|
1841
|
Other / Meta / Re: Typical Spammerisms
|
on: June 25, 2019, 07:22:20 AM
|
People like you guys wont understand the struggle of those who arent native speaker like me,english was never the basis of your knowledge and ability.Dont give me the crap that this is english forum,try to join to spanish forum and try to communicate.
When have we not welcomed someone to the Spanish board? Edit: I've been through your posts, and there are 0 made at spanish board; so how on earth is that relevant to anything? Most of your posts are on Meta/Reputation and you got involved in DT drama. |
|
|
|
|
1842
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 07:14:30 AM
|
Suchmoon suggested another approach though If you are reffering to this: Then send the remaining 0.027 and stop clowning around. I don't think suchmoon believes that's actually gonna happen, and I get the feeling she was being facetious. If you haven't sent ArmandoComellas' funds back to him yet I think it's about time you do. Nope, I think I told you on a PM too; but he suggested something similar to your PM Are we seriously advocating for Csmiami to just steal his money? Say someone buys something from me, and sends me the shipping fee upfront and agrees to pay the rest after they receive the item. Before it's shipped, the buyer realized that they can't actually afford the item for some reason and need to spend their coins on living expenses or whatever. Am I then allowed to keep the shipping fee?
A deal was made, and ArmandoComellas backs out. Csmiami is not damaged by the action of returning their funds. (minus tx fees)
It was not my intention to keep the funds (at least for more than a couple of days). At first I was just really amazed by the whole situation, how absurd everything seemed post after post, repeating the 0.03 for 0.015 each time. It was quite a good way to gain insight on how these people work; because the moment he smelt he could get some blood (or money), he got so focused on it he just didn't really read the posts of his own thread. There could be an argument made to scam a scammer to repay the person they scammed, but as of right now ArmandoComellas has not scammed anyone, and while you could argue that they were likely to scam, thought crimes aren't reasons to steal money. That kind of reminds me of this |
|
|
|
|
1843
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 01:48:05 AM
|
LOL! @ArmandoComellas, You just won "The most entertaining fuckstick on bitcointalk today" award. You win absolutely nothing. Don't spend it all in one place.
Hey Csmiami, maybe you should donate the 0.003BTC to Known Alts And Part Time Extortion thread.
I was thinking about donating it to Sea Shepherd (I have some personal thing for them), but helping the forum may work too. Suchmoon suggested another approach though |
|
|
|
|
1847
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 12:47:54 AM
|
Oh shit i put 0.00300000 well man send it back to me please!
FFS what a clown... Did you really think Csmiami won't notice the extra 0?  That was kind of the point of this "sociologic experiment on forum scammers"
It was my bad i didnt see that extra 0 (0.003) i dont have the bad intentions as your thoughts coming
Nope, you were the one saying 0.03 on the first place; I did only repeat it several times for you to correct me, or in case you didn't, realize that you really meant 0.03 for 0.015 |
|
|
|
|
1848
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 12:42:05 AM
|
Oh shit i put 0.00300000 well man send it back to me please! So you suddenly want to get out of a deal that has been made in public and quoting the ammount of BTC several times? What if now I don't feel like it and want you to maintain your end of the deal? If you dont want to maintain the deal just send me back that 0.003 BTC Ou, but I do indeed feel like maintaining it, so as it has been stated here, you still have to send 0.027BTC before I release your 0.015BTC loan |
|
|
|
|
1852
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 12:26:20 AM
|
You dont know so thats why after 1 hour of you made the investment i will give you the first 0.03 to create the confidence that you need to trust me.
Thank you guys and im here to help, help each other and start believing in people, Peer to peer
If you send the 0,03 first to any of my addresses, I'll gladly give you a loan of 0,015 within the hour  Done, give me your hash!! 0,03BTC to be sent to 14GmTrt1j33Nex17BExoP3Ejz2dpgeiQMy and I will send 0,015BTC as a loan Hello Friend!! the transaction is done, here is the hash in the blockchain My hash is 388hFGeoMBFtUr4njtpEiNgUBVsTexUGge Not receiving the 0,03BTC for a 0,015BTC loan  You didn't post any valid transaction id |
|
|
|
|
1853
|
Economy / Lending / Re: INVESTMENT NEED CAPITAL BECASUE THE BANKSTERS DEALYED MY PAYMENT
|
on: June 25, 2019, 12:14:53 AM
|
You dont know so thats why after 1 hour of you made the investment i will give you the first 0.03 to create the confidence that you need to trust me.
