Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 11:13:03 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 [456] 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589902 times)
raducuc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 11, 2017, 09:50:33 PM
Last edit: April 11, 2017, 11:06:32 PM by raducuc
 #9101

hey,
thanks for having me here.
I've got an issue that I saw other people have on the ethereum forum but none of the solutions I've heard (so far) being suggested so far apply to me.

I've got a setup: windows 10 with Gigabyte 970A-DS3P, 1000W gold psu and 2x470 + 2x480 . All of them stock for now until i get this stable enough. Running all with usb raisers.
I'm using 16.9.1 because the one recommended apparently is not good for the new 4xx's, and with this I've managed to run the miner for 8-9 hours to 11 hours continuously. (using all the DDU workflow etc to make sure it's all cleaned up).
Claymore v9 with etherminer.
Temperatures are all @72-79C with fans running 35-55% on average.
The 470's run on 21-22mh/s and 480's on 24-25.5mh/s as expected from stock I believe.

It all runs well until at one point the miner hangs (as I see on etherpage, the worker is inactive). The moment I remote in, and click in the terminal, it seems to come back and realize it's been idle for at least an hour, and restarts itself. If I don't click on the terminal it can keep hanging on forever.
Here's my log

edit : saw the above post, will try switching from 16.9.1 and running 16.11.5 overnight

Code:
06:43:10:238	1b28	ETH - Total Speed: 92.468 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 07:46
06:43:10:242 1b28 ETH: GPU0 21.974 Mh/s, GPU1 21.065 Mh/s, GPU2 24.698 Mh/s, GPU3 24.730 Mh/s
06:43:10:568 1b28 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x57d5ad7", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000086a938e5"]}
06:43:10:597 1b28 got 39 bytes
06:43:10:618 1b28 buf: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
06:43:10:630 1b28 parse packet: 38
06:43:10:636 1b28 new buf size: 0
06:43:16:120 1b28 got 248 bytes
06:43:16:136 1b28 buf: {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x1639287504617d0b0719ee4d92e47a47a50e22f458ec09b135406efe2f6ac2ac","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a22d"]}
06:43:16:149 1b28 parse packet: 247
06:43:16:154 1b28 ETH: job changed
06:43:16:159 1b28 new buf size: 0
08:28:56:090 14a4 GPU0 t=79C fan=35%, GPU1 t=79C fan=48%, GPU2 t=64C fan=59%, GPU3 t=77C fan=32%
08:28:56:106 14a4 watchdog - eminer thread hangs
08:28:56:114 14a4 watchdog - fminer thread hangs
08:28:56:126 14a4 em hbt: 6339985, fm hbt: 4646485,
08:28:56:135 14a4 Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
06:46:17:443 1b20 ETH: put share nonce e6402904a8fe7691
08:28:56:146 1b20 ETH round found 1 shares
06:51:00:017 1bac ETH: put share nonce 48ea9331d56e388a
06:51:17:124 1878 ETH: put share nonce 5fde7ce2560fd9f3
08:28:56:085 1b28 ETH: 04/11/17-06:43:16 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
08:28:56:170 1b28 target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
06:45:13:921 b88 ETH: put share nonce 8ce1ef644bcff524
06:45:19:723 1b24 ETH: put share nonce 665eaf40597a78a6
06:46:07:708 1bb8 ETH: put share nonce d4ad41146e83da23
06:47:51:719 440 ETH: put share nonce 8b2d0e90d62711b
08:28:56:159 1bac ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 1878 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <94.23.28.180> port 4444
06:44:55:593 1324 ETH: put share nonce de05781447c1e256
08:28:56:210 1b28 ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:180 b88 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:185 1b24 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 1bb8 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 acc
08:28:56:233 acc GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:237 acc GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:241 acc GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:245 acc GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:193 440 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:210 1324 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:257 1b28 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:219 113c send: {"worker": "eth1.0", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": ["0x7Fb21ac4Cd75d9De3E1c5D11D87bB904c01880fc", "x"], "id": 2, "method": "eth_submitLogin"}
08:28:56:268 acc ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:272 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Connected (eu1.ethermine.org:4444)
08:28:56:276 acc ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:280 acc Incorrect ETH shares: none
08:28:56:284 acc Pool switches: ETH - 0, DCR - 0
08:28:56:288 acc Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
08:28:56:287 113c got 39 bytes
08:28:56:296 113c buf: {"id":2,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
08:28:56:300 113c parse packet: 38
08:28:56:304 113c ETH: Authorized
08:28:56:308 113c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
08:28:56:312 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:327 113c got 248 bytes
08:28:56:332 113c buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x21718c6ca5344316ff78951e38d0df6f4db9d89116d764c940a666241a6ab99a","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a3d9"]}
08:28:56:336 113c parse packet: 247
08:28:56:340 113c ETH: job changed
08:28:56:344 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:348 113c DevFee: start mining
08:28:56:415 acc GPU0 t=56C fan=0%, GPU1 t=56C fan=12%, GPU2 t=65C fan=16%, GPU3 t=43C fan=14%
08:28:56:420 acc
08:28:57:382 14a4 Restarting OK, exit...

