk the merits are limited, and by design less merit per merit sent. Of course, we have merit sources which keep injecting a certain amount of merit each month based on theymos' calculations, but normal users are receiving half of a merit for every one merit they receive. 

Well, in some ways banks have already achieved digital currency. The number in your bank account, doesn't directly correlate to gold being sent physically every time you issue a transaction. So, we are already approaching that digital world, where cash is becoming less, and less relevant. However, they haven't delved in Cryptocurrencies or at least their "own" digital currency as of yet. I'm not sure if they would be able to pull that off, as there would need to be some sort of benefit to it, and I suspect that this would attract a lot of tension between the governments, and the banks. Banks already have a massive amount of control with traditional currencies, and the governments can find out exactly how much you've got. So, at the moment we are already at that dangerous level of them having complete control of your money.

Bitcoin was created to allow you to take back that control. However, the scalability is the issue. My thoughts are that we will likely see either a sidechain or a complete alternative to Bitcoin to solve this. Bitcoin would then be seen as the foundation or building steps rather that the solution to the problem. I'm not quite sure which is more likely at this point, but there will definitely be change towards making either Bitcoin or cryptocurrency more viable in terms of scalability. We've already seen half solutions to the issue.

Ah right, I see. Yeah, so usually this is done at proof of funds or to prove that you have escrowed an amount. If you are using an escrow, then they will usually sign the address which is holding the funds to let both parties know that they are basically in control, and therefore the trade can proceed. Unless your escrowing, you'll only need to sign a message as proof of funds, as some times people require this if an escrow isn't being used, and they intend to go first. Really though, normal usage you should be using an escrow whenever possible, and the need for you to sign a message isn't very frequent at all.

If you are trading, then signing a message isn't needed, unless you are doing peer to peer trading, and they require proof of funds.

I guess this depends on your definition of trading. Since, technically waiting a long time period trades is still trading. Frequent trading usually takes a little bit more skill in anticipating what news could effect the market, but generally if you believe in Bitcoin in the long run, you could simply invest, and then take out a certain amount, once your target threshold has been hit.

Somewhat natural. There's only a limited amount of users, and depending on the sections you visit, that'll be concentrated ten fold. Unless, you yourself visit a lot of sections on the forum, I would accept most merit sources merit to be concentrated to one or two sections. This is likely some of the criteria considered when Theymos allocated merit sources.

For example, you'll see this habit a lot more in local sections where the user base is much lower than other sections. Its not necessarily a bad thing.  

Levy is likely to out price most clubs, and I think I would even include Real Madrid in that. The only club I see that would be willing to outbid most other clubs, and actually need a striker is Man City. Aguero recently signed a contract again didn't he? I'm sure I read that, but even if he did hes an injury prone player, and age is only going to make that worse if anything. So, Man City ideally need a top striker, and I'm not convinced that Gabriel is that man.

I do think the best fitting club would likely be Man Utd, I can't really put my finger on why since Man Utd have a rather quick attack right now with the likes of Martial, and Rashford, but I can imagine Kane in a Man Utd shirt. If it was down to Kane, I think he would choose Man Utd over anyone in the Premier League.

I don't think Real Madrid suits Kane, and if I was Kane I would look at the recent movements from England to Spain, and consider whether or not he would be a vital part of that success. It seems players like Gareth Bale, Coutinho who were doing fantastic in the Premier League at the time, moved to Spain, and also become a part of the background. Hazard is another example, but that is mainly through injury.

I'm much rather Mayweather get KO'd by Logan just because of the amount of press it would get, and ultimately it would be hilarious. Imagine it, the self proclaimed GOAT, and a lot of fans sort of echoing that getting knocked out by a predominately Youtube entertainer, who has previously got beaten, and drew with a Youtuber who is most famous for playing video games.

It would be absolutely hilarious. Although, I have been quite open in stating that the chances of that are completely minimal. I'm not even sure I would want to see Logan get knocked out, I would prefer if it went the distance if Mayweather were to win.

I'm not sure, Conor can still beat the best of them. I think in the recent Poirer fight he actually caught him a couple of nicely, and gave him a buzz. The thing is everyone knows if you weather the storm Conor is going to be gassed. He's talked about working on his fitness, but I haven't seen any massive improvements in that regard.

If he stays in 155 or moves up like he has done, I think we will see him pick up a few wins here, and there, but nothing like the earlier domination simply because hes a risky type fighter, and the top guys know how to keep out of danger with him. At least to some extent.

I like to think of this forum as a sort of safe haven to discussion about anything related to cryptocurrencies. Where freedom of speech is usually much better than alternatives, doesn't have a broken popularity voting system, and doesn't have over zealous rules. Plus, is probably one of the only places which actually promotes substantial discussion, rather than the social media type replies the modern world is going towards.

Also, how nice is it to have a place which isn't littered with memes? Don't get me wrong, I enjoy a meme or a funny image from time to time, however constantly recycled memes are tedious, and just destroys actual discussion.

Exactly, and this is my biggest issue with Reddit. Reddit can be fantastic to read sometimes, but its so easily manipulated, you wouldn't want to read topics which are particularly sensitive or important, due to the fact that anyone with a motive could easily impose their views on it, simply by creating a massive farm of accounts to down vote content they disagree with.

If you are into politics, which I'll be honest I don't tend to stop by the politic sub reddit, its likely full of this sort of behaviour.

Negative statements only really influence those that were influenced to get into Bitcoin in the first place. Call them sheep, call them what ever you want. However, they likely aren't buying into Bitcoin to use it as a currency or a way of supporting the technology that Bitcoin has implemented. They wanted to make money, and the first time there's any resistance to that vision, they'll sell. 

This is then countered by those that are looking to invest, with a optimistic view point for the long term. So, really these statements only effect things in the short term, but really most investors should be looking at the long term, and not a get rich quick scheme.

Not sure I would agree with the clear price manipulation. Although, there was definitely people out there that were influenced by some statements  from others in the space, which definitely caused many people to panic. My interpretation is; those that have invested based on the public shifting in favour of cryptocurrencies likely bailed, once a few individuals, and companies turn towards a more hostile outlook (if we can actually call it that, but in their perception they likely saw it as that) the act of these panic selling drove the price down, but this was the perfect opportunity for those that have standing orders, and those that leaped at the opportunity to grab more Bitcoin for less, which resulted in another turn in the tide, and increased the value.

Developing countries aren't likely to benefit from the features implemented in Cryptocurrencies directly. Instead, due to the nature of cryptocurrencies, and the frequent swings within what most would consider a very volatile market, it creates investment opportunities which could potentially land an investor a significant amount of profit. If you were a citizen in a developing country, and you invest only $10 worth back in 2010, you would be absolutely swimming in it now if you held on this long. That's what developing countries, or more specifically their citizens can benefit from cryptocurrencies.