He is being non-cooperative,in fact I haven't heard from him in quite some time...

(sorry for explaining myself so badly)

You get a FREE Golden Ticket with your winnings every time you wager or bet a total of 500,000 satoshi (0.00500000 BTC).

or

Scroll down to buy a Golden Ticket for 25,000 satoshi (0.00025000 BTC). You can collect multiple tickets for a higher chance of winning.

Y en tan solo 5 días se ha pasado de 10.000 a 13.500.  (más bien en 24 horas ha subido 2.000, pero bue)

Qs did i, but nor for payment involved stuff

Message verified to be from 1FRuP1rCCfGbFjQTXezWGN3AvBTW5xBet8

They did have some liquidity problems on Clam when it's price fell, and BTC lenders paid the price (a 12% of their balance was deducted). But it seemed like everything had been solved and they were returning the funds to their users. This action you are talking about is rather quite strange

There are many charities that have some dishonest management, usually the ones receiving more donations, but luckily, there are still some that really work. Many friends of mine have gone as volunteers to European refugee camps, and there was a huge difference between (say)Red Cross, and a charity few people knew about. The first ones were there for the pictures, the latter were there to work.

Charities need to have good marketing teams, because if there is no money, they can do nothing (even if they do little to start with). Now, there are some very different ways of doing such marketing. I am a volunteer on NGO Sea Shepherd Global, because I like how they handle things. Said marketing is one of the things I liked most; they don't ambush you in the middle of the street for you to sign some petition or donate money; they go with their fleet to wherever they need to go, and document everything. Then, those documented things are what they show the people as a "proof" of their work (many of us have seen the Whale Wars on Discovery).

In conclusion, (not on my personal example anymore) charities do need to ask for funds, because if they did wait for people to donate out of the blue, there would be no donation. Instead, they ask you to donate so that they can do X, Y and/or Z. Transparency of the donations is the key here; to see that what you have donated does indeed something more than paying a 5 star hotel next to a refugee camp

And if you have a legendary account, why are you posting from a Brand new one?

Peeeero para poder hacer eso, primero tienen que quitarte el ban. De hacerlo de otra forma, estas incumpliendo las normas del foro.

Tal vez la razón no está ligada, pero las cuentas están ligadas entre si. Un ban se aplica sobre una persona, no una cuenta

Creo que la norma es lo suficientemente clara como para evitar interpretaciones erroneas

Talk about the devil...



Because you don't abuse your users with never solved support tickets and stuck withdrawals....

Cuidado con esto, podria jugar en tu contra si tu cuenta original está baneada en lugar de bloqueada, publicar fuera de Meta, y solamente en un hilo creado para discutir el ban se considera una evasión del ban, y de ser ese el caso, podrias no llegar a recuperar la cuenta en la vida

Edit: tras mirar tu perfil, hay 3 post fuera de ese criterio de Meta y Ban-appeal; no se como se va a desarrollar la cosa, pero creo que pinta fea....

Unless the first topics and boards are reserved for staff. For example:

The traschan (2, 3, 4, and some more too)

Well, yes but no. Once I sent the 0.0027 I left my phone unattended (as I was with other people) and didn't check the forum until I was back home. I had no actual chance of responding before the reds were sent, I was simply sent negative feedback without any previous discussion about it (I'm not saying this is something that must be done, but in this particular case, I could have been done). So of course, when I got back and saw how things were looking, I "rushed" to right everything before it was too late

(this answer applies to the feedback Darkstar has just left I believe)

True, I took this one personally, since he had previously spammed my thread and was creating quite a lot of threads to ask for a loan. But I also believe this is the first time I take it personally on the forum with anyone

Yeah, no hard feelings. As I have just posted on your thread, it was more the shock of opening the forum and seeing a double red+flag for a few satoshis. Honestly, I think I'd have acted in quite a similar way.