I have another log example if required.
Any ideas?
Cheers
AzzAz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006


View Profile
April 11, 2017, 11:07:34 PM
 #9102

hey,
thanks for having me here.
I've got an issue that I saw other people have on the ethereum forum but none of the solutions I've heard (so far) being suggested so far apply to me.

I've got a setup: windows 10 with Gigabyte 970A-DS3P, 1000W gold psu and 2x470 + 2x480 . All of them stock for now until i get this stable enough. Running all with usb raisers.
I'm using 16.9.1 because the one recommended apparently is not good for the new 4xx's, and with this I've managed to run the miner for 8-9 hours to 11 hours continuously. (using all the DDU workflow etc to make sure it's all cleaned up).
Claymore v9 with etherminer.
Temperatures are all @72-79C with fans running 35-55% on average.
The 470's run on 21-22mh/s and 480's on 24-25.5mh/s as expected from stock I believe.

It all runs well until at one point the miner hangs (as I see on etherpage, the worker is inactive). The moment I remote in, and click in the terminal, it seems to come back and realize it's been idle for at least an hour, and restarts itself. If I don't click on the terminal it can keep hanging on forever.
Here's my log

edit : saw the above post, will try switching from 16.9.1 and running 16.11.5 overnight

Code:
06:43:10:238	1b28	ETH - Total Speed: 92.468 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 07:46
06:43:10:242 1b28 ETH: GPU0 21.974 Mh/s, GPU1 21.065 Mh/s, GPU2 24.698 Mh/s, GPU3 24.730 Mh/s
06:43:10:568 1b28 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x57d5ad7", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000086a938e5"]}
06:43:10:597 1b28 got 39 bytes
06:43:10:618 1b28 buf: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
06:43:10:630 1b28 parse packet: 38
06:43:10:636 1b28 new buf size: 0
06:43:16:120 1b28 got 248 bytes
06:43:16:136 1b28 buf: {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x1639287504617d0b0719ee4d92e47a47a50e22f458ec09b135406efe2f6ac2ac","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a22d"]}
06:43:16:149 1b28 parse packet: 247
06:43:16:154 1b28 ETH: job changed
06:43:16:159 1b28 new buf size: 0
08:28:56:090 14a4 GPU0 t=79C fan=35%, GPU1 t=79C fan=48%, GPU2 t=64C fan=59%, GPU3 t=77C fan=32%
08:28:56:106 14a4 watchdog - eminer thread hangs
08:28:56:114 14a4 watchdog - fminer thread hangs
08:28:56:126 14a4 em hbt: 6339985, fm hbt: 4646485,
08:28:56:135 14a4 Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
06:46:17:443 1b20 ETH: put share nonce e6402904a8fe7691
08:28:56:146 1b20 ETH round found 1 shares
06:51:00:017 1bac ETH: put share nonce 48ea9331d56e388a
06:51:17:124 1878 ETH: put share nonce 5fde7ce2560fd9f3
08:28:56:085 1b28 ETH: 04/11/17-06:43:16 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
08:28:56:170 1b28 target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
06:45:13:921 b88 ETH: put share nonce 8ce1ef644bcff524
06:45:19:723 1b24 ETH: put share nonce 665eaf40597a78a6
06:46:07:708 1bb8 ETH: put share nonce d4ad41146e83da23
06:47:51:719 440 ETH: put share nonce 8b2d0e90d62711b
08:28:56:159 1bac ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 1878 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <94.23.28.180> port 4444
06:44:55:593 1324 ETH: put share nonce de05781447c1e256
08:28:56:210 1b28 ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:180 b88 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:185 1b24 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 1bb8 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 acc
08:28:56:233 acc GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:237 acc GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:241 acc GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:245 acc GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:193 440 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:210 1324 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:257 1b28 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:219 113c send: {"worker": "eth1.0", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": ["0x7Fb21ac4Cd75d9De3E1c5D11D87bB904c01880fc", "x"], "id": 2, "method": "eth_submitLogin"}
08:28:56:268 acc ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:272 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Connected (eu1.ethermine.org:4444)
08:28:56:276 acc ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:280 acc Incorrect ETH shares: none
08:28:56:284 acc Pool switches: ETH - 0, DCR - 0
08:28:56:288 acc Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
08:28:56:287 113c got 39 bytes
08:28:56:296 113c buf: {"id":2,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
08:28:56:300 113c parse packet: 38
08:28:56:304 113c ETH: Authorized
08:28:56:308 113c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
08:28:56:312 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:327 113c got 248 bytes
08:28:56:332 113c buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x21718c6ca5344316ff78951e38d0df6f4db9d89116d764c940a666241a6ab99a","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a3d9"]}
08:28:56:336 113c parse packet: 247
08:28:56:340 113c ETH: job changed
08:28:56:344 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:348 113c DevFee: start mining
08:28:56:415 acc GPU0 t=56C fan=0%, GPU1 t=56C fan=12%, GPU2 t=65C fan=16%, GPU3 t=43C fan=14%
08:28:56:420 acc
08:28:57:382 14a4 Restarting OK, exit...

