MarkAz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 09:56:53 AM |
|
FWIW, I just tried using a fixed fan speed with -ttli and it solves the flapping issue I mentioned earlier. About the only downside to this is that some cards are 'wasting' power at fan speeds that are higher than they need, but really not that big a deal.
For those interested in trying it, I basically set the fan speed to a fixed 80% of max:
-tt -80
And then an a intensity target of 70c:
-ttli 70
|
|
|
|
Volodka_007
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 10:02:04 AM |
|
It works for me also. Exactly speed like genoil 21 mhs with 1080 MSI (Win 7x64, 372.54). CPU load is ok.
Previously, I used version 5.3 and MSI AF for speed control and overclocking, "timeout /t 60 setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool http://185.86.79.245:8545 -mode 1 -ethi 16 -esm 1 -tstop 89 -gser 1" on 6.1.3, after starting my fans resets to autospeed, but if I set the option -tt 0 I can`t keep track of temperatures
|
|
|
|
|
Volodka_007
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 10:20:22 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
alrami
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 10:32:57 AM |
|
I have Nvidia 2Gb card it's unable to load a DAG with dualminer v.6.0 will it's be fixed, or better to forgot about?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
ozoner99
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 11:27:33 AM |
|
Hi, is anyone else having an issue with the new versions (6.0 and 6.1) not detecting all cards for temp monitoring?
One of my rigs has 2 x 480x cards (plugged straight into 16x slots on the mainboard).
Rig is mining fine on both cards, but the temp is monitored for only one card. Both cards are detected fine in windows (10), and also in wattman (I can control them in wattman fine), and behave otherwise as you would expect, but one is refusing to show its temp in the miner.
Nothing odd in the logfile, apart from the lack of temp from GPU1 :
21:11:33:748 11e8 GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units 21:11:33:763 11e8 GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units 21:11:33:779 11e8 ETH - Total Speed: 50.334 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01 21:11:33:779 11e8 ETH: GPU0 25.477 Mh/s, GPU1 24.857 Mh/s 21:11:33:779 11e8 Incorrect ETH shares: none 21:11:33:779 11e8 Pool switches: ETH - 0, SC - 0 21:11:33:779 11e8 Current ETH share target: 0x0000000556f9b3f0 (diff: 804MH), epoch #69 21:11:33:794 11e8 GPU0 t=62C fan=57%
Any ideas? (incidentally powerlimit is set low for the moment, so hashrate is a little down on normal)
I have another rig mining happily with 5 x 480's, all their temps detect fine with 6.0 and 6.1.
I have tried using -gser 2 without success.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 12:14:10 PM |
|
Hi, is anyone else having an issue with the new versions (6.0 and 6.1) not detecting all cards for temp monitoring?
One of my rigs has 2 x 480x cards (plugged straight into 16x slots on the mainboard).
Rig is mining fine on both cards, but the temp is monitored for only one card. Both cards are detected fine in windows (10), and also in wattman (I can control them in wattman fine), and behave otherwise as you would expect, but one is refusing to show its temp in the miner.
OP, "FAQ" section: - I see only one card instead of two in temperature management info. Disable CrossFire.
|
|
|
|
ozoner99
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 12:21:28 PM |
|
OP, "FAQ" section:
- I see only one card instead of two in temperature management info. Disable CrossFire.
Oh man, how embarrassing. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 01:54:13 PM |
|
Claymore
ETC + LBRY is good idea! Only one coin LBRY have profit same ETC+SIA
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
klondike_bar_recovery
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 02:43:37 PM |
|
Claymore
ETC + LBRY is good idea! Only one coin LBRY have profit same ETC+SIA
that would be great if it worked - LBRY is predominately cpu-intensive and only occupies 700MB of ram on my 1070 cards
|
|
|
|
bctopics
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 03:21:42 PM |
|
Getting 2 mh/s with my 980ti. Suggestions?
driver version 372.54
install older driver for Maxwell What driver do you recommend?
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 03:32:12 PM |
|
Getting 2 mh/s with my 980ti. Suggestions?
driver version 372.54
install older driver for Maxwell What driver do you recommend? For Win10 you need to use driver 347.52, and disable automatic driver updates in Windows 10, which is a pain.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
bctopics
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 04:13:33 PM |
|
Getting 2 mh/s with my 980ti. Suggestions?
driver version 372.54
install older driver for Maxwell What driver do you recommend? For Win10 you need to use driver 347.52, and disable automatic driver updates in Windows 10, which is a pain. Any guides on how to do this?
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 4294
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 04:52:47 PM |
|
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-us-west1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/Marvell9.57/ola_lawal@yahoo.com -allpools 1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://sia-us-west1.nanopool.org:7777 -dwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/Marvell9.57/ola_lawal@yahoo.com -dcoin sia -dcri 40 -tt 75
that's what I'm using for my 470s
the 8GB card arrived today and it gets 23mhs stock vs the 20 mhs stock on the 4 gig cards
I also installed the hotfix 16.8.2 over 7.3 and it fixed the issue with upping mem freq over 1700 , all 470s can get to 2050 mem now
Right now I upped the mem to 1750 for all cards and the 8 gig card gets to 24 mhs eth and 467 sia , all the 4 GB cards arfe 21.2 and 427 sia.