The only thing I might disagree on, is the way the situation was escalated to the trust discussion, before I was consulted/had given any actual response to the situation

First of all I thank Darkstar_ for mentioning this thread, since I didn't even think it would have reached the Reputation board so fast. DireWolf should have a PM coming from me because of that same reason, I first wanted to talk to him and Darkstar about the feedback and then move it to the reputation board if I was not satisfied (less people involved, means less mess).

I didn't answer the original thread right away since I was having some drinks with some friends when everything was going on. I admit my actions may not have been the best ones, but at no moment did I think this would go this far; as I have stated a couple of times. I did repeat the stupid offer of "0.03 for 0.015" on each message on porpuse (and with smileys), trying to make the OP realize what a stupid situation he was offering. That did not happen, and I was actually sent some funds. At first I took that as something funny, but after giving it some thought, I realized how quickly and badly the situation could scalate, so I PM'd bot suchmoon and DireWolf (both had been active on the thread) to ask for some advice.

The first one to reply was suchmoon with this:


It did not sound bad at the time to hold for some days to the funds to make the "likely scammer" sweat a bit. Direwolf replied quite similarly, and since it was almost 4 am, I went to sleep.

In the morning, I gave the situation some more thought, a fresher view, and posted on my local board about the situation . Then, seeing that the original thread was turning rather dark for me, I decided to get rid of the funds ASAP. That's were I made the mistake of mentally calculating satoshis while having a few beers.

Now, I arrive home, do some stuff, open BTT, and realize I have a double neg, and that the situation at the original thread has scalated faster and worse than expected. The moment I saw the situation.... well, you can all read the original thread. I did totally panic, but luckily it was just a few satoshi "problem"

I don't usually interact with newbies asking for a no collateral loan more than to leave some red trust, but as this particular one had been spamming my personal lending thread, and had created several other threads to ask for money (giving a different version on each), I had kind of some personal hard feeling against him, which I exploited on the first opportunity that showed up

---

You may be right at me not handling the situation the best way, but I think I've made pretty clear that I wanted to have nothing to do with those funds, since I considered them quite a hot potato. The only thing Darkstar and Direwolf have triggered was an almost heart attack on me when I opent the forum

Hmmmm, even I do agree with that.

I didn't actually see that thread and that's why I PM'd Direwolf (to prevent more people getting involved). Thanks for pointing that out

Then I think I can relax a bit... strange though that it hasn't showed up until now. I'd PM'd Direwolf about the neg before seeing the flag, I don't think something odd will come out of this, but I guess I should also talk to Steamtyme to remove the flag


I guess there is some truth to that... I paid the price for trolling a newbie/"likely scammer"

---

Where did this just go to?

Welp, life has turned out to be a bitch, and "The minimum withdrawal amount is 0.00030000 BTC". Looks like he is going to get some BTCBTC after all from all this idiotic thread (maybe not getting at all, but I am paying double fees)

---

Alright, this is now getting out of hand. I think I have explained the situation the best way I could and that everything has been sorted out, but creating a flag now seems a bit overkill to me ATM...

Glad to see we still think the same way for some stuff....

I'm going to just publish it to prevent a second error... If in the first withdrawal I sent 0.0027, on this one I'll be sending 0.0003-0.00003366 on fees; 0.00026634BTC, right?



I suggest you lock this thread as soon as the transaction is sent.

Responding to A, I used the word "nervous" because I couldn't find another one close to "ser un plasta" in english. But he believed the tokens could be sold overnight, so that is the main reason he sent so many PMs

And with B, that's kind of confusing... At first, we decided he was going to create a Yobit code so that I had the coins in my account, and from there I could do whatever I wanted with them. Once we realized that could not be done, the decition we took was to sell the coins from his account.

Yes, I know it was a complete stupid move, but at that time, it seemed a good idea to me. But when I started to see how long it took the market to move, and that every time I tried to login I needed him to send the code, I tried to call the deal off by teaching him how to place the orders, while he refunded me the upfront payment.



Yep, poor research on my side was one of the main causes of that