I have another log example if required.
Any ideas?
Cheers

79 is too much. don't go over 70. Let fans spin a bit.
cryptominer420
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 255


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:05:37 AM
 #9103

hey,
thanks for having me here.
I've got an issue that I saw other people have on the ethereum forum but none of the solutions I've heard (so far) being suggested so far apply to me.

I've got a setup: windows 10 with Gigabyte 970A-DS3P, 1000W gold psu and 2x470 + 2x480 . All of them stock for now until i get this stable enough. Running all with usb raisers.
I'm using 16.9.1 because the one recommended apparently is not good for the new 4xx's, and with this I've managed to run the miner for 8-9 hours to 11 hours continuously. (using all the DDU workflow etc to make sure it's all cleaned up).
Claymore v9 with etherminer.
Temperatures are all @72-79C with fans running 35-55% on average.
The 470's run on 21-22mh/s and 480's on 24-25.5mh/s as expected from stock I believe.

It all runs well until at one point the miner hangs (as I see on etherpage, the worker is inactive). The moment I remote in, and click in the terminal, it seems to come back and realize it's been idle for at least an hour, and restarts itself. If I don't click on the terminal it can keep hanging on forever.
Here's my log

edit : saw the above post, will try switching from 16.9.1 and running 16.11.5 overnight