I think I could get these cards way higer with a custom bios though all in all they are decent cards with no 480s in stock
@Marvell1 how do you apply hot fix over 7.3? I first install 16.7.3-it is OK, then i try to install hotfix, it installs, but then throws Q5core.dll error if i keep 16.7.3. If i remove 16.7.3 first, then 'hotfix' installs fine. By "over", do you mean install "hotfix" in the same folder as 16.7.3, or let it choose whatever folder it chooses? Thanks
|
|
|
|
clipto
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 311
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 05:09:34 PM |
|
After trying a lot of different driver versions, we have it running with CUDA 6.5 and Miner 6.1 Geforce Driver: 350.12
ETH - Total Speed: 21.970 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:08 ETH: GPU0 12.659 Mh/s, GPU1 9.311 Mh/s SC - Total Speed: 329.548 Mh/s, Total Shares: 36, Rejected: 0 SC: GPU0 189.889 Mh/s, GPU1 139.659 Mh/s
GPU0=GTXTitanX GPU1=GTX970
----------
Current batfile is this:
ethdcrminer64.exe -epool etc-eu.suprnova.cc:3333 -ewal user.worker -epsw x -esm 3 -dpool sia.suprnova.cc:7777 -dwal worker.user -dpsw x -dcoin sia -allpools 1
We got it running at Windows 7 x64 now. GPU #0: GeForce GTX TITAN X, 12288 MB available, 24 compute units, capability: 5.2 GPU #1: GeForce GTX 970, 4096 MB available, 13 compute units, capability: 5.2 ETH - Total Speed: 34.305 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02 ETH: GPU0 15.662 Mh/s, GPU1 18.674 Mh/s Still, the GTX 970 is faster than the GTX TitanX, both in single as in dual mode? How is this possible?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 05:27:02 PM |
|
Claymore
ETC + LBRY is good idea! Only one coin LBRY have profit same ETC+SIA
I will check it, but I need to release Linux version of v6 firstly.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 06:20:48 PM |
|
Claymore
ETC + LBRY is good idea! Only one coin LBRY have profit same ETC+SIA
I will check it, but I need to release Linux version of v6 firstly. GTX TITANS AND 980TI CARDS-- For some strange reason, top-end nVidia cards do not "scale" in proportion to their compute capacity when mining Dagger-Hashimoto. I have an EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti, and it mines ETH/DCR at 22MH/s / 210MH/s, but my EVGA 970 FTW cars get 20MH/s mining ETH (with Genoil's miner). On other, more compute intensive algos, the top-end cards perform better. My 980ti is on Win 7 x64, driver 368.81. My Linux GTX 970 rig is Lubuntu 14.04, driver 347.52. GTX 1080 cards reportedly hash ETH at a less-than-predicted rate, also. --scryptr EDIT: Claymore, thank you for your work. Waiting patiently for your Linux build of v6.x. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
clipto
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 311
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 06:29:24 PM |
|
For some strange reason, top-end nVidia cards do not "scale" in proportion to their compute capacity when mining Dagger-Hashimoto. I have an EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti, and it mines ETH/DCR at 22MH/s / 210MH/s, but my EVGA 970 FTW cars get 20MH/s mining ETH (with Genoil's miner). On other, more compute intensive algos, the top-end cards perform better. My 980ti is on Win 7 x64, driver 368.81.
Thanks for clarifying, is that the best performing driver for Win 7 x64? We are now running the latest one, maybe we can get a bit higher speed with another driver?
|
|
|
|
ParkExcite
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 07:05:15 PM Last edit: August 18, 2016, 04:39:20 AM by ParkExcite |
|
Claymore on 6.1 with a nVidia card the sent hashrate on dwarfpool doesn't appear. On the 6.0 it work great.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 17, 2016, 07:14:16 PM |
|
For some strange reason, top-end nVidia cards do not "scale" in proportion to their compute capacity when mining Dagger-Hashimoto. I have an EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti, and it mines ETH/DCR at 22MH/s / 210MH/s, but my EVGA 970 FTW cars get 20MH/s mining ETH (with Genoil's miner). On other, more compute intensive algos, the top-end cards perform better. My 980ti is on Win 7 x64, driver 368.81.
Thanks for clarifying, is that the best performing driver for Win 7 x64? We are now running the latest one, maybe we can get a bit higher speed with another driver? I CHECKED YESTERDAY-- No new nVidia drivers for my Win 7 x64 system. There are newer drivers (designated with a higher number than 368.81), but not for my system. As for speed, Claymore's miner is actually faster in hash rate than Genoil's 1.1.7 by about ~1MH/s. I get just under 22MH/s , whereas Genoil's miner was mining at just over 20MH/s. My Linux-based GTX 270 cards mine at just under 20MH/s with Genoil's miner. Claymore's miner has only mined with driver 368.81 on my Win 7 system, so I can't compare perforrmance on driver versions. I was mining Library Credits (LBC) with my GTX 980ti because it can perform as well as 5 GTX 750ti cards mining LBC, about 250MH/s. And, while the GTX 750ti cards will mine at a steady 50MH/s each, the GTX 980ti card will fluctuate between 220MH/s and 250MH/s because of temperature throttling. The GTX 980ti card will start off higher than 260MH/s, but rapidly throttle down. I try to use cards on algos where they do well. With Claymore's miner, I miine ETH/DCR. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|