--

Se que no tiene mucho que ver con el planteamiento de realizar transacciones ahora, como plantes; pero crees que habría/existe algún indicador para "adivinar" cuando pueden llegar estos momentos de poco volumen tomando el Mempool de un nodo de core en ese momento? O son cosas independientes?

Yeah; you may have to wait a couple of hours; because the internet out here works rather un-steadily

Once again; sent. I'll be out for some weeks but will still check this for repayment

He explained that here

I quote your reply because it's the first one; but I think my point has been misunderstood or maybe I didn't explain in an ordered way. I'm not saying that people should be judge by their post quality; but rather for their actions. I know there are threads I don't understand, with good replies that make no sense to me, but nevertheless, they are useful for other people. Of course content is updated; this is a forum after all, so that's why I think I've not explained myself pretty well.

---

I'm aware; and have some users there. But me not liking how someone writes/feeling it's complete BS, is not the point of the suggestion

---

That's actually quite the opposite of what I'm proposing. I'm in favour of freedom of speech; but I think that there has to be some limit to it; one of the most current/modern fascist argument is actually freedom of speech. They claim to have the right to spread hate and other stuff; but that's not actually freedom of speech. I recall some paradox on the topic....

---

This would be some kind of "extreme resource"; not just throwing accusations and requesting to ban a user because of a different oppinion. As with everything, a system can be good, but if abused; it can be the worst thing ever created. Since the DT uptade I consider most DT users I've seen active to be quite sensible and fair; and that's why I put a "high" number of said users as "judges". Besides; that's wxactly why it's a suggestion. I had an idea, I thought it could be a good system if used with responsibility; and now I share that thought. Life would be just boring if everyone agreed, so I don't think people would be elegible for a "ban-hearing" just because of a different approach to a topic.

---

First line and you are already insulting to prove your point. Surprinsingly, I happen to agree with the second part of the sentence: what is not useful for me can be to someone else; but that was not the point of my OP. 


I've had to check this one; I have not participated in a Sig Camp since the Waves campaign, which was 2 years ago! I also haven't applied to any other sig camp since said time aprox.


I believe that current DT (updated a month and something ago) combined with merit system does actually have a "must be correct benchmark" function. People are trusted for a reason, or at least where I come from, trust is something you earn.


Please, point me a single trust I've sent as retaliation


Neutral trust can in fact be used for other kind of "alerts"

We can even have a cup of tea in Trafalgar Square and the answer would still be no way

As we all may be aware of, there are certains accounts in the forum that are.... a huge pain in the ass (to say the least). To bring an example, the recent "situation" with game-protect (flag thread here, and negative trust retaliation here).

To simplify this; a well know spammer/"almost scammer" has received a flag, and made some negative trust retaliation; which is quite useless, but has also been spamming threads created by people supporting the flag. Mods have deleted most/all of the spam replies, but that doesn't feel like enough (for many).

Now, this is a recent example, in which I got a bit caught, but there are many other cases out there (personally, I'd add The-One-Above-All to the list; who is on many peoples' ignore list as an example, because of his constant useless replies), and I'm sure a longer list could be created, but I don't think it's neccessary for this.

After giving it some thought; I believe I've reached something that could be considered a solution: the same way some global moderators/admins can perma-ban users for X reasons; there could be a system to vote on some users that despite not being actually breaking rule forums enough to be perma-banned (example of GP getting posts deleted and nothing else), they are well known to be some kind of "cancer" (maybe the word is too hard, but it's late night and I cannot come up with something better) and in case some kind of agreement is reached; said user could get perma-banned. I'll further explain:

---

Say I've been posting shit for the last year and scamming people and doing some nasty stuff, enough to have my account veeery very red painted; but as I would technically not have broken any forum rule, I'd still be able to do the nasty stuff here.

But, the nasty stuff I've been doing is so nasty; that at least 30 DT1 people would support my perma-ban (some more thought has to be given to this, since DT2 and non-DT users should also have a saying). Then; like with the flag system, someone could create a thread saying: "Let's perma-ban Csmiami/ Csmiami should be expelled from the forum" or something similar.