Code:
06:43:10:238	1b28	ETH - Total Speed: 92.468 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 07:46
06:43:10:242 1b28 ETH: GPU0 21.974 Mh/s, GPU1 21.065 Mh/s, GPU2 24.698 Mh/s, GPU3 24.730 Mh/s
06:43:10:568 1b28 send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x57d5ad7", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000086a938e5"]}
06:43:10:597 1b28 got 39 bytes
06:43:10:618 1b28 buf: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
06:43:10:630 1b28 parse packet: 38
06:43:10:636 1b28 new buf size: 0
06:43:16:120 1b28 got 248 bytes
06:43:16:136 1b28 buf: {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x1639287504617d0b0719ee4d92e47a47a50e22f458ec09b135406efe2f6ac2ac","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a22d"]}
06:43:16:149 1b28 parse packet: 247
06:43:16:154 1b28 ETH: job changed
06:43:16:159 1b28 new buf size: 0
08:28:56:090 14a4 GPU0 t=79C fan=35%, GPU1 t=79C fan=48%, GPU2 t=64C fan=59%, GPU3 t=77C fan=32%
08:28:56:106 14a4 watchdog - eminer thread hangs
08:28:56:114 14a4 watchdog - fminer thread hangs
08:28:56:126 14a4 em hbt: 6339985, fm hbt: 4646485,
08:28:56:135 14a4 Miner thread hangs, need to restart miner!
06:46:17:443 1b20 ETH: put share nonce e6402904a8fe7691
08:28:56:146 1b20 ETH round found 1 shares
06:51:00:017 1bac ETH: put share nonce 48ea9331d56e388a
06:51:17:124 1878 ETH: put share nonce 5fde7ce2560fd9f3
08:28:56:085 1b28 ETH: 04/11/17-06:43:16 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
08:28:56:170 1b28 target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
06:45:13:921 b88 ETH: put share nonce 8ce1ef644bcff524
06:45:19:723 1b24 ETH: put share nonce 665eaf40597a78a6
06:46:07:708 1bb8 ETH: put share nonce d4ad41146e83da23
06:47:51:719 440 ETH: put share nonce 8b2d0e90d62711b
08:28:56:159 1bac ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 1878 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:164 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <94.23.28.180> port 4444
06:44:55:593 1324 ETH: put share nonce de05781447c1e256
08:28:56:210 1b28 ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:180 b88 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:185 1b24 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 1bb8 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:189 acc
08:28:56:233 acc GPU #0: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:237 acc GPU #1: Ellesmere, 4096 MB available, 32 compute units
08:28:56:241 acc GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:245 acc GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
08:28:56:193 440 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:210 1324 ETH round found 1 shares
08:28:56:257 1b28 ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:219 113c send: {"worker": "eth1.0", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": ["0x7Fb21ac4Cd75d9De3E1c5D11D87bB904c01880fc", "x"], "id": 2, "method": "eth_submitLogin"}
08:28:56:268 acc ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 649, Rejected: 0, Time: 09:32
08:28:56:272 113c DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Connected (eu1.ethermine.org:4444)
08:28:56:276 acc ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s, GPU3 0.000 Mh/s
08:28:56:280 acc Incorrect ETH shares: none
08:28:56:284 acc Pool switches: ETH - 0, DCR - 0
08:28:56:288 acc Current ETH share target: 0x0000000112e0be82 (diff: 4000MH), epoch #117
08:28:56:287 113c got 39 bytes
08:28:56:296 113c buf: {"id":2,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":true}
08:28:56:300 113c parse packet: 38
08:28:56:304 113c ETH: Authorized
08:28:56:308 113c send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}
08:28:56:312 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:327 113c got 248 bytes
08:28:56:332 113c buf: {"id":3,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":["0x21718c6ca5344316ff78951e38d0df6f4db9d89116d764c940a666241a6ab99a","0x43fda41afeee2c25ccf00d7614c11ada7f8ef43a2d27d8b74ce8bd6aaaf702bd","0x0112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba","0x35a3d9"]}
08:28:56:336 113c parse packet: 247
08:28:56:340 113c ETH: job changed
08:28:56:344 113c new buf size: 0
08:28:56:348 113c DevFee: start mining
08:28:56:415 acc GPU0 t=56C fan=0%, GPU1 t=56C fan=12%, GPU2 t=65C fan=16%, GPU3 t=43C fan=14%
08:28:56:420 acc
08:28:57:382 14a4 Restarting OK, exit...

I have another log example if required.
Any ideas?
Cheers

Check your power setting within windows your system is going to sleep.

   ╖   ╓╖╖                         ╖╖╖ ,
  ▒   ╢▒,@▒▒▒║ ╓╣╝║║*╢  ╢▒╣ ],`]░╢▒▒╖ ▒ ╥╢▒▒▒╢  @╝╢▒
  Ñ▒▒]▒▒` ]`╢║▒╣▒╢▒▒  ╢▒╝▒▒▒  ╢▒╜║▒▒▒╢▒╜  ╢╢║N
 ║╢   ▒▒╜ ║▒▒╢▒▒@@╢▒║  ╢▒╜ ▒ ╙▒▒,║░▒╣ ▒║ ╢▒▒╢▒▒▒»@╢@@╢╜



.















▬▬  A Miner Built Mining Platform  ▬▬[/url]
Powered by Our Mining Community













TechPark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:27:31 AM
 #9104

hey,
thanks for having me here.
I've got an issue that I saw other people have on the ethereum forum but none of the solutions I've heard (so far) being suggested so far apply to me.