Thank you guys and im here to help, help each other and start believing in people, Peer to peer
If you send the 0,03 first to any of my addresses, I'll gladly give you a loan of 0,015 within the hour Done, give me your hash!! 0,03BTC to be sent to 14GmTrt1j33Nex17BExoP3Ejz2dpgeiQMy and I will send 0,015BTC as a loan |
|
|
|
|
1854
|
Other / Meta / Re: Altcoin paywall
|
on: June 24, 2019, 06:52:11 PM
|
If it was not a Profit driven site, then their would be No ADs. Quoted from another forum I'm a member of Hi, as with many things the saying: "Fast, Good or Cheap. Pick two." applies to hosting.
Ad revenue is not for profit, but rather a need |
|
|
|
|
1855
|
Other / Archival / Re: This is my BTC, Bitcointalk story, what is yours?
|
on: June 24, 2019, 06:42:21 PM
|
I had a problem myself to choose a proper section for this thread. I thought about reputation but found a similar thread in meta some time ago and that is why decided to post it here.
My story is about Bitcointalk and BTC, so it can fit into both of these sections meta and bitcoin discussion.
I will leave it to moderators.
I think you are refering to this thread. I don't mean to sound harsh, but this looks like what has been discussed around in some threads: merit fishing. I'm glad BTC saved you though  |
|
|
|
|
1857
|
Economy / Lending / Re: Need 0.045 btc loan.
|
on: June 24, 2019, 04:58:29 PM
|
|
Thanks for the update on PM about your collateral I guess.
I have been checking, and you want to use those tokens. Let's do the math:
AXU/XLM currently at 0.0089979
XLM/BTC currently at 0.0000116
So 150,000 * 0.0089979 * 0.0000116 =0.015656346BTC
0.015656346BTC is very far away from the 120% value most lendors ask in this board (0.45*1.2=0.54BTC) So I don't think this is valid collateral
|
|
|
|
|
1858
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: June 24, 2019, 04:35:12 PM
|
address- 1CmowaXpbzWGHrmzxYo46bhSd2m6UbpWgu message- Hello! SwayStar123 again, this address' private key mightve been compromised so im gonna stake another address here. This is the address- 13kjvGbGXW4x2ctyuNE8gskMKFoRn5tge7 signature- IJPh3PWSdsHsH0pBYOXT+z4ZwHODaniTuVTUcIawAd9RY4royHhVVVDMxTAfv518ei686K0iM+8KuGz7jBQ062U= new wallet- address- 13kjvGbGXW4x2ctyuNE8gskMKFoRn5tge7 message- Hello SwayStar123 here! My previous wallet mightve been compromised so gonna stake with a new address.
Previous address- 1CmowaXpbzWGHrmzxYo46bhSd2m6UbpWgu signature- IMJf7lHVWp4HfO0wn4JltZhTT1+Soy7SDoGpjo/roGeyBXCN+TG8wW1zMZXCCmGBPRJ7dWRfZ9I0azwGA4ryfWc= Verified on Trezor; but message appears to be in binary? |
|
|
|
|
1860
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stop shameless bumps if you have nothing new to say
|
on: June 24, 2019, 03:38:00 PM
|
Personally I'm against necro-bumping when there is nothing relevant to say.
Fortunately, mods can sometimes delete the bump (and thus the visibility of the tread) if it is listed as off-topic. One of the greatest achievements of the merit sistem is that it stopped these gruesome people from posting in 2013 threads just to gain activity "because I have the right to post"
I hope those were the kind of bumps you were complanining about (and now you know you can report them) My issue is that there aren't any defined/strict rulesets to depict how long a thread has to be inactive in order for a bump to be considered a necrobump. Personally, I've encountered some barely-substantial posts bumping threads that have been inactive for a few months. I believe some of them were left there while others were deleted. The issue is, though, that it starts up a new wave of spam with old posts (some from over a year ago) being quoted and answered as if they were being asked now. Example: "price reaching $X" post from 2015 being responded to now. Yup, those are exactly the ones I mean. A thread a few months old maybe still be relevant; but an inactive thread from 3/4/... years ago is hardly relevant now (or you can be hardly relevant to it) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
(Imgur seems to not pass the proxy??)