In the thread, similar to flag system, all the adecuate information on why that should happen should be provided. Since it's some serious thing, the user in question would receive an email/PM notification, in order to be able to defend his stay on the forum. And on the trust/somewhere over the user profile page; a little window to provide your vote.

I have not said 30 DT1 members randomly before; I consider it something difficult that 30 people agree on something; judging by how responsible some/most of those members are. But, since it's just a rough idea, that could be modified.

---

Believing I've writen everything that came to my mind; I'll edit if I can think of something more

If I recall correctly; you did indeed encourage us to support the flag


It's quite hard for me to understand why you are so mad about that now; but whatever

---

---

Alexa, play Hammer to fall - Queen

On the lower left side of your screen you should see 2 options: move topic and lock topic.

You click on "move topic", and from there you can choose to which board you want to move it

In this case, it would be https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0 aka Reputation

WOW! I thought that faucets nowadays were on the edge and were no longer profitable; but at least they do give some more then 1 satoshi


That's near 0.0001$/video! Can't believe people are doing such a tedious task for that joke of an ammount....

But thanks to email notifications.... I'd have loved to see how it was explained, but at least we know what he wanted

I know I sometimes take a bit of a draconian approach to some posts (not neccesarily newbies), but that does mean not that it's an irrational judgement, as you say. In my case, it comes from my own past with the forum: I came here for the money; but stayed for the technology. During that time of mine where I was only interested in making some quick cash (I believe my first 3/7 pages on post history), but as time has gone on, I have even been embarrased because of that (not that it matters, since it's the past. I have seen what people doing stuff just for money make to the forum, mostly because I've been there, done that.

Yes, I did check the post history, and BPIP; and I saw an old account, that woke up un February 2019, and has ever since made 4 posts. Half of those, are on a thread on how to earn merit; which in my oppinion, if the user had browsed the forum and read the stickies, s/he would know how activity and merit system work. There could still be some doubt though; as with the activity update periods (took me a long while to understand them) or any other stuff, but asking "How can I get Merit?" looks like a very poor interest on the forum itself (ignoring stickies).

I see your point, I and I agree with it; there is a long road between welcoming newbies and paving the way for spammers.



Agreed, I rarely surf B&H section; and when I see a thread with a title being so obvious and with an answer that has been said thousands of times; I simply ignore it (maybe not the best course of action, but people please do a bit of research). I was just surprised to see this question in meta, and I guess I snapped a bit. This time it was me; but it could've been another user.

Or his/her post quality is low because s/he is interested in bounty campaigns, giveaways and other shitcoin related stuff, and is now aware that some rank is required for most of those.

There are only 4 posts, so it's hard to tell, but again, having only 4 posts after a year, shows that little interest has been put into the forum. In that case, you would be right: the person is a complete newbie

Si fuese en una zona (más) transitada; tal vez, pero estamos hablando de que lo han colocado en la primera planta de un centro comercial en el que han cerrado un wok, tiendas de chinos e incluso un burger king! Lo único "atractivo" en esa planta además, es un New Yorker...... y una especie de gimnasio de artes marciales que han abierto hace no mucho; por lo demás, toda la planta está cerrada.

Al final a golpe de pantallazo--Paint, se ve que quedan de tamaño reducido. Lo malo es que de espacio, son algo más grandes

If you bothered to read the site...

Negativo; si le das a "quote", verás que los BBcode de las imágenes llevan la extensión .jpg

El foro introdujo hace no mucho una limitación de creo que 2 MB en archivos de imagen, por lo que cualquier cosa superior a eso no pasa el proxy

Yeah, I'm aware I was only kidding with a bit of Human Rights drama. The only hardware that it's sole porpuse is to be used for the forum would be the server; in case theymos has one at home/bunker/safe location. I don't think anyone buys a phone/desktop/laptop just to access BTT, so we are going a bit off-topic if we start taking into account the electricity/carbon fingerprint (I believe it's said that way in English?) that users spend while accessing the forum

And all the pollution and child labor that goes in the mines where the main metals of which batteries and motherboards are extracted (and made) from