I've got a setup: windows 10 with Gigabyte 970A-DS3P, 1000W gold psu and 2x470 + 2x480 . All of them stock for now until i get this stable enough. Running all with usb raisers.
I'm using 16.9.1 because the one recommended apparently is not good for the new 4xx's, and with this I've managed to run the miner for 8-9 hours to 11 hours continuously. (using all the DDU workflow etc to make sure it's all cleaned up).
Claymore v9 with etherminer.
Temperatures are all @72-79C with fans running 35-55% on average.
The 470's run on 21-22mh/s and 480's on 24-25.5mh/s as expected from stock I believe.

It all runs well until at one point the miner hangs (as I see on etherpage, the worker is inactive). The moment I remote in, and click in the terminal, it seems to come back and realize it's been idle for at least an hour, and restarts itself. If I don't click on the terminal it can keep hanging on forever.
Here's my log

edit : saw the above post, will try switching from 16.9.1 and running 16.11.5 overnight

Code:


I have another log example if required.
Any ideas?
Cheers

Check your power setting within windows your system is going to sleep.

Usually when a miner hangs it points to a particular GPU in you case its the whole thread.
What are the values of  your virtual memory and environmental variables?
Add  "-cclock 1000" and "-cvdcc 1000"
ciprianpt
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 8


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2017, 09:46:13 AM
 #9105

He's getting better - I ran a test at 1150/2100 with just copied timings quick - his ASM kernel does 29.188 Mh/s. My ASM kernel does 29.72Mh/s (avg 29.65 or so), which is now closer than I'd like...

Wolf,

How to run your kernel? -asm wolf Smiley with the price of dcr today dualmining rocks unfortunately the new kernel is not working as it should with the rx470/480 gpus because 800-1000 for each gpu are a huge difference.

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

Thanks

Since I'd have to HEAVILY modify Claymore's miner (in assembly) to run mine, I just use SGMiner.

Keep in mind: Not only are you using more power dualmining, but you double his fee.

Hey wolf the fee is doubled for decred only ? are you sure, because i did not find and info for that..

https://1stMiningRig.com - Just Another Mining Blog Smiley
Trimegistus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 09:49:24 AM
 #9106


Hey wolf the fee is doubled for decred only ? are you sure, because i did not find and info for that..


From the readme file:

Code:
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 1% for Ethereum-only mining mode (-mode 1) and 2% for dual mining mode (-mode 0), every hour the miner mines for 36 or 72 seconds for developer. 
Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal is mined without developer fee.
If you don't agree with the dev fee - don't use this miner, or use "-nofee" option.
Attempts to cheat and remove dev fee will cause a bit slower mining speed (same as "-nofee 1") though miner will show same hashrate.

jackbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 09:56:11 AM
 #9107


Hey wolf the fee is doubled for decred only ? are you sure, because i did not find and info for that..


From the readme file:

Code:
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 1% for Ethereum-only mining mode (-mode 1) and 2% for dual mining mode (-mode 0), every hour the miner mines for 36 or 72 seconds for developer. 
Decred/Siacoin/Lbry/Pascal is mined without developer fee.
If you don't agree with the dev fee - don't use this miner, or use "-nofee" option.
Attempts to cheat and remove dev fee will cause a bit slower mining speed (same as "-nofee 1") though miner will show same hashrate.

If you are dual mining any coin he mines Eth for 72 seconds for himself using your miner(s). It just means he only mines Eth for the developer fee. 36 seconds if mining Eth, 72 seconds if mining two coins.

Buy a Trezor and Protect your BTC, BCH, BTG, DASH, LTC, DGB, ZEC, ETH and ETC from hackers.
If I was helpful please buy me a coffee BTC: 1DWK7vBaxcTC5Wd2nQwLGEoy8xdFVzGKLK  BTG: AWvN1iBqCUqG2tEh3XoVvRbdcGrAzfBBpW
If I was helpful please buy me a burger DGB: DLASV6CUQpGtGSyaVz5FYuu5YxZ17MoGQz
coinzoid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 10:05:39 AM
 #9108

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 10:13:06 AM
 #9109

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
jackbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 10:41:55 AM
 #9110

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

This thread is long and I am new to your miner. What does the -dcri value do? Right now my startup script (copied from Nanopool) does not have this value set.

Buy a Trezor and Protect your BTC, BCH, BTG, DASH, LTC, DGB, ZEC, ETH and ETC from hackers.
If I was helpful please buy me a coffee BTC: 1DWK7vBaxcTC5Wd2nQwLGEoy8xdFVzGKLK  BTG: AWvN1iBqCUqG2tEh3XoVvRbdcGrAzfBBpW
If I was helpful please buy me a burger DGB: DLASV6CUQpGtGSyaVz5FYuu5YxZ17MoGQz
ciprianpt
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 127
Merit: 8


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2017, 10:50:23 AM
 #9111

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

This thread is long and I am new to your miner. What does the -dcri value do? Right now my startup script (copied from Nanopool) does not have this value set.


Check first page, there you will find the best explanation for each feature!

https://1stMiningRig.com - Just Another Mining Blog Smiley
jackbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 10:53:26 AM
 #9112

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

This thread is long and I am new to your miner. What does the -dcri value do? Right now my startup script (copied from Nanopool) does not have this value set.


Check first page, there you will find the best explanation for each feature!

I did that after my post. I am playing around with the value to find best one. My card is an MSI RX 470 Armor 8gb OC. Will using the -asm option give me faster hashing speeds?

Buy a Trezor and Protect your BTC, BCH, BTG, DASH, LTC, DGB, ZEC, ETH and ETC from hackers.
If I was helpful please buy me a coffee BTC: 1DWK7vBaxcTC5Wd2nQwLGEoy8xdFVzGKLK  BTG: AWvN1iBqCUqG2tEh3XoVvRbdcGrAzfBBpW
If I was helpful please buy me a burger DGB: DLASV6CUQpGtGSyaVz5FYuu5YxZ17MoGQz
Qazo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 101



View Profile
April 12, 2017, 11:20:26 AM
 #9113

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

i tried that

with -dcri 30 i get 142 on eth and 4200 on dcr
with -dcri 35 i get 132 on eth and 4600 on dcr

it's stable but eth hashrate is much lower
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 11:59:01 AM
Last edit: April 12, 2017, 12:30:04 PM by Claymore
 #9114

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

i tried that

with -dcri 30 i get 142 on eth and 4200 on dcr
with -dcri 35 i get 132 on eth and 4600 on dcr

it's stable but eth hashrate is much lower

What if you use "-dcri 33"?
Above I marked the key phrase ("try to increase -dcri value a bit"), but it seems I should say values directly...
I understand you'd like to see x2 hashrate and smooth work, but hardware has different opinion, memory controller goes crazy at some -dcri values and I don't see any workarounds for now (without losing hashrate).
For stock clocks/bios, increasing -dcri value +3 gave me -0.5% ETH of maximum but stable hashrate. May be it does not work for modded bios, I don't know.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
Technicrate
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 12:05:42 PM
 #9115

Claymore, run some test on rx480 to fix the fluctuation problem on rx480 cards.

I use stock cards for tests. Yes at some dcri value I can see memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, it's about 90% but then it's 65% for a few seconds. For my Nitro+ 480 I see it at "-dcri 47". Try to increase -dcri value a bit, for me "-dcri 50" is stable.
Of course your values will be different if you use different card/bios/clocks.

Yes it is stable with dcri 50, however it decreases eth hashrate in greater amount.
Instead, if possible could you please double check miner code and see if miner works stable, without sacrificing ETH hashrate? For me "-dcri 30" is the most for ETH >> 29.3 ETH, 875 DCR but when using this value, gpus randomly have memory controller load deviations in GPU-Z, and this is seen through miner console. As a result lower effective hashrate is calculated on pool.

What if you use "-dcri 35"?

This thread is long and I am new to your miner. What does the -dcri value do? Right now my startup script (copied from Nanopool) does not have this value set.


The higher the -dcri value, the higher the DCR results but the ETH results will be lower.
biggee
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 12:25:09 PM
Last edit: April 12, 2017, 12:38:29 PM by biggee
 #9116

Hey guys,

Having a strange one here with v9 in dual mode...

Rig 1 : 6 x GPU (mixture of RX470 & RX480 4GB & 8GB) all bios modded
Perfect, ETH hashrate is 1 MH higher than before and before Decred has nearly doubled - well happy.

Rig 2 : 5 x Sapphire RX 470 (Ref) all bios modded
DCR hash rate has nearly doubled as in the other rig but ETH has bombed. Gone from 28+ per card (with v8.1) down to 20 - 21 MH.

I've tried tuning the dcri (if I go up the DCR rate increases and ETH drops, if I go down DCR  drops AND ETH drops).

If I disable DCR mining the ETH hash rate goes back up to 28+ on each card.

Both rigs are running via VNC with HDMI dummy plugs if that helps.

Any suggestions?

** UPDATE **
Just tried -asm 0 and 3 of the cards are now running at 28+ again but two of them are still way under performing..

With -asm 0 :

Code:
GPU0 28.279 Mh/s, GPU1 23.385 Mh/s, GPU2 28.688 Mh/s, GPU3 22.781 Mh/s, GPU4 28.249 Mh/s

with -asm 1 :

Code:
GPU0 20.932 Mh/s, GPU1 21.144 Mh/s, GPU2 20.181 Mh/s, GPU3 21.051 Mh/s, GPU4 22.130 Mh/s

With v8.1 they were all at a constant 28+
miner417
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:00:30 PM
 #9117

Hey guys,

Having a strange one here with v9 in dual mode...

Rig 1 : 6 x GPU (mixture of RX470 & RX480 4GB & 8GB) all bios modded
Perfect, ETH hashrate is 1 MH higher than before and before Decred has nearly doubled - well happy.

Rig 2 : 5 x Sapphire RX 470 (Ref) all bios modded
DCR hash rate has nearly doubled as in the other rig but ETH has bombed. Gone from 28+ per card (with v8.1) down to 20 - 21 MH.

I've tried tuning the dcri (if I go up the DCR rate increases and ETH drops, if I go down DCR  drops AND ETH drops).

If I disable DCR mining the ETH hash rate goes back up to 28+ on each card.

Both rigs are running via VNC with HDMI dummy plugs if that helps.

Any suggestions?

** UPDATE **
Just tried -asm 0 and 3 of the cards are now running at 28+ again but two of them are still way under performing..

With -asm 0 :

Code:
GPU0 28.279 Mh/s, GPU1 23.385 Mh/s, GPU2 28.688 Mh/s, GPU3 22.781 Mh/s, GPU4 28.249 Mh/s

with -asm 1 :

Code:
GPU0 20.932 Mh/s, GPU1 21.144 Mh/s, GPU2 20.181 Mh/s, GPU3 21.051 Mh/s, GPU4 22.130 Mh/s

With v8.1 they were all at a constant 28+

Try -asm 0 with lightly changing the -dcri option. During runtime you can modify dcri with the + and - keys. Try that, and monitor each card. The stable dcri is a little different for each card. I have one asus strix 470 4g that needs to be at dcri 28, and another that needs to be a 24.
biggee
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:41:07 PM
 #9118

Hey guys,

Having a strange one here with v9 in dual mode...

Rig 1 : 6 x GPU (mixture of RX470 & RX480 4GB & 8GB) all bios modded
Perfect, ETH hashrate is 1 MH higher than before and before Decred has nearly doubled - well happy.

Rig 2 : 5 x Sapphire RX 470 (Ref) all bios modded
DCR hash rate has nearly doubled as in the other rig but ETH has bombed. Gone from 28+ per card (with v8.1) down to 20 - 21 MH.

I've tried tuning the dcri (if I go up the DCR rate increases and ETH drops, if I go down DCR  drops AND ETH drops).

If I disable DCR mining the ETH hash rate goes back up to 28+ on each card.

Both rigs are running via VNC with HDMI dummy plugs if that helps.

Any suggestions?

** UPDATE **
Just tried -asm 0 and 3 of the cards are now running at 28+ again but two of them are still way under performing..

With -asm 0 :

Code:
GPU0 28.279 Mh/s, GPU1 23.385 Mh/s, GPU2 28.688 Mh/s, GPU3 22.781 Mh/s, GPU4 28.249 Mh/s

with -asm 1 :

Code:
GPU0 20.932 Mh/s, GPU1 21.144 Mh/s, GPU2 20.181 Mh/s, GPU3 21.051 Mh/s, GPU4 22.130 Mh/s

With v8.1 they were all at a constant 28+

Try -asm 0 with lightly changing the -dcri option. During runtime you can modify dcri with the + and - keys. Try that, and monitor each card. The stable dcri is a little different for each card. I have one asus strix 470 4g that needs to be at dcri 28, and another that needs to be a 24.

Cheers bro, I have tried tuning at runtime (see above) but wasn't able to figure out how to to that for each GPU at runtime, only all of them at once. Is there a key combo to tune each GPU individually? I know you can specify separate values in the bat file but can it be done at runtime also?
cashen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:42:59 PM
 #9119

Hey guys,

Having a strange one here with v9 in dual mode...

Rig 1 : 6 x GPU (mixture of RX470 & RX480 4GB & 8GB) all bios modded
Perfect, ETH hashrate is 1 MH higher than before and before Decred has nearly doubled - well happy.

Rig 2 : 5 x Sapphire RX 470 (Ref) all bios modded
DCR hash rate has nearly doubled as in the other rig but ETH has bombed. Gone from 28+ per card (with v8.1) down to 20 - 21 MH.

I've tried tuning the dcri (if I go up the DCR rate increases and ETH drops, if I go down DCR  drops AND ETH drops).

If I disable DCR mining the ETH hash rate goes back up to 28+ on each card.

Both rigs are running via VNC with HDMI dummy plugs if that helps.

Any suggestions?

** UPDATE **
Just tried -asm 0 and 3 of the cards are now running at 28+ again but two of them are still way under performing..

With -asm 0 :

Code:
GPU0 28.279 Mh/s, GPU1 23.385 Mh/s, GPU2 28.688 Mh/s, GPU3 22.781 Mh/s, GPU4 28.249 Mh/s

with -asm 1 :

Code:
GPU0 20.932 Mh/s, GPU1 21.144 Mh/s, GPU2 20.181 Mh/s, GPU3 21.051 Mh/s, GPU4 22.130 Mh/s

With v8.1 they were all at a constant 28+

Try -asm 0 with lightly changing the -dcri option. During runtime you can modify dcri with the + and - keys. Try that, and monitor each card. The stable dcri is a little different for each card. I have one asus strix 470 4g that needs to be at dcri 28, and another that needs to be a 24.

Cheers bro, I have tried tuning at runtime (see above) but wasn't able to figure out how to to that for each GPU at runtime, only all of them at once. Is there a key combo to tune each GPU individually?

-drci x

X being value you want.
miner417
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 12, 2017, 01:46:43 PM
 #9120

Hey guys,

Having a strange one here with v9 in dual mode...

Rig 1 : 6 x GPU (mixture of RX470 & RX480 4GB & 8GB) all bios modded
Perfect, ETH hashrate is 1 MH higher than before and before Decred has nearly doubled - well happy.

Rig 2 : 5 x Sapphire RX 470 (Ref) all bios modded
DCR hash rate has nearly doubled as in the other rig but ETH has bombed. Gone from 28+ per card (with v8.1) down to 20 - 21 MH.

I've tried tuning the dcri (if I go up the DCR rate increases and ETH drops, if I go down DCR  drops AND ETH drops).

If I disable DCR mining the ETH hash rate goes back up to 28+ on each card.

Both rigs are running via VNC with HDMI dummy plugs if that helps.

Any suggestions?

** UPDATE **
Just tried -asm 0 and 3 of the cards are now running at 28+ again but two of them are still way under performing..

With -asm 0 :

Code:
GPU0 28.279 Mh/s, GPU1 23.385 Mh/s, GPU2 28.688 Mh/s, GPU3 22.781 Mh/s, GPU4 28.249 Mh/s

with -asm 1 :

Code:
GPU0 20.932 Mh/s, GPU1 21.144 Mh/s, GPU2 20.181 Mh/s, GPU3 21.051 Mh/s, GPU4 22.130 Mh/s

With v8.1 they were all at a constant 28+

Try -asm 0 with lightly changing the -dcri option. During runtime you can modify dcri with the + and - keys. Try that, and monitor each card. The stable dcri is a little different for each card. I have one asus strix 470 4g that needs to be at dcri 28, and another that needs to be a 24.

Cheers bro, I have tried tuning at runtime (see above) but wasn't able to figure out how to to that for each GPU at runtime, only all of them at once. Is there a key combo to tune each GPU individually? I know you can specify separate values in the bat file but can it be done at runtime also?

Sadly no, what I was suggesting was to tune the dcri, and just look at 1 GPU at a time. So start with GPU0, manually tune the value with + , -, find a stable one, write it down, then do the same thing on all the other cards, 1 at a time. Don't even look at the other cards when tuning 1 value, they can be running, but pay no attention to them.
Pages: « 1 ... 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 [456] 